Home / Appendix-Prediction and Falsification
This chapter follows the publication template for the falsification program. It uses plain language, avoids equations, and preserves the fixed structure. For general readers: we distribute one external time standard to all terminals and perform co-source, co-window comparisons of absolute time of arrival across multiple propagation environments (vacuum cavity; near-surface free space; high-altitude paths through the troposphere; ionospheric satellite links; optical fiber; and submarine cables). After removing geometric terms (including the Sagnac effect), relativistic terms (including Shapiro delay), medium terms (refractive index/group index, wet delay, Total Electron Content), and hardware terms, we test for a frequency-independent, cross-carrier/polarization/link-consistent residual that varies monotonically with environment strength.
I. One-Sentence Goal
Using a single external time standard, compare absolute arrival times over different environment paths in the same source and observation window. After standard subtractions, test whether a band-insensitive common residual remains and increases monotonically from vacuum/high, dry air to humid boundary layers/ionospheric crossings/high-convergence paths. If the residual can be explained by dispersion, calibration drift, or time-standard divergence—or fails cross-team/facility robustness—the claim is disfavored.
II. What to Measure
- Absolute arrival-time residuals (text grades):
With the external standard as zero, absolutely calibrate arrival times of pulses/PRN sequences per environment path. After subtractions, grade the common residual as strong / medium / weak and uplift / depression; require same-sign behavior across neighboring sub-bands and dual polarizations. - Non-dispersion consistency:
Across microwave/millimeter/optical carriers and dual polarizations, compare direction and strength ranking. Any λ² / 1/ν flip or rescaling, or covariance with Faraday/group delay, is classified as medium/chain dispersion. - Cross-environment monotonicity:
Using environment proxies—refractive/group index, precipitable water vapor/wet delay, Total Electron Content and crossing angle, path convergence near massive bodies, and intrinsic fiber/cable parameters—qualitatively grade enhanced / plateau / uncorrelated behavior. Test the vacuum → troposphere/ionosphere → high-convergence/high-humidity/high-TEC monotonic rise. - Same-source multi-path consistency:
For one transmitter reference observed along different environment paths (two-way and one-way Earth–space; space–space links; vacuum cavity vs free space vs fiber), normalize by geometry/medium and test curve overlap and ordering consistency. - Zero-lag co-occurrence:
With decoupled dual chains and multi-station parallel logging, quantify zero-lag peaks and side-lobe contrasts among residuals across environment paths to verify co-window behavior (graded strong/medium/weak).
III. How to Do It
- Time standard and end-to-end referencing:
Establish one external time standard (optical lattice clock or hydrogen maser) and distribute via two-way stabilized fiber/free-space time transfer. Enforce round-trip closures and co-view constraints to keep zero differences. Only this single standard may set arrival-time zero points. - Channels and environment families:
- Vacuum baselines: long-path vacuum tubes/cavities, one-way and round-trip.
- Near-surface / high-altitude free space: short LOS, mountain–mountain/tower–tower, balloon/UAV/airborne relays spanning dry/cold vs humid/hot and low/high elevation.
- Ionosphere/satellite links: Earth–space and space–space microwave/optical links over low/mid/high latitudes and day/night/solar-cycle phases.
- Medium references: single-mode fiber/submarine cable one-way and round-trip with real-time models of group index and thermo-elastic strain.
- Signaling and measurement:
- Common source: split one reference to all paths; use short pulses + PRN codes with multi-carrier / dual polarization.
- Link calibration: unified delay/group-delay/phase calibration with switchable open/short/bypass states. Subtract geometric terms including Sagnac, relativistic/tidal/solid-Earth terms, under one convention.
- Medium models: troposphere via met/PWV + mapping functions; ionosphere via TEC + crossing angle; fiber/cable via online thermo-strain arrays + group-index curves. Record transfer functions and residual upper limits.
- Forward prediction, blinding, arbitration:
- Environment team (forward): using only environment proxies and geometric masks, issue prediction cards for direction/strength, monotone profiles, and symmetry/asymmetry expectations by path/epoch.
- Measurement teams (independent pipelines): under the single time standard and unified medium conventions, deliver absolute residuals and non-dispersion/co-occurrence verdicts.
- Arbitration: align prediction cards and results per pre-registered rules; report hit / wrong / null rates by path/carrier/institution.
- Sequence construction and normalization:
Build scan sequences across environment gradients (humidity, TEC, elevation, near-mass passages). Normalize by noise floors / link stability to produce dimensionless common-term curves and compare cross-path overlaps.
IV. Positive/Negative Controls and Removal of Artifacts
- Positive controls (supporting a path term):
- Across multiple environment paths/carriers/polarizations/institutions, observe co-directional, non-dispersive residuals that rise monotonically with environment strength (humidity/TEC/path convergence/medium complexity).
- Same-source multi-paths overlap after geometry/medium normalization and show significant zero-lag between paths.
- Forward-prediction hit rates for direction/strength/monotonicity are significantly above chance, with independent-pipeline replication.
- Negative controls (against a path term):
- Residuals flip/scale with λ² / 1/ν or co-vary with Faraday/group delay, or track medium proxies linearly → dispersion/medium effects.
- Significance appears in one path/carrier/institution only, or is highly sensitive to medium/geometric conventions → method/model preference.
- Label swaps / geometric rotations / open-bypass still yield “detections” → system/selection bias.
V. Systematics and Safeguards (Three Items)
- Time-standard distribution and closure: drift can fake “absolute” differences. Safeguard: two-way transfer + co-view + triangle closures, with hold-out links for final validation; publish stability logs.
- Incomplete medium modeling and residual dispersion: leaks into the common term. Safeguard: three-line modeling—troposphere (PWV/met), ionosphere (TEC/angle), fiber (thermo-strain/index)—with transfer-function corrections and upper-bound constraints; compare de-dispersion vs raw conventions for direction consistency.
- Link asymmetry and hardware drift: asymmetric TX/RX chains and thermal drift create false offsets. Safeguard: round-trip-symmetric designs, bypass/short switches, hardware swaps/thermal shocks, and delay-spectrum monitoring; down-weight/hold out unstable epochs.
VI. Execution and Transparency
Pre-register path families and environment bins, the single external time standard and distribution links, unified geometric/relativistic/medium conventions, residual grading and non-dispersion/co-occurrence criteria, and all controls/exclusions and arbitration rules. Reserve hold-out sequences/links per environment bin. Enable cross-institution/link replication by exchanging raw time-tags/arrival-time series and scripts; run down-sampling/noise/model-perturbation robustness tests. Publicly release prediction cards, residual grade tables, non-dispersion/co-occurrence summaries, time-standard/medium/geometry logs, and key intermediates. This chapter closes a loop with Chapters 1 (cross-probe frequency-independent common term), 20 (same-source multi-path solar-grazing sequence), and 23 (21 cm non-dispersive common term—environment relation).
VII. Pass/Fail Criteria
- Support (passes):
- In two or more environment families and two or more institutions, detect a band-insensitive common residual whose strength increases monotonically with environment proxies.
- Same-source multi-paths overlap after normalization, show zero-lag co-occurrence, and forward-prediction hits exceed chance.
- Conclusions are robust to time-standard / medium / geometry conventions and to pipeline/hardware swaps.
- Refutation (fails):
- Residuals flip with λ² / 1/ν / Faraday laws or depend strongly on medium/bandpass/geometry choices, failing cross-institution replication.
- Signals are confined to one path/carrier, or persist under label swaps / geometric rotations / open-bypass.
- Monotonicity and co-occurrence fail; arbitration hit rates approach chance.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/