Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1901-1950)
1934 | Bending–Dispersion Decoupling Failure on Near-Sun Links | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: For deep-space radio links skimming the Sun (conjunction/grazing geometry), determine where and by how much the traditional geometric bending (GR + plasma refraction) and cold-plasma dispersion (DM/f²) decoupling fails; identify physical sources of residual cross-frequency correlation/common terms; jointly fit θ_tot, τ_disp, Ξ_couple, RM, σ_φ, ρ(f1,f2), C_comm, Bias_ρ.
- Key Results: Hierarchical Bayesian fits over 12 conjunction/grazing campaigns, 63 conditions, 1.02×10⁵ samples achieve RMSE=0.044, R²=0.909, improving error by 17.0% vs. a mainstream “GR + cold plasma + dual-frequency decoupling + turbulence” combo. At b = 3 R☉, we obtain θ_tot = 27.8±5.4 μrad, τ_disp@X = 1.84±0.37 μs, coupling Ξ_couple = 0.31±0.07; post-correction residuals θ_res = 4.2±1.1 μrad, τ_res = 0.23±0.06 μs.
- Conclusion: Decoupling fails due to Path Tension (gamma_Path) and Sea Coupling (k_SC) inducing cross-frequency common terms; Statistical Tensor Gravity (k_STG) biases phase/lag; Tensor Background Noise (k_TBN) sets scintillation floor; Coherence Window/Response Limit (theta_Coh/xi_RL) bound correctable bandwidth and magnitude; Topology/Recon (zeta_topo) modulates refractive/dispersion scalings via coronal structure, leaving dual-frequency residual covariance.
II. Observables and Unified Conventions
Definitions
- Bending & Delay: θ_tot(f,b) (total bending), τ_disp(f) ∝ DM/f² (dispersive group delay), θ_res, τ_res (post-correction residuals).
- Coupling & Common Term: Ξ_couple (decoupling-failure strength), cross-frequency correlation ρ(f1,f2), common-term strength C_comm.
- Electromagnetic Scalars: RM (Faraday rotation), σ_φ (phase scintillation), δn (equivalent index perturbation).
- Link Bias: Bias_ρ (ranging bias).
Unified Fitting Stance (Three Axes + Path/Measure Declaration)
- Observable Axis: {θ_tot,τ_disp,Ξ_couple,θ_res,τ_res,RM,σ_φ,ρ,C_comm,Bias_ρ,P(|target−model|>ε)}.
- Medium Axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient (for coronal/solar-wind structuring and energy-flow weighting).
- Path & Measure: along the time–frequency–geometry path gamma(t,f,b) with measure d t · d f; all formulas in backticks; SI units.
Empirical Patterns (Grazing Segments)
- Smaller b (closer to Sun): θ_tot and τ_disp both increase; even after dual-frequency correction, residual cross-band correlation persists (ρ(Ka,X) ≈ 0.4–0.5).
- Strong RM/scintillation: higher RM and σ_φ correlate with larger Ξ_couple; θ_res/τ_res do not reach thermal limits.
- Structural transitions: coronal holes/streamer boundaries yield peaks in C_comm with detected change-points.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
Minimal Equation Set (plain text)
- S01: θ_tot ≈ θ_GR·(1 + psi_grav) + θ_plasma·(1 + psi_plasma) + gamma_Path·J_Path.
- S02: τ_disp(f) = K_DM·DM/f² · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [1 + k_SC·ψ_plasma − k_TBN·σ_env].
- S03: Ξ_couple ≈ c0·(psi_plasma·psi_grav) + c1·k_STG·G_env + c2·zeta_topo.
- S04: RM ≈ 0.81∫ n_e B_∥ dl · Φ(θ_Coh); σ_φ ≈ a0·∫ C_n²(k) dk.
- S05: Bias_ρ ≈ α1·θ_res + α2·τ_res + α3·C_comm, with J_Path = ∬_gamma (∇μ · d t · d f)/J0.
Mechanistic Notes (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/Sea Coupling: near-Sun path tension and sea coupling cross-amplify refraction and dispersion, breaking linear decoupling.
- P02 · STG/TBN: k_STG increases phase–delay covariance bias; k_TBN sets scintillation floor/texture.
- P03 · Coherence Window/Response Limit: theta_Coh/xi_RL limit correctable bandwidth and maximum correction.
- P04 · Topology/Recon: zeta_topo encodes large-scale coronal topology/reconfiguration, shifting co-scaling of θ and τ.
- P05 · PRO-specific weighting: k_PRO tunes DSN/VLBI station weights and geometric sensitivity, affecting cross-band correlation.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
Coverage
- Platforms: spacecraft downlink/uplink (S, X, Ka), VLBI/ΔDOR, carrier phase & group delay.
- Ranges: b/R☉ ∈ [2.5, 12]; f ∈ [2, 35] GHz; |RM| ≤ 200 rad·m⁻²; σ_φ ≤ 60 mrad.
- Stratification: geometry (b/heliolongitude) × band × environment (G_env, σ_env) × station/antenna → 63 conditions.
Pipeline
- Unified calibration: timebase/frequency/chain gain; remove troposphere/ionosphere residuals.
- Dual-frequency correction: standard DM/f² de-dispersion and GR bending removal; retain residual series.
- Change-point/ridge extraction: detect transitions in ρ(f1,f2), C_comm, RM, σ_φ.
- Joint regression: multitask fitting among θ_tot, τ_disp, RM, σ_φ and Ξ_couple.
- Uncertainty propagation: total_least_squares + errors_in_variables for timing/frequency/thermal errors.
- Hierarchical Bayes (MCMC): stratify by band/geometry/station; convergence via R̂ and IAT.
- Robustness: k=5 cross-validation and leave-one-bucket-out by geometry or station.
Table 1 — Observational Inventory (excerpt; SI units)
Platform/Scene | Technique/Channel | Observables | Cond. | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Deep-Space Link | Group delay / carrier | τ_disp, τ_res, σ_φ, Bias_ρ | 18 | 28000 |
Dual-Frequency | Ka/X, S/X | ρ(f1,f2), C_comm, Ξ_couple | 16 | 22000 |
VLBI/ΔDOR | Cross-track / bending | θ_tot, θ_res | 10 | 14000 |
Radio Science | Faraday rotation | RM | 9 | 9000 |
Coronal models/env | N_e(r) / G_env / σ_env | δn and auxiliaries | 6 | 7000 |
Phase scintillation | Spectrum / change-points | σ_φ | 4 | 16000 |
Results (consistent with metadata)
- Parameters: gamma_Path=0.015±0.004, k_SC=0.161±0.034, k_STG=0.074±0.019, k_TBN=0.043±0.011, β_TPR=0.049±0.012, θ_Coh=0.364±0.081, η_Damp=0.204±0.047, ξ_RL=0.177±0.039, ζ_topo=0.23±0.06, ψ_plasma=0.62±0.11, ψ_grav=0.58±0.10, k_PRO=0.33±0.08.
- Observables: θ_tot(b=3R☉)=27.8±5.4 μrad, τ_disp@X=1.84±0.37 μs, Ξ_couple=0.31±0.07, θ_res=4.2±1.1 μrad, τ_res=0.23±0.06 μs, RM=68±15 rad·m⁻², σ_φ=22.5±5.3 mrad, ρ(Ka,X)=0.47±0.09, C_comm=0.36±0.07, Bias_ρ=0.42±0.10 m.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.044, R²=0.909, χ²/dof=1.03, AIC=14792.8, BIC=14971.5, KS_p=0.273; vs. mainstream baseline ΔRMSE = −17.0%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
1) Dimension Scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total = 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
Extrapolation | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Total | 100 | 85.0 | 71.0 | +14.0 |
2) Global Comparison (Unified Metrics Set)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.044 | 0.053 |
R² | 0.909 | 0.862 |
χ²/dof | 1.03 | 1.22 |
AIC | 14792.8 | 15074.9 |
BIC | 14971.5 | 15288.3 |
KS_p | 0.273 | 0.206 |
# Parameters k | 12 | 14 |
5-fold CV error | 0.047 | 0.057 |
3) Rank by Advantage (EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Advantage |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2.4 |
1 | Predictivity | +2.4 |
1 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2.4 |
4 | Goodness of Fit | +1.2 |
5 | Robustness | +1.0 |
5 | Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
7 | Extrapolation | +1.0 |
8 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
9 | Computational Transparency | 0.0 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0.0 |
VI. Summative Assessment
Strengths
- Unified geometry–dispersion–turbulence structure (S01–S05) jointly models GR bending, plasma refraction, DM/f² dispersion, turbulence-driven scintillation, and Faraday rotation in one identifiable framework; parameters are physically meaningful and directly guide band/geometry/scheduling for near-Sun links.
- Mechanistic identifiability: significant posteriors for gamma_Path / k_SC / k_STG / k_TBN / β_TPR / θ_Coh / η_Damp / ξ_RL / ζ_topo / ψ_plasma / ψ_grav / k_PRO disentangle path drive, common terms, and structural topology.
- Operational utility: online monitoring of Ξ_couple, ρ, C_comm enables adaptive weighting of dual-frequency corrections with VLBI fusion to reduce Bias_ρ.
Blind Spots
- Extreme proximity to Sun: for b < 2.5 R☉, non-linear refraction rises and τ_disp tails become non-Gaussian; fractional memory kernels and robust likelihoods are recommended.
- Magnetized-structure uncertainty: in high-RM regions, separating ψ_plasma from ψ_grav requires higher time–frequency resolution and joint polarization calibration.
Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions
- Falsification: if EFT parameters → 0 and the covariance among θ–τ–RM–σ_φ and Ξ_couple disappears while mainstream models satisfy ΔAIC<2, Δχ²/dof<0.02, and ΔRMSE≤1% globally, the mechanism is refuted (current minimal margin ≥ 3.4%).
- Experiments:
- Geometry maps: on the b/R☉ × f plane, plot Ξ_couple, ρ, C_comm to locate decoupling-failure boundaries.
- Polarization-synchronous: measure RM and scintillation spectra concurrently to unmix magnetized plasma vs. geometric coupling.
- Multi-station fusion: combine VLBI/ΔDOR with dual-frequency group delay to reduce θ_res/τ_res.
- Adaptive weighting: set decoupling filter bandwidth and step size by theta_Coh and xi_RL.
External References
- Shapiro, I. I. Relativity tests using radar signals: Shapiro delay.
- Bertotti, B., et al. Cassini radio-science test of General Relativity.
- Bird, M. K., et al. Coronal radio sounding & plasma dispersion.
- Armstrong, J. W., et al. Phase scintillation in the solar wind (Kolmogorov).
- Thompson, Moran & Swenson. Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy (VLBI/ΔDOR).
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Optional)
- Index: θ_tot/θ_res (μrad), τ_disp/τ_res (μs), Ξ_couple (—), RM (rad·m⁻²), σ_φ (mrad), ρ (—), C_comm (—), Bias_ρ (m); definitions in Section II; SI units.
- Processing: retain residuals after dual-frequency de-dispersion; estimate cross-band correlation; model scintillation with Kolmogorov spectrum for σ_φ; propagate errors via total_least_squares + errors_in_variables; hierarchical Bayes with priors shared across band/geometry/station; k=5 cross-validation and leave-one-bucket-out for robustness.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Optional)
- Leave-one-out: key parameters vary < 15%; RMSE fluctuation < 10%.
- Stratified robustness: G_env↑ → σ_φ↑, RM↑, Ξ_couple↑; slight drop in KS_p.
- Noise stress test: add 5% 1/f drift and frequency-standard jitter → θ_Coh and k_TBN increase; overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with gamma_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2), posterior means shift < 8%; evidence ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5.
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 0.047; geometry blind-test maintains ΔRMSE ≈ −14%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/