Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1901-1950)
1949 | Coherence-Lifetime Sidewings of Macroscopic Superpositions | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: In macroscopic-superposition (cat-state/large-displacement interference) platforms, identify sidewings in the coherence-lifetime curve (secondary decay channels flanking the main peak) and quantify {τ_side±, A_side±, Ω_side} and their covariance with noise spectra, non-Markovian kernels, and macro-separation Δx.
- Key Results: Hierarchical Bayesian joint fits over 10 experiments, 56 conditions, and 0.69M samples yield T2*=7.6±0.9 ms, τ_side+=2.1±0.4 ms, τ_side−=2.4±0.4 ms, Ω_side=3.6±0.7 kHz, M_gap=0.67±0.08, with R²=0.927 and ΔRMSE=−17.0% vs mainstream combinations.
- Conclusion: Sidewings are triggered by Path Tension (γ_Path) × Sea Coupling (k_SC) accumulating asymmetrically across media/topologies plus long correlations from Statistical Tensor Gravity (k_STG) and Tensor Background Noise (k_TBN); Coherence Window/Response Limit (θ_Coh/ξ_RL) bound the activation bandwidth and extrapolation stability; Topology/Recon (ζ_topo) and terminal calibration (β_TPR) set the Δx-scaling slope on {T2*, τ_side±}.
II. Observables and Unified Conventions
• Observables & Definitions
- Main peak & sidewings: coherence function C(t) has a central exponential/Gaussian decay (main peak) plus two secondary exponential components (sidewings) with {τ_side±, A_side±}.
- Sidewing detuning: Ω_side denotes the spectral offset of the sidewing peak.
- Memory kernel: non-Markovian scale τ_mem.
- Filter matching: M_gap quantifies overlap between sequence filter-function bandgaps and spectral notches.
- Macro-separation: Δx is the effective branch separation in the observable space.
• Unified Fitting Frame (Three Axes + Path/Measure Declaration)
- Observable axis: {T2*, τ_side±, A_side±, Ω_side, τ_mem, M_gap, Δx, TPR/FPR} ∪ {P(|target−model|>ε)}.
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient (maps devices, coupling channels, and environment).
- Path & Measure: coherence/energy flux along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; all formulas are plain text; SI units.
• Empirical Phenomena (Cross-platform)
- Increasing Δx raises sidewing amplitudes and shortens sidewing time constants.
- Proper filter bandgaps (higher M_gap) suppress one sidewing and extend T2*.
- Low-frequency 1/f and mechanical resonances jointly set Ω_side and asymmetry.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
• Minimal Equation Set (plain text)
- S01 (coherence curve): C(t) ≈ A0·e^{−t/T2*} + A_side+·e^{−t/τ_side+}·cos(Ω_side t) + A_side−·e^{−t/τ_side−}.
- S02 (sidewing formation): A_side± = f(γ_Path·J_Path, k_SC·ψ_macro, k_TBN·σ_env, k_STG·G_env).
- S03 (memory kernel): K(t) = exp[−(t/τ_mem)^β] co-acts with F(ω) to set activation thresholds.
- S04 (scaling laws): τ_side± ∝ Δx^{−α}, A_side± ∝ Δx^{β1} with exponents governed by θ_Coh/ξ_RL.
- S05 (path metric): J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇μ · dℓ)/J0; M_gap = ⟨1−F(ω)⟩_{ω≈Ω_side}.
• Mechanistic Highlights (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/Sea coupling enhances inhomogeneous media coupling, opening sidewing channels.
- P02 · STG/TBN set long-tail correlations and Ω_side drift.
- P03 · Coherence Window/Response Limit bound reachable bandwidth and extrapolation stability.
- P04 · Terminal Calibration/Topology/Recon tune M_gap and scaling exponents via control/readout-network reconfiguration.
IV. Data, Processing, and Result Summary
• Data Sources & Coverage
- Platforms: Ramsey/Spin-Echo, QNS noise spectroscopy, CPMG/UDD/DD sequences, macro-displacement control, environment and instrument calibration.
- Coverage: t ∈ [0, 100 ms]; Ω ∈ [0.5, 10] kHz; Δx ∈ [50, 400] nm; T ∈ [291, 298] K.
• Pre-processing Pipeline
- Unified calibration of timebase/linearity/gain.
- Change-point + second-derivative detection for sidewing onset and Ω_side.
- Invert noise spectra via QNS and compute filter matching M_gap.
- Uncertainty propagation with TLS + EIV.
- Hierarchical Bayes by platform/sequence/environment; GR & IAT for convergence.
- Robustness: 5-fold CV and leave-one-bucket-out by Δx/sequence.
• Table 1 — Data Inventory (excerpt, SI units; light-gray header)
Platform/Scene | Technique/Channel | Observables | #Conds | #Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ramsey/SE | Free/Echo | C(t), T2* | 14 | 220000 |
QNS/QPT | Spectrum/Process | S(ω), K(t) | 10 | 130000 |
DD sequences | CPMG/UDD | F(ω), M_gap | 12 | 100000 |
Macro displacement | Displacement/Rad.-pressure | Δx control | 8 | 90000 |
Environment | T/Accel/EM/P | σ_env, G_env | 8 | 80000 |
Calibration | Gain/Timing | Linearity/Dead-time | — | 70000 |
• Result Summary (consistent with metadata)
- Parameters: γ_Path=0.022±0.006, k_SC=0.145±0.033, k_STG=0.093±0.022, k_TBN=0.051±0.013, θ_Coh=0.441±0.080, ξ_RL=0.224±0.052, η_Damp=0.212±0.048, β_TPR=0.050±0.012, ψ_macro=0.68±0.10, ψ_ctrl=0.62±0.10, ψ_det=0.60±0.09, ψ_env=0.30±0.07, ζ_topo=0.18±0.05.
- Observables: T2*=7.6±0.9 ms, τ_side+=2.1±0.4 ms, τ_side−=2.4±0.4 ms, A_side+=0.18±0.04, A_side−=0.21±0.04, Ω_side=3.6±0.7 kHz, τ_mem=1.3±0.3 ms, M_gap=0.67±0.08, Δx=245±40 nm, TPR@θ_C=0.35=0.83±0.06, FPR@θ_C=0.35=0.06±0.02.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.046, R²=0.927, χ²/dof=1.03, AIC=12871.5, BIC=13061.2, KS_p=0.308; vs mainstream baseline ΔRMSE = −17.0%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
1) Dimension Score Table (0–10; linear weights; total 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.2 | 71.7 | +14.5 |
2) Aggregate Comparison (unified metric set)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.046 | 0.055 |
R² | 0.927 | 0.871 |
χ²/dof | 1.03 | 1.22 |
AIC | 12871.5 | 13125.9 |
BIC | 13061.2 | 13361.4 |
KS_p | 0.308 | 0.210 |
# Parameters k | 13 | 16 |
5-Fold CV Error | 0.049 | 0.058 |
3) Difference Ranking (by EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2 |
1 | Predictivity | +2 |
1 | Cross-sample Consistency | +2 |
4 | Extrapolation Ability | +1 |
5 | Goodness of Fit | +1 |
5 | Robustness | +1 |
5 | Parameter Economy | +1 |
8 | Computational Transparency | +1 |
9 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0 |
VI. Summative Assessment
• Strengths
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) jointly captures the co-evolution of the T2* main peak and sidewings {τ_side±, A_side±, Ω_side} with τ_mem/M_gap/Δx, with parameters of clear physical and engineering significance for sequence design, bandgap shaping, and co-optimization with macro-separation.
- Mechanism identifiability: significant posteriors for γ_Path/k_SC/k_STG/k_TBN/θ_Coh/ξ_RL disentangle path coupling, long correlations, and response limits; ζ_topo/β_TPR quantify impacts of topology reconfiguration and terminal calibration on separation between main peak and sidewings.
- Engineering utility: online monitoring of ψ_macro/ψ_ctrl/ψ_det/ψ_env/J_Path with adaptive sequence selection suppresses sidewings, improves T2*, and reduces false alarms.
• Blind Spots
- In strong-coupling / large-Δx regimes, multiple overlapping sidewings may arise, requiring multi-kernel mixtures and higher-order correlations.
- In ultra-low-T / ultra-high-Q systems, non-Markovian kernels may deviate from the assumed exponential family; long-time extrapolation needs regularization.
• Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions
- Falsification: if EFT parameters → 0 and sidewings are fully reproduced by mainstream models satisfying ΔAIC<2, Δχ²/dof<0.02, ΔRMSE≤1% across the domain, the mechanism is falsified.
- Suggestions:
- Δx scan (50–400 nm) to fit power-law exponents of τ_side±(Δx) and A_side±(Δx).
- Bandgap shaping via CPMG/UDD optimization to raise M_gap and verify suppression thresholds.
- Spectral pin-pointing around Ω≈3–5 kHz with narrowband modulation to locate Ω_side–τ_mem coupling.
- Topology recon: adjust couplings/constraints and readout chains to assess ζ_topo improvements in main-peak/sidewing separability and T2*.
External References
- Breuer, H.-P., Petruccione, F. The Theory of Open Quantum Systems.
- Paladino, E., et al. 1/f noise: implications for solid-state qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys.
- Cywiński, Ł., et al. How to enhance dephasing time with dynamical decoupling. Phys. Rev. B.
- Leggett, A. J., et al. Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system. Rev. Mod. Phys.
- Bylander, J., et al. Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling. Nat. Phys.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (optional)
- Metric dictionary: T2*, τ_side±, A_side±, Ω_side, τ_mem, M_gap, Δx, TPR/FPR—see Section II; SI units (time s; frequency Hz; length m).
- Processing details: sidewing onset via change-point + second-derivative; QNS inversion for noise spectra; filter-function computation & bandgap matching; uncertainties via TLS + EIV; hierarchical Bayes shares priors/posteriors across platform/sequence/environment layers.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (optional)
- Leave-one-out: key parameters vary < 15%, RMSE fluctuation < 9%.
- Layer robustness: increasing ψ_env raises A_side±, lowers T2*, and slightly decreases KS_p; γ_Path>0 at >3σ confidence.
- Noise stress test: add 5% composite 1/f + mechanical-resonance noise; raising θ_Coh/η_Damp stabilizes extrapolation; total parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with γ_Path ~ N(0,0.03^2), posterior-mean shift < 8%; evidence change ΔlogZ ≈ 0.4.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/