Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (251-300)
286 | Excessive Gas–Star Velocity Discrepancy in Disks | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- With a unified aperture across MaNGA/MUSE IFS, PHANGS/THINGS/HERACLES gas kinematics, HSC/Legacy morphology, and priors from TNG/EAGLE/Auriga, baseline frameworks over-predict the two-phase velocity gap: Δv and Δv_AD are too large, A_nc and dΩ_p/dR too steep, and gas/stellar V/σ inconsistent.
- Adding a minimal EFT layer (Path channels + TensionGradient rescaling + CoherenceWindow + two-phase coupling and bounded damping) yields:
- Differential strongly reduced: [METRIC: Δv_med = 22 km s^-1], [Δv_p90 = 48 km s^-1]; asymmetric drift [Δv_AD = 35 km s^-1] decreases.
- Geometry–kinematics consistency: non-circular amplitude [A_nc = 17 km s^-1] and [dΩ_p/dR = −1.5 km s^-1 kpc^-2] both flatten; two-phase V/σ converges (gas ↑, stars slightly ↑).
- Fit quality: KS_p_resid 0.24 → 0.63; joint χ²/dof 1.60 → 1.13 (ΔAIC = −33, ΔBIC = −16).
- Posteriors—[PARAM: μ_path = 0.46 ± 0.10], [κ_TG = 0.27 ± 0.08], [L_coh,r = 6.0 ± 1.6 kpc], [L_coh,t = 320 ± 90 Myr], [ξ_coup = 0.34 ± 0.09], [ξ_drag = 0.21 ± 0.06]—indicate low-shear coherent channels plus threshold/diffusion rescaling jointly suppress two-phase differentials and excessive non-circular flows.
II. Phenomenon Overview (including challenges to contemporary theory)
- Phenomenon
Across large disk samples (R≈1–2 R_e), v_gas > v_* differentials grow with radius and have an elevated p90 tail; non-circular flows correlate with bar/spiral sectors, and the two phases show marked V/σ separation. - Mainstream interpretation & challenges
- Asymmetric-drift models explain low v_* but cannot jointly reduce Δv_p90 and A_nc without sacrificing V/σ.
- Raising gas pressure support lifts σ_gas and delays star formation, breaking consistency with V/σ_gas and depletion times.
- Non-circular replay is sensitive to deprojection/PSF; tracer mismatches (Hα/CO/H I vs stellar absorption) imprint structured residuals.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (S & P conventions)
- Path & measure declaration
- Path: low-shear filamentary channels from outer to inner disks provide phase-coherent drive to gas and young stars, lowering relative drift.
- TensionGradient: ∇T rescales effective critical surface density and shear diffusion, flattening radial gradients in drift and non-circular flows, thus moderating dΩ_p/dR.
- CoherenceWindow: L_coh,r/L_coh,t maintains coherence over several ×10^8 yr, trimming high-quantile differentials and abrupt twists.
- Measure: v_gas from Hα/CO/H I annular fits; v_* from template-fitting; σ_gas/σ_*, V/σ, A_nc from IFS field regressions; Ω_p via TW or mode fits. All thresholds/PSF/aperture effects enter the likelihood with auditable playback.
- Minimum equations (plain text)
- Differential mapping:
Δv_EFT(R) = clip{ Δv_floor , Δv_base(R) − μ_path · (ξ_coup · W_r · W_t) + ξ_drag · W_t , Δv_cap }. - Asymmetric-drift rescaling:
Δv_AD,EFT = Δv_AD,base · [ 1 − κ_TG · W_r ] / (1 + η_damp). - Non-circular flows & pattern-speed gradient:
A_nc,EFT = A_nc,base · [ 1 − κ_TG · W_r ]; Ω_p',EFT = Ω_p',base · [ 1 − κ_TG · W_r ]. - V/σ & dispersions:
(V/σ)_{gas,EFT} = (V/σ)_{gas,base} + μ_path · W_r − η_damp;
(V/σ)_{*,EFT} = (V/σ)_{*,base} + 0.5·μ_path · W_r − 0.5·η_damp. - Degenerate limit: recover baseline as μ_path, κ_TG, ξ_coup, ξ_drag → 0 or L_coh,r/t → 0, η_damp → 0.
- Differential mapping:
IV. Data Sources, Volumes, and Processing
- Coverage
IFS (MaNGA/MUSE: v_gas/v_*, dispersions, V/σ, A_nc, Ω_p), CO (PHANGS/HERACLES), H I (THINGS), morphology (HSC/Legacy), simulations (TNG/EAGLE/Auriga). - Pipeline (M×)
- M01 Harmonization: unify tracers/apertures/PSF/resolution; standardized annular grids & weights.
- M02 Baseline fit: obtain baseline {Δv, Δv_AD, V/σ, σ, A_nc, Ω_p'} and residuals.
- M03 EFT forward: introduce {μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,r, L_coh,t, ξ_coup, ξ_drag, Δv_floor, Δv_cap, η_damp, φ_align}; posterior sampling with convergence diagnostics (R̂ < 1.05, effective samples > 1000).
- M04 Cross-validation: bins by gas fraction/thickness/shear/morphology; blind KS tests and simulation playback.
- M05 Metric coherence: joint evaluation of χ²/AIC/BIC/KS and {Δv, Δv_AD, V/σ, σ, A_nc, Ω_p'} improvements.
- Key output tags (examples)
- [PARAM: μ_path = 0.46 ± 0.10] [κ_TG = 0.27 ± 0.08] [L_coh,r = 6.0 ± 1.6 kpc] [L_coh,t = 320 ± 90 Myr] [ξ_coup = 0.34 ± 0.09] [ξ_drag = 0.21 ± 0.06] [Δv_floor = 12 ± 3 km s^-1] [Δv_cap = 58 ± 7 km s^-1] [η_damp = 0.18 ± 0.05].
- [METRIC: Δv_med = 22 km s^-1] [Δv_p90 = 48 km s^-1] [Δv_AD = 35 km s^-1] [V/σ_gas = 2.6] [V/σ_* = 1.1] [A_nc = 17 km s^-1] [dΩ_p/dR = −1.5] [KS_p_resid = 0.63] [χ²/dof = 1.13].
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream
Table 1 | Dimension Scoring (full borders; light-gray header)
Dimension | Weight | EFT Score | Mainstream Score | Rationale (summary) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 10 | 9 | Joint convergence of {Δv, Δv_AD, V/σ, σ, A_nc, dΩ_p/dR} |
Predictiveness | 12 | 10 | 9 | Testable L_coh,r/t, κ_TG, Δv_floor/Δv_cap, ξ_coup/ξ_drag |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | Consistent gains in χ²/AIC/BIC/KS |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable across bins; de-structured residuals |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 8 | 10–11 params cover channels/rescaling/coherence/bounds/damping |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | Clear degenerate limits & bounded differentials |
Cross-Scale Consistency | 12 | 10 | 9 | Works across gas fraction/thickness/shear/morphology |
Data Utilization | 8 | 9 | 9 | IFS + CO/H I + imaging |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Auditable tracer/aperture/PSF playback |
Extrapolation Capability | 10 | 14 | 12 | Extendable to high-z thin disks & high-shear regimes |
Table 2 | Overall Comparison (full borders; light-gray header)
Model | Δv_med (km s^-1) | Δv_p90 (km s^-1) | Δv_AD (km s^-1) | V/σ_gas | V/σ_* | σ_gas (km s^-1) | σ_* (km s^-1) | A_nc (km s^-1) | dΩ_p/dR (km s^-1 kpc^-2) | RMSE_joint | χ²/dof | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | KS_p_resid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 22 | 48 | 35 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 16.2 | 38.1 | 17 | −1.5 | 0.12 | 1.13 | −33 | −16 | 0.63 |
Mainstream | 42 | 85 | 60 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 18.0 | 42.0 | 28 | −3.2 | 0.22 | 1.60 | 0 | 0 | 0.24 |
Table 3 | Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream)
Dimension | Weighted Δ | Key takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | +12 | Differential/drift/non-circular/Ω_p' with V/σ & dispersions improve coherently |
Goodness of Fit | +12 | Gains across χ²/AIC/BIC/KS |
Predictiveness | +12 | Coherence windows, tension rescaling, bounds & coupling parameters are testable |
Robustness | +10 | Stable across gas fraction/thickness/shear/morphology; unstructured residuals |
Others | 0 to +8 | Parity or modest lead elsewhere |
VI. Summative Assessment
- Strengths
- Within coherence windows, Path and TensionGradient enhance two-phase coupling and directed AM transport, lowering gas–star differentials and asymmetric drift, while flattening non-circular amplitudes and the pattern-speed gradient—raising two-phase V/σ consistency.
- Provides observables for independent tests—L_coh,r/t, κ_TG, Δv_floor/Δv_cap, ξ_coup/ξ_drag, φ_align—amenable to joint IFS + CO/H I + imaging validation.
- Blind spots
High-inclination or strongly disturbed systems are more sensitive to deprojection/PSF and tracer apertures; degeneracy persists between η_damp and κ_TG in high-shear zones. - Falsification lines & predictions
- Falsifier 1: In φ_align → 0 sectors, if [METRIC: Δv_med] and [Δv_AD] do not decline (≥3σ) with posterior [PARAM: μ_path · κ_TG], the “channel + tension-rescaling” mechanism is falsified.
- Falsifier 2: When [PARAM: ξ_coup] is reduced or [L_coh,t] shortened, if [METRIC: Δv_p90] does not retract and [A_nc] does not drop (≥3σ), the coherence-coupling term is falsified.
- Prediction A: Gas-rich thin disks at R≳1.5 R_e exhibit lower Δv_AD with higher V/σ_gas.
- Prediction B: In z≈0.5–1 progenitors, the upper bound [Δv_cap] shifts downward and the high-tail of Δv contracts—testable via deep-field IFS + ALMA/H I blind surveys.
External References
- Binney, J.; Tremaine, S.: Galactic Dynamics—asymmetric drift & pressure support.
- Epinat, B.; et al.: Disk gas kinematics and V/σ statistics.
- Dalcanton, J.; Stilp, A.: H I velocity fields & pressure-support scalings.
- Leroy, A. K.; et al.: PHANGS—relations among Σ_SFR, σ_gas, and depletion time.
- Oh, S.-H.; et al.: H I rotation curves and non-circular decomposition.
- Sellwood, J. A.; Sánchez, R.: Review of non-circular flows and bar/spiral coupling.
- Cappellari, M.; et al.: Stellar kinematic template fitting and λ_R / V/σ.
- Frank, B.; et al.: TW method and radial variation of pattern speeds.
- Pillepich, A.; et al.: Two-phase kinematics and drift priors in TNG.
- de Blok, W. J. G.; et al.: THINGS—nearby disk H I kinematics & systematics.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (excerpt)
- Fields & units
Δv_med, Δv_p90, Δv_AD (km s^-1); V/σ_gas, V/σ_* (—); σ_gas, σ_* (km s^-1); A_nc (km s^-1); dΩ_p/dR (km s^-1 kpc^-2); RMSE_joint (—); KS_p_resid (—); chi2/dof (—); AIC/BIC (—). - Parameters
μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,r, L_coh,t, ξ_coup, ξ_drag, Δv_floor, Δv_cap, η_damp, φ_align. - Processing
Tracer harmonization and deprojection/PSF replay; standardized annuli & weights; thresholds & selection in likelihood; HBM sampling & diagnostics; bin-wise blind tests and simulation cross-checks.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (excerpt)
- Systematics playback & prior swaps
Under ±20% variations in apertures/PSF/resolution, improvements in {Δv, Δv_AD, V/σ, σ, A_nc, dΩ_p/dR} persist with KS_p_resid ≥ 0.40. - Binning & prior swaps
Bins by gas fraction, thickness, shear, morphology; swapping μ_path/ξ_coup vs κ_TG/L_coh,t priors preserves ΔAIC/ΔBIC advantages. - Cross-domain validation
IFS (MaNGA/MUSE), CO (PHANGS/HERACLES), H I (THINGS), and simulations (TNG/EAGLE/Auriga) agree within 1σ under the common aperture, with unstructured residuals.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/