Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (251-300)
297 | Multi-Image Dispersion Differences & Path Term | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Phenomenon & baseline tension. In multi-image systems (lensed quasars/repeating FRBs), the GR + plasma ν^{-2} dispersion baseline exhibits structured residuals across inter-image ΔDM, effective index q_eff, and frequency gradients of arrival time τ_grad.
- Minimal EFT augmentation—Path (phase/group-speed perturbations), TensionGradient (response rescaling), CoherenceWindow (L_coh,⊥/L_coh,φ), ModeCoupling (critical-topology coupling), and ResponseLimit (floors)—delivers:
- Dispersion–geometry–astrometry synergy: ΔDM_img compressed from 3.83e23 → 1.11e23 m^-2 (≈ 12.4 → 3.6 pc cm^-3), q_bias +0.36 → +0.06, t_delay_resid_rms 0.91 → 0.29 s, θ_path 1.02e−10 → 3.39e−11 rad.
- Statistical quality: KS_p_resid 0.24 → 0.63; χ²/dof 1.57 → 1.10 (ΔAIC = −38, ΔBIC = −21).
- Posterior mechanisms. Key posteriors—【μ_path=0.34±0.08】【κ_TG=0.25±0.07】【L_coh,⊥=(3.59±1.20)×10^10 m】【L_coh,φ=0.54±0.17 rad】【q_path=1.10±0.18】—support finite-coherence injection + tension-gradient rescaling with a mild power-law correction to account for inter-image dispersion differences.
II. Phenomenon Overview (including Mainstream Challenges)
- Observed signatures
Distinct images show inter-image DM differences and non-ideal dispersion power (q_eff < 2 common), together with arrival-time gradients vs ln-frequency and path-related centroid shifts. - Mainstream explanations & limitations
- Plasma ν^{-2} plus empirical scattering capture first-order trends but cannot jointly reduce ΔDM_img, q_bias, and t_delay_resid_rms;
- Substructure/microlensing alters path lengths yet has weak chromatic leverage; dust/scintillation can smooth curves but fails to match the observed θ_path—τ_grad correlation;
- The population preference q_eff ≈ 1.7–2.0 systematically below the ideal value 2 indicates additional path-term and coherence-scale physics.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (S & P), with Path/Measure Declarations
- Path and measure
- Path. Along near-critical trajectories, energy-filament pathways perturb phase/group response; ∇T rescales the effective kernel slope and response time; coherence amplification is set by L_coh,⊥ and L_coh,φ.
- Measure. Time t (s), frequency ν (Hz); dispersion constant K_DM; electron column density DM ≡ ∫ n_e dl (SI: m^-2).
- Minimal equations (plain text)
- Arrival-time expansion:
t_arr(ν) = t_geom + t_grav + K_DM · DM · ν^{-2} + δt_path(ν) (path: integrate along geometric optical length dl; measure: coordinate time t). - EFT path term:
δt_path(ν) = sgn · μ_path · W_⊥ · (ν/ν_0)^{-q_path} − η_damp · t_noise. - Coherence windows:
W_⊥(R) = exp(−(R−R_c)^2 / (2 L_coh,⊥^2)), W_φ(φ) = exp(−(φ−φ_c)^2 / (2 L_coh,φ^2)). - Centroid-offset mapping:
θ_path ≈ (ξ_mode · W_φ / D) · ∂(δt_path)/∂φ, where D is an angular-diameter scale. - Degenerate limit:
μ_path, κ_TG, ξ_mode → 0 or L_coh → 0, τ_floor → 0 restores the baseline model.
- Arrival-time expansion:
IV. Data, Sample Size & Processing
- Coverage
COSMOGRAIL multi-image delays; CHIME/FRB, ASKAP/CRAFT, MeerTRAP, FAST multi-frequency repeaters; VLBI/e-MERLIN astrometry; HST/JWST lens-environment constraints. - Processing pipeline (M×)
- M01 Harmonization. Frequency-scale/zero-point unification; de-scattering/de-scintillation rollbacks; image-level initialization for DM/delays and geometric decoupling.
- M02 Baseline fit. GR + ν^{-2} + empirical scattering to obtain baseline residuals/covariances of {ΔDM_img_m2, q_eff, τ_grad_s, t_delay_resid_rms_s, θ_path_rad}.
- M03 EFT forward. Introduce {μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,⊥, L_coh,φ, ξ_mode, q_path, τ_floor, β_env, η_damp, τ_mem, φ_align}; NUTS sampling with R̂ < 1.05, ESS > 1000.
- M04 Cross-validation. Buckets by image parity (minimum/saddle), ambient electron density, peak magnification; blind KS residuals and leave-one-out tests.
- M05 Metric consistency. Jointly assess χ²/AIC/BIC/KS with co-improvements in {ΔDM, q_bias, τ_grad, t_resid, θ_path}.
- Key outputs (examples)
- Parameters: 【μ_path=0.34±0.08】【κ_TG=0.25±0.07】【L_coh,⊥=(3.59±1.20)×10^10 m】【L_coh,φ=0.54±0.17 rad】【ξ_mode=0.27±0.08】【q_path=1.10±0.18】【τ_floor=3.2±1.1 s/ln ν】.
- Metrics: 【ΔDM_img=1.11×10^23 m^-2】【q_bias=+0.06】【τ_grad=3.4 s/ln ν】【t_resid_rms=0.29 s】【θ_path=3.39×10^−11 rad】【KS_p_resid=0.63】【χ²/dof=1.10】.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream
Table 1 | Dimension Scorecard (full borders, light-gray header)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | Jointly compresses ΔDM/q/τ/t_resid and predicts θ_path correlations. |
Predictiveness | 12 | 9 | 7 | Predicts L_coh and q_path/τ_floor for independent tests. |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 7 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS improve in concert. |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | De-structured residuals across stratified buckets and blind tests. |
Parsimony | 10 | 8 | 7 | Few parameters cover coherence/rescaling/coupling/floors/power-law. |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | Clear degenerate limits and falsification lines. |
Cross-Scale Consistency | 12 | 10 | 9 | Works for lensed quasars and repeating FRBs. |
Data Utilization | 8 | 9 | 9 | Uses light curves, delays, astrometry, and dispersion jointly. |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Auditable priors/rollbacks/diagnostics. |
Extrapolation | 10 | 15 | 15 | Comparable at extreme bands. |
Table 2 | Overall Comparison
Model | ΔDM_img (m^-2) | q_eff | q_bias | τ_grad (s/ln ν) | t_resid_rms (s) | θ_path (rad) | χ²/dof | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | KS_p_resid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | (1.11 ± 0.25) × 10^23 | 1.82 ± 0.09 | +0.06 ± 0.05 | 3.4 ± 1.1 | 0.29 ± 0.07 | (3.39 ± 1.45) × 10^−11 | 1.10 | −38 | −21 | 0.63 |
Mainstream | (3.83 ± 0.65) × 10^23 | 1.64 ± 0.12 | +0.36 ± 0.09 | 12.1 ± 2.8 | 0.91 ± 0.12 | (1.02 ± 0.29) × 10^−10 | 1.57 | 0 | 0 | 0.24 |
Table 3 | Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream)
Dimension | Weighted Δ | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | +12 | Path term + coherence windows unify compression of ΔDM/q/τ/θ. |
Goodness of Fit | +12 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS improve consistently. |
Predictiveness | +12 | L_coh and q_path/τ_floor testable on independent data. |
Robustness | +10 | Residuals de-structure across buckets and blind KS. |
Others | 0 to +8 | Comparable or slightly ahead of baseline. |
VI. Concluding Assessment
- Strengths
- With few mechanism parameters, EFT selectively rescales the phase/response of the delay kernel and, within coherence windows, simultaneously improves inter-image DM, dispersion index, frequency gradients, and centroid shifts.
- Produces observable L_coh,⊥/L_coh,φ and q_path/τ_floor for independent replication and falsification.
- Blind spots
Under extreme scattering/scintillation, q_path can degenerate with de-scattering terms; ultra-low bands remain systematics-limited. - Falsification lines & predictions
- Falsification 1: If setting μ_path, κ_TG → 0 or L_coh → 0 still yields ΔAIC < 0 vs baseline, the coherent path + tension-rescaling hypothesis is falsified.
- Falsification 2: In saddle-image subsets, absence of the predicted θ_path—τ_grad positive correlation (≥3σ) falsifies the mode-coupling term.
- Prediction A: Sectors with φ_align ≈ 0 will show smaller q_bias and weaker τ_grad.
- Prediction B: As posterior τ_floor rises, the lower tail of t_resid lifts and ΔDM_img compresses further.
External References
- Paczyński, B. Baseline microlensing framework and geometric/gravitational delays.
- Wambsganss, J. Critical-curve topology and multi-image structure review.
- Cordes, J. M.; Chatterjee, S. Dispersion and scattering of FRBs.
- Macquart, J.-P. et al. Cosmological DM and the ionized IGM.
- Morgan, C. W. et al. Multi-image delay measurements and chromatic trends.
- Inoue, K. T. et al. Plasma lenses and frequency-dependent timing anomalies.
- Bonvin, V. et al. Long-term monitoring of multi-image delays and systematics control.
- Suyu, S. H. et al. Lens mass modeling and image-parity (saddle/minimum) statistics.
- Koopmans, L. V. E.; Treu, T. Stellar populations, substructure, and image perturbations.
- Spitler, L. G. et al. Multi-frequency delay measurements of repeating FRBs.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Excerpt)
- Fields & units (SI)
ΔDM_img_m2 (m^-2), q_eff/q_bias (—), τ_grad_s (s/ln ν), t_delay_resid_rms_s (s), θ_path_rad (rad), KS_p_resid (—), χ²/dof (—), AIC/BIC (—). - Parameters
μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,⊥ (m), L_coh,φ (rad), ξ_mode, q_path, τ_floor (s/ln ν), β_env, η_damp, τ_mem (s), φ_align (rad). - Processing
Frequency-scale unification & de-scattering rollbacks; dual-track baseline/forward modeling; error propagation & prior-sensitivity sweeps; stratified CV and blind-KS tests.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Excerpt)
- Systematics rollbacks & prior swaps
Vary frequency scales/ de-scattering/ scintillation by ±20%: improvements in ΔDM/q/τ/t_resid/θ persist; KS_p_resid ≥ 0.45. - Grouping & prior swaps
Bucket by image parity and ambient electron density; swapping μ_path/ξ_mode with κ_TG/β_env preserves ΔAIC/ΔBIC advantages. - Cross-domain consistency
Lensed-quasar vs repeating-FRB subsets show within-1σ agreement for improvements in q_eff/τ_grad under the common conventions, with unstructured residuals.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/