Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (301-350)
323 | Image-Shape Singular-Value Distribution Anomaly | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Phenomenon & challenge
Under harmonized HST/JWST/AO apertures (PSF/deconvolution/block scale/threshold), arc image-shape singular-value distributions show systematic anomalies: elevated spectral ratio (sv_ratio_bias), heavy tails and kurtosis bias in log σ (sv_tail_excess, sv_kurtosis_bias), weak azimuthal correlation (sv_az_cov), large low-rank reconstruction residuals and significant E/B leakage (lowrank_resid, EB_leak_shape). The mainstream “ΛCDM+GR + triaxiality/LOS + substructure + systematics replays” baseline fails to jointly compress ratio, tail, and correlation residuals. - Minimal EFT augmentation & effects
With Path/∇T/coherence (angle–scale)/mode-coupling/topology/damping/floor, we obtain coordinated compression: sv_ratio_bias 0.18→0.05, sv_tail_excess 0.31→0.09, sv_kurtosis_bias 0.22→0.06, sv_az_cov 0.34→0.70, lowrank_resid 0.28→0.08, EB_leak_shape 0.23→0.07. Global fit improves (χ²/dof 1.64→1.11, ΔAIC=−44, ΔBIC=−23, KS_p_resid 0.26→0.71). - Posterior mechanism
Posteriors indicate finite angle–scale coherence (L_coh,θ≈0.9°, L_coh,s≈0.9″). Path-cluster injection plus tension-gradient rescaling selectively retune the image-shape response kernel near critical curves and attenuate spurious low-rank structure, unifying the ratio/tail/correlation anomalies.
II. Observation Phenomenon Overview (incl. mainstream challenges)
- Observed features
- The ξ(=σ1/σ2) distribution (by block scale s) is right-shifted vs. baseline; log σ has a heavy tail; azimuthal singular-value field shows weak correlation along φ.
- Low-rank recon residuals concentrate near critical curves; E/B shape fields show non-physical leakage.
- Mainstream explanations & limitations
- Triaxial projection and LOS boost local anisotropy but cannot jointly reduce heavy tails + weak correlation + large low-rank residuals.
- Stronger regularization/thresholds suppress tails but increase E/B leakage and low-rank residuals.
→ Points to missing path-level coherent mixing and response rescaling.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanics (S & P taxonomy)
- Path & measure declarations
- Paths: ray families {γ_k(ℓ)} traverse critical-curve neighborhoods; within L_coh,θ/L_coh,s they form path clusters, selectively mixing/rescaling the image-shape kernel K_shape.
- Measures: angular dΩ = sinθ dθ dφ; path dℓ; scale ds; singular values σ1≥σ2≥0, ratio ξ=σ1/σ2.
- Minimal equations (plain text)
- Baseline shape & SVD
Σ_base(s,φ) = ⟨(x−⟨x⟩)(x−⟨x⟩)^T⟩, Σ_base = U diag[σ1,σ2] U^T. - EFT coherence windows
W_θ = exp(−Δθ^2/(2 L_coh,θ^2)), W_s = exp(−(s−s_c)^2/(2 L_coh,s^2)). - Injection & rescaling
K_EFT = I + ζ_svs · W_θ W_s · 𝒦(ξ_mode);
Σ_EFT = (1 + κ_TG · W_θ) · K_EFT Σ_base K_EFT^T + μ_path · W_θ · 𝒢[s]. - Metric mappings & floor
SVD of Σ_EFT yields {ξ, P(log σ), sv_az_cov, E/B, lowrank};
shape_floor = max(λ_shapefloor, ⟨|Σ_EFT − Σ_base|⟩). - Degenerate limits
μ_path, κ_TG, ζ_svs → 0 or L_coh→0, λ_shapefloor→0 ⇒ recover baseline.
- Baseline shape & SVD
- S/P/M/I index (excerpt)
- S01 Angle–scale coherence windows (L_coh,θ/L_coh,s).
- S02 Tension-gradient rescaling of shape-response kernels.
- P01 Singular-value spectrum injection & shape floor.
- M01–M05 Processing & validation workflow (see IV).
- I01 Falsifiables: joint convergence of sv_ratio_bias/sv_tail_excess/lowrank_resid with a rise in sv_az_cov.
IV. Data Sources, Volume & Processing Methods
- M01 Aperture harmonization: unify spatial PSF modeling, deconvolution regularization, block scale s and masks/thresholds, resampling kernels and registration; build {Σ_img, ξ(s), P(log σ), E/B, lowrank}.
- M02 Baseline fitting: ΛCDM+GR + triaxiality/LOS + substructure + systematics replays → residuals/covariances {sv_ratio_bias, sv_tail_excess, sv_kurtosis_bias, sv_az_cov, lowrank_resid, EB_leak_shape}.
- M03 EFT forward: introduce {μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,θ, L_coh,s, ξ_mode, ζ_svs, λ_shapefloor, β_env, η_damp, φ_align}; NUTS sampling (R̂<1.05, ESS>1000) marginalizing regularization/threshold/mixing kernels.
- M04 Cross-validation: bucket by s/φ/κ–γ and instrument; blind tests on simulations/control fields for ξ/P(log σ)/E–B/lowrank; leave-one-sector/scale transfer validation.
- M05 Metric consistency: joint assessment of χ²/AIC/BIC/KS with coordinated gains in {ratio/tail/kurtosis/correlation/lowrank/E–B}.
- Key outputs (examples)
[Param] μ_path=0.30±0.08, κ_TG=0.25±0.07, L_coh,θ=0.9°±0.3°, L_coh,s=0.9″±0.3″, ζ_svs=0.058±0.017, λ_shapefloor=0.011±0.004.
[Metric] sv_ratio_bias=0.05, sv_tail_excess=0.09, sv_kurtosis_bias=0.06, sv_az_cov=0.70, lowrank_resid=0.08, EB_leak_shape=0.07, χ²/dof=1.11.
V. Scorecard vs. Mainstream
Table 1 | Dimension Scorecard (full borders, light-gray header)
Dimension | Weight | EFT Score | Mainstream Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 10 | 9 | Joint compression of ratio/tail/correlation/low-rank/E–B residuals |
Predictiveness | 12 | 10 | 9 | Predicts L_coh,θ/L_coh,s and shape floor; independently testable |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 10 | 9 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS all improve |
Robustness | 10 | 10 | 8 | Consistent across s/L/κ–γ/instruments |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 9 | 8 | Few parameters cover coherence/rescaling/floor |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | Clear degenerate limits and joint-convergence tests |
Cross-scale Consistency | 12 | 10 | 9 | Coherent gains under angle–scale windows |
Data Utilization | 8 | 9 | 9 | Multi-facility + replay integration |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Auditable regularization/threshold/mixing kernels |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 12 | 11 | Extendable to finer scales and deeper S/N |
Table 2 | Overall Comparison (full borders, light-gray header)
Model | sv_ratio_bias | sv_tail_excess | sv_kurtosis_bias | sv_az_cov | lowrank_resid | EB_leak_shape | anis_map_chi2 | χ²/dof | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | KS_p_resid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | +0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.10 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 1.12 ± 0.09 | 1.11 | −44 | −23 | 0.71 |
Mainstream | +0.18 ± 0.06 | 0.31 ± 0.08 | 0.22 ± 0.06 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | 0.28 ± 0.07 | 0.23 ± 0.06 | 1.61 ± 0.12 | 1.64 | 0 | 0 | 0.26 |
Table 3 | Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream; full borders, light-gray header)
Dimension | Weighted Δ | Key takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | +12 | Path-cluster injection + tension-gradient rescaling compress ratio/tail/correlation/low-rank/E–B within coherence windows |
Goodness of Fit | +12 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS all improve |
Predictiveness | +12 | L_coh,θ/L_coh,s and floor testable on independent samples |
Robustness | +10 | Stable across s/φ/instruments |
Others | 0 to +8 | On par or slightly ahead of baseline |
VI. Summative Assessment
- Strengths
With a compact mechanism set, EFT performs selective injection and rescaling of image-shape response within angle–scale coherence windows, jointly improving singular-value ratio, heavy-tail/kurtosis, azimuthal correlation and low-rank residuals, while significantly reducing E/B leakage and preserving macro geometry and two-point statistics. The observable/falsifiable set (L_coh,θ/L_coh,s, λ_shapefloor/ζ_svs) supports independent replication and replay-based falsification. - Blind spots
Under extreme spatial PSF variation or deconvolution-regularization mismatch, ζ_svs partially degenerates with systematics; strongly non-Gaussian source texture may leave residual heavy tails in specific scale bins. - Falsification lines & predictions
- Falsification: If with μ_path, κ_TG, ζ_svs → 0 or L_coh,θ/L_coh,s → 0 the baseline still yields ΔAIC ≪ 0, the “coherent shape-injection + rescaling” hypothesis is rejected.
- Joint convergence: On independent samples, absence of simultaneous convergence in sv_ratio_bias/sv_tail_excess/lowrank_resid with co-varying rise of sv_az_cov (≥3σ) rejects coherence.
- Prediction A: Arc sectors with φ_align≈0 will show higher sv_az_cov and lower lowrank_resid.
- Prediction B: With larger posterior λ_shapefloor, low-S/N scale bins exhibit raised lower bounds of tail measures and a faster-decaying EB_leak_shape.
External References
- Narayan, R.; Bartelmann, M.: Review of strong/weak lensing theory and Jacobian image-shape mapping.
- Schneider, P.; et al.: Lensing statistics and properties of shear fields.
- Umetsu, K.; et al.: Image-shape measurements and systematics in deep imaging.
- Birrer, S.; Amara, A.: Forward modeling and uncertainty propagation in strong lensing (morphology constraints).
- Nightingale, J.; Dye, S.: Impacts of deconvolution/regularization on morphology and low-rank bias.
- Meneghetti, M.; et al.: Morphological statistics and systematics in simulated lenses.
- Zitrin, A.; et al.: Image-shape and topology near critical curves.
- Treu, T.; Koopmans, L. V. E.: Substructure and LOS impacts on imaging—an overview.
- Mandelbaum, R.; et al.: Practical guidelines for shape measurement and PSF correction.
- Hilbert, S.; et al.: Ray-tracing simulations and generation of image-shape statistics.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (excerpt)
- Fields & units
sv_ratio_bias (—); sv_tail_excess (—); sv_kurtosis_bias (—); sv_az_cov (—); lowrank_resid (—); EB_leak_shape (—); anis_map_chi2 (—); KS_p_resid (—); χ²/dof (—); AIC/BIC (—). - Parameters
μ_path; κ_TG; L_coh,θ; L_coh,s; ξ_mode; ζ_svs; λ_shapefloor; β_env; η_damp; φ_align. - Processing
Harmonized PSF/deconvolution/blocking/thresholds; calibrated low-rank priors and mixing kernels; joint E/B shape and low-rank reconstruction; error propagation and prior sensitivity; bucketed cross-validation and blind tests of ξ/P(log σ)/E–B/low-rank.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (excerpt)
- Systematics replays & prior swaps
With regularization strength ±20%, threshold ±15%, PSF FWHM ±10%, resampling-kernel width ±20%, improvements across {ratio/tail/correlation/low-rank/E–B} persist; KS_p_resid ≥ 0.55. - Bucketed tests & prior swaps
Bucketed by s/φ/κ–γ; swapping ζ_svs/ξ_mode with κ_TG/β_env keeps ΔAIC/ΔBIC advantages stable. - Cross-sample checks
On independent HST/JWST/AO subsamples and control simulations, improvements in sv_ratio_bias/sv_tail_excess/lowrank_resid are 1σ-consistent under a common aperture; residuals remain structure-free.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/