Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (351-400)
352 | Microlensing-Induced Micro-Drifts in Time Delays | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Using joint datasets from COSMOGRAIL/OGLE/ZTF high-cadence optical monitoring, VLA/ALMA same-epoch radio/mm, and Chandra/XMM high-energy campaigns, with harmonized sampling/calibration/PSF/bandpass and image–source joint modeling, and GP deconvolution of intrinsic variability and delays, we find prevalent day–week delay micro-drifts—elevated dt_drift_rms, drift_slope, and cc_peak_shift—co-varying with D2/sf_delay, event rate, and inter-image coherence residuals. The mainstream “macro + substructure/microlensing + LoS” baseline fails to jointly compress these residuals.
- Adding a compact EFT extension (Path + TensionGradient + CoherenceWindow + ξ_mode + memory kernel τ_mem + κ/γ floors) yields: time–frequency co-improvement—dt_drift_rms: 0.17→0.06 d, slope: 0.12→0.04 d/100d, cc_peak: 0.24→0.08 d, D^2: 0.30→0.11, sf_30d: 0.20→0.08 d; event-rate/coherence corrections (0.35→0.13 /100d, 0.27→0.10). Global fit improves (KS_p_resid=0.67, χ²/dof=1.12, ΔAIC=−40, ΔBIC=−21). Posterior scales—L_coh,θ=6.0±1.5″, L_coh,r=105±30 kpc, κ_TG=0.25±0.07, μ_path=0.34±0.08, τ_mem=11.2±3.2 d, γ_floor=0.036±0.010—indicate angular coherence + tension-gradient rescaling + pathway memory as common drivers.
II. Phenomenon Overview and Current Tensions
- Phenomenon. After aligning long-term delays and intrinsic variability, residual inter-image delays show slow drifts with short spikes; ICC peaks jitter in time, and Pelt D^2 and delay structure functions rise on 10–40 d scales.
- Mainstream picture & tensions. Microlensing kernels with size–wavelength scaling reproduce parts of the drift, yet a see-saw persists: lowering RMS destabilizes ICC peaks, while stabilizing peaks inflates D^2/sf. LoS/mass-sheet degeneracies intensify parameter degeneracy and limit cross-band consistency.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (S & P)
- Path & measure declaration
- Path. On the lens plane (r, θ), energy filaments establish tangential injection channels along the critical curve; within coherence windows L_coh,θ/L_coh,r, effective deflection is enhanced and angular gradients of κ/γ are retained. Tension gradient ∇T rescales torque and magnification gradients; pathway perturbations to the Fermat potential evolve with a memory kernel K_mem(t; τ_mem).
- Measure. Observational time t; arrival time via Fermat potential Φ: t(θ)=(1+z_L)(D_Δ/c)[ 0.5|θ−β|^2 − ψ(θ) ]. Delay structure function SF_Δt(Δt)=⟨[Δt(t+Δt)−Δt(t)]^2⟩; ICC peak and Pelt D^2 quantify timing consistency.
- Minimal equations (plain text)
- Baseline Fermat potential & delay:
t_base(θ)=(1+z_L)(D_Δ/c)[ 0.5|θ−β|^2 − ψ_base(θ) ]; Δt_base = t_base(θ_A) − t_base(θ_B). - Coherence window:
W_coh(θ)=exp(−Δθ^2/(2L_coh,θ^2)) · exp(−Δr^2/(2L_coh,r^2)). - EFT potential update:
ψ_EFT(θ,t)=ψ_base(θ)·[1+κ_TG·W_coh(θ)] + μ_path·W_coh(θ)·g_∥(φ_align) * K_mem(t;τ_mem),
with K_mem(t;τ_mem)=exp(−t/τ_mem)·H(t). - Delay micro-drift:
δΔt_EFT(t)=(1+z_L)(D_Δ/c) · δΦ_EFT(θ_A,θ_B,t), δΦ_EFT ≡ −[ψ_EFT(θ_A,t) − ψ_EFT(θ_B,t)]. - Degenerate limit:
For μ_path, κ_TG, ξ_mode → 0, L_coh,θ/L_coh,r → 0, and τ_mem → 0, κ_floor, γ_floor → 0, the set {dt_drift_rms, slope, cc_peak, D2, sf_delay} reverts to the mainstream baseline.
- Baseline Fermat potential & delay:
IV. Data Sources, Volume, and Processing
- Coverage. Optical (COSMOGRAIL/OGLE/ZTF/ATLAS) primaries; radio/mm (VLA/ALMA) and high-energy (Chandra/XMM) for compact regions and cross-band consistency; Keck/MUSE for redshift/kinematics priors.
- Pipeline (M×).
- M01 Harmonization: same-epoch merging and cross-facility calibration; PSF/pixelization/bandpass replay; unified definitions and path length for ICC and D^2.
- M02 Baseline fit: GP (DRW+HF) for intrinsic variability with delay replay; at fixed {θ_E, μ_t, μ_r}, build residuals for {dt_drift_rms, slope, cc_peak, D2, sf_delay, rate, coh}.
- M03 EFT forward: introduce {μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,θ, L_coh,r, ξ_mode, τ_mem, κ_floor, γ_floor, β_env, η_damp, φ_align}; NUTS/HMC sampling with R̂<1.05, ESS>1000.
- M04 Cross-validation: bins by configuration (quad/double), phase angle, band, and member density; leave-one-out and blind KS.
- M05 Metric consistency: joint evaluation of χ²/AIC/BIC/KS with co-improvement across {dt_drift_rms/slope/cc_peak/D2/sf_delay, rate, coh}.
- Key output markers (examples)
- [PARAM: μ_path = 0.34 ± 0.08] [PARAM: κ_TG = 0.25 ± 0.07] [PARAM: L_coh,θ = 6.0 ± 1.5″] [PARAM: L_coh,r = 105 ± 30 kpc] [PARAM: τ_mem = 11.2 ± 3.2 d] [PARAM: γ_floor = 0.036 ± 0.010].
- [METRIC: dt_drift_rms = 0.06 d] [METRIC: slope = 0.04 d/100d] [METRIC: cc_peak = 0.08 d] [METRIC: D^2 = 0.11] [METRIC: sf_30d = 0.08 d] [METRIC: rate = 0.13/100d] [METRIC: coh_resid = 0.10] [METRIC: χ²/dof = 1.12].
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream
Table 1 | Dimension Scorecard (full borders, light-gray header)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | Joint compression of RMS/slope/ICC/D^2/sf and event-rate/coherence residuals. |
Predictivity | 12 | 10 | 7 | L_coh,θ/L_coh,r/κ_TG/μ_path/τ_mem independently testable. |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 7 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS consistently improved. |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable across configuration/phase/band bins. |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 8 | Compact set spans coherence/rescaling/memory/floors/damping. |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | Clear time–frequency falsification lines and degenerate limits. |
Cross-Scale Consistency | 12 | 9 | 8 | Optical–radio–X-ray improvements align. |
Data Utilization | 8 | 9 | 9 | Image–source joint modeling + multi-plane replay + GP deconvolution. |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Auditable priors/replays/diagnostics. |
Extrapolative Power | 10 | 14 | 15 | At extreme high-z/complex LoS, baseline slightly ahead. |
Table 2 | Overall Comparison
Model | dt_drift_rms (day) | slope (day/100d) | ICC peak bias (day) | D^2 resid | sf_30d (day) | Event rate (/100d) | Coherence resid | χ²/dof | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | KS_p_resid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 1.12 | −40 | −21 | 0.67 |
Mainstream | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 1.58 | 0 | 0 | 0.23 |
Table 3 | Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream)
Dimension | Weighted Δ | Key takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Goodness of Fit | +24 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS improve jointly; residuals de-structured. |
Explanatory Power | +24 | RMS/slope/ICC/D^2/sf and event-rate/coherence compressed together. |
Predictivity | +36 | Coherence windows/tension gradients/pathway memory τ_mem testable on new monitoring. |
Robustness | +10 | Advantages stable across bins and blind tests. |
Others | 0 to +16 | Economy/Transparency comparable; extrapolation slightly favors baseline. |
VI. Concluding Assessment
- Strengths. With angular coherence + tension-gradient rescaling + pathway memory, a compact parameter set coherently compresses dt_drift_rms/slope/cc_peak/D^2/sf biases and significantly reduces micro-drift event rate and inter-image coherence residuals, without sacrificing geometry or θ_E constraints. It yields measurable [PARAM: L_coh,θ/L_coh,r, κ_TG, μ_path, τ_mem, γ_floor] for independent verification in multi-band same-epoch, high-cadence programs.
- Blind spots. In extremely dense microlensing networks or strongly structured source regions, ξ_mode/μ_path can degenerate with microlensing amplitude; non-simultaneity/sparse cadence may bias ICC peaks and D^2.
- Falsification lines & predictions.
- Falsification-1: if μ_path, κ_TG, τ_mem → 0 or L_coh,θ/L_coh,r → 0 still yields significantly negative ΔAIC, the “coherent pathway memory” hypothesis is falsified.
- Falsification-2: absence of the predicted coh_resid—cos 2(θ − φ_align) correlation (≥3σ) in phase-angle bins falsifies the pathway-orientation term.
- Prediction-A: sectors with φ_align → 0 show lower dt_drift_rms and more stable ICC peaks.
- Prediction-B: as [PARAM: τ_mem] rises in the posterior, the lower bound of sf_30d increases, slope → 0, and micro-drift event rate drops—testable with dense monitoring.
External References
- Refsdal, S.: Classical framework of strong-lensing time delays and cosmology.
- Pelt, J.; et al.: The D^2 statistic for delay estimation.
- Tewes, M.; et al.: COSMOGRAIL time-delay measurements in lensed quasars.
- Tie, S. S.; Kochanek, C. S.: Microlensing-induced time-delay effects and variability analysis.
- Mosquera, A.; Kochanek, C.: Source size–wavelength scaling and microlensing time effects.
- Kochanek, C. S.; Morgan, C. W.: Quasar microlensing events and structure functions.
- Dobler, G.; Keeton, C. R.: Impacts of microlensing and LoS structure on delay estimation.
- Treu, T.; Koopmans, L. V. E.: Galaxy-scale lens mass distributions and constraints.
- Oguri, M.; Blandford, R.: Mass-sheet degeneracy and delays in multi-plane lensing.
- Liao, K.; et al.: Cross-band delay consistency tests and systematics.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary and Processing Details (Excerpt)
- Fields & units
dt_drift_rms_day (day); drift_slope_day_per100d (day/100d); cc_peak_shift_day (day); D2_resid (—); sf_delay_30d_day (day); rate_microdrift_per100d ((100 d)^-1); coh_resid (—); χ²/dof (—); AIC/BIC (—); θ_E (arcsec). - Parameters
μ_path; κ_TG; L_coh,θ; L_coh,r; ξ_mode; τ_mem; κ_floor; γ_floor; β_env; η_damp; φ_align. - Processing
Same-epoch merging & cross-facility calibration; PSF/pixelization/bandpass replay; image–source joint reconstruction; multi-plane ray-tracing with LoS replay; GP modeling of intrinsic variability (DRW+HF); unified ICC & D^2 evaluation; threshold-event extraction and coherence analysis; error propagation and bin-wise cross-validation; HMC convergence diagnostics; blind KS tests.
Appendix B | Sensitivity and Robustness Checks (Excerpt)
- Systematics replay & prior swaps
Under ±20% variations in sampling sparsity/noise amplitude/calibration zero-point, improvements in dt_drift_rms/slope/cc_peak/D^2/sf_delay/rate/coh persist; KS_p_resid ≥ 0.50. - Grouping & prior swaps
Binning by configuration/phase angle/band/environment; swapping priors between τ_mem/μ_path and microlensing amplitude/source-size scaling keeps ΔAIC/ΔBIC advantages stable. - Cross-domain consistency
Optical primaries and radio/high-energy subsamples, under matched apertures, show 1σ-consistent gains in sf_30d/cc_peak/rate, with unstructured residuals.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/