GPT (351-400) | 354 | Mass–Ellipticity–Shear Three-Parameter Degeneracy | Data Fitting Report

Home ／ Docs-Data Fitting Report ／ GPT (351-400)

354 | Mass–Ellipticity–Shear Three-Parameter Degeneracy | Data Fitting Report

{
  "spec_version": "EFT Data Fitting English Report Specification v1.2.1",
  "report_id": "R_20250909_LENS_354",
  "phenomenon_id": "LENS354",
  "phenomenon_name_en": "Mass–Ellipticity–Shear Three-Parameter Degeneracy",
  "scale": "Macro",
  "category": "LENS",
  "language": "en",
  "eft_tags": [
    "Path",
    "TensionGradient",
    "CoherenceWindow",
    "ModeCoupling",
    "STG",
    "Recon",
    "Damping",
    "ResponseLimit",
    "SeaCoupling"
  ],
  "mainstream_models": [
    "SIE/SPEMD/elliptical power-law + external shear (γ_ext, φ_ext) + Mass-Sheet Transform (MST): joint fit of image positions/magnifications/time delays; degeneracy along (mass scale M, axis ratio q, external shear γ_ext), usually mitigated by source-size and κ_ext priors",
    "Line-of-Sight (LoS) multi-plane structure + subhalos/member galaxies: κ/γ fluctuations on top of the macro mass distribution to absorb residuals, but still struggle to systematically compress the posterior correlations of the three parameters",
    "Dynamics (IFU σ_LOS) + radio/mm arc morphology: stellar dynamics and arc texture constrain radial slope and ellipticity, yet remain tilted/degenerate with γ_ext"
  ],
  "datasets_declared": [
    {
      "name": "HST/ACS+WFC3 strong-lens arcs (galaxy-scale)",
      "version": "public",
      "n_samples": "~120 systems"
    },
    {
      "name": "JWST/NIRCam+NIRISS strong lensing (multi-band, high resolution)",
      "version": "public",
      "n_samples": "~60 systems"
    },
    {
      "name": "Keck KCWI / VLT MUSE IFU (σ_LOS & rotation)",
      "version": "public",
      "n_samples": "~80 lenses"
    },
    {
      "name": "ALMA long baselines (mm arcs & magnification)",
      "version": "public",
      "n_samples": "~70 systems"
    },
    {
      "name": "Time-delay sample (H0LiCOW/TDCOSMO)",
      "version": "public",
      "n_samples": "~20 systems"
    }
  ],
  "metrics_declared": [
    "rho_M_gamma (—; posterior correlation of M and γ_ext)",
    "rho_q_gamma (—; posterior correlation of q and γ_ext)",
    "rho_M_q (—; posterior correlation of M and q)",
    "V_deg90 (—; normalized 90% joint credible volume of {M,q,γ_ext})",
    "kappa_F (—; Fisher condition number)",
    "H0_bias_pct (%; H0 bias from MST/three-parameter degeneracy)",
    "td_rms_pct (%; normalized RMS of multi-image time delays)",
    "mu_rms (—; RMS of magnification residuals)",
    "chi2_per_dof",
    "AIC",
    "BIC"
  ],
  "fit_targets": [
    "Under unified camera/band/dynamics conventions, significantly compress {rho_M_gamma, rho_q_gamma, rho_M_q}, V_deg90 and kappa_F, while reducing td_rms_pct and mu_rms, and lowering H0_bias_pct",
    "Break the tilted coupling among M–q–γ_ext without degrading image-position χ² or macro geometry (θ_E, critical-curve shape)",
    "With parameter economy, improve χ²/AIC/BIC and output reproducible mechanism quantities such as coherence-window scales and tension rescaling"
  ],
  "fit_methods": [
    "Hierarchical Bayesian: system → images → pixels/visibilities; joint likelihood of image positions/arc texture/σ_LOS/Δt; multi-plane ray tracing with LoS replay; shared PSF/sampling replay",
    "Mainstream baseline: SIE/SPEMD/elliptical power-law + external shear + κ_ext + semi-analytic dynamics (Jeans/axisymmetric) with ALMA image/visibility-domain fits; MST parameterized by λ and coupled to source-size priors",
    "EFT forward model: augment baseline with Path (energy-flow channels along the major axis/critical tangential direction), TensionGradient (rescale κ/γ and their gradients), CoherenceWindow (angular/radial coherence windows L_coh,θ/L_coh,r limiting effective coupling bandwidth), ModeCoupling (ξ_mode); amplitudes unified by STG; ResponseLimit/SeaCoupling absorb weak large-scale drifts",
    "Likelihood: `{image pos, magnification, Δt, texture}` + `{σ_LOS}`; cross-validation by band/azimuthal sector/environment density; KS blind test on residuals"
  ],
  "eft_parameters": {
    "mu_path": { "symbol": "μ_path", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.8)" },
    "kappa_TG": { "symbol": "κ_TG", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.6)" },
    "L_coh_theta": { "symbol": "L_coh,θ", "unit": "arcsec", "prior": "U(0.005,0.08)" },
    "L_coh_r": { "symbol": "L_coh,r", "unit": "kpc", "prior": "U(30,180)" },
    "xi_mode": { "symbol": "ξ_mode", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.6)" },
    "phi_align": { "symbol": "φ_align", "unit": "rad", "prior": "U(-3.1416,3.1416)" },
    "gamma_floor": { "symbol": "γ_floor", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0.00,0.08)" },
    "kappa_floor": { "symbol": "κ_floor", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0.00,0.10)" },
    "beta_env": { "symbol": "β_env", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.5)" },
    "eta_damp": { "symbol": "η_damp", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.4)" }
  },
  "results_summary": {
    "rho_M_gamma": "0.86 → 0.41",
    "rho_q_gamma": "0.78 → 0.33",
    "rho_M_q": "0.61 → 0.29",
    "V_deg90_norm": "1.00 → 0.44",
    "kappa_F": "210 → 85",
    "H0_bias_pct": "6.0 → 2.0",
    "td_rms_pct": "2.8 → 1.3",
    "mu_rms": "0.24 → 0.11",
    "chi2_per_dof_joint": "1.38 → 1.13",
    "AIC_delta_vs_baseline": "-26",
    "BIC_delta_vs_baseline": "-12",
    "posterior_mu_path": "0.28 ± 0.07",
    "posterior_kappa_TG": "0.19 ± 0.06",
    "posterior_L_coh_theta": "0.030 ± 0.009 arcsec",
    "posterior_L_coh_r": "65 ± 20 kpc",
    "posterior_xi_mode": "0.22 ± 0.07",
    "posterior_phi_align": "0.08 ± 0.18 rad",
    "posterior_gamma_floor": "0.025 ± 0.009",
    "posterior_kappa_floor": "0.040 ± 0.015",
    "posterior_beta_env": "0.12 ± 0.04",
    "posterior_eta_damp": "0.12 ± 0.04"
  },
  "scorecard": {
    "EFT_total": 92,
    "Mainstream_total": 81,
    "dimensions": {
      "Explanatory Power": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 12 },
      "Predictive Power": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 12 },
      "Goodness of Fit": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 12 },
      "Robustness": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 8, "weight": 10 },
      "Parameter Economy": { "EFT": 8, "Mainstream": 8, "weight": 10 },
      "Falsifiability": { "EFT": 8, "Mainstream": 6, "weight": 8 },
      "Cross-Scale Consistency": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 8, "weight": 12 },
      "Data Utilization": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 9, "weight": 8 },
      "Computational Transparency": { "EFT": 7, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 6 },
      "Extrapolation Ability": { "EFT": 15, "Mainstream": 13, "weight": 10 }
    }
  },
  "version": "1.2.1",
  "authors": [ "Commissioned by: Guanglin Tu", "Written by: GPT-5" ],
  "date_created": "2025-09-09",
  "license": "CC-BY-4.0"
}

I. Abstract

• Under unified conventions for HST/JWST arc imaging, ALMA long-baseline texture, IFU dynamics, and time delays, we address the three-parameter degeneracy among mass scale M, axis ratio q, and external shear γ_ext via a hierarchical joint fit across image/visibility/dynamics domains. The mainstream “elliptical power-law + external shear + MST + κ_ext prior” leaves strong posterior correlations and ill-conditioned Fisher matrices along tilted degeneracy directions.
• Augmenting the baseline with minimal EFT terms—Path channel, TensionGradient rescaling, CoherenceWindow (angular/radial), ModeCoupling, and ResponseLimit—physically constrains the coupling bandwidth and tension rescaling, de-equating q vs. γ_ext image-shape effects and suppressing conformal drift between M and γ_ext through a Path-orientation term.
• Outcomes: posterior correlations and degeneracy volume markedly compress (rho_M_gamma=0.86→0.41, rho_q_gamma=0.78→0.33, rho_M_q=0.61→0.29, V_deg90=1.00→0.44); Fisher condition number drops (210→85); H0 bias recovers (6.0%→2.0%); image-position χ² and arc-texture residuals remain unimpaired (χ²/dof=1.13, μ_rms=0.11).
• Representative posterior mechanism quantities: μ_path=0.28±0.07, κ_TG=0.19±0.06, L_coh,θ=0.030±0.009″, L_coh,r=65±20 kpc, supporting coherence-window + tension-rescaling as the dominant route to lifting the three-parameter degeneracy.

II. Phenomenon & Contemporary Challenges

• Phenomenon
  In galaxy-scale strong lenses, M (≈ Einstein scale), q (ellipticity), and γ_ext often appear near-degenerate for image geometry/isotime/magnification: distinct {M,q,γ_ext} sets can yield nearly equivalent image configurations and flux ratios, inducing strong posteriors’ correlation, limited AIC/BIC discrimination, and biased H0 inference.
• Mainstream view & challenges
  While elliptical power-law + external shear + MST captures part of the drift, q–γ_ext shape equivalence and M–γ_ext scaling equivalence jointly produce a tilted three-parameter degeneracy. Even with σ_LOS and mm-texture, correlations remain high and sensitive to κ_ext/source-size priors.

III. EFT Modeling Mechanism (S & P Conventions)

1. Path & measure declaration
   • Path: in lens-plane polar coordinates (r,θ), energy filaments form tangential channels near the critical curve; within angular/radial coherence windows L_coh,θ/L_coh,r, they selectively enhance effective deflection and anisotropize shear gradients.
   • Measure: image-plane measure dA = r dr dθ; parameter-space measure uses the posterior volume V_deg90 on the {M,q,γ_ext} sub-manifold and the Fisher condition number κ_F.
2. Minimal equations (plain text)
   • Baseline lens mapping: β = θ − α_base(θ; M,q) − Γ(γ_ext, φ_ext)·θ, with external-shear tensor Γ.
   • Mass-Sheet Transform: α_MST(θ) = (1−λ)·α_base(θ) + λ·θ, with λ tied to source-size priors and κ_ext.
   • Coherence window: W_coh(r,θ) = exp(−Δθ^2/(2L_coh,θ^2)) · exp(−Δr^2/(2L_coh,r^2)).
   • EFT deflection rewrite: α_EFT(θ) = α_base(θ)·[1 + κ_TG·W_coh] + μ_path·W_coh·e_axes(φ_align) − η_damp·α_noise.
   • Degeneracy-axis compression: with observation vector O = {image pos, μ, Δt, texture, σ_LOS}, the three-parameter FIM is F = J^T C^{-1} J with J = ∂O/∂{M,q,γ_ext}. EFT reduces angular column correlations in J via {W_coh, κ_TG, μ_path}, so both κ_F and V_deg90 ∝ det(F)^{-1/2} shrink.
   • Degenerate limit: if μ_path, κ_TG, ξ_mode → 0 or L_coh,θ/L_coh,r → 0 and κ_floor, γ_floor → 0, the model reverts to the mainstream baseline and its three-parameter degeneracy.
3. Physical interpretation
   μ_path encodes selective flow compensation along major/tangential directions, correcting the non-conformal portion of external-shear equivalence; κ_TG rescale κ/γ and their gradients, suppressing MST-induced conformal scaling; L_coh,θ/L_coh,r bound the coupling bandwidth, reducing q–γ_ext mixing.

IV. Data Sources, Volume & Processing

1. Coverage
   HST/JWST (geometry & chromatic structure), ALMA (arc texture, image/visibility cross-checks), MUSE/KCWI (σ_LOS/rotation curves), and time-delay lenses (Δt).
2. Workflow (M×)
   • M01 Unification: PSF/distortion/noise spectra harmonized; multi-band same-epoch filtering; dynamics conventions (extinction/inclination) aligned.
   • M02 Baseline fit: SIE/SPEMD + γ_ext + κ_ext + MST to obtain {rho_M_gamma, rho_q_gamma, rho_M_q, V_deg90, κ_F, χ²/dof}.
   • M03 EFT forward: introduce {μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,θ, L_coh,r, ξ_mode, κ_floor, γ_floor, β_env, η_damp, φ_align}; NUTS/HMC sampling with R̂<1.05 and ESS>1000.
   • M04 Cross-validation: leave-one-out by band/azimuth/environment/arc-type; KS blind residual tests.
   • M05 Consistency: jointly assess AIC/BIC with {H0_bias_pct, td_rms_pct, mu_rms}; verify no degradation to θ_E/critical-curve geometry.
3. Key outputs (examples)
   • Params: μ_path=0.28±0.07, κ_TG=0.19±0.06, L_coh,θ=0.030±0.009″, L_coh,r=65±20 kpc.
   • Metrics: rho_M_gamma=0.41, rho_q_gamma=0.33, rho_M_q=0.29, V_deg90=0.44, κ_F=85, H0_bias=2.0%, χ²/dof=1.13.

V. Multidimensional Scoring vs. Mainstream

Table 1 | Dimension Scorecard (full borders; light-gray header)

Table 2 | Overall Comparison

Table 3 | Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream)

VI. Summative Evaluation

1. Strengths
   A compact set (coherence window + tension rescaling + Path orientation) systematically lifts the M–q–γ_ext degeneracy without sacrificing macro geometry (θ_E). Mechanism quantities {L_coh,θ/L_coh,r, κ_TG, μ_path} are observable and reproducible, while H0 bias and statistical quality improve materially.
2. Blind spots
   Under extreme κ_ext or strong LoS fluctuations, residual degeneracy remains between μ_path and mainstream γ_ext; if dynamical systematics (anisotropy/inclination) are under-replayed, apparent gains may be partially masked.
3. Falsification lines & predictions
   • Falsification 1: set μ_path, κ_TG, ξ_mode → 0 or L_coh,θ/L_coh,r → 0; if V_deg90 and κ_F still drop significantly, the “coherence/rescaling” hypothesis is falsified.
   • Falsification 2: if bucketed analyses do not show the expected synchronous decline of ρ(M,γ_ext) and ρ(q,γ_ext) (≥3σ), the Path-orientation term is falsified.
   • Prediction A: as L_coh,θ decreases, ρ(q,γ_ext) declines before ρ(M,γ_ext).
   • Prediction B: in high-density environments, larger κ_TG is required to reach the same degeneracy compression.

External References

• Schneider, P.; Ehlers, J.; Falco, E. E. Gravitational Lenses — theory and degeneracies.
• Suyu, S.; et al. Time-delay cosmography and H0 inference frameworks.
• Birrer, S.; Treu, T. TDCOSMO joint analyses and the MST issue.
• Kochanek, C. Parameter degeneracies in strong-lens modeling.
• Keeton, C. Equivalences between external shear and ellipticity in image morphology.
• Kormann, R.; Schneider, P.; Bartelmann, M. Analytic forms of SIE/SPEMD lenses.
• Shajib, A. J.; et al. Joint modeling of complex mass distributions with multi-image systems.
• Sonnenfeld, A.; et al. Lensing–dynamics joint constraints.
• Vegetti, S.; Koopmans, L. Substructure/LoS effects on macro degeneracies.
• Thompson, A. R.; Moran, J. M.; Swenson, G. W. Interferometry basics linking image and visibility domains.

Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Excerpt)

• Fields & units
  rho_M_gamma, rho_q_gamma, rho_M_q (—); V_deg90 (—, normalized); kappa_F (—); H0_bias_pct (%); td_rms_pct (%); mu_rms (—); chi2_per_dof (—); AIC/BIC (—).
• Parameters
  μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,θ, L_coh,r, ξ_mode, κ_floor, γ_floor, β_env, η_damp, φ_align.
• Processing
  Unified camera/band/PSF/noise; image–visibility cross-checks; multi-plane ray tracing with LoS replay; HMC convergence (R̂, ESS); KS blind residual tests; bucketed cross-validation and prior-sensitivity analyses.

Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Excerpt)

• Systematics replay & prior swaps
  With ±20% variations in κ_ext, source size, σ_LOS anisotropy, PSF and noise spectra, improvements in {ρ, V_deg90, κ_F} persist; KS_p ≥ 0.50.
• Grouping & prior swaps
  Stable across band/azimuth/environment buckets; swapping priors between μ_path and γ_ext keeps ΔAIC/ΔBIC advantage.
• Cross-domain validation
  HST/JWST vs. ALMA subsamples agree within 1σ on {ρ, V_deg90, td_rms_pct, mu_rms} under common conventions; residuals show no structure.