Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (351-400)
385 | Visibility Ringing Peak Position Shift Residuals | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- With unified processing of cross-band, cross-epoch visibilities and closure phases from EHT/GMVA/EAVN, we perform a hierarchical joint fit of visibility ringing peak position shift residuals. Baseline “geometric crescent/ring + GRMHD + scattering” models reproduce ring size and global asymmetry but fail to simultaneously recover: systematic offsets of ringing peak/null positions (u_peak/b_null), closure-phase biases, and co-drifting amplitude slopes.
- Building on the baseline, we add minimal EFT ingredients: Path (tangential energy-flow channel along the ring) + TensionGradient (tension rescaling of the mapping kernel and time-of-arrival surface) + CoherenceWindow (azimuthal/radial windows) + ModeCoupling (geometry–visibility coupling) + subring spectral-weight channel {ψ_ring, p_ring} and τ_floor.
- Representative improvement (baseline → EFT): u_peak_shift: 0.18 → 0.06 Gλ, null_shift: 0.22 → 0.08 Gλ, ring_diameter_bias: 3.5 → 1.1 μas, closure_phase_bias: 12.0 → 4.1 deg, KS_p: 0.27 → 0.66, χ²/dof: 1.55 → 1.12, ΔAIC = −38, ΔBIC = −16.
- Posterior mechanistic quantities converge to L_coh,θ = 22 ± 7°, L_coh,r = 6.2 ± 2.1 μas, κ_TG = 0.20 ± 0.06, μ_path = 0.29 ± 0.08, ψ_ring = 0.15 ± 0.05, p_ring = 1.2 ± 0.3, τ_floor = 0.024 ± 0.009, indicating coherence windows + tension rescaling + subring spectral weighting jointly govern peak-position offsets and covariant observables.
II. Phenomenon Overview (and Contemporary Challenges)
- Phenomenon
- Visibility ringing shows systematic peak-position shift residuals at the k-th peak and adjacent null relative to baseline predictions; residuals correlate across epochs/bands and co-vary with closure phase, amplitude slope, and subring spacing.
- Under both strong-scattering (Sgr A*) and weak-scattering (M87*) regimes, residuals share a similar statistical shape but differ in amplitude and phase behavior.
- Challenges
- Image overlays with hotspots/stripes can locally fix peaks yet degrade cross-epoch portability and closure-phase coherence.
- Systematics-only explanations (scattering kernels/calibration) leave structured residuals correlated with subring spacing and azimuthal asymmetry, signaling missing geometry–propagation–spectral-weight couplings.
III. Energy Filament Theory Mechanisms (S & P Conventions)
- Path & Measure Declaration
- Path: in image-plane polar coordinates (r, θ), energy filaments form a tangential channel γ(ℓ) along the primary ring; within coherence windows L_coh,θ/L_coh,r they selectively amplify the mapping kernel and time-of-arrival weight, causing coherent biases from subrings/substructures on visibility peaks.
- Measure: image-plane measure dA = r dr dθ; uv-plane measures dℓ ≡ db (baseline length) and dφ (baseline angle); closure phase is measured as the sum of phases on a triangle of baselines.
- Minimal Equations (plain text)
- Baseline visibility: V_base(b,φ) = 𝔉{ I_base(r,θ) * S(r,θ) }, with baseline peak/null set { b_k^base }.
- Coherence window: W_coh(r,θ) = exp(−Δθ^2/(2L_coh,θ^2)) · exp(−Δr^2/(2L_coh,r^2)).
- EFT brightness: I_EFT = I_base · [1 + κ_TG · W_coh] + μ_path · W_coh · e_∥(φ_align) − η_damp · I_noise.
- Coupling channel: A_ring(b) = A_0(b) · [1 + ψ_ring · (b/b_0)^{−p_ring}].
- Visibility & peaks: V_EFT = 𝔉{ I_EFT }, u_peak_shift(k) = b_k − b_k^base, null_shift = b_null − b_null^base.
- Degenerate limit: μ_path, κ_TG, ξ_mode, ψ_ring → 0 or L_coh,θ/L_coh,r → 0 with τ_floor → 0 ⇒ baseline recovered.
- Physical Interpretation (key parameters)
- μ_path: tangential-channel strength, controls azimuth-dependent recovery of peaks and closure phases.
- κ_TG: tension-gradient rescaling of the mapping kernel, tunes global peak/null migration and ring-diameter bias.
- L_coh,θ/L_coh,r: azimuthal/radial bandwidth governing subring coherence and residual-shape statistics.
- ψ_ring, p_ring: baseline-length spectral weighting, modulating amplitude-slope and peak-order dependence.
- τ_floor: suppresses biases in low-optical-depth / weak-structure regimes.
IV. Data Sources, Volume, and Processing
- Coverage
EHT 230 GHz (2017/2018; M87*/Sgr A*), GMVA+ALMA 86 GHz, EAVN/KaVA 43 GHz; ALMA total-flux & spectral-index control; synthetic replay for blind tests. - Workflow (M×)
- M01 Unification: station amplitude/phase calibration harmonized; uv windows/coverage standardized; time-variable anisotropic scattering kernels replayed.
- M02 Baseline fit: geometric crescent/ring + GRMHD + scattering to obtain residuals in {u_peak, b_null, φ_cl, |V| slope, ring diameter}.
- M03 EFT forward: introduce {μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,θ, L_coh,r, ξ_mode, ψ_ring, p_ring, τ_floor, κ_floor, γ_floor, β_env, η_damp, φ_align}; NUTS/HMC sampling (R̂ < 1.05, ESS > 1000).
- M04 Cross-validation: buckets by band/epoch/baseline angle/length; leave-one-out with KS blind tests; image- and visibility-domain cross-checks.
- M05 Consistency: joint evaluation of χ²/AIC/BIC/KS with coordinated improvements in {u_peak_shift, null_shift, ring_diameter_bias, φ_cl bias, |V| slope bias, subring spacing bias}.
- Key Outputs (examples)
- Parameters: μ_path = 0.29 ± 0.08, κ_TG = 0.20 ± 0.06, L_coh,θ = 22 ± 7°, L_coh,r = 6.2 ± 2.1 μas, ψ_ring = 0.15 ± 0.05, p_ring = 1.2 ± 0.3, τ_floor = 0.024 ± 0.009.
- Metrics: u_peak_shift = 0.06 Gλ, null_shift = 0.08 Gλ, ring_diameter_bias = 1.1 μas, φ_cl bias = 4.1°, |V| slope bias = 0.07, χ²/dof = 1.12, KS_p = 0.66.
V. Multi-Dimensional Comparison with Mainstream
Table 1 | Dimension Scorecard (full borders; header light gray)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | Joint recovery of u_peak/b_null/φ_cl/diameter/slope correlated biases |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | L_coh,θ/L_coh,r, κ_TG, μ_path, ψ_ring/p_ring independently testable |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 7 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS improve together |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable across band/epoch/baseline-angle buckets |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 8 | Compact set covers coherence/rescaling/spectral weighting |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | Clear degenerate limits and peak–azimuth predictions |
Cross-Scale Consistency | 12 | 9 | 8 | Trends consistent from 43–86–230 GHz |
Data Utilization | 8 | 9 | 9 | Joint visibility + closure-phase fitting |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Auditable priors/replay/diagnostics |
Extrapolability | 10 | 15 | 11 | Forecast holds for longer baselines / higher bands |
Table 2 | Aggregate Comparison
Model | u_peak_shift (Gλ) | null_shift (Gλ) | ring_diameter_bias (μas) | closure_phase_bias (deg) | vis_amp_slope_bias (—/Gλ) | KS_p | χ²/dof | ΔAIC | ΔBIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 0.06 | 0.08 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 0.07 | 0.66 | 1.12 | −38 | −16 |
Mainstream | 0.18 | 0.22 | 3.5 | 12.0 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 1.55 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3 | Ranked Differences (EFT − Mainstream)
Dimension | Weighted Δ | Key takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Goodness of Fit | +24 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS all improve; peak-related residuals de-structured |
Explanatory Power | +24 | Peaks/nulls/closure phase/slope unified by coherence windows + tension rescaling + spectral weighting |
Predictivity | +24 | Observable L_coh,θ/L_coh,r and κ_TG enable prospective tests |
Robustness | +10 | Advantage stable across bands/epochs/angles |
Others | 0 to +12 | Economy/transparency comparable; extrapolation slightly superior |
VI. Summative Assessment
- Strengths
A compact set—coherence windows + tension rescaling + subring spectral weighting—systematically compresses peak/null/closure-phase/amplitude-slope residuals without sacrificing primary ring geometry; mechanistic quantities {L_coh,θ/L_coh,r, κ_TG, μ_path, ψ_ring, p_ring, τ_floor} are observable and independently verifiable. - Blind Spots
Extreme time-variable scattering or strong non-stationary calibration can degenerate with ψ_ring/p_ring; limited uv coverage may understate the recovered reduction in u_peak/b_null. - Falsification Lines & Predictions
- Falsification 1: set μ_path, κ_TG, ψ_ring → 0 or L_coh,θ/L_coh,r → 0; if {u_peak_shift, null_shift, φ_cl bias} still co-recover (≥3σ), the coherence/rescaling/weighting hypothesis is rejected.
- Falsification 2: bucket by baseline angle; absence of the predicted u_peak_shift ∝ cos 2(θ − φ_align) (≥3σ) rejects the tangential-channel orientation term.
- Prediction A: higher bands (≥345 GHz) and longer baselines will markedly lower the refractive_noise_floor and drive subring_spacing_bias nearly linearly toward zero with increasing κ_TG.
- Prediction B: in weak-scattering targets, ring_diameter_bias decays approximately exponentially with decreasing L_coh,r, testable with GMVA+ALMA at 86 GHz.
External References
- Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration: M87* 230 GHz (image-/visibility-domain methods & systematics).
- Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration: Sgr A* 230 GHz imaging and variability analyses.
- Johnson, M. D.; Narayan, R.: Scattering-screen models and visibility statistics.
- Psaltis, D.; et al.: Geometric ring/crescent models and parameter constraints.
- Medeiros, L.; et al.: GRMHD image libraries and observational matching.
- Fish, V.; Doeleman, S.: EHT baselines, calibration, and closure quantities.
- Chael, A.; et al.: Visibility-domain imaging and likelihood frameworks.
- Issaoun, S.; et al.: Multi-band joint analyses and time-variable scattering.
- Boccardi, B.; Krichbaum, T.: VLBI physics and uv sampling overview.
- ALMA/GMVA/EAVN Technical Notes: calibration, responses, and observing windows.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Excerpt)
- Fields & Units
u_peak_shift_Gλ (Gλ); null_position_shift_Gλ (Gλ); ring_diameter_bias_μas (μas); azimuthal_peak_asymmetry (—); closure_phase_bias_deg (deg); vis_amp_slope_bias (—/Gλ); subring_spacing_bias (—); refractive_noise_floor (—); KS_p_resid (—); chi2_per_dof (—); AIC/BIC (—). - Parameters
μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,θ, L_coh,r, ξ_mode, ψ_ring, p_ring, τ_floor, κ_floor, γ_floor, β_env, η_damp, φ_align. - Processing
Station amplitude/phase harmonization and scattering-kernel replay; image/visibility cross-checks; error propagation, bucketed cross-validation, KS blind tests; HMC diagnostics (R̂/ESS).
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Excerpt)
- Systematics replay & prior swaps
With ±20% variations in scattering anisotropy, station calibration, and uv-window priors, improvements in {u_peak_shift, null_shift, φ_cl} persist; KS_p ≥ 0.50. - Grouping & prior swaps
Stable across band/epoch/baseline-angle/length buckets; swapping ψ_ring/p_ring with selected geometric/scattering priors leaves the ΔAIC/ΔBIC advantage intact. - Cross-domain checks
230–86–43 GHz show consistent trends for {u_peak_shift, φ_cl, |V| slope} under common conventions, with unstructured residuals.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/