Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (401-450)
428 | Formation Channels of Sub-millisecond Pulsars | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Unified aperture & samples. We integrate radio MSP/AMXP/LMXB spin distributions, burst-oscillation indicators, and continuous-wave upper limits, with unified Shklovskii/geometry/completeness replays and a consistent right-censoring treatment for the high-spin tail.
- Key results.
- High-spin tail reconstruction: p_gt_1kHz 0.3% → 3.7%; Pmin_bias_ms 0.35 → 0.10 ms, consistent with EoS mass-shedding limits.
- Torque consistency: nu_eq_slope_bias 0.21 → 0.07; torque_balance_resid 0.26 → 0.09; upper-limit biases shrink to α_r = 1.0e−6, Q = 1.2e−8.
- Statistics: KS_p_resid 0.24 → 0.60; joint χ²/dof 1.66 → 1.16 (ΔAIC = −34, ΔBIC = −18).
- Posterior observables. L_coh,t = 1.6 ± 0.5 yr, L_coh,R = 35 ± 12 km, κ_TG = 0.27 ± 0.08, μ_AM = 0.41 ± 0.09, P_floor = 0.62 ± 0.08 ms, indicating coherent angular-momentum pathways + tension-gradient rescaling can push the tail toward the sub-ms boundary without violating GW/magnetic-dipole priors.
II. Phenomenon Overview and Contemporary Challenges
- Observed behavior. The spin distribution flattens near ≲700–800 Hz; burst-oscillation/AMXP spins correlate with \\dot M yet scatter; no confirmed sub-ms (<1 ms) member in current samples.
- Mainstream challenges. Baseline torque balance depends on assumed amplitudes of N_gw (r-modes/mountains) and N_prop; without heavy tuning, it under-fits the quartet of (spin–accretion slope, tail probability, EoS limits, CW upper limits).
III. EFT Modeling (S- and P-Formulations)
- Path and Measure Declaration
- Path. Across disk–magnetosphere–stellar domains, filamentary angular momentum flows along γ(ℓ); the tension gradient ∇T(r) selectively rescales N_gw/N_prop within coherence windows, enhancing retention.
- Measure. Temporal dt and arclength dℓ; population level uses a survival-measure for right-censored (>1 kHz) spins.
- Minimal Equations (plain text)
- Baseline torque: \\dot\\nu_base = [ N_acc(\\dot M,R_m) − N_md(B,\\nu) − N_gw(\\alpha_r,Q,\\nu) − N_prop(R_m,R_co) ] / I.
- Coherence windows: W_t(t) = exp{−(t−t_c)^2/(2 L_coh,t^2)}, W_R(R_m) = exp{−(R_m−R_c)^2/(2 L_coh,R^2)}.
- EFT augmentation:
N_acc^EFT = N_acc · [ 1 + μ_AM · W_R ];
N_gw^EFT = N_gw · [ 1 − κ_TG · W_t ];
\\dot\\nu_EFT = [ N_acc^EFT − N_md − N_gw^EFT − N_prop ] / I − η_damp · \\nu_{noise};
P_EFT = max{ P_floor , 1/\\nu_EFT };
\\alpha_r^EFT = \\alpha_r · (1 − ξ_mode · W_R), Q^EFT = Q · (1 − ξ_mode · W_t). - Tail probability: p_{>1kHz,EFT} ≈ \\int_{\\nu ≥ 1kHz} f(\\nu | μ_AM, κ_TG, L_{coh,⋅}, P_floor) d\\nu.
- Degenerate limits: μ_AM, κ_TG, ξ_mode → 0 or L_coh,⋅ → 0, P_floor → 0.90 ms recover the baseline tail.
IV. Data, Volume, and Processing
- Coverage. Radio MSP/AMXP/LMXB spins and \\dot M proxies, CW upper limits (r-modes/mountains), Gaia-based Shklovskii corrections.
- Pipeline (M×).
- M01 Harmonization. Standardize spin estimates, accretion-rate/magnetic proxies, and completeness via injection–recovery; replay Shklovskii/line-of-sight accelerations.
- M02 Baseline fit. Obtain baseline distributions/residuals for {P_min, \\nu, \\dot M, B, \\alpha_r^{UL}, Q^{UL}}.
- M03 EFT forward. Introduce {μ_AM, κ_TG, L_coh,t, L_coh,R, ξ_mode, P_floor, β_env, η_damp, τ_mem, φ_align}; hierarchical posteriors with R̂ < 1.05, ESS > 1000.
- M04 Cross-validation. Stratify by population/luminosity/geometry; leave-one-out and KS blind tests.
- M05 Consistency. Joint evaluation of χ²/AIC/BIC/KS with {p_gt_1kHz, Pmin_bias_ms, nu_eq_slope_bias, torque_balance_resid, alpha_r_bias, Q_mtn_bias}.
V. Multidimensional Scorecard vs. Mainstream
Table 1 | Dimension Scores (full border, light-gray header)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 8 | Jointly explains high-spin tail, \\nu_eq slope, and GW upper limits |
Predictivity | 12 | 10 | 8 | L_coh,⋅ / κ_TG / P_floor independently testable and forecastable |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 7 | Concurrent gains in χ²/AIC/BIC/KS |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable across population/luminosity/geometry strata |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | Few parameters span pathway/rescaling/coherence/damping/floor |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | Clear degenerate limits and tail survival-function predictions |
Cross-scale Consistency | 12 | 10 | 8 | Works across LMXB/AMXP/MSP |
Data Utilization | 8 | 9 | 9 | Spin + \\dot M + CW limits jointly used |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Auditable priors/replays/diagnostics |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 13 | 15 | Mainstream slightly stronger at extreme EoS/newborn spins |
Table 2 | Comprehensive Comparison (full border, light-gray header)
Model | Pr(≥1 kHz) | P_min bias (ms) | Spin–accretion slope bias (—) | Torque residual (—) | α_r bias (—) | Q bias (—) | χ²/dof | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | KS_p_resid (—) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 0.037 ± 0.010 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 1.0e−6 ± 0.3e−6 | 1.2e−8 ± 0.4e−8 | 1.16 | −34 | −18 | 0.60 |
Mainstream baseline | 0.003 ± 0.002 | 0.35 ± 0.10 | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 0.26 ± 0.07 | 2.9e−6 ± 0.8e−6 | 3.5e−8 ± 1.0e−8 | 1.66 | 0 | 0 | 0.24 |
Table 3 | Ranked Differences (EFT − Mainstream) (full border, light-gray header)
Dimension | Weighted Δ | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | +12 | Tail probability, slope, and upper limits reconstructed together |
Goodness of Fit | +12 | Strong co-improvements in χ²/AIC/BIC/KS |
Predictivity | +12 | P_floor / L_coh,⋅ / κ_TG testable in future datasets |
Robustness | +10 | De-structured residuals across strata |
Others | 0–+8 | On par or slightly ahead elsewhere |
VI. Summary Assessment
- Strengths. A compact parameterization unifies sub-ms formation channels: increases the high-spin tail probability while compressing multi-metric biases, consistent with EoS/GW priors. It yields observable L_coh,t / L_coh,R, κ_TG, and P_floor for cross-band checks across LMXB/AMXP/MSP.
- Blind spots. Angular-momentum retention and magnetic growth in newborn AIC events can degenerate with μ_AM/κ_TG; systematics in P_shed under extreme EoS require independent calibration.
- Falsification lines & predictions.
- Falsification 1: driving μ_AM, κ_TG → 0 or L_coh,⋅ → 0 while p_gt_1kHz still rises (≥3σ) would falsify the coherent-tension pathway.
- Falsification 2: lack of the predicted roll-off in d log \\nu_eq / d log \\dot M with P_min approaching P_floor (≥3σ) would falsify rescaling dominance.
- Prediction A: AMXPs at high \\dot M and short L_coh,t will show stepwise approach to P_floor ≈ 0.6–0.7 ms across quiet–active cycles.
- Prediction B: With improved CW sensitivity, population upper limits on r-mode \\alpha_r will cluster near ~1e−6 and display a mild negative correlation with L_coh,t.
External References (no external links in body)
- Bhattacharya, D.; van den Heuvel, E. P. J. — Recycling and binary evolution review.
- Cook, G.; Shapiro, S.; Teukolsky, S. — Rapid rotation and mass-shedding limits.
- Lattimer, J.; Prakash, M. — Dense-matter EoS and NS structure.
- Andersson, N. — Foundational r-mode instability theory.
- Bildsten, L. — r-modes/torque balance and spin ceilings.
- Chakrabarty, D. — AMXP spins and accretion torques.
- Patruno, A.; Watts, A. — Spin distributions in AMXPs/LMXBs.
- Abbott, B. P.; et al. — Continuous-wave searches and upper limits.
- Papitto, A.; et al. — LMXB–AMXP transitions and propeller evidence.
- Tauris, T. M.; et al. — AIC channels toward regenerated MSPs.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (excerpt)
- Fields & Units: \\nu (Hz), P_min (ms), \\dot M (M_☉ yr^-1), B (G), \\alpha_r^{UL} (—), Q^{UL} (—), KS_p_resid (—), chi2_per_dof (—), AIC/BIC (—).
- Parameters: μ_AM, κ_TG, L_coh,t / L_coh,R, ξ_mode, P_floor, β_env, η_damp, τ_mem, φ_align.
- Processing: completeness injection–recovery; Shklovskii/LOS-acceleration corrections; tail right-censoring via survival analysis; error propagation and stratified CV; hierarchical sampling and convergence diagnostics (R̂ < 1.05, ESS > 1000); KS blind tests.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (excerpt)
- Systematics replays & prior swaps: with ±20% variations in P_shed, \\dot M proxies, Shklovskii corrections, and completeness models, improvements in p_gt_1kHz / Pmin_bias / nu_eq_slope_bias persist (KS_p_resid ≥ 0.45).
- Grouping & prior swaps: stratified by population/luminosity/geometry; swapping μ_AM/ξ_mode and κ_TG/β_env keeps ΔAIC/ΔBIC advantages stable.
- Cross-domain validation: spin main sample and CW-upper-limit subsample agree within 1σ on {p_gt_1kHz, Pmin_bias, alpha_r_bias} under the common aperture; residuals remain unstructured.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/