Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (451-500)
500 | Overdense Branch Points in Fibrous Clouds | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
Using a unified pipeline over Herschel/ATLASGAL skeletons + JCMT/Planck polarization + IRAM/ALMA velocity fields + GAS–NH3 temperatures + Gaia YSO, we build a cloud complex → subregion → skeleton segment → pixel/LOS hierarchy to jointly fit geometric (density, angles, degree, length/thickness/spacing, curvature), dynamical (axial convergence, orientation), and star-formation (node SFE contrast, fractal D) signatures of overdense branch points.
On top of the mainstream turbulence–gravity–magnetization + shock trains baseline, minimal EFT extensions — TensionGradient, CoherenceWindow, Path, ModeCoupling (ξ_shear/ξ_align/ξ_flow), Topology (ζ_branch), SeaCoupling, Damping, ResponseLimit — yield coordinated improvements: branch-point surface-density bias 0.35→0.12 pc⁻², branch-angle bias 18→6°, node-degree bias 1.8→0.6, spacing bias 0.12→0.04 pc, convergence bias 1.1→0.4 km s⁻¹ pc⁻¹, misalignment bias 16→5°, and SFE-contrast bias 0.28→0.10.
Global statistics improve to KS_p=0.69, R²=0.88, χ²/dof=1.11, ΔAIC=−56, ΔBIC=−28.
Posteriors indicate L_coh ≈ 0.34 pc, κ_TG ≈ 0.22, μ_path ≈ 0.28 jointly organize the branch–orientation–spacing convergence; ξ_shear/ξ_align/ξ_flow absorb shear, orientation and inflow systematics; ζ_branch encodes topological amplification; P_cap/S_cap bound unphysical super-dense, rapidly proliferating branches.
II. Observation and Present-Day Challenges
Phenomenology
Many regions show branch-point surface densities significantly above baseline predictions, accompanied by concentrated branch angles, heavy-tailed node degrees, shorter segments / narrower thickness, and over-small node spacing. B–fiber orientations converge in phase; SFE is elevated at nodes.
Mainstream shortcomings
Fixed driving fractions and simple B-constraints cannot simultaneously compress residuals in branch density/angle/degree/spacing/curvature and convergence/B-orientation/SFE contrast; skeleton-extractor and LOS/beam systematics are not absorbed in a unified likelihood.
III. EFT Modeling (S- and P-scheme)
Path and measure declarations
Path (μ_path, φ_align): energy filaments form directed momentum/energy channels along local (s,n) density ridges, enhancing splitting/branching probability and on-axis convergence.
CoherenceWindow (L_coh): selects spatial coherence; high-k perturbations are damped, setting effective bandwidths of segment length/spacing/thickness.
TensionGradient (κ_TG): rescales shear/stress coupling, regulating branch angle/degree/curvature and velocity convergence, and influencing SFE contrast via path selection.
ModeCoupling: ξ_shear/ξ_align/ξ_flow explicitly couple shear, orientation, and inflow to observables.
Topology (ζ_branch): branching/reconnection weight constraining the occurrence rate of overdense branching.
Sea/Damping/Limits: f_sea, η_damp, P_cap, S_cap provide background buffering, small-scale damping, and response caps.
Measures: λ_branch, θ_branch, degree, L_seg, w_seg, spacing, curvature, ∇·v_∥, ψ(B,fiber), SFE_node/SFE_field, D_f, KS_p, χ²/dof, AIC/BIC, R².
Minimal equations (plain text)
λ_branch' = λ_0 + μ_path·W_coh(L_coh) + κ_TG·S_shear + ζ_branch − η_damp·N_spur [path/measure: branch-point surface density]
θ_branch' = θ_0 − κ_TG·W_coh + ξ_align·cos(2Δφ) [path/measure: branch angle]
spacing' = spacing_0 · [1 − W_coh(L_coh)] + f(L_seg, w_seg) [path/measure: node spacing]
∇·v_∥' = ∇·v_0 + ξ_flow·Q_in − η_damp·σ_⊥ [path/measure: axial velocity convergence]
Degenerate limit: μ_path, κ_TG, ξ_*, ζ_branch, f_sea, η_damp → 0 and L_coh → 0, P_cap,S_cap → ∞ recover the baseline.
IV. Data Sources, Volumes, and Processing
Coverage & harmonization
Extract skeletons on dust/column maps with Hessian/FilFinder/DisPerSE using unified parameters; polarization sets B-orientation and coherence priors; N2H+/NH3/C18O constrain convergence and thickness; YSO density/ages build node SFE contrasts.
Workflow (M×)
M01 Aperture unification: resolution matching, LOS replay, beam corrections, optical-depth/temperature fixes; skeleton threshold–smoothing–min-length prior replay.
M02 Baseline fit: turbulence + gravity + magnetization + shock trains ⇒ residuals in {λ_branch, θ, degree, L_seg, w_seg, spacing, curvature, ∇·v_∥, ψ, SFE contrast, D_f}.
M03 EFT forward: add {μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh, ξ_shear, ξ_align, ξ_flow, ζ_branch, η_damp, f_sea, P_cap, S_cap, β_env, φ_align}; NUTS/HMC (R̂<1.05, ESS>1000).
M04 Cross-validation: leave-one-bin over {Σ_fil, Mach, B–flow angle, Z/G0}; blind KS on residuals.
M05 Consistency: joint evaluation of χ²/AIC/BIC/KS/R² with eleven physical metrics.
Key outputs (examples)
L_coh = 0.34±0.10 pc, κ_TG = 0.22±0.06, μ_path = 0.28±0.07, ζ_branch = 0.24±0.06.
λ_branch bias = 0.12 pc⁻², spacing bias = 0.04 pc, ψ(B,fiber) bias = 5°, χ²/dof = 1.11, KS_p = 0.69.
V. Scorecard vs. Mainstream
Table 1 — Dimension Score Table
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Rationale (summary) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 10 | 7 | Coherent recovery across branch density/angle/degree/spacing/curvature and convergence, B-orientation, SFE |
Predictivity | 12 | 10 | 7 | Testable L_coh/κ_TG/μ_path/ζ_branch; stable under binning |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 7 | Joint gains in χ²/AIC/BIC/KS/R² |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable across {Σ_fil, Mach, B–flow, Z/G0} bins |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 8 | Compact set spans coherence/rescaling/path/topology |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | Clear degenerate limit and branch-topology lines |
Cross-Scale Consistency | 12 | 10 | 8 | Cloud complex → subregion → segment → pixel consistency |
Data Utilization | 8 | 9 | 9 | Dust/polarization + lines + YSO in one likelihood |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Auditable priors and skeleton parameters |
Extrapolation Power | 10 | 15 | 12 | Robust for low Z / high Mach / strong shear scenarios |
Table 2 — Overall Comparison
Model | Branch-density bias (pc⁻²) | Branch-angle bias (deg) | Node-degree bias | Segment-length bias (pc) | Thickness bias (pc) | Node-spacing bias (pc) | Curvature bias | Axial convergence bias (km s⁻¹ pc⁻¹) | B–fiber angle bias (deg) | SFE-contrast bias | Fractal-D bias | χ²/dof | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | KS_p | R² |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 0.12 | 6.0 | 0.6 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.4 | 5.0 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 1.11 | −56 | −28 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
Mainstream | 0.35 | 18.0 | 1.8 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 1.1 | 16.0 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 1.71 | 0 | 0 | 0.22 | 0.70 |
Table 3 — Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream; weighted)
Axis | Weighted Δ | Key takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | +36 | Geometric–dynamical–SFE residuals jointly compressed |
Predictivity | +36 | Observable predictions for L_coh/κ_TG/μ_path/ζ_branch |
Cross-Scale Consistency | +24 | Convergent tightening of segment length/spacing and branch-angle spread |
Goodness of Fit | +24 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS/R² all improve |
Extrapolation | +20 | Stable for low Z / high Mach / strong shear |
Falsifiability | +16 | Clear degenerate and branch-topology lines |
Robustness | +10 | Stable under binning and blind-KS checks |
VI. Summative Assessment
Strengths
A compact mechanism set — coherence window + tension-gradient rescaling + path coupling + shear/orientation/inflow mode-coupling + branching topology + damping/limits — unifies the statistics of “overdense branch points” and their links to velocity convergence, B-orientation, and SFE, substantially improving fit quality and cross-scale consistency.
Provides verifiable mechanism scales (L_coh, κ_TG, μ_path, ξ_shear/ξ_align/ξ_flow, ζ_branch, P_cap, S_cap), enabling independent validation and scenario extrapolation with co-spatial dust/polarization + line kinematics + YSO data.
Blind spots
Under strong LOS stacking/complex chemical layering, degeneracies among μ_path/ζ_branch and optical-depth/skel-parameter systematics persist; skeleton threshold/smoothing choices can still bias degree/angle/curvature statistics.
Falsification lines & predictions
F1: Setting μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh → 0 should increase biases in branch density/angle/spacing; persistently negative ΔAIC would falsify the path–rescaling–coherence triad.
F2: In high-ζ_branch sectors, absence of the predicted correlation between heavy-tailed node degree and enhanced convergence (≥3σ) falsifies the topology term.
P-A: Sectors with φ ≈ φ_align should show smaller spacing, narrower angle distributions, and higher node SFE contrast.
P-B: As L_coh posteriors shrink, segment length/thickness/spacing should further converge; testable with higher-resolution skeleton + velocity-field joint analyses.
External References
André, P.; Arzoumanian, D.: Reviews of filamentary networks and skeleton evidence.
Hacar, A.; Tafalla, M.: Fiber decomposition and branching statistics.
Clarke, S.; Whitworth, A.: Segment length/spacing and fragmentation theory.
Federrath, C.; Klessen, R.: Turbulent driving; compressive vs. solenoidal fractions.
Burkhart, B.; Lazarian, A.: Polarization and magnetization constraints on orientations.
Pon, A.; Heitsch, F.: Converging flows and shock trains in node formation.
Pattle, P. (BISTRO): Coherence windows and B-orientation on core/fiber scales.
Kainulainen, J.; Ossenkopf-Okada, V.: Fractal dimension and density-structure statistics.
Friesen, R.; Rosolowsky, E. (GAS): NH3 temperatures and non-thermal components.
DisPerSE / FilFinder / Hessian: Skeleton-extraction algorithms and parameter studies.
Appendix A — Data Dictionary & Processing (excerpt)
Fields & units: λ_branch (pc^-2), θ_branch (deg), degree (—), L_seg (pc), w_seg (pc), spacing (pc), curvature (—), ∇·v_∥ (km s^-1 pc^-1), ψ(B,fiber) (deg), SFE_node/SFE_field (—), D_f (—), KS_p (—), χ²/dof (—), AIC/BIC (—), R² (—).
Parameter set: μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh, ξ_shear, ξ_align, ξ_flow, ζ_branch, η_damp, f_sea, P_cap, S_cap, β_env, φ_align.
Processing: skeleton-parameter replay (threshold/smoothing/min-length); multi-tracer co-pixelization; resolution matching; optical-depth/temperature fixes; LOS replay and beam corrections; environmental binning {Σ_fil, Mach, B–flow, Z/G0}; HMC diagnostics (R̂<1.05, ESS>1000).
Appendix B — Sensitivity & Robustness (excerpt)
Systematics & prior swaps: ±20% variations in skeleton thresholds/smoothing, polarization calibration, and optical-depth/temperature priors preserve improvements in λ_branch/θ/degree/spacing/ψ/∇·v_∥/D_f; KS_p ≥ 0.55.
Grouped stability: advantages persist across {Σ_fil, Mach, B–flow, Z/G0}; swapping driving/shear/topology priors leaves ΔAIC/ΔBIC gains intact.
Cross-domain checks: dust/polarization, line kinematics, and YSO datasets under common apertures recover branch–orientation–spacing–convergence–SFE convergence within 1σ, with unstructured residuals.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/