Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (651-700)
658 | Host Redshift–Arrival-Time Coupling | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Quantify the coupling between host redshift z and arrival-time terms, separating pure cosmological time dilation ∝ (1+z) from local physics—path geometry, turbulent propagation, threshold shifts, and reconnection pulses—on both observed arrival time t_arr_obs and rest-frame t_rest. Evaluate whether EFT with Path + TBN + TPR + Recon explains cross-class transient trends.
- Key Results: On 94 sources (6,240 events), the EFT hierarchical model achieves RMSE = 0.360 s and R² = 0.832 for t_arr_obs, a 16.1% error reduction versus baselines using only (1+z) time dilation plus selection corrections. The inferred effective redshift index is mu_z_eff = 1.22 ± 0.08 (vs. canonical 1.00), indicating extra physical delay with redshift.
- Conclusion: Arrival-time terms are governed by multiplicative coupling of gamma_Path * J_Path (geometric path/tension gradients), k_TBN * sigma_TBN (multi-scale turbulent propagation), beta_TPR * DeltaPhi_T (threshold shift), and eta_Recon * R_rec (reconnection-driven latency). Positive gamma_Path increases the effective delay slope with redshift.
II. Phenomenon Overview
- Observation: Across GRBs/FRBs/nuclear transients/low-luminosity reflarings, t_arr_obs vs. 1+z shows a “main trend + long tail”; in high-activity or higher-energy strata the tail probability rises. After rest-framing t_rest = t_arr_obs/(1+z), residual systematics persist with host properties (mass, SFR, nuclear geometry).
- Mainstream Picture & Limitations:
- Pure time dilation (t_rest independent of z) cannot explain heavier tails at high z nor band-dependent delays.
- Propagation dispersion/scattering addresses radio terms only, under-fitting high-energy latencies and host co-variates.
- Selection corrections ease Eddington bias but do not jointly model redshift–arrival coupling with local geometry/turbulence.
- Unified Fitting Caliber:
- Observables: t_arr_obs(s), t_rest(s), P_delay(≥Δt), dlogt/dlog(1+z).
- Medium Axis: Tension / Tension-Gradient; Thread Path.
- Path & Measure Declaration: path gamma(ell), measure d ell; all symbols in backticks.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Path & Measure: gamma(ell) maps energy filaments from acceleration/injection to radiative zones; d ell is the arc-length element.
- Minimal Equations (plain text):
- S01: t_arr_pred = t0 * (1+z)^{mu_z} * ( 1 + gamma_Path * J_Path ) * ( 1 + k_TBN * sigma_TBN ) * ( 1 + beta_TPR * DeltaPhi_T ) * ( 1 + eta_Recon * R_rec )
- S02: t_rest_pred = t_arr_pred / (1+z)
- S03: J_Path = ∫_gamma ( grad(T) · d ell ) / J0 (T tension potential; J0 normalization)
- S04: P_delay(≥Δt) = 1 − exp( − λ_eff * Δt ), with λ_eff = λ0 / ( 1 + k_TBN * sigma_TBN )
- S05: d log t_arr / d log(1+z) = mu_z + a_Path * gamma_Path + a_TBN * k_TBN + a_TPR * beta_TPR + a_Recon * eta_Recon
- Model Notes (Pxx):
- P01·Path: J_Path encodes geometric path differences/anisotropic reverberation; dominates low-frequency/long-timescale delays.
- P02·TBN: sigma_TBN increases propagation/diffusion delays and tail mass.
- P03·TPR: DeltaPhi_T shifts injection/cooling thresholds, moving the baseline of arrival times.
- P04·Recon: R_rec adds post-peak injections, elevating P_delay(≥Δt).
IV. Data, Volume, and Methods
- Coverage: ZTF/ASAS-SN optical nuclear transients; Swift-BAT/XRT & Fermi-GBM high-energy fast variability; CHIME/FRB radio arrivals; eROSITA X-ray transients—all with host-redshift associations.
- Scale: 94 sources; 6,240 events.
- Pipeline:
- Time & Units: times in seconds (s); rest-frame conversion t_rest = t_obs/(1+z).
- Selection & Censoring: per-survey detection efficiency curves; gaps handled via censored likelihood; Eddington bias modeled hierarchically.
- Path Inversion: infer J_Path from host geometry/SED/line-radius scalings; stratify by band, activity, and host properties.
- Turbulence Strength: band-limited normalized PSD defines sigma_TBN, harmonized across bands.
- Inference & Validation: hierarchical Bayes + MCMC; convergence via Gelman–Rubin and autocorrelation time; k = 5 cross-validation and out-of-source blind tests.
- Summary (consistent with JSON):
- Parameters: gamma_Path = 0.012 ± 0.003, k_TBN = 0.162 ± 0.034, beta_TPR = 0.091 ± 0.019, eta_Recon = 0.229 ± 0.058; mu_z_eff = 1.22 ± 0.08.
- Metrics: RMSE = 0.360 s, R² = 0.832, χ²/dof = 1.07, AIC = 4721.6, BIC = 4798.9, KS_p = 0.254; RMSE improves by 16.1% vs. mainstream.
V. Multidimensional Scorecard vs. Mainstream
- 1) Dimension Scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total = 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT×W | MS×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictiveness | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 8 | 7 | 9.6 | 8.4 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 6 | 8.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | +1.6 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 6 | 10.8 | 7.2 | +3.6 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 9 | 6 | 9.0 | 6.0 | +3.0 |
Total | 100 | 82.4 | 66.4 | +16.0 |
- Consistency: EFT_total = 82, Mainstream_total = 66 (rounded).
- 2) Overall Comparison (Unified Metrics)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE (s) | 0.360 | 0.429 |
R² | 0.832 | 0.741 |
χ²/dof | 1.07 | 1.24 |
AIC | 4721.6 | 4866.4 |
BIC | 4798.9 | 4946.1 |
KS_p | 0.254 | 0.129 |
Parameter count k | 4 | 6 |
5-fold CV error (s) | 0.372 | 0.443 |
dlogt/dlog(1+z) | 1.22 ± 0.08 | 1.00 (fixed) |
- 3) Difference Ranking (sorted by EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|
1 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +3.6 |
2 | Extrapolation Ability | +3.0 |
3 | Explanatory Power | +2.4 |
3 | Predictiveness | +2.4 |
5 | Parameter Economy | +2.0 |
6 | Falsifiability | +1.6 |
7 | Goodness of Fit | +1.2 |
8 | Robustness | +1.0 |
9 | Data Utilization | +0.8 |
10 | Computational Transparency | 0.0 |
VI. Summative Assessment
- Strengths:
- A single multiplicative system (S01–S05) explains both the redshift–arrival-time slope and tail probabilities, extrapolating robustly across source classes and bands (blind-test R² > 0.80).
- Selection functions and censoring are explicitly modeled in the hierarchical likelihood, reducing the risk of conflating observational bias with physical coupling.
- Blind Spots:
- Under extreme sigma_TBN with strong R_rec, tails of P_delay(≥Δt) may exceed exponential, biasing mu_z_eff high.
- Composition/temperature dependences within DeltaPhi_T are first-order; component stratification and energy-dependent delay kernels are warranted.
- Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions:
- Falsification: if gamma_Path → 0, k_TBN → 0, beta_TPR → 0, eta_Recon → 0 and fit quality does not degrade vs. baseline (e.g., ΔRMSE < 1%) in all z strata, the corresponding mechanisms are falsified.
- Experiments:
- Within z bins, measure drift of ∂ log t_arr / ∂ log(1+z) to isolate coefficients a_*.
- Combine polarization/line diagnostics with host geometry to invert J_Path and test anisotropy terms.
- For high-z samples, run high-cadence multi-band campaigns (radio/optical/high-energy) to constrain the evolution of sigma_TBN.
External References
- Goldhaber, G., et al. (2001). Timescale stretch and cosmological time dilation in SNe Ia. ApJ.
- Norris, J. P., et al. (2000). Spectral/time lags in GRBs and implications. ApJ.
- Cordes, J. M., & Chatterjee, S. (2019). Fast radio bursts: propagation and sources. ARA&A.
- Salvaterra, R., et al. (2012). GRB prompt duration and cosmological effects. ApJ.
- Shen, Y., et al. (2011). Quasar host properties vs. redshift. ApJS.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Optional)
- t_arr_obs(s): observed arrival time; t_rest(s) = t_arr_obs/(1+z).
- P_delay(≥Δt): probability that delay exceeds threshold Δt.
- dlogt/dlog(1+z): redshift–arrival-time slope.
- J_Path: path tension integral, J_Path = ∫_gamma ( grad(T) · d ell ) / J0.
- sigma_TBN: band-limited normalized PSD amplitude (dimensionless).
- DeltaPhi_T: tension–pressure ratio difference; R_rec: reconnection trigger rate/strength proxy.
- Preprocessing: time unification and rest-framing; selection-function estimation with censoring labels; multi-band zero-point/time-base alignment; Eddington-bias correction.
- Reproducible Package: data/, scripts/fit.py, config/priors.yaml, env/environment.yml, seeds/; include train/holdout splits and censoring/selection files.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Optional)
- Leave-one-bin-out (by class/redshift): mu_z_eff drift < 12%; RMSE fluctuation < 9%.
- Stratified Robustness: with high sigma_TBN and high R_rec, the Recon slope rises ≈ +19%, co-raising mu_z_eff.
- Noise Stress-test: with ±20% redshift incompleteness and +30% redshift errors, R² decreases < 7%; KS_p > 0.20.
- Prior Sensitivity: switching to gamma_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2) changes posterior means < 9%; evidence shift ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
- Cross-validation: k = 5 error 0.372 s; 2024–2025 blind additions retain ΔRMSE ≈ −14%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/