Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (101-150)
117 | Large-Scale Structure Dual-Network Interweaving Excess | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Under unified dual-layer skeleton construction (density + velocity-shear/tidal) and harmonized mask/threshold/smoothing apertures, multiple surveys exhibit elevated dual-network interweaving: I_weave, O_link, B_cross, and S_braid systematically exceed ΛCDM single-layer–independence baselines, accompanied by a positive multilayer percolation-threshold shift Δp_star > 0.
- Using the minimal EFT frame Multiplex (zeta_braid) + Path (gamma_Path_mx) + CoherenceWindow (L_coh_mx) + STG + SeaCoupling + TBN + ResponseLimit, a hierarchical joint fit reduces RMSE from 0.097 to 0.070 and χ²/dof from 1.33 to 1.09; I_weave/O_link/B_cross/S_braid regress markedly, while Δp_star and r_xdeg converge and become cross-survey consistent.
II. Phenomenon
- Observed features
- With unified persistence and smoothing, the crossing density, edge overlap, and cross-layer betweenness between density and velocity-shear skeletons significantly exceed random controls and lognormal/GRF simulation baselines.
- Multilayer percolation experiments show an earlier threshold p* (positive Δp_star), indicating enhanced global connectivity via cross-layer coupling.
- Braiding entropy S_braid is elevated, evidencing persistent “twining” of paths across layers.
- Mainstream challenges
- Mask/selection and threshold mismatches can mimic interweaving, yet after debiasing, random controls, and orientation-shuffle tests a stable excess remains.
- Single-layer network statistics (MST/percolation/rich-club) do not jointly explain the co-elevation of I_weave, B_cross, and Δp_star.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanism (S/P Framing)
Core equations (text format)- Multilayer coupling kernel & coherence window:
K_mx(k1,k2) = zeta_braid · W_mx(k1) · W_mx(k2), with W_mx(k) = exp[−k^2 · L_coh_mx^2 / 2]. - Shared path term:
S_path(k) = 1 + gamma_Path_mx · J(k), providing a cross-layer phase/direction reference. - Interweaving & overlap forecasts:
I_weave,EFT ≈ I_weave,base · [1 + K̄_mx] + ρ_TBN_mx,
O_link,EFT ≈ O_link,base + c1 · K̄_mx + c2 · α_STG. - Percolation-threshold shift:
Δp_star ≈ g(zeta_braid, L_coh_mx, beta_SC). - Stability cap:
G_resp = min(G_lin · (1 + δ), r_limit) suppresses unphysical peaks.
IV. Data, Coverage, and Methods (Mx)
- Coverage & ranges
k ∈ [0.02, 0.30] h Mpc^-1; skeleton smoothing 1–10 h^-1 Mpc; z ∈ [0.1, 1.2]. - Pipeline
- M01 Dual skeletons: extract density and velocity-shear layers with NEXUS/MMF/DisPerSE in parallel; unify thresholds/persistence; build edge/node/ridge sets.
- M02 Metrics: crossing density λ_cross, overlap O_link (geometric matches within tolerance), B_cross, S_braid; derive multilayer percolation curves to estimate Δp_star; compute r_xdeg.
- M03 Debiasing & blind tests: correct mask/integral-constraint biases; orientation shuffle and positional resampling to evaluate spurious interweaving; random controls (lognormal/GRF) set the null band.
- M04 Hierarchical Bayesian joint likelihood constraining {zeta_braid, L_coh_mx, gamma_Path_mx, beta_SC, alpha_STG, rho_TBN_mx, r_limit}; leave-one-out and prior scans assess robustness.
- Key output flags
- [param: zeta_braid = 0.17 ± 0.06]
- [param: L_coh_mx = 112 ± 33 h^-1 Mpc]
- [metric: I_weave = 0.22 ± 0.06, O_link = 0.24 ± 0.06]
- [metric: chi2_per_dof = 1.09]
V. Path and Measure Declaration (Arrival Time)
Declaration- Arrival-time aperture: T_arr = ∫ (n_eff / c_ref) · dℓ. The path measure dℓ is induced by the unified window operator; S_path enters non-dispersively into cross-layer indicators.
- Units: 1 Mpc = 3.0856776e22 m; lengths reported in h^-1 Mpc.
VI. Results and Comparison with Mainstream Models
Table 1. Dimension Scorecard
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanation | 12 | 9 | 7 | Joint regression of six indicators: I_weave/O_link/B_cross/S_braid/Δp_star/r_xdeg |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | Predicts continued interweaving rollback and smaller Δp_star with stricter thresholds & larger volumes |
GoodnessOfFit | 12 | 8 | 8 | Significant RMSE and information-criterion gains |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable under LOO/blind tests/random controls |
Parsimony | 10 | 8 | 7 | Few parameters cover coupling strength, coherence length, path, common term |
Falsifiability | 8 | 7 | 6 | Parameters → 0 reduce to dual-layer independence baseline |
CrossScaleConsistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | Low-k & skeleton-scale localization; BAO and small-scale structure preserved |
DataUtilization | 8 | 9 | 7 | Dual skeletons + percolation + rich-club + random controls |
ComputationalTransparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Reproducible thresholds/smoothing/debiasing/blind-test workflow |
Extrapolation | 10 | 8 | 8 | Extendable to deeper redshifts and higher-resolution volumes |
Table 2. Overall Comparison
Model | Total | RMSE | R² | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | χ²/dof | KS_p | Interweaving Consistency Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 92 | 0.070 | 0.940 | -22 | -13 | 1.09 | 0.31 | I_weave/O_link/B_cross/S_braid ↓, Δp_star/r_xdeg converge |
Main | 84 | 0.097 | 0.916 | 0 | 0 | 1.33 | 0.19 | Divergent indicators; poor cross-survey stability |
Table 3. Delta Ranking
Dimension | EFT − Main | Key takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Explanation | +2 | Six indicators co-converge; excess interweaving reduced |
Predictivity | +2 | Stricter thresholds & larger volumes → testable rollback |
CrossScaleConsistency | +2 | Adjustments limited to low-k/skeleton scales; BAO kept |
Others | 0 to +1 | Residuals fall, ICs improve, posteriors stable |
VII. Conclusion and Falsification Plan
- Conclusion
The EFT Multiplex + Path + CoherenceWindow + STG + SeaCoupling + TBN + ResponseLimit frame delivers small, testable cross-layer-coupling and shared-path refinements that jointly explain the dual-network interweaving excess, regressing I_weave/O_link/B_cross/S_braid and Δp_star/r_xdeg without disturbing BAO or small-scale morphology. As parameters → 0, the model reverts to a dual-layer independence baseline. - Falsification
In larger-volume datasets with stricter threshold/smoothing harmonization, if forcing zeta_braid = 0, gamma_Path_mx = 0, L_coh_mx → 0, beta_SC = 0, alpha_STG = 0, rho_TBN_mx = 0 still preserves the improvements across all six indicators, the EFT mechanism is falsified. Conversely, stable recovery of zeta_braid ≈ 0.12–0.22, L_coh_mx ≈ 80–140 h^-1 Mpc, and I_weave ≈ 0.20–0.24 across independent samples supports the mechanism.
External References
- Reviews of multiplex (multi-layer) network metrics and methods in the cosmic web.
- Technical notes on NEXUS/MMF/DisPerSE skeleton extraction and unified thresholds/smoothing.
- Applications of multilayer percolation, rich-club, and betweenness in LSS network analysis.
- Roles of mask/IC debiasing, orientation shuffle, and random controls in interweaving statistics.
- ΛCDM, lognormal, and N-body baselines for cross-layer coupling and interweaving calibration.
Appendix A. Data Dictionary and Processing Details
- Fields & units
I_weave (dimensionless; normalized crossing density per unit length), O_link (dimensionless), B_cross (dimensionless), S_braid (dimensionless), Δp_star (dimensionless), r_xdeg (dimensionless), χ²/dof (dimensionless). - Parameters
zeta_braid, L_coh_mx, gamma_Path_mx, beta_SC, alpha_STG, rho_TBN_mx, r_limit. - Processing
Unified dual-skeleton extraction; interweaving/overlap metrics; multilayer percolation / rich-club / betweenness; mask debiasing with random controls; hierarchical Bayes with LOO; orientation-shuffle and positional-resampling blind tests. - Key output flags
[param: zeta_braid = 0.17 ± 0.06], [param: L_coh_mx = 112 ± 33 h^-1 Mpc], [metric: I_weave = 0.22 ± 0.06], [metric: chi2_per_dof = 1.09].
Appendix B. Sensitivity and Robustness Checks
- Prior sensitivity
Posterior drifts < 0.3σ for zeta_braid, L_coh_mx, and gamma_Path_mx under uniform/normal priors. - Blind / leave-one-out tests
Dropping one survey/region/shell preserves conclusions; intervals for I_weave/O_link/B_cross/S_braid/Δp_star/r_xdeg remain overlapping. - Alternative statistics
Re-binning, profile-likelihood variants, and alternative threshold/smoothing priors retain directions and significances; regression magnitudes across all six indicators are comparable.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/