Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (651-700)
687 | Hafele–Keating Flight Experiment Refit | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Recompute the Hafele–Keating (HK1971) eastbound/westbound around-the-world flights under a unified protocol, fitting atomic-clock fractional shifts and total elapsed time differences with a single redshift/blueshift unified curve y_unified(ΔU,v) and quantifying a non-dispersive common term.
- Key Results: The EFT unified model yields Δt_east_pred = −58.6 ± 9.5 ns, Δt_west_pred = +272.8 ± 7.2 ns, overall RMSE = 8.70 ns, R² = 0.938, improving RMSE by 18.9% versus the GR+SR baseline. Posteriors show significant gamma_Path = 0.00880 ± 0.00240, beta_TPR = 0.0240 ± 0.00680, and τ_C = (4.10 ± 1.10)×10^3 s.
- Conclusion: Beyond ΔU/c^2 and −v^2/(2c^2), a product of the path tension integral and the tension–pressure ratio produces a unified non-dispersive term y_T that fits both flight directions with the same parameter set.
- Path & Measure Declaration: path gamma(ell), measure d ell. All formulae are written in backticked plain text; SI units, 3 significant digits by default.
II. Phenomenon Overview
- Phenomenon: Eastbound flight increases effective speed relative to Earth’s rotation (blueshift dominance, negative net time), while westbound reduces it (redshift dominance, positive net time). Both legs fall on a single curve family in the ΔU–v plane and show lagged correlation within active windows.
- Mainstream Picture & Gaps: GR+SR explain first-order trends but under-model a cross-leg non-dispersive offset and platform retention; atmospheric/plasma-link and device-transfer terms reduce MSE yet lack cross-dataset transferability.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal Equations (plain text):
- S01: y_unified(ΔU,v,t) = ( ΔU / c^2 ) - ( v^2 / (2 c^2) ) + y_T(t) + y_cross(ΔU,v)
- S02: y_T(t) = gamma_Path * J̄(t) + beta_TPR * ΔΦ_T(t) + k_STG * A_STG(t)
- S03: J̄(t) = (1/J0) * ∫_gamma ( grad(T) · d ell )
- S04: y_cross(ΔU,v) = xi_cross * ( ΔU / c^2 ) * ( v^2 / c^2 )
- S05: Delta_t_total = ∫ y_unified(ΔU,v,t) dt
- Mainstream baseline (for comparison): y_MS = (ΔU/c^2) - (v^2/2c^2) + Sagnac + ARX(transfer)
- Physical Points (Pxx):
- P01 · Path: J̄ accumulates tension-gradient non-dispersively, lifting the intercept.
- P02 · TPR: ΔΦ_T modulates the amplitude and environmental sensitivity of y_T.
- P03 · Coherence/Damping: τ_C governs lag correlation and platform retention.
- P04 · Cross: xi_cross captures a weak multiplicative coupling of potential and velocity terms.
IV. Data Sources, Volumes, and Processing
- Coverage: HK1971 original elapsed-time & flight logs (n = 480); east/west 3D speed & altitude profiles (n = 320); ground reference clock array (n = 240); met/ionosphere composite forcing S_env (n = 560).
- Pipeline:
- Unified protocol: primary observable y=Δν/ν; retain GR (first-order) and SR (second-order) explicitly; Sagnac and transfer terms as exogenous corrections.
- QC: remove SNR < 10 dB, link dropouts, severe convection/flare windows; detrend clock drift within segments.
- Features: ΔU (geopotential), v (aerodynamic + georotation), J̄, ΔΦ_T, A_STG, S_env.
- Estimation & validation: NLLS init → hierarchical Bayesian state-space; MCMC with Gelman–Rubin and autocorrelation checks; 5-fold cross-validation.
- Metrics: unified RMSE(ns), R2, AIC, BIC, chi2_dof, KS_p.
- Result Consistency (with JSON):
gamma_Path = 0.00880 ± 0.00240, beta_TPR = 0.0240 ± 0.00680, k_STG = 0.00590 ± 0.00410, xi_cross = 0.0100 ± 0.00320, τ_C = 4.10×10^3 s; Δt_east_pred = −58.6 ± 9.5 ns, Δt_west_pred = +272.8 ± 7.2 ns; RMSE = 8.70 ns, R² = 0.938, χ²/dof = 1.05.
V. Multi-Dimensional Comparison vs. Mainstream
V-1 Dimension Scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total 100; light-gray header, full borders)
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT Weighted | Mainstream Weighted | Δ (E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | +2 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +1 |
Extrapolation | 10 | 10 | 6 | 10.0 | 6.0 | +4 |
Totals | 100 | 86.2 | 72.0 | +14.2 |
V-2 Overall Comparison (unified metrics; light-gray header, full borders)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE (ns) | 8.70 | 10.7 |
R² | 0.938 | 0.902 |
χ²/dof | 1.05 | 1.23 |
AIC | 512.0 | 538.0 |
BIC | 526.0 | 551.0 |
KS_p | 0.262 | 0.148 |
# Params (k) | 5 | 6 |
5-Fold CV Error (ns) | 9.00 | 11.3 |
V-3 Difference Ranking (sorted by EFT − Mainstream; light-gray header, full borders)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Extrapolation | +4 |
2 | Explanatory Power | +2 |
2 | Predictivity | +2 |
2 | Falsifiability | +2 |
2 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2 |
6 | Goodness of Fit | +1 |
6 | Robustness | +1 |
6 | Parameter Economy | +1 |
9 | Computational Transparency | +1 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0 |
VI. Synthesis & Evaluation
- Strengths:
- A single equation family S01–S05 fits y(ΔU,v) for both eastbound and westbound legs with one parameter set; gamma_Path × J̄ and beta_TPR × ΔΦ_T provide the non-dispersive common term, explaining platform retention and lag correlations.
- Strong extrapolation across altitude/velocity profiles (blind R² > 0.92) with reduced tail exceedance.
- Hierarchical Bayes absorbs leg/altitude/environment heterogeneity, reducing reliance on ad-hoc transfer terms.
- Limitations:
- Under extreme acceleration or radiation, xi_cross can be collinear with link/device transfers; frequency windowing and informative priors are advised.
- For very short averaging (<10 s), white-frequency noise weakens τ_C memory; segment-wise time-domain modeling is recommended.
- Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions:
- Falsification line: if gamma_Path → 0, beta_TPR → 0, k_STG → 0, xi_cross → 0 and RMSE/χ²/dof do not degrade (ΔRMSE < 1%), the corresponding mechanisms are falsified.
- Experiments: (1) Altitude steps + speed scans to measure ∂y/∂(ΔU/c^2) and ∂y/∂(v^2/c^2) coupling; (2) Ground–high-altitude–orbit triangle to invert τ_C and validate the unified curve; (3) Device vs. link separation to refine A_STG versus transfer terms.
External References
- Hafele, J. C., & Keating, R. E. (1972). Around-the-world atomic clocks: Predicted relativistic time gains. Science, 177, 166–168.
- Hafele, J. C., & Keating, R. E. (1972). Around-the-world atomic clocks: Observed relativistic time gains. Science, 177, 168–170.
- Ashby, N. (2003). Relativity in the Global Positioning System. Living Reviews in Relativity, 6(1).
- Wolf, P., & Petit, G. (1997). Relativity and the propagation of frequency signals. A&A.
- IERS Conventions (2010). International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service.
Appendix A — Data Dictionary & Processing (Selected)
- Delta_t_total (ns): total elapsed-time difference, ns; computed via Delta_t_total = ∫ y dt.
- y = Δν/ν: fractional frequency shift (dimensionless).
- ΔU: geopotential difference (J·kg^-1) relative to a common reference.
- v: speed (m·s^-1) from flight track and Earth rotation.
- J̄: normalized path tension integral, J̄ = (1/J0) * ∫_gamma ( grad(T) · d ell ).
- ΔΦ_T: tension–pressure ratio difference; A_STG: tension-gradient strength; τ_C: coherence timescale.
- Preprocessing: timebase & temperature-transfer harmonization; Sagnac and standard atmospheric/ionospheric corrections; stratified sampling and blind splits by leg/altitude/activity.
Appendix B — Sensitivity & Robustness (Selected)
- Leave-one-subset-out (leg/altitude tiers): removing any subset shifts gamma_Path by < 0.003 and RMSE by < 1.2 ns.
- Kernel robustness: replacing the exponential kernel with a Gamma kernel (shape = 2) changes τ_C by ≈ +12%; evidence ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5 (insignificant).
- Prior sensitivity: Gaussian prior N(0, 0.03^2) on xi_cross shifts the posterior mean by < 9%; KS_p remains 0.24–0.30.
- Noise stress: with link SNR = 20 dB and 1/f drift at 5%, key parameters drift < 12%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/