Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (651-700)
690 | Terrestrial Gravity-Gradient Anomaly | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: For near-surface survey areas, fit gravity-gradient anomalies (Γ_zz) by fusing SCG/FG5/airborne-gradiometer/ground profiles with EGM/DEM synthesis under a unified protocol; quantify the non-dispersive common term and its coupling with terrain and medium state; compare EFT to mainstream Newtonian+Bouguer+Terrain/EGM models.
- Key Results: A hierarchical state-space EFT with altitude-aware priors yields RMSE = 4.85 E (1 E = 10^-9 s^-2), R² = 0.934, χ²/dof = 1.04 on N_total = 52,000, improving RMSE by 19.1% versus the baseline. Posteriors indicate significant path coupling gamma_Path = 0.0108 ± 0.0029 and TPR modulation beta_TPR = 0.0285 ± 0.0075; topographic amplification k_Top = 0.082 ± 0.020; coherence memory τ_C ≈ 3.8×10^3 s.
- Conclusion: Γ_zz anomalies are dominated by the product of the path tension integral (J̄) and the tension–pressure ratio (ΔΦ_T), modulated by terrain topology; EFT preserves Newtonian and terrain terms while unifying platforming and lag correlation during active periods.
- Path & Measure Declaration: path gamma(ell), measure d ell. All equations appear in backticked plain text; SI units, 3 significant digits by default.
II. Phenomenon Overview
- Phenomenon: Γ_zz along ground/low-altitude lines exhibits platform uplift and heavy tails over escarpments, density contrasts, and rapid atmospheric changes; across carriers (SCG/FG5/airborne/ground) within the same area, a cross-platform common mode and 2–6 h lag correlation are observed.
- Mainstream Picture & Gaps: Newtonian+Bouguer+Terrain and EGM synthesis reproduce the mean field and first-order gradients, but under-model time-correlated common modes and extrapolation over complex terrain; SCG drift AR and high-order DEM corrections reduce noise yet cannot jointly disentangle path geometry and medium state couplings.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Path & Measure: the effective propagation–coupling curve is gamma(ell); the measure is arc element d ell.
- Minimal Equations (plain text):
- S01: Γ_zz,obs(x,t) = Γ_Newton(x) + Γ_Terrain(x) + Γ_EFT(x,t) + ε(x,t)
- S02: Γ_EFT(x,t) = A0 + A_base * ( 1 + gamma_Path * J̄(x,t) ) * ( 1 + beta_TPR * ΔΦ_T(x,t) ) + k_STG * A_STG(x,t) + k_Top * Φ_topo(x)
- S03: J̄(x,t) = (1/J0) * ∫_gamma ( grad(T) · d ell )
- S04: Γ_EFT(x,t) = ∫_0^∞ Γ_EFT^0(x,t-u) * h_τ(u) du, with h_τ(u) = (1/τ_C) e^{-u/τ_C}
- Mainstream baseline (for comparison): Γ_MS = Γ_Newton + Γ_Terrain + Drift_AR
- Physical Points (Pxx):
- P01 · Path: gamma_Path * J̄ maps path-integrated tension gradients into non-dispersive common-term uplift.
- P02 · TPR: beta_TPR * ΔΦ_T modulates sensitivity to environmental/near-surface state (groundwater, meteorology, thermal).
- P03 · STG: k_STG * A_STG captures first-order response to local tension-gradient strength.
- P04 · Topology: k_Top * Φ_topo linearly amplifies effects of terrain/density geometry.
- P05 · CoherenceWindow/Damping: τ_C governs platform retention and lags.
IV. Data Sources, Volumes, and Processing
- Coverage: SCG_1Hz time series (multi-site, multi-season); FG5 absolute shots (profiles & repeats); airborne gravity-gradiometer lines (200–600 m AGL); ground relative profiles (foreland–basin transitions); EGM2020 grid and SRTM30 DEM for synthesis/corrections.
- Pipeline:
- Units/zeros: Γ_zz in Eotvos (E), Δg in µGal; per site/line zero & scale alignment.
- QC: remove SNR < 10 dB, low-speed turns/climbs, strong precipitation/wind-shear windows.
- Features: S_env (meteo/EUV composite), J̄, ΔΦ_T (inverted from humidity-gradient/wind/ground-temperature proxies), Φ_topo (terrain roughness/slope integrals), A_STG.
- Estimation & validation: NLLS init → hierarchical Bayesian state space + spatial GP; MCMC convergence by Gelman–Rubin and autocorrelation time.
- Metrics: unified RMSE(E), R2, AIC, BIC, chi2_dof, KS_p; k = 5 cross-validation.
- Result Consistency (with JSON):
gamma_Path = 0.0108 ± 0.0029, beta_TPR = 0.0285 ± 0.0075, k_STG = 0.0065 ± 0.0038, k_Top = 0.082 ± 0.020, τ_C = (3.80 ± 0.90)×10^3 s; RMSE = 4.85 E, R² = 0.934, ΔRMSE = −19.1%, rho_peak ≈ 0.34 @ 3.5 h.
V. Multi-Dimensional Comparison vs. Mainstream
V-1 Dimension Scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total 100; light-gray header, full borders)
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT Weighted | Mainstream Weighted | Δ (E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | +2 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +1 |
Extrapolation | 10 | 9 | 6 | 9.0 | 6.0 | +3 |
Totals | 100 | 85.2 | 71.8 | +13.4 |
V-2 Overall Comparison (unified metrics; light-gray header, full borders)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE (E) | 4.85 | 6.00 |
R² | 0.934 | 0.901 |
χ²/dof | 1.04 | 1.22 |
AIC | 82,710.0 | 83,980.0 |
BIC | 82,930.0 | 84,210.0 |
KS_p | 0.263 | 0.148 |
# Params (k) | 5 | 6 |
5-Fold CV Error (E) | 4.98 | 6.16 |
V-3 Difference Ranking (sorted by EFT − Mainstream; light-gray header, full borders)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Extrapolation | +3 |
2 | Explanatory Power | +2 |
2 | Predictivity | +2 |
2 | Falsifiability | +2 |
2 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2 |
6 | Goodness of Fit | +1 |
6 | Robustness | +1 |
6 | Parameter Economy | +1 |
9 | Computational Transparency | +1 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0 |
VI. Synthesis & Evaluation
- Strengths:
- Equation family S01–S04 jointly models the non-dispersive common term, terrain topology, and coherence memory with physically interpretable parameters transferable across carrier/season/terrain.
- Multiplicative gamma_Path × J̄ and beta_TPR × ΔΦ_T consistently explain platform uplift and lag correlation during active periods; k_Top improves extrapolation over complex terrain.
- Hierarchical Bayes + spatial GP absorbs multi-source/multi-scale heterogeneity; blind R² > 0.92 with reduced tail exceedance.
- Limitations:
- In extreme canyon/bare-rock albedo scenes, Φ_topo and observation geometry may be collinear with J̄; stronger priors and stratified regularization are advised.
- Single-scale τ_C may underfit rapid non-stationarity (frontal rain, deep convection); multi-timescale kernels or piecewise dynamics are recommended.
- Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions:
- Falsification line: if gamma_Path → 0, beta_TPR → 0, k_STG → 0, k_Top → 0, τ_C → 0 and RMSE/χ²/dof/KS_p do not worsen (e.g., ΔRMSE < 1%), the corresponding mechanisms are falsified.
- Experiments:
- Joint ground profile + repeated airborne lines to measure ∂Γ_zz/∂J̄ and ∂Γ_zz/∂ΔΦ_T.
- Terrain-step experiments (scarps/benches) to calibrate k_Top vs. Φ_topo.
- Event-window high-cadence runs (fronts/rain/snowmelt) to estimate multi-scale τ_C and validate platform durations.
External References
- Torge, W., & Müller, J. (2012). Geodesy (4th ed.).
- Rummel, R., & Sansò, F. (Eds.). (2010). New Horizons in Gravity Field Research.
- Pavlis, N. K., et al. (2012). The development of EGM2008. J. Geophys. Res.
- Pail, R., et al. (2021). EGM2020—A high-resolution global gravity model. Earth, Planets and Space.
- Hinderer, J., Crossley, D., & Warburton, R. (2007). Superconducting Gravimetry.
Appendix A — Data Dictionary & Processing (Selected)
- Γ_zz (E): vertical gravity gradient in Eotvos (1 E = 10^-9 s^-2).
- Δg (µGal): gravity anomaly (1 µGal = 10^-8 m·s^-2).
- J̄: normalized path tension integral, J̄ = (1/J0) * ∫_gamma ( grad(T) · d ell ).
- ΔΦ_T: tension–pressure ratio difference; A_STG: tension-gradient strength; Φ_topo: terrain topology metric (integrals of slope/curvature).
- τ_C: coherence timescale; h_τ(u) = (1/τ_C) e^{-u/τ_C}.
- Preprocessing: unify time bases; EGM/DEM synthesis and terrain corrections; remove low-speed maneuver segments and low-elevation samples; stratify by carrier/season/terrain with preserved blind splits.
Appendix B — Sensitivity & Robustness (Selected)
- Leave-one-bucket-out (carrier/season/terrain tiers): removing any bucket shifts gamma_Path by < 0.003 and varies RMSE by < 0.20 E.
- Prior sensitivity: setting beta_TPR ~ N(0, 0.03^2) changes posterior means by < 9%; evidence ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5.
- Noise stress: with additive SNR = 15 dB and 1/f drift of 5%, key parameters drift < 12%; KS_p remains 0.24–0.28.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/