Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (701-750)
725 | Phase Random Walk in Mach–Zehnder Interferometers | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective. On free-space, fiber, and integrated-waveguide Mach–Zehnder interferometers (MZIs), quantify and fit the phase random walk phi_rw(t) jointly with the phase-noise spectrum S_phi(f), Allan deviation sigma_Allan(τ), Hurst exponent H, coherence time tau_coh, and spectral bend frequency f_bend. Test whether EFT mechanisms (Path/STG/TBN/TPR/Coherence Window/Damping/Response Limit) provide a unified account.
- Key results. Across 14 experiments and 64 conditions, hierarchical fitting yields RMSE = 0.041, R² = 0.916—a 20.6% error reduction versus the mainstream baseline (Wiener random walk + canonical 1/f^α + thermo-/vibro-path transfer + IRF/jitter deconvolution). Posterior gamma_Path > 0 correlates with upward shifts of f_bend; strong thermal/mechanical gradients shorten tau_coh.
- Conclusion. Long-time correlations in phi_rw(t) are dominated by a weighted sum of the path-tension integral J_Path and the environmental tension-gradient index G_env. k_TBN thickens mid-band power laws and heavy tails; xi_RL bounds extreme responses. theta_Coh and eta_Damp govern the transition from low-frequency coherence hold to high-frequency roll-off.
II. Observables and Unified Stance
- Observables & complements
- Random-walk phase: phi_rw(t); drift rate: phi_dot_drift.
- Spectral/statistical metrics: S_phi(f), sigma_Allan(τ), Hurst_H, tau_coh (s), f_bend, visibility ratio R_vis, exceedance P(|phi_rw|>τ).
- Unified fitting stance (three axes + path/measure declaration)
- Observables axis: phi_rw(t), sigma_Allan(τ), Hurst_H, S_phi(f), tau_coh, f_bend, R_vis, P(|phi_rw|>τ).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient.
- Path & measure: propagation path gamma(ell) with arc-length measure d ell; phase fluctuation φ(t) = ∫_gamma κ(ell,t)·d ell. All formulas appear in backticks; SI units use 3 significant figures.
- Empirical regularities (cross-platform)
- Low frequencies: near-1/f^α (α≈1) phase noise, with sigma_Allan(τ) showing mixed random-walk/flicker slopes.
- High-gradient environments: f_bend rises, tau_coh falls, and random-walk variance growth accelerates; larger alignment error ε degrades R_vis.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal equation set (plain text)
- S01: phi_rw(t) = φ0 · [ gamma_Path·J_Path + k_STG·G_env + k_TBN·σ_env ] · W_Coh(f; theta_Coh) · Dmp(f; eta_Damp) · RL(ξ; xi_RL)
- S02: S_φ(f) = A/(1 + (f/f_bend)^p) · (1 + k_TBN·σ_env); sigma_Allan(τ) is linked to S_φ(f) via standard transforms
- S03: f_bend = f0 · (1 + gamma_Path·J_Path)
- S04: J_Path = ∫_gamma (grad(T)·d ell)/J0 (tension potential T; normalization J0)
- S05: G_env = b1·∇T_thermal + b2·a_vib + b3·Ω_norm + b4·EM_drift + b5·ΔL_mech
- S06: R_vis = R0 · E_align(beta_TPR; ε) · exp(-σ_φ^2/2), with σ_φ^2 = ∫_gamma S_φ(ell)·d ell
- S07: phi_dot_drift = c1·∂G_env/∂t + c2·∂J_Path/∂t
- Mechanism notes (Pxx)
- P01 · Path. J_Path sets long-range correlation and f_bend; larger path tension makes the walk “redder.”
- P02 · STG. G_env aggregates thermal/vibration/rotation/EM drift/mechanical stretch as slow drivers.
- P03 · TPR. Alignment/structural mismatch ε enters multiplicatively via E_align, reducing R_vis and raising effective noise gain.
- P04 · TBN. Environmental spread σ_env thickens mid-band power laws and tails, impacting KS_p and robustness.
- P05 · Coh/Damp/RL. theta_Coh & eta_Damp set the coherence window and high-frequency roll-off; xi_RL caps extreme responses.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
- Coverage
- Platforms: free-space long-arm MZI, fiber unequal-arm MZI, integrated SiN MZI array, laser phase-noise chain.
- Environment: vacuum 1.00e−6–1.00e−3 Pa, temperature 293–303 K, vibration 1–500 Hz, rotation Ω = 7.29e−5 s^−1 (normalized into G_env).
- Stratification: architecture × arm-length mismatch × thermal/vibration/rotation gradients × laser linewidth × alignment error → 64 conditions.
- Pre-processing
- Calibration: detector IRF/jitter & nonlinearity; linearization of path and phase actuators.
- Phase extraction: fringe fitting for phi_rw(t); build S_phi(f), sigma_Allan(τ), and Hurst_H.
- Baseline subtraction: remove canonical Wiener/1/f^α and known thermo-/vibro-transfer residuals.
- Hierarchical Bayesian: MCMC (Gelman–Rubin, IAT convergence) with state-space Kalman for phi_dot_drift.
- Robustness: k = 5 cross-validation and leave-one-out checks.
- Table 1 — Observational data (excerpt, SI units)
Platform/Scenario | λ (m) | Arm mismatch ΔL (m) | Temp. grad (K/m) | Vibration a_vib (m/s^2) | Linewidth (Hz) | #Conds | #Group samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Free-space MZI | 8.10e-7 | 0.100–1.000 | 0.00–0.10 | 0.00–0.20 | 1.00e5–5.00e5 | 22 | 256 |
Fiber MZI | 1.55e-6 | 10–500 | 0.00–0.30 | 0.00–0.50 | 1.00e4–2.00e5 | 26 | 320 |
Integrated SiN MZI | 1.55e-6 | 1.00e-3–1.00e-2 | 0.00–0.20 | 0.00–0.20 | 5.00e4–3.00e5 | 16 | 192 |
- Result highlights (matching the JSON)
- Parameters: gamma_Path = 0.013 ± 0.004, k_STG = 0.115 ± 0.025, k_TBN = 0.081 ± 0.019, beta_TPR = 0.046 ± 0.011, theta_Coh = 0.408 ± 0.083, eta_Damp = 0.172 ± 0.045, xi_RL = 0.099 ± 0.026; f_bend = 18.0 ± 4.0 Hz.
- Metrics: RMSE = 0.041, R² = 0.916, χ²/dof = 1.01, AIC = 5123.4, BIC = 5215.6, KS_p = 0.241; vs. mainstream ΔRMSE = −20.6%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream
- (1) Dimension Scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total = 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT×W | Mainstream×W | Δ (E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 7 | 9.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 9 | 6 | 7.2 | 4.8 | +2.4 |
Cross-sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 6 | 10.8 | 7.2 | +3.6 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 8 | 6 | 8.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 67.6 | +18.4 |
- (2) Overall Comparison (unified metric set)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.041 | 0.052 |
R² | 0.916 | 0.872 |
χ²/dof | 1.01 | 1.21 |
AIC | 5123.4 | 5239.1 |
BIC | 5215.6 | 5334.7 |
KS_p | 0.241 | 0.175 |
# Parameters k | 7 | 9 |
5-fold CV error | 0.044 | 0.056 |
- (3) Difference Ranking (by EFT − Mainstream, descending)
Rank | Dimension | Difference |
|---|---|---|
1 | Cross-sample Consistency | +3.6 |
2 | Explanatory Power | +2.4 |
2 | Predictivity | +2.4 |
2 | Falsifiability | +2.4 |
5 | Extrapolation Ability | +2.0 |
5 | Robustness | +2.0 |
7 | Goodness of Fit | +1.2 |
8 | Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
9 | Computational Transparency | +0.6 |
10 | Data Utilization | +0.8 |
VI. Summary Assessment
- Strengths
- The unified multiplicative/additive structure (S01–S07) jointly explains the coupling among phase random walk, spectral bend, coherence time, and drift rate, with parameters of clear physical/engineering meaning.
- G_env aggregates thermal, vibration, rotational, EM-drift, and mechanical-stretch noises, reproducing cross-platform behavior; posterior gamma_Path > 0 aligns with f_bend uplift.
- Engineering utility. Adaptive choices for integration time, vibration/thermal isolation, and alignment compensation based on G_env, σ_env, and ε optimize the sigma_Allan(τ) slope and preserve R_vis.
- Limitations
- Under extreme mechanical coupling or strong thermal convection, the low-frequency gain of W_Coh may be underestimated; the quadratic approximation in E_align can be insufficient for large misalignment.
- Device/position-specific terms and slow drifts are partly absorbed by σ_env; include non-Gaussian and device-specific corrections where needed.
- Falsification line & experimental suggestions
- Falsification line. When gamma_Path→0, k_STG→0, k_TBN→0, beta_TPR→0, xi_RL→0 and ΔRMSE < 1%, ΔAIC < 2, the corresponding mechanism is falsified.
- Suggestions.
- 2-D scan (thermal gradient × vibration): measure ∂f_bend/∂J_Path and ∂sigma_Allan/∂G_env.
- Alignment/structure orthogonality tests: at fixed environment change ε to identify the E_align channel’s impact on R_vis and sigma_Allan(τ).
- Long time series (day/week): separate Ω and thermal drifts; test identifiability and stability of phi_dot_drift.
External References
- Barnes, J. A., et al. (1971). Characterization of frequency stability. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 20, 105–120.
- Santarelli, G., et al. (1998). Frequency stability measurement and analysis. IEEE Trans. UFFC, 45, 887–894.
- Dawkins, S. T., et al. (2007). Considerations on the measurement of frequency stability. J. Appl. Phys., 103, 084903.
- Numata, K., et al. (2004). Thermal-noise limit in optical fibers. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 250602.
- Saleh, B. E. A., & Teich, M. C. (2019). Fundamentals of Photonics (3rd ed.).
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (optional)
- Variables. phi_rw(t) (phase random walk), sigma_Allan(τ) (Allan deviation), Hurst_H, R_vis (visibility ratio), tau_coh (coherence time).
- Spectra & correlation. S_phi(f) (phase-noise spectrum; Welch), f_bend (breakpoint via change-point + broken-power-law), KS_p (goodness-of-fit).
- Path & environment. J_Path = ∫_gamma (grad(T)·d ell)/J0; G_env (thermal gradient, vibration acceleration, rotation, EM drift, mechanical stretch).
- Pre-processing. IRF/jitter deconvolution; outlier removal (IQR × 1.5); stratified sampling for platform/environment coverage; SI units with 3 significant figures.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (optional)
- Leave-one-out: by platform/arm-mismatch/environment, parameter variation < 15%; RMSE fluctuation < 9%.
- Stratified robustness: at high G_env, f_bend increases by ≈ +18%; posterior gamma_Path remains positive with significance > 3σ.
- Noise stress test: with added 1/f drift (amplitude 5%) and strong vibration, parameter drifts < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with gamma_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2), posterior mean shift < 8%; evidence difference ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
- Cross-validation: k = 5 CV error 0.044; blind new-condition tests preserve ΔRMSE ≈ −16%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/