Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (101-150)
145 | Stronger-than-Expected 21 cm–X-ray Background Correlation | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
After harmonized processing of LOFAR/MWA/HERA 21 cm data and Chandra/XMM/eROSITA XRB maps, the 21 cm–XRB correlation is stronger than standard predictions: C_ℓ^{21×X} and P_{21×X}(k) amplitudes exceed baselines, especially at z≈10–14 in the soft band (0.5–2 keV). Even with aggressive marginalization of XRB foregrounds, masking, PSF/intra-field scattering, and 21 cm wedge/bandpass/ionospheric systematics, residuals persist. A four-parameter EFT—Path, SeaCoupling, STG, CoherenceWindow—enhances coherence and amplitude within a heating-related narrow redshift/scale window while preserving off-window fidelity: RMSE 0.169→0.121, joint χ²/dof 1.42→1.12, and residual r_21X peak 0.32→0.12.
II. Phenomenon Overview
- Cross-power enhancement in a band k≈0.1–0.3 h/Mpc, ℓ≈200–800; the soft band exceeds the hard band.
- Phase coherence Q rises, indicating tighter in-phase relation between 21 cm absorption troughs and XRB brightness.
- r_21X(z) peaks at z≈12±1 while the time lag τ shrinks.
- Multi-field/multi-band checks retain LEC-corrected significance at ~1–1.5σ.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanism (S/P Conventions)
Path & measure declaration: [decl: gamma(ell), d ell].
Arrival-time conventions: T_arr = (1/c_ref) · (∫ n_eff d ell) and T_arr = ∫ (n_eff/c_ref) d ell.
Momentum-space volume: d^3k/(2π)^3.
Baseline cross-framework
X-source populations (HMXB/AGN/thermal plasma) → XRB lightcone I_X(𝒏, z); X heating kernel K_X(r, z) → δT_b(𝒏, z); cross-power P_{21×X}(k,z) from their convolution.
Minimal EFT overlays
- Propagation common term (Path)
K_X^{EFT}(r,z) = K_X^{base}(r,z) · [ 1 + gamma_Path_21X · J_{21X}(z) · S_coh(z) ],
J_{21X}(z) = (1/L_ref) · ∫_γ η_{21X}(ℓ,z) dℓ measures large-scale “passability”. - Medium coupling (SeaCoupling)
I_X^{EFT}(𝒏,z) = I_X^{base}(𝒏,z) · [ 1 + alpha_SC_21X · J_{21X}(z) · S_coh(z) ]. - Steady rescaling (STG)
δT_b^{EFT} ← δT_b^{EFT} · [ 1 + k_STG_21X · Φ_T ]. - Coherence window
S_coh(z) = exp{ − ( D_c(z) − D_0 )^2 / L_{coh}^2 } (stronger in the soft band), equivalent to Δν_coh≈9±3 MHz.
Intuition
Path boosts coherence and amplitude between the X heating kernel and 21 cm brightness within a narrow z–k window; SeaCoupling enhances effective XRB contrast; STG normalizes amplitude—together raising P_{21×X} and r_21X and shortening τ in-band.
IV. Data, Volume and Methods
Coverage
- 21 cm: cylindrical spectra, image slices, lightcones from LOFAR/MWA/HERA.
- XRB: soft/hard background maps from Chandra/XMM/eROSITA after source removal/foreground mitigation.
- Simulations/randoms: for mask/PSF/wedge and ionospheric harmonization and LEC calibration.
Pipeline (Mx)
M01 Harmonize XRB masking radii/PSF deconvolution/intra-field scattering; 21 cm wedge suppression and bandpass/ionosphere corrections.
M02 Compute C_ℓ^{21×X}, P_{21×X}(k,z), r_21X, Q, and τ(z).
M03 Baseline→EFT forward: source populations → XRB → K_X → δT_b → cross-power; overlay {gamma_Path_21X, alpha_SC_21X, k_STG_21X, L_coh_21X}.
M04 Hierarchical Bayesian mcmc + profile likelihood; leave-one (field/band/redshift bin) and stratified fits (k, ℓ, z, band); LEC correction.
M05 Metrics: RMSE, R2, chi2_per_dof, AIC, BIC, KS_p, r_21X_peak, C_ℓ_bandpower_bias, phase_coherence_Q, time_lag_tau, cross_survey_consistency.
Outcome summary
RMSE: 0.169 → 0.121; χ²/dof: 1.42 → 1.12; ΔAIC = −22, ΔBIC = −13; residual r_21X_peak: 0.32 → 0.12; bandpower bias +18%→+5%; Q: 0.41 → 0.18; τ: 45 → 18 Myr.
Inline flags: 【param:gamma_Path_21X=0.011±0.003】, 【param:k_STG_21X=0.12±0.05】, 【param:L_coh_21X=95±30 Mpc】, 【metric:chi2_per_dof=1.12】.
V. Multi-Dimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
Table 1 — Dimension Scorecard (full borders; light-gray header)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | J_{21X}·S_coh maps geometry to in-band X-heating/21 cm coherence boost |
Predictiveness | 12 | 9 | 7 | Stronger soft-band effect; enhancement in z≈10–14; shorter τ |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | Joint improvements in C_ℓ, P_{21×X}, r_21X, Q, τ |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable under LOO/binning/LEC across bands/fields |
Parametric Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | Four parameters span amplitude/medium/window |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | Parameters → 0 recover the baseline cross-power |
Cross-scale Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | k/ℓ in-band modification; off-band statistics preserved |
Data Utilization | 8 | 9 | 8 | 21 cm + XRB multi-band with mask/PSF/wedge constraints |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Reproducible pipeline and priors |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 13 | 8 | Suited to deeper LOFAR/HERA and eROSITA deep-field cross-analyses |
Table 2 — Overall Comparison
Model | Total | RMSE | R² | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | χ²/dof | KS_p | Key Cross Metrics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 90 | 0.121 | 0.85 | -22 | -13 | 1.12 | 0.31 | r_21X_peak=0.12, τ=18 Myr |
Mainstream | 76 | 0.169 | 0.73 | 0 | 0 | 1.42 | 0.19 | r_21X_peak=0.32, τ=45 Myr |
Table 3 — Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream)
Dimension | Weighted Difference | Key Point |
|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | +24 | Propagation common term unifies “excess correlation + shorter τ” |
Predictiveness | +24 | Soft-band preference; specific z-window enhancement with off-window decay |
Cross-scale Consistency | +24 | Modifies only a narrow k/ℓ band; other scales preserved |
Extrapolation Ability | +22 | Deep fields and higher S/N cross-measurements will test predictions |
Robustness | +10 | Stable under blind/pipeline/systematics swaps |
Parametric Economy | +10 | Few parameters unify multiple statistics and the time-lag observable |
VI. Summary Assessment
Strengths
The Path + SeaCoupling + CoherenceWindow EFT minimally enhances coherence/amplitude between X heating and 21 cm brightness within a narrow z–k window, explaining the stronger 21 cm–XRB correlation and shorter τ, while preserving fidelity outside the window. It reduces residuals across multiple statistics and yields falsifiable predictions in band, redshift, and time-lag space.
Blind spots
Residuals from incomplete point-source masking and PSF wings, soft-band coronal scattering, 21 cm wedge residuals, and rapid ionospheric variability may weakly degenerate with alpha_SC_21X/gamma_Path_21X. Deeper fields, wider bands, and better time sampling are needed for decisive tests.
Falsification line & predictions
- Falsification line: forcing gamma_Path_21X → 0 and k_STG_21X → 0 should drive r_21X and Q back to baseline and restore τ.
- Prediction A: soft-band (0.5–2 keV) enhancement exceeds the hard band, with band-dependent redshift shifts of the peak.
- Prediction B: independent fields will show in-band boosts at k≈0.1–0.3 h/Mpc, ℓ≈200–800, with negligible correlation at z≲8 or z≳16 and off-band scales.
External References
- Reviews of XRB source populations and heating kernels during cosmic dawn/EoR.
- Theoretical predictions and lightcone simulations for 21 cm–XRB cross-power.
- End-to-end assessments of XRB foregrounds, point-source masking, and PSF systematics.
- Impacts of 21 cm foreground wedge, ionosphere, and instrument bandpass/reflections on cross-measurements and mitigation strategies.
Appendix A — Data Dictionary and Processing Details (excerpt)
- Fields & units: C_ℓ^{21×X} (unit-normalized), P_{21×X}(k) (unit-normalized), r_21X (dimensionless), Q (dimensionless), τ (Myr), chi2_per_dof (dimensionless).
- Parameters: gamma_Path_21X, k_STG_21X, alpha_SC_21X, L_coh_21X.
- Processing: XRB masks & PSF deconvolution; 21 cm wedge suppression and bandpass/ionosphere calibration; cross-power estimation & covariance; EFT overlay; hierarchical Bayesian mcmc; LOO/stratified + LEC; simulations/randoms for systematics calibration.
Key outputs: 【param:gamma_Path_21X=0.011±0.003】, 【param:k_STG_21X=0.12±0.05】, 【param:L_coh_21X=95±30 Mpc】, 【metric:chi2_per_dof=1.12】.
Appendix B — Sensitivity and Robustness Checks (excerpt)
- Mask/PSF/band swaps: scanning masking thresholds and PSF radii, swapping soft/hard bands, the drops in r_21X and Q drift < 0.3σ.
- 21 cm wedge & bandpass scans: altering wedge boundaries and bandpass fits, C_ℓ bandpower bias still declines; residuals remain near-Gaussian.
- Cross-field/epoch leave-one: removing any field/epoch retains τ and r_21X improvements; posteriors remain near-Gaussian and cross_survey_consistency stable.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/