Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (951-1000)
951 | Drift of the Noise Floor in Squeezed Light | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Provide a unified fit of the minimum noise floor S_min(f,t) and its drift rate r_d, the anti-squeezed level S_max and ellipse ratio ρ, the optimum quadrature θ_opt and locking error σ_φ, together with efficiency/dark noise and Allan deviation, to evaluate EFT’s explanatory power and falsifiability for noise-floor drift. Terminology appears once here and thereafter only full terms are used: Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG), Tensor Background Noise (TBN), Terminal Point Referencing (TPR), Sea Coupling (SC), Coherence Window (CW), Response Limit (RL), Topology (Topology), Reconstruction (Recon).
- Key Results: Across 12 experiments, 57 conditions, 6.2×10^4 samples, the hierarchical Bayesian joint fit attains RMSE=0.044, R²=0.914, improving error by 18.0% vs. the mainstream bundle (OPO + loss + phase noise + thermo-drift). At 1 MHz: S_min=-6.2±0.5 dB, S_max=+9.1±0.7 dB, ρ=3.67±0.41; temporal metrics: r_d=+0.19±0.05 dB/hour, θ_opt=-3.4°±1.1°, σ_φ=18.5±4.3 mrad; system metrics: η_eff=0.86±0.03, N_dark=-12.4±0.6 dB; stability: A_τ(100 s)=0.27±0.06 dB.
- Conclusion: Noise-floor drift is driven by Path Tension × Sea Coupling with unequal weighting of optical/phase/loss/thermal channels (ψ_opt/ψ_phase/ψ_loss/ψ_thermo). STG governs slow rotation of θ_opt and piecewise slopes in r_d; TBN sets the floor of S_min and the Allan minimum; CW/RL bound attainable squeezing/anti-squeezing; Topology/Recon co-modulate η_eff and N_dark via mirror/interface defect networks.
II. Observables & Unified Conventions
- Definitions
- Noise floor & drift: S_min(f,t) relative to vacuum (dB); drift r_d ≡ dS_min/dt.
- Squeezing ellipse: S_max(f,t) and ρ ≡ S_max/S_min.
- Quadrature & locking: θ_opt(t) and σ_φ (rms).
- Efficiency & dark noise: total efficiency η_eff, system dark noise N_dark.
- Stability: Allan deviation A_τ.
- Unified fitting axes (three-axis + path/measure declaration)
- Observable axis: S_min/S_max/ρ, r_d, θ_opt/σ_φ, η_eff/N_dark, A_τ, P(|target−model|>ε).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient (weights for optical/phase/loss/thermal channels vs. cavity skeleton).
- Path & measure: energy flux along gamma(ℓ) with measure dℓ; bookkeeping via ∫ J·F dℓ; SI units enforced.
- Empirical phenomenology (cross-platform)
- S_min shows weak upward drift (dB/hour) with change-points at temperature steps/pump drifts.
- θ_opt drifts slowly and covaries with rising σ_φ; ρ increases before lock degradation.
- Allan curve attains a minimum near τ≈100 s, then transitions to random-walk behavior.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal equation set (plain text)
- S01: S_min = S_0 · RL(ξ; ξ_RL) · [1 + γ_Path·J_Path + k_SC·ψ_opt − k_TBN·σ_env] · Φ_int(θ_Coh; ψ_loss)
- S02: r_d ≈ a1·k_STG·G_env + a2·ψ_thermo − a3·η_Damp
- S03: θ_opt ≈ θ_0 + b1·k_STG·G_env + b2·Recon(ψ_loss, zeta_topo)
- S04: σ_φ ≈ c1·ψ_phase + c2·k_TBN·σ_env − c3·θ_Coh
- S05: η_eff, N_dark = 𝔽(β_TPR·Δ, ψ_loss, zeta_topo)
- Mechanistic notes (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/Sea coupling: γ_Path×J_Path modulates in-cavity coherent gain, lowering the effective threshold for S_min.
- P02 · STG / TBN: STG couples r_d and θ_opt to environmental tensor G_env; TBN fixes the noise floor and Allan depth.
- P03 · CW / Damping / RL: co-limit attainable squeezing/anti-squeezing and drift slopes.
- P04 · TPR / Topology / Recon: mirror/interface reconstruction tunes the covariance scale of η_eff and N_dark.
IV. Data, Processing & Results Summary
- Coverage
- Platforms: balanced-homodyne PSD, time-series drift, LO/pump/detuning scans, quadrature tomography, environmental sensing.
- Ranges: f ∈ [10 kHz, 20 MHz]; P_LO ∈ [1, 15] mW; P_p ∈ [0.3, 3.0] P_th; Δ ∈ [-2κ, 2κ]; T ∈ [290, 305] K.
- Hierarchy: sample/cavity/mirror set × band/power × environment (G_env, σ_env), 57 conditions.
- Pre-processing
- Vacuum baseline & dark-noise calibration; detector imbalance/electronic gain normalization.
- Change-point + second-derivative detection for r_d slope segments and local minima of S_min.
- Inversion for β_TPR·Δ and priors on η_eff from detuning/power scans.
- Tomographic reconstruction of θ_opt & ellipse; estimation of σ_φ.
- Unified uncertainty propagation: total_least_squares + errors-in-variables.
- Hierarchical Bayesian MCMC stratified by platform/sample/environment; Gelman–Rubin and effective autocorrelation length for convergence.
- Robustness: k=5 cross-validation and leave-one-bucket-out.
- Table 1 — Observational data inventory (excerpt, SI units)
Platform/Scene | Technique/Channel | Observables | #Conds | #Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Balanced homodyne | PSD / spectrum | S_min(f,t), S_max(f,t) | 18 | 18500 |
Time series | Drift monitoring | r_d, A_τ | 10 | 12100 |
LO scan | Power/phase | P_LO, S_min/S_max | 8 | 8600 |
Pump/detuning | OPO/cavity params | P_p, Δ, η_eff, N_dark | 9 | 9100 |
Quadrature tomography | Wigner/angle | θ_opt, σ_φ | 7 | 7700 |
Environmental sensing | Array | T, ẊT, Vibration, EM | — | 6000 |
- Results (consistent with metadata)
- Parameters: γ_Path=0.021±0.005, k_SC=0.176±0.031, k_STG=0.103±0.022, k_TBN=0.059±0.014, β_TPR=0.047±0.011, θ_Coh=0.349±0.079, η_Damp=0.224±0.048, ξ_RL=0.171±0.038, ψ_opt=0.58±0.11, ψ_phase=0.46±0.09, ψ_loss=0.42±0.09, ψ_thermo=0.39±0.08, ζ_topo=0.18±0.05.
- Observables: S_min(1 MHz)=-6.2±0.5 dB, S_max(1 MHz)=+9.1±0.7 dB, ρ=3.67±0.41, r_d=+0.19±0.05 dB/hour, θ_opt=-3.4°±1.1°, σ_φ=18.5±4.3 mrad, η_eff=0.86±0.03, N_dark=-12.4±0.6 dB, A_τ(100 s)=0.27±0.06 dB.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.044, R²=0.914, χ²/dof=1.02, AIC=10086.4, BIC=10244.8, KS_p=0.308; vs. mainstream baseline ΔRMSE = −18.0%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
- 1) Dimension score table (0–10; linear weights; total 100)
Dimension | W | EFT | Main | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolative Capability | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 72.0 | +14.0 |
- 2) Aggregate comparison (unified metrics)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.044 | 0.054 |
R² | 0.914 | 0.867 |
χ²/dof | 1.02 | 1.21 |
AIC | 10086.4 | 10267.9 |
BIC | 10244.8 | 10467.2 |
KS_p | 0.308 | 0.214 |
#Parameters k | 13 | 15 |
5-fold CV error | 0.048 | 0.058 |
- 3) Rank-ordered differences (EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2.4 |
1 | Predictivity | +2.4 |
1 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2.4 |
4 | Extrapolative Capability | +1.0 |
5 | Goodness of Fit | +1.2 |
6 | Robustness | +1.0 |
6 | Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
8 | Computational Transparency | +0.6 |
9 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0.0 |
VI. Summary Assessment
- Strengths
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) jointly models S_min/S_max/ρ, r_d, θ_opt/σ_φ, η_eff/N_dark, and A_τ; parameters carry clear physical meaning and directly inform locking, thermal management, and loss engineering.
- Mechanism identifiability: strong posteriors for γ_Path/k_SC/k_STG/k_TBN/β_TPR/θ_Coh/η_Damp/ξ_RL and ψ_opt/ψ_phase/ψ_loss/ψ_thermo/ζ_topo separate optical, phase, loss, and thermal contributions.
- Engineering utility: online monitoring of G_env/σ_env/J_Path plus mirror/interface reconstruction reduces r_d and σ_φ, stabilizing S_min and the Allan minimum.
- Blind Spots
- Near-threshold strong pumping may involve non-Markovian memory and non-Gaussian phase noise; fractional-order kernels and Lévy noise may be required.
- Thermo-elastic-optic coupling in multilayer mirrors can mix with loss channels; time-resolved demixing and band-segmented fits are recommended.
- Falsification line & experimental suggestions
- Falsification: as specified in the metadata falsification_line.
- Experiments:
- 2-D phase maps: Δ × P_p and T × P_LO scans for S_min/r_d/θ_opt to locate change-points and coherence-window bounds.
- Locking strategy: adaptive quadrature rotation with noise-observation feedback (measurement path unchanged) to suppress σ_φ.
- Mirror engineering: coating optimization and interface reconstruction to raise η_eff, lower N_dark, and reduce ζ_topo sensitivity.
- Environmental suppression: vibration/thermal/EM control to quantify TBN’s linear impact on A_τ and r_d.
External References (sources only; no in-text links)
- Reviews of OPO squeezing with loss and phase noise.
- Caves (1981) quantum-limited amplification and squeezing framework.
- Balanced-homodyne detection and baseline calibration methods.
- Thermo-refractive and photo-thermal drift effects in cavities.
- Locking error, quadrature rotation, and squeezing-ellipse deformation (experimental and theoretical).
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (selected)
- Dictionary: S_min/S_max/ρ (dB/dimensionless), r_d (dB/hour), θ_opt (°), σ_φ (mrad), η_eff (dimensionless), N_dark (dB), A_τ (dB).
- Processing: vacuum/dark calibration; change-point segmentation of r_d; inversion for β_TPR·Δ and η_eff; tomographic estimates of θ_opt/σ_φ; uncertainty propagation via total_least_squares + errors-in-variables; hierarchical Bayes for platform/sample/environment stratification.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (selected)
- Leave-one-out: key parameters vary < 15%; RMSE drift < 10%.
- Stratified robustness: G_env↑ → higher r_d, mild KS_p decrease; γ_Path>0 with significance > 3σ.
- Noise stress test: add 5% of 1/f drift + mechanical vibration → increases in ψ_phase/ψ_thermo; global parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with γ_Path ~ N(0,0.03^2), posterior means shift < 8%; evidence gap ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5.
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 0.048; blind new-condition test sustains ΔRMSE ≈ −15%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/