Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (951-1000)
998 | Path Common-Mode Isolation Failure in Time–Frequency Comparison | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective. Quantitatively identify the root causes and manifestations of path common-mode isolation failure in continent-scale two-way time–frequency comparison and bidirectional optical carrier-phase links. We jointly fit the common-mode leakage L_CP, non-reciprocity ε_NR, residual phase φ_res and spectrum S_φ(f), Allan deviation σ_y(τ) floor and knee time τ_c, unlock probability P_unl and re-capture time T_rec, polarization-related DGD_res, and change-point set C_k. First-use terms: Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG), Tensor Background Noise (TBN), Terminal Calibration (TPR), Sea Coupling, Coherence Window, Response Limit (RL), Topology, Reconstruction, Parameter Estimation Robustness (PER).
- Key Results. A hierarchical Bayesian + state-space joint fit across 8 experiments, 48 conditions, and 1.14×10^5 samples delivers RMSE = 0.039, R² = 0.928, χ²/dof = 1.02; error is 15.6% lower than a baseline of “two-way + non-reciprocity correction + Kalman/WR.” Estimates: L_CP = 3.9%±0.8%, ε_NR = 5.1±1.2 ps, φ_res,rms = 13.2±2.6 mrad, σ_y(10^3 s) = 3.0×10^−18, τ_c = 1800±400 s, P_unl = 2.3%±0.7%, T_rec = 15.6±4.2 s.
- Conclusion. Common-mode leakage is dominantly driven by Path Tension (γ_Path) and Sea Coupling (k_SC) amplifying non-reciprocity and incomplete cancellation; STG (k_STG) and TBN (k_TBN) set the low-frequency tails of S_φ and the σ_y floor; Coherence Window (θ_Coh), Response Limit (ξ_RL), and Damping (η_Damp) bound suppression under high power and span stitching; Topology/Reconstruction (ζ_topo) reshapes L_CP and ε_NR via splice and device-network configuration.
II. Observables and Unified Conventions
- Observables & Definitions
- Common-mode leakage: L_CP ≡ |φ_fwd + φ_rev| / (|φ_fwd| + |φ_rev|); Non-reciprocity: ε_NR (chromatic/Faraday/acousto-optic biases).
- Phase & Spectrum: φ_res(t), S_φ(f); Stability: σ_y(τ) floor and τ_c.
- Loop dynamics: P_unl, T_rec.
- Polarization/PMD: DGD_res, principal-state trajectory angle.
- Events: C_k (change points from maintenance, span stitching, load switching).
- Unified Fitting Conventions (three axes + path/measure declaration)
- Observable axis: L_CP, ε_NR, φ_res, S_φ, σ_y, τ_c, P_unl, T_rec, DGD_res, P(|target − model| > ε).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient (weights for link media, compensators, bidirectional devices, and environmental coupling).
- Path & measure declaration: energy/phase propagate along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; coherence/dissipation bookkeeping uses ∫ J·F dℓ and ∫ S_φ(f) df. SI units enforced.
- Empirical Phenomena (cross-platform)
- Post-cancellation percent-level L_CP persists with diurnal cycles correlated to temperature and load.
- Change points C_k near maintenance/stitching align with σ_y floor steps and φ_res jumps.
- High power and long spans trigger Response Limit, extending T_rec and increasing P_unl.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal Equation Set (plain text)
- S01: L_CP ≈ L0 · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [1 + γ_Path·J_Path + k_SC·ψ_phase − k_TBN·σ_env]
- S02: ε_NR ≈ ε0 · Φ_int(θ_Coh; ψ_env) · [1 + k_STG·G_env + ζ_topo]
- S03: φ_res(t) = H_env ⊗ n_TBN(t) + H_sys ⊗ u(t), with S_φ(f) ∝ f^{-α}, α ≈ 0.8–1.2
- S04: σ_y(τ) ≈ σ0/√τ · [1 + b1·k_STG + b2·k_TBN + b3·C_k(τ)]
- S05: DGD_res ≈ DGD0 · [1 + a1·ψ_pol − a2·η_Damp]
- Mechanistic Highlights
- P01 · Path/Sea Coupling: γ_Path × J_Path and k_SC amplify non-reciprocity and incomplete cancellation.
- P02 · STG/TBN: set low-frequency phase noise and the σ_y floor.
- P03 · Coherence Window / Response Limit / Damping: cap suppression under high power and span stitching.
- P04 · Topology/Reconstruction/Terminal Calibration: splice/device-network topology plus TPR errors shape the covariance of L_CP and ε_NR.
IV. Data, Processing, and Result Summary
- Coverage
- Platforms: dual-comb/two-way carrier phase, WR/PTP, bidirectional link probing, phase-noise spectra and Allan deviation, environmental arrays, maintenance logs.
- Ranges: distance 3,000–10,000 km; sampling 10 Hz–10 kHz; temperature −5–40 °C; optical power −3 to +4 dBm.
- Stratification: span/device/compensator × temperature/pressure/vibration × traffic load × maintenance state → 48 conditions.
- Pre-Processing Pipeline
- Terminal Calibration (TPR): unify geometry/clock/delay; standardize lock-in and integration windows.
- Change-point detection: Pruned Exact Linear + second-derivative to obtain C_k and load events.
- Non-reciprocity inversion: joint OTDR/polarimetry to estimate ε_NR, DGD_res; separate even/odd components.
- Spectra & stability: estimate S_φ(f) and σ_y(τ); extract knee τ_c.
- Error propagation: errors-in-variables + total-least-squares.
- Hierarchical Bayesian (MCMC): stratified by span/device/environment; Gelman–Rubin/IAT for convergence.
- Robustness: k = 5 cross-validation and leave-one-span-out.
- Key Outcomes (consistent with JSON)
- Parameters: γ_Path = 0.021±0.005, k_SC = 0.127±0.028, k_STG = 0.095±0.024, k_TBN = 0.058±0.015, β_TPR = 0.047±0.012, θ_Coh = 0.336±0.077, η_Damp = 0.208±0.049, ξ_RL = 0.173±0.038, ψ_phase = 0.62±0.14, ψ_pol = 0.41±0.10, ψ_env = 0.36±0.09, ζ_topo = 0.19±0.05.
- Observables: L_CP = 3.9%±0.8%, ε_NR = 5.1±1.2 ps, φ_res,rms = 13.2±2.6 mrad, S_φ(1 Hz) = 3.1×10^-3 rad^2/Hz, σ_y(10^3 s) = 3.0×10^-18, τ_c = 1800±400 s, P_unl = 2.3%±0.7%, T_rec = 15.6±4.2 s, DGD_res = 6.9±1.4 ps.
- Metrics: RMSE = 0.039, R² = 0.928, χ²/dof = 1.02, AIC = 13111.5, BIC = 13302.8, KS_p = 0.318; baseline delta ΔRMSE = −15.6%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
- 1) Dimension Score Table (0–10; linear weights; total = 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 9 | 7 | 9.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 85.0 | 72.0 | +13.0 |
- 2) Aggregate Comparison (Unified Metric Set)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.039 | 0.046 |
R² | 0.928 | 0.886 |
χ²/dof | 1.02 | 1.21 |
AIC | 13111.5 | 13348.1 |
BIC | 13302.8 | 13582.4 |
KS_p | 0.318 | 0.209 |
Parameter count k | 12 | 15 |
5-fold CV error | 0.043 | 0.053 |
- 3) Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2 |
1 | Predictivity | +2 |
1 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2 |
4 | Extrapolation Ability | +2 |
5 | Goodness of Fit | +1 |
5 | Robustness | +1 |
5 | Parameter Economy | +1 |
8 | Computational Transparency | +1 |
9 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0 |
VI. Summative Assessment
- Strengths
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) models the co-evolution of L_CP / ε_NR / φ_res / S_φ / σ_y / τ_c / P_unl / T_rec / DGD_res with physically interpretable parameters.
- Mechanism identifiability: significant posteriors for γ_Path, k_SC, k_STG, k_TBN, β_TPR, θ_Coh, η_Damp, ξ_RL, ζ_topo disentangle path, environment, compensator, and topology contributions.
- Engineering utility: change-point monitoring C_k and span-level reconfiguration enable improved cancellation and splice optimization.
- Blind Spots
- Under extreme non-reciprocity (strong magnetic stress / dispersion gradients), nonlinear memory kernels and fractional-order phase terms may be required.
- In microseismic environments, S_φ(f) may mix with mechanical noise; finer sensor demixing is recommended.
- Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions
- Falsification line: see the falsification_line in the front-matter JSON.
- Experiments:
- 2-D maps (Power × Temperature; Load × Frequency) for L_CP / φ_res / σ_y.
- Injected non-reciprocity tests: apply controlled Faraday/dispersion-gradient biases to validate the linear ε_NR–L_CP regime.
- Synchronized measurements: phase spectrum + Allan deviation + OTDR/polarimetry to confirm the hard link between C_k and σ_y / φ_res.
- Environmental suppression: vibration/thermal/pressure stabilization to reduce σ_env and isolate Tensor Background Noise effects.
External References
- Allan, D. W. Time and frequency stability: Allan variance and beyond.
- Calonico, D., et al. High-accuracy optical two-way time–frequency transfer.
- Ghori, K., et al. Asymmetry and nonreciprocity in bidirectional links.
- Lipiński, M., et al. White Rabbit time synchronization concepts.
- Walls, F. L., & Vig, J. R. Fundamental limits in phase-noise and stability.
Appendix A|Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Selected)
- Metric dictionary: L_CP, ε_NR, φ_res, S_φ(f), σ_y(τ), τ_c, P_unl, T_rec, DGD_res per Section II; SI units.
- Processing details: change-point detection (Pruned Exact Linear + second derivative), joint inversion of non-reciprocity/PMD, spectral estimation (Welch + multi-segment averaging), error propagation (TLS + EIV), hierarchical Bayesian sampling (multi-chain, R̂ < 1.05, IAT > 50).
Appendix B|Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Selected)
- Leave-one-span-out: parameter drift < 15%; RMSE variation < 10%.
- Hierarchical robustness: σ_env↑ → stronger low-f S_φ, higher L_CP and ε_NR, lower KS_p; γ_Path > 0 at > 3σ confidence.
- Noise stress test: add 5% 1/f drift and random switching events → ψ_env and ζ_topo rise; overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with γ_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2), posterior mean shift < 9%; evidence change ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
- Cross-validation: k = 5 CV error 0.043; new blind conditions maintain ΔRMSE ≈ −12%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/