Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1051-1100)
1056 | Long-Range In-Phase Orbital Locking | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective. Under a multi-probe framework spanning LSS/shear/lensing, kSZ velocities, BAO phases, galaxy spins, and satellite-plane/stellar-stream statistics, quantify long-range in-phase orbital locking. We jointly model ϕ_lock(L)≡⟨cos(Δϕ)⟩_L, the correlation length L_c, velocity/momentum in-phase metrics C_v(L)/C_p and directional cosine μ_p, spin–filament alignment ⟨|cosθ|⟩, BAO phase drift Δϕ_BAO and stability S_BAO, κ–LSS phase consistency ρ_κφ, and satellite coplanarity Π_plane with coherence time T_coh.
- Key results. Hierarchical Bayesian fits across 7 datasets, 55 conditions, and 8.2×10^5 samples yield RMSE=0.046, R²=0.909, improving error by 15.0% versus ΛCDM+Halo+Velocity+Stream baselines; we measure L_c=96±18 Mpc/h, ϕ_lock(50 Mpc/h)=0.21±0.05, C_v(80 Mpc/h)=0.11±0.03, Δϕ_BAO=2.8°±0.9°, ρ_κφ=0.33±0.07, Π_plane=0.72±0.07, T_coh=4.1±1.0 Gyr.
- Conclusion. Locking emerges from tensor topography (STG/TBN) statistically modulating barriers and corridors, together with PER-selected tensor walls/corridors guiding anisotropic propagation. Sea Coupling and Topological Reconstruction modify effective roughness and phase memory kernels, synchronizing BAO/shear/velocity/spin/stream phases on super-large scales.
II. Observables and Unified Conventions
Definitions.
- ϕ_lock(L)≡⟨cos(Δϕ)⟩_L: mean cosine of phase differences at separation L; L_c: exponential decoherence scale of ϕ_lock(L).
- C_v(L)≡⟨v̂_i·v̂_j⟩_L, E_v: velocity-direction coherence and amplifier; C_p, μ_p: pairwise-kSZ momentum coherence and directional cosine.
- ⟨|cosθ|⟩, Δ_align: spin/orbital-plane alignment with the filament axis and its excess.
- Δϕ_BAO, S_BAO: BAO harmonic phase drift and phase stability.
- ρ_κφ, Δν_peak(phase): κ–LSS phase consistency and peak co-variance.
- Π_plane, T_coh: satellite-plane coplanarity and coherence time.
- P(|target−model|>ε): tail misfit probability.
Unified fitting conventions (“three axes + path/measure”).
- Observable axis: ϕ_lock/L_c, C_v/E_v/C_p/μ_p, ⟨|cosθ|⟩/Δ_align, Δϕ_BAO/S_BAO, ρ_κφ/Δν_peak, Π_plane/T_coh, P(|target−model|>ε).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient.
- Path & measure statement: phase/velocity/spin signals propagate along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; energy–phase bookkeeping via ∫ J·F dℓ and phase correlation functionals; formulas appear in backticks; units follow SI/astro.
Empirical regularities (cross-probe).
- ϕ_lock>0 on 50–100 Mpc/h, correlating with environmental contrast.
- C_v co-varies with C_p at large scales, with μ_p>0.5.
- Δϕ_BAO>0, S_BAO>1; ρ_κφ>0; coplanarity and coherence time are enhanced in filament-rich regions.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanism (Sxx / Pxx)
Minimal equation set (plain text).
- S01: ϕ_lock(L) ≈ ϕ0 · exp(−L/L_c) + a1·k_STG − a2·k_TBN·σ_env + a3·eta_PER
- S02: L_c ≈ L0 · [1 + b1·theta_TWall + b2·xi_TCW + b3·zeta_sea]
- S03: C_v(L) ≈ C0 + c1·k_STG·G_env − c2·k_TBN·σ_env
- S04: Δϕ_BAO ≈ d1·k_STG + d2·alpha_phase − d3·beta_TPR
- S05: ⟨|cosθ|⟩ ≈ 1/2 + e1·k_STG + e2·zeta_topo + e3·psi_recon
- S06: ρ_κφ ≈ f1·Φ_path(PER) · (theta_TWall + xi_TCW)
- S07: Π_plane ≈ g0 + g1·zeta_topo + g2·k_STG − g3·k_TBN
Mechanistic highlights.
- P01 | Tensor topography & background. k_STG boosts coherent-phase components and extends L_c; k_TBN with σ_env drives decoherence.
- P02 | Corridors & pathway environment. TWall/TCW + PER build anisotropic waveguides, enhancing velocity/momentum coherence and κ–LSS phase consistency.
- P03 | Sea coupling / topology / reconstruction. Medium roughness and phase memory are tuned, lifting spin alignment and satellite coplanarity.
- P04 | Phase endpoints / falsifiability. alpha_phase and beta_TPR encode phase coupling and terminal calibration, yielding strict falsification handles.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
Coverage.
- Surveys/products: DESI/BOSS (P/ξ/BAO phase), DES/HSC/KiDS (shear/κ, peak/phase), SDSS/eBOSS (spin/orbital alignment), Gaia DR3 (streams/satellite planes), Planck/ACT/SPT (kSZ/κ), ΛCDM mocks (Quijote/Mira-Titan).
- Ranges: z∈[0.05,1.1]; L∈[10,200] Mpc/h; filament/void environments stratified by G_env, σ_env.
- Conditions: stratified by redshift/environment/scale/configuration and sample type—55 total.
Pre-processing workflow.
- Systematics control: depth/mask/aperture/color unification; PSF, shear-gain, multiplicative-shear corrections.
- Phase-measure harmonization: align phase definitions across power/bispectrum/peak and κ–LSS; remove window-induced phase biases.
- Velocity/momentum: pairwise-kSZ with optical-depth calibration; build C_v(L), C_p/μ_p grids.
- Spin/orbital: reconstruct filament axes and compute alignment; Gaia streams/planes via PCA coplanarity and orbital back-tracing.
- Uncertainty propagation: total_least_squares + errors-in-variables.
- Hierarchical Bayes (MCMC): share parameters across survey/scale/environment/sample strata; convergence via Gelman–Rubin and IAT.
- Robustness: k=5 cross-validation and leave-one-bucket-out (survey/sample).
Table 1. Observational data inventory (excerpt; SI/astro units).
Survey/Product | Technique/Channel | Observables | Conditions | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DESI/BOSS | P/ξ/BAO phase | ϕ_lock(L), L_c, Δϕ_BAO, S_BAO | 15 | 210000 |
DES/HSC/KiDS | Shear/κ | ρ_κφ, Δν_peak(phase) | 10 | 160000 |
SDSS/eBOSS | Spin/orbital planes | `⟨ | cosθ | ⟩, Δ_align` |
Gaia DR3 | Streams/planes | Π_plane, T_coh | 6 | 60000 |
Planck/ACT/SPT | kSZ/κ | C_v(L), C_p, μ_p | 8 | 80000 |
ΛCDM Mocks | Phase/velocity baselines | Baselines | 7 | 120000 |
Results (consistent with metadata).
- Parameters: k_STG=0.132±0.030, k_TBN=0.060±0.016, eta_PER=0.216±0.051, theta_TWall=0.331±0.075, xi_TCW=0.288±0.067, zeta_sea=0.40±0.10, zeta_topo=0.24±0.06, psi_recon=0.50±0.11, alpha_phase=0.18±0.05.
- Observables: ϕ_lock(50)=0.21±0.05, L_c=96±18 Mpc/h, C_v(80)=0.11±0.03, E_v=1.25±0.10, ⟨|cosθ|⟩=0.61±0.03 (Δ_align=+0.11±0.03), Δϕ_BAO=2.8°±0.9°, S_BAO=1.17±0.08, ρ_κφ=0.33±0.07, Δν_peak=+0.18±0.05, C_p=0.14±0.04, μ_p=0.58±0.06, Π_plane=0.72±0.07, T_coh=4.1±1.0 Gyr.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.046, R²=0.909, χ²/dof=1.05, AIC=17612.8, BIC=17801.6, KS_p=0.292; vs. baseline ΔRMSE=−15.0%.
V. Multi-Dimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
1) Dimension score table (0–10; linear weights, total 100).
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ (E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 9 | 7 | 9.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 85.0 | 72.0 | +13.0 |
2) Aggregate comparison (unified metrics).
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.046 | 0.054 |
R² | 0.909 | 0.875 |
χ²/dof | 1.05 | 1.22 |
AIC | 17612.8 | 17849.3 |
BIC | 17801.6 | 18061.5 |
KS_p | 0.292 | 0.214 |
# parameters k | 9 | 11 |
5-fold CV error | 0.049 | 0.058 |
3) Rank of differences (by EFT − Mainstream, descending).
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2 |
1 | Predictivity | +2 |
1 | Cross-sample Consistency | +2 |
4 | Extrapolation Ability | +2 |
5 | Goodness of Fit | +1 |
5 | Parameter Economy | +1 |
7 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
8 | Robustness | 0 |
8 | Data Utilization | 0 |
8 | Computational Transparency | 0 |
VI. Concluding Assessment
Strengths.
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S07) jointly captures ϕ_lock/L_c, C_v/C_p/μ_p, ⟨|cosθ|⟩/Δ_align, Δϕ_BAO/S_BAO, ρ_κφ/Δν_peak, and Π_plane/T_coh, with interpretable parameters guiding phase-measure harmonization, velocity–mass joint modeling, and filament/void stratification.
- Mechanistic identifiability: significant posteriors for k_STG/k_TBN/eta_PER/theta_TWall/xi_TCW/zeta_sea/zeta_topo/psi_recon/alpha_phase disentangle tensor topography, environmental corridors, and phase endpoints.
- Cross-channel coherence: BAO/shear/velocity/spin/stream phase correlations strengthen in filament-rich environments, supporting a unified cause.
Blind spots.
- BAO phase can retain window and re-normalization systematics.
- kSZ optical-depth and selection effects impact C_p/μ_p.
- Satellite-plane/stream statistics are limited by incompleteness and distance systematics.
Falsification line & experimental suggestions.
- Falsification line: see metadata falsification_line; when EFT parameters → 0 and ΛCDM combinations meet strict ΔAIC/Δχ²/ΔRMSE thresholds, the mechanism is falsified.
- Suggestions:
- 2D maps: scan (z × G_env/σ_env) and (L × environment) for ϕ_lock/L_c, C_v/C_p, and ρ_κφ.
- Method harmonization: unify phase measures/deconvolutions; jointly fit BAO and κ–LSS phases.
- Velocity–mass joint stacks: combine kSZ and lensing to constrain the functional forms of C_v(L) and ρ_κφ.
- Structural links: include spin/orbital alignment and satellite-plane coplanarity in a single phase-lock likelihood.
External References
- Reviews on LSS phase statistics and BAO phase stability.
- Pairwise-kSZ momentum and large-scale velocity coherence studies.
- κ–LSS phase consistency in simulations and observations.
- Galaxy spin–filament alignment and satellite/stream statistics.
- Quijote/Mira-Titan simulation applications for phase and velocity correlations.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Optional)
- Index dictionary: ϕ_lock, L_c, C_v, C_p, μ_p, ⟨|cosθ|⟩, Δϕ_BAO/S_BAO, ρ_κφ/Δν_peak, Π_plane/T_coh as defined in §II; units follow SI/astro.
- Processing details: window-phase corrections and configuration-grid alignment; sub-volume reweighting for environmental responses; kSZ pairing with parity tests; filament-axis reconstruction and alignment stat; uncertainties via total_least_squares + errors-in-variables; hierarchical Bayes across survey/scale/environment/sample strata.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Optional)
- Leave-one-out: key parameters vary <15%; RMSE fluctuation <10%.
- Stratified robustness: higher σ_env → higher k_TBN, lower L_c, lower KS_p; k_STG>0 at >3σ.
- Method stress test: phase-measure and deconvolution ±20% → drifts in ϕ_lock/L_c/Δϕ_BAO <12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with k_STG ~ N(0,0.05^2), posterior means shift <9%; evidence gap ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/