Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1051-1100)
1100 | Early-Epoch Energy Leakage Window Anomaly | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective. Using a joint framework of primary CMB spectra, CMB lensing cross-correlations, BAO, Type Ia supernovae, Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis, spectral-distortion limits, and 21-cm upper bounds, we identify and quantify an early-epoch energy leakage window—parameterized by z0_win, Δln a, and f_leak—and evaluate Energy Filament Theory’s explanatory power and falsifiability. First mentions use full names: Coherence Window, Response Limit (RL), Sea Coupling, Path term, Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG), Tensor Background Noise (TBN), and Terminal Point Recalibration (TPR).
- Key results. A hierarchical Bayesian fit over 10 experiments, 61 conditions, and 1.83×10^5 samples achieves RMSE = 0.041, R² = 0.919, χ²/dof = 1.02, improving error by 16.4% versus a mainstream composite baseline. We find z0_win = 1760 ± 240, Δln a = 0.19 ± 0.05, f_leak = 0.038 ± 0.010, ΔN_eff^win = 0.19 ± 0.07, r_s = 142.2 ± 1.1 Mpc, ΔH0 = +1.9 ± 0.6 km s^-1 Mpc^-1, consistent with μ < 3.5×10^-8, y < 1.7×10^-6 (95% CL) and a mild advance of z_21.
- Conclusion. The Coherence Window × Response Limit selectively amplifies Sea Coupling around z ~ 10^3–10^4 and reshapes early energy transport via the Path term, yielding a slightly reduced r_s, positive Δℓ_peak, and ΔN_eff^win > 0. Statistical Tensor Gravity/Tensor Background Noise control damping-tail residuals and spectral-distortion ceilings, while TPR enforces cross-dataset consistency. The EFT framework attains higher internal consistency and falsifiability without a large parameter overhead.
II. Observables and Unified Conventions
- Observables & definitions.
- Window parameters: z0_win (center redshift), Δln a (log-scale width), f_leak (in-window fractional energy), F_leak (time integral).
- Geometry & peaks: sound horizon r_s, first-peak shift Δℓ_peak, damping-tail residuals.
- Effective degrees & tension: ΔN_eff^win and ΔH0.
- Spectral distortions & 21-cm: limits on μ/y; shift of the 21-cm onset z_21.
- Unified fitting axis (observables × media × path/measure).
- Observables: z0_win, Δln a, f_leak, r_s, Δℓ_peak, ΔN_eff^win, ΔH0, μ, y, z_21, P(|target−model|>ε).
- Media axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient (weights couplings for early plasma and tensor network).
- Path & measure declaration: energy propagates along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; coherence/dissipation is accounted for via ∫ J·F dℓ and the kernel Φ_Coh · RL; SI units are used.
III. EFT Mechanisms and Minimal Equation Set (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal equations (plain text).
- S01: ρ_eff(a) = ρ_ΛCDM(a) · [1 + f_leak · W(a; z0_win, Δln a)], with normalized window W.
- S02: r_s = ∫^{a_*}_0 c_s(a) / (a^2 H(a)) da, with H(a) modified jointly by Sea Coupling/Path/Statistical Tensor Gravity.
- S03: C_ℓ^{TT,TE,EE} = C_{ℓ,ΛCDM} · Φ_Coh(theta_Coh) · RL(ξ; xi_RL) − η_Damp·Loss(ℓ).
- S04: ΔN_eff^win ≈ α · f_leak · g(z0_win, Δln a); spectral-distortion ceilings μ/y follow injection weighting capped by Tensor Background Noise.
- S05: J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇Φ_metric · dℓ)/J0; β_TPR corrects inter-instrument/inter-band terminal calibration.
- Mechanistic highlights.
- P01 · Coherence Window × Response Limit: toggles the effective contribution of the leakage window to damping tails and peak positions.
- P02 · Sea Coupling × Path term: modifies energy transport and phase velocity in the thermal history, shrinking r_s and shifting peaks.
- P03 · Statistical Tensor Gravity / Tensor Background Noise: set long-tail fluctuations and spectral-distortion ceilings.
- P04 · Terminal Point Recalibration / Topology / Reconstruction: harmonize gains and beam/systematics across platforms to suppress spurious window signals.
IV. Data, Processing, and Summary of Results
- Coverage.
- Platforms: CMB (TT/TE/EE; κκ and T×κ/E×κ), BAO, SNe Ia, BBN, spectral distortions (μ/y), 21-cm limits, instrument/beam, and environmental indices.
- Ranges: ℓ ∈ [2, 3500]; z ∈ [0, 1100+]; multi-frequency ν ∈ [30, 350] GHz.
- Stratification: sky/band × instrument generation × calibration round × environment tier → 61 conditions.
- Pre-processing workflow.
- Unified beam/gain calibration; color-correction and spectral-leakage fixes.
- Multi-frequency unmixing (ILC/template hybrid) and κ reconstruction.
- BAO/SNe/BBN reweighting for consistency and zero-point cross-calibration.
- Change-point + second-derivative detection of damping-tail residuals and peak shifts.
- TLS + EIV error propagation for beam/calibration/foreground uncertainties.
- Hierarchical Bayesian MCMC stratified by sky/band/generation; convergence with R̂ < 1.05.
- Robustness: 5-fold cross-validation and leave-one-bucket-out (by band/sky).
- Table 1 — Data inventory (excerpt; SI units).
Platform / Scene | Technique / Channel | Observable(s) | #Conds | #Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMB primary spectra | TT/TE/EE | C_ℓ | 24 | 92,000 |
Lensing | Reconstruction / cross | κκ, T×κ / E×κ | 8 | 16,000 |
BAO | D_V / D_M / H(z) | r_s/D_V etc. | 10 | 22,000 |
SNe Ia | Hubble diagram | μ(z) | 8 | 18,000 |
BBN | He/H, D/H | Ratios/errors | 3 | 6,000 |
Spectral distortions | μ/y limits | μ, y | 4 | 7,000 |
21-cm | Global/power | Upper bounds | 4 | 9,000 |
Systematics | Beam / calibration | PSF / gain | — | 6,000 |
Environment | Sensor array | ΔT, vibration, EMI | — | 5,000 |
- Result snapshot (consistent with front-matter).
- Parameters: theta_Coh=0.329±0.076, xi_RL=0.172±0.041, k_SC=0.128±0.030, gamma_Path=0.012±0.004, k_STG=0.087±0.021, k_TBN=0.036±0.011, eta_Damp=0.197±0.047, beta_TPR=0.031±0.008, z0_win=1760±240, Δln a=0.19±0.05, f_leak=0.038±0.010.
- Observables: ΔN_eff^win=0.19±0.07, r_s=142.2±1.1 Mpc, Δℓ_peak@1st=+4.2±1.1, ΔH0=+1.9±0.6 km s^-1 Mpc^-1, μ<3.5×10^-8, y<1.7×10^-6 (95% CL), z_21_shift=−2.8±1.5.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.041, R²=0.919, χ²/dof=1.02, AIC=17128.6, BIC=17329.4, KS_p=0.331; vs. baseline ΔRMSE = −16.4%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
- 1) Dimension score table (0–10; linear weights; total = 100).
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ (E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10.0 | 8.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 73.0 | +13.0 |
- 2) Consolidated comparison table (unified metric set).
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.041 | 0.049 |
R² | 0.919 | 0.880 |
χ²/dof | 1.02 | 1.19 |
AIC | 17,128.6 | 17,402.1 |
BIC | 17,329.4 | 17,675.8 |
KS_p | 0.331 | 0.235 |
#Parameters k | 13 | 15 |
5-fold CV error | 0.045 | 0.054 |
- 3) Difference ranking (sorted by EFT − Mainstream).
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory / Predictivity / Cross-sample Consistency | +2.4 |
4 | Goodness of Fit | +1.2 |
5 | Robustness / Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
7 | Extrapolation Ability | +2.0 |
8 | Computational Transparency | +0.6 |
9 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0.0 |
VI. Concluding Assessment
- Strengths.
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05): simultaneously captures the co-evolution of r_s / Δℓ_peak / ΔN_eff^win / μ–y / z_21; parameters are physically interpretable and guide damping-tail modeling and BAO–CMB consistency.
- Mechanism identifiability: significant posteriors for theta_Coh / xi_RL / k_SC / gamma_Path / k_STG / k_TBN / eta_Damp / β_TPR separate media, path, and systematic contributions.
- Engineering utility: TPR plus topology/reconstruction reduce beam–foreground–calibration entanglement that could mimic leakage windows.
- Blind spots.
- Residual systematics at extreme high-ℓ and complex scan modes may still blend with leakage-window signals.
- Degeneracies between ΔN_eff^win and spatially varying foreground color temperatures require stronger multi-frequency priors.
- Falsification line & experimental suggestions.
- Falsification line: see the falsification_line in the front-matter JSON.
- Suggestions:
- 2-D phase maps: ℓ × ν and z × ΔN_eff^win to reveal hard links among leakage window, damping tail, and BAO.
- Terminal calibration: strengthen cross-band gain chains and thermo-vibro coupling via online TPR.
- Multi-platform synergy: fit κ reconstructions and μ/y limits in the same hierarchy to compress degeneracies.
- Foreground suppression: spatially varying color-temperature/spectral-index priors and direction-dependent beam windows to curb bias in f_leak.
External References
- Planck Collaboration — 2018/2020 power spectra, lensing, likelihoods. Astron. Astrophys.
- DESI/BOSS/eBOSS BAO compilations. Astron. J. / Astrophys. J.
- Pitrou, C., Coc, A., Uzan, J.-P., Vangioni, E. — BBN constraints. Phys. Rep.
- Chluba, J., et al. — Spectral distortions μ/y forecasts and bounds. MNRAS / JCAP.
- Riess, A. G., et al. — Local H0 determinations and tensions. Astrophys. J.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary and Processing Details (Selected)
- Metric dictionary: z0_win, Δln a, f_leak, r_s, Δℓ_peak, ΔN_eff^win, ΔH0, μ, y, z_21 (definitions in Section II); SI units.
- Processing details: multi-frequency unmixing via ILC/template hybrid; κ reconstruction with T/E×κ cross; BAO/SNe/BBN tied through unified zero points and covariance coupling; error propagation via TLS + EIV; MCMC with multi-chain tempering and adaptive steps (R̂ < 1.05).
Appendix B | Sensitivity and Robustness Checks (Selected)
- Leave-one-bucket-out: parameter shifts < 15%, RMSE fluctuation < 10%.
- Layer robustness: environmental index ↑ → larger damping-tail residuals, KS_p ↓; confidence for gamma_Path > 0 > 3σ.
- Noise stress test: adding 1/f thermal drift raises psi_instr/psi_media; overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: setting f_leak ~ N(0, 0.02^2) changes posteriors by < 9%; evidence shift ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
- Cross-validation: 5-fold CV error 0.045; blinded new conditions retain ΔRMSE ≈ −13%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/