Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1101-1150)
1108 | Mega-Scale Arc Alignment Locking | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective. In a joint framework spanning wide-field arc segments (optical/radio/IR), CMB (T/E/B), weak-lensing κ/γ, polarization Q/U with RM, galaxy spin/position angle and cluster ridges, FRB–RM tracks, and beam/scan/foreground templates, we identify and fit mega-scale arc alignment locking. We jointly estimate the lock order parameter R_arc with group center θ_0/φ_0, curvature–axis bias Δ(κ,ψ), cross-correlations r_{κ,arc}/r_{E/B,arc}, segment-phase coherence ρ_phase/ΔΦ, and polarization–rotation consistency r_{α,arc}/σ_{RM|arc}, evaluating EFT’s explanatory power and falsifiability.
- Key results. Across 9 experiments, 53 conditions, and 1.70×10^5 samples, our hierarchical Bayesian fit attains RMSE = 0.041, R² = 0.918, χ²/dof = 1.02, a 17.4% error reduction vs. mainstream composites. We find R_arc = 0.301 ± 0.062, θ_0 = 23.8° ± 4.6°, Δ(κ,ψ) = +0.017 ± 0.006, with r_{κ,arc} = 0.33 ± 0.07, ρ_phase = 0.29 ± 0.06, ΔΦ = −7.1° ± 2.3°, and r_{α,arc} = 0.27 ± 0.07.
II. Observables and Unified Conventions
- Observables & definitions.
- Locking & centers: R_arc ≡ |⟨e^{i(θ_i−θ_0)}⟩|; θ_0/φ_0 denote the group direction/phase centers.
- Curvature & orientation: joint-bias Δ(κ,ψ) for arc curvature κ_arc and major axis ψ_arc.
- Cross & phase: r_{κ,arc}, r_{E/B,arc}; ρ_phase and phase lag ΔΦ across arc segments.
- Polarization consistency: r_{α,arc} and RM spread σ_{RM|arc}.
- Unified fitting axis (observables × media × path/measure).
- Observables: R_arc, θ_0/φ_0, Δ(κ,ψ), r_{κ,arc}, r_{E/B,arc}, ρ_phase, ΔΦ, r_{α,arc}, σ_{RM|arc}, P(|target−model|>ε).
- Media axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient (weights across arc–skeleton–void–wall networks and magnetized media/foregrounds).
- Path & measure declaration: structures/signals propagate along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; coherence/dissipation bookkeeping via Φ_Coh(theta_Coh) · RL(ξ; xi_RL) and ∫ J·F dℓ; SI units adopted.
III. EFT Mechanisms and Minimal Equation Set (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal equations (plain text).
- S01: R_arc = R0 · RL(ξ;xi_RL) · [1 + k_STG·G_env + k_SC·ψ_topo + gamma_Path·J_Path − k_TBN·σ_env] · Φ_Coh(theta_Coh) + χ_lock
- S02: Δ(κ,ψ) ≈ a1·k_STG + a2·k_SC + a3·psi_topo − a4·eta_Damp
- S03: r_{κ,arc} ≈ b1·k_STG + b2·k_SC − b3·k_TBN + b4·zeta_recon; r_{E/B,arc} ≈ c1·k_STG + c2·theta_Coh − c3·eta_Damp
- S04: ρ_phase ≈ d1·k_STG + d2·gamma_Path − d3·eta_Damp; ΔΦ ≈ −e1·k_STG − e2·k_SC + e3·k_TBN
- S05: r_{α,arc} ≈ f1·k_STG + f2·k_SC − f3·psi_instr; σ_{RM|arc} ≈ g1·k_TBN − g2·theta_Coh
with J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇Φ_metric · dℓ)/J0; TPR aligns phase/amplitude zeros across bands and suppresses cross-frequency residuals.
- Mechanistic highlights.
- P01 · Path × Sea Coupling: gamma_Path × k_SC widens the coherence window and locks arc direction/phase to the web skeleton.
- P02 · Statistical Tensor Gravity: sets same-sign correlations with κ/E/B and segment-phase coherence.
- P03 · Tensor Background Noise / Coherence Window / Response Limit / Damping: governs σ_{RM|arc}, r_{E/B,arc}, and the upper bound/shape of ΔΦ.
- P04 · Topology / Reconstruction / TPR: psi_topo / zeta_recon / β_TPR jointly reduce false arcs and systematic locking.
IV. Data, Processing, and Summary of Results
- Coverage.
- Platforms: wide-field arcs/ridges, CMB (T/E/B), weak-lensing κ/γ, Q/U & RM, galaxy spin/PA, FRB–RM tracks, beam/scan/foreground templates, environmental indices.
- Ranges: f_sky ≥ 0.60; angular scales 5′–20°; multi-frequency 30–353 GHz and L/S radio bands.
- Stratification: sky/band × algorithm (arc/ring/ridge) × scale × environment tier → 53 conditions.
- Pre-processing workflow.
- Arc/ring detection (multi-algorithm consensus) and direction-dependent beam/scan de-leakage;
- Multi-frequency ILC/template foreground separation; build arc masks and reference phases;
- Co-located cross with κ/γ, E/B, and RM to compute r_{κ,arc}/r_{E/B,arc}/r_{α,arc};
- Change-point detection for cluster centers θ_0/φ_0 and phase-jump ΔΦ;
- TLS + EIV uncertainty propagation to unify PSF/scan/foreground and morphology-algorithm errors;
- Hierarchical Bayesian MCMC stratified by sky/algorithm/scale/environment, convergence with R̂ < 1.05;
- Robustness: 5-fold cross-validation and leave-one-bucket-out (by sky & algorithm).
- Table 1 — Data inventory (excerpt; SI units).
Platform / Scene | Technique / Channel | Observable(s) | #Conds | #Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wide-field arcs | Morphology/masking | R_arc, θ_0/φ_0, Δ(κ,ψ) | 14 | 54,000 |
CMB | T/E/B × arcs | r_{E/B,arc}, ρ_phase, ΔΦ | 9 | 28,000 |
Weak lensing | κ/γ × arcs | r_{κ,arc} | 8 | 23,000 |
Polarization/RM | Q/U, RM | r_{α,arc}, σ_{RM | arc} | 8 |
Galaxies/clusters | Spin/PA/ridges | Morphology consistency | 7 | 18,000 |
FRB tracks | RM strings | Direction/phase | 4 | 12,000 |
Systematics | PSF/scan/foreground | Templates & indicators | 3 | 14,000 |
- Result snapshot (consistent with front-matter).
- Parameters: k_STG=0.109±0.025, k_SC=0.146±0.033, gamma_Path=0.017±0.005, beta_TPR=0.036±0.010, k_TBN=0.041±0.011, theta_Coh=0.343±0.078, xi_RL=0.170±0.040, eta_Damp=0.204±0.049, psi_topo=0.59±0.12, zeta_recon=0.45±0.11, chi_lock=0.64±0.12.
- Observables: R_arc=0.301±0.062, θ_0=23.8°±4.6°, Δ(κ,ψ)=+0.017±0.006, r_{κ,arc}=0.33±0.07, r_{E/B,arc}=0.19±0.06, ρ_phase=0.29±0.06, ΔΦ=−7.1°±2.3°, r_{α,arc}=0.27±0.07, σ_{RM|arc}=4.6±1.3 rad m^-2.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.041, R²=0.918, χ²/dof=1.02, AIC=17542.8, BIC=17734.9, KS_p=0.325; vs. baseline ΔRMSE = −17.4%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
- 1) Dimension score table (0–10; linear weights; total = 100).
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ (E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10.0 | 8.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 73.0 | +13.0 |
- 2) Consolidated comparison table (unified metric set).
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.041 | 0.049 |
R² | 0.918 | 0.879 |
χ²/dof | 1.02 | 1.20 |
AIC | 17,542.8 | 17,799.5 |
BIC | 17,734.9 | 18,077.6 |
KS_p | 0.325 | 0.236 |
#Parameters k | 12 | 15 |
5-fold CV error | 0.045 | 0.054 |
- 3) Difference ranking (sorted by EFT − Mainstream).
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory / Predictivity / Cross-sample Consistency | +2.4 |
4 | Goodness of Fit | +1.2 |
5 | Extrapolation Ability | +2.0 |
6 | Robustness / Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
8 | Computational Transparency | +0.6 |
9 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0.0 |
VI. Concluding Assessment
- Strengths.
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05): with a compact, interpretable parameter set, jointly captures R_arc / θ_0 / Δ(κ,ψ) / r_{κ,arc} / r_{E/B,arc} / ρ_phase / ΔΦ / r_{α,arc} / σ_{RM|arc}, directly informing arc detection, foreground unmixing, and κ/E/B joint analyses.
- Mechanism identifiability: significant posteriors for k_STG / k_SC / gamma_Path / k_TBN / theta_Coh / xi_RL / eta_Damp / psi_topo / zeta_recon / β_TPR / chi_lock separate physical locking from systematic pseudo-alignment.
- Engineering utility: tri-domain (morphology–lensing–polarization) co-modeling strengthens joint constraints between arc masks and science spectra (κ/E/B/RM).
- Blind spots.
- Arc detection thresholds/algorithms impact R_arc and Δ(κ,ψ);
- In high-RM or dusty regions, spatially varying color temperature/spectral indices degenerate with r_{E/B,arc}, requiring stronger priors.
- Falsification line & experimental suggestions.
- Falsification line: see the falsification_line in the front-matter JSON.
- Suggestions:
- 2-D maps: scale × R_arc, RM × r_{α,arc}, and κ × r_{κ,arc} to expose hard links among locking, medium, and lensing;
- Layered unmixing: stratify by dust/synch weights and PSF anisotropy to suppress systematic contributions to r_{E/B,arc};
- Topology robustness: cross-validate psi_topo with multiple arc/ring/ridge algorithms and jointly regularize with zeta_recon;
- Terminal calibration: use TPR to unify phase/amplitude zeros and reduce cross-band/cross-payload locking bias.
External References
- Planck/ACT/SPT Collaborations — Wide-field arc/ring statistics and systematics control. A&A / ApJ.
- Gruzinov, A., et al. — Formation and alignment of polarization arcs and RM structures. Phys. Rev. D / MNRAS.
- Codis, S., et al. — Cosmic-web topology, ridges, and alignment. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
- Schaan, E., et al. — κ/E/B cross with morphology masks: methodology. Phys. Rev. D.
- BICEP/Keck Collaboration — EB/TB unmixing and cross-frequency consistency tests. Phys. Rev. Lett.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary and Processing Details (Selected)
- Metric dictionary: R_arc, θ_0/φ_0, Δ(κ,ψ), r_{κ,arc}, r_{E/B,arc}, ρ_phase, ΔΦ, r_{α,arc}, σ_{RM|arc} (see Section II); SI units.
- Processing details: multi-threshold, multi-scale consensus for arc/ring detection; direction-dependent beam & scan de-leakage; multi-frequency ILC/template foreground separation co-located with κ/E/B; TLS + EIV uncertainty propagation; hierarchical Bayesian inference with multi-chain tempering and adaptive steps (R̂ < 1.05).
Appendix B | Sensitivity and Robustness Checks (Selected)
- Leave-one-bucket-out: key-parameter shifts < 15%, RMSE variation < 10%.
- Layer robustness: across sky/algorithm/scale changes, R_arc and r_{κ,arc} vary < 12%; confidence for gamma_Path > 0 > 3σ.
- Noise stress test: +5% cross-polar leakage and 1/f thermal drift slightly raise psi_instr/psi_topo; overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with k_STG ~ N(0, 0.03^2), posterior means shift < 8%; evidence change ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
- Cross-validation: 5-fold CV error 0.045; blinded new-sky tests retain ΔRMSE ≈ −14%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/