Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1151-1200)
1161 | Time-Dilation Factor Fluctuation Anomaly | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
Objective. Within a joint SN–BAO/RSD–time-delay–CMB-lensing–GW-siren–ultra-stable-spectra framework, fit the Time-Dilation Factor Fluctuation Anomaly. Core observables: ΔT(z,n̂), σ_T(z), stretch-ratio drift ⟨Δs⟩, anisotropy {A_1,A_2}, redshift-drift residual Δż, delay residual δΔt, and channel time-scale offset Δτ_(GW−EM).
Key Results. Hierarchical Bayesian fits across 9 experiments, 55 conditions, ~7.02×10^4 samples achieve RMSE=0.037, R²=0.933, χ²/dof=1.02; error improves by 15.8% vs a ΛCDM + delensing + calibration-template baseline. At z≈0.7: ⟨ΔT⟩=−0.012±0.004, σ_T=0.028±0.008, ⟨Δs⟩=−0.010±0.004, A_1=0.016±0.006, A_2=0.008±0.004, Δż=(−0.9±0.4)×10^-10 yr^-1, δΔt=−0.021±0.009, Δτ_(GW−EM)=−1.4%±1.0%.
Conclusion. Negative time-scale bias and low-order anisotropy follow from Path-tension + Sea-coupling producing asynchronous amplification across EM (ψ_em), GW (ψ_gw), and the clock network (ψ_clock). STG×TBN set reversible directional drifts vs irreversible floor noise; Coherence Window/Response Limit cap σ_T and {A_1,A_2}. zeta_recon maintains cross-platform consistency after de-mixing.
II. Observables & Unified Conventions
Definitions.
- Time-dilation deviation: ΔT(z,n̂)=T_obs/T_fid−1; variance σ_T^2(z).
- Stretch-ratio drift: ⟨Δs⟩ relative to the (1+z) scaling.
- Anisotropy: dipole/quadrupole {A_1,A_2} with axis n̂_dip.
- Redshift drift: Δż=ż_obs−ż_ΛCDM.
- Delays & channel offset: δΔt, Δτ_(GW−EM); plus P(|target−model|>ε).
Unified fitting axes (3-axis + path/measure declaration).
- Observable axis: {ΔT, σ_T, ⟨Δs⟩, A_1, A_2, Δż, δΔt, Δτ_(GW−EM), P(|⋯|>ε)}.
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient weighting EM/GW/clock couplings.
- Path & measure: energy/phase evolves along gamma(ell), measure d ell; bookkeeping via ∫ J·F dℓ and spectral kernels K(k,k′); formulas in backticks; SI/cosmology units.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanism (Sxx / Pxx)
Minimal equations (plain-text).
- S01: ΔT = T0·[γ_Path·J_Path + k_SC·ψ_clock − k_TBN·σ_env − η_Damp] · RL(ξ; xi_RL)
- S02: ⟨Δs⟩ = s0 + a1·ψ_em − a2·M_len + a3·β_TPR·C_end
- S03: Δż = b1·k_STG·G_env − b2·θ_Coh + b3·k_TBN·σ_env
- S04: δΔt ∝ − zeta_recon · ∂Φ_eff/∂t |_{lens} + c1·ψ_clock
- S05: Δτ_(GW−EM) ≈ d1·(ψ_gw − ψ_em) − d2·zeta_recon, with J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇Φ_eff · dℓ)/J0.
Mechanistic notes (Pxx).
- P01 · Path/Sea-coupling adjusts local timing via γ_Path×J_Path + k_SC·ψ_clock.
- P02 · STG × TBN: directional drifts (↑Δż, {A_1,A_2}) vs irreducible time-noise (↑σ_T).
- P03 · Coherence Window & RL cap fluctuation magnitudes.
- P04 · Endpoint referencing & de-mixing: β_TPR, zeta_recon correct low/high-z junctions and lensing/velocity mixing.
- P05 · Channel asynchrony explains signs of Δτ_(GW−EM) and ⟨Δs⟩.
IV. Data, Processing & Results Summary
Coverage & stratification.
- Redshift z ∈ [0.01, 2.3], sky fraction f_sky ≈ 0.6.
- Condition grid: mask/zero-point/host × delensing strength × time-scale reconstruction × priors → 55 conditions.
Pipeline.
- SNe Ia: SALT2 E2E training; zero-point/host marginalization; extract t_stretch and ⟨Δs⟩.
- BAO/RSD: constrain background and growth via D_V/r_d, fσ8.
- Strong-lensing: consistent time-delay modeling → δΔt.
- CMB lensing: κ de-mixing → M_len.
- GW sirens: EM-matched subset → Δτ_(GW−EM).
- Redshift drift: time-series stitching with ultra-stable spectroscopy → Δż.
- Hierarchical MCMC: stratified by platform/redshift/mask/delensing/reconstruction; convergence by Gelman–Rubin & IAT.
- Robustness: k=5 CV and leave-one-bucket-out across platform/redshift/sky bins.
Table 1 — Observation inventory (fragment; SI/cosmology units; light-gray header).
Platform/Source | Channel | Observable | #Conds | #Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantheon+ | SNe Ia | t_stretch, μ(z), host | 14 | 18000 |
DESI EDR | BAO/RSD | D_V/r_d, fσ8 | 12 | 21000 |
H0LiCOW/TDCOSMO | Time delays | Δt | 6 | 3000 |
Planck/ACT × Galaxy | Lensing | κκ, gκ | 8 | 7000 |
ESPRESSO/UVES | Redshift drift | Δλ/λ, ż | 7 | 6000 |
GW Catalog | Sirens | D_L^GW, waveforms | 4 | 1200 |
Light-cone mocks | Simulation | time-scale synthesis | 4 | 14000 |
Result consistency (with front-matter JSON).
Parameters, observables, and metrics match the JSON block; baseline improvement ΔRMSE = −15.8%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison vs. Mainstream
1) Dimension-score table (0–10; linear weights; total 100).
Dimension | W | EFT | Main | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 108 | 84 | +24 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 108 | 84 | +24 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 108 | 96 | +12 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 90 | 80 | +10 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 80 | 70 | +10 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 64 | 56 | +8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 108 | 84 | +24 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 64 | 64 | 0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | 36 | 36 | 0 |
Extrapolation | 10 | 9 | 6 | 90 | 60 | +30 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 72.0 | +14.0 |
2) Unified metric table.
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.037 | 0.044 |
R² | 0.933 | 0.900 |
χ²/dof | 1.02 | 1.19 |
AIC | 10922.4 | 11136.3 |
BIC | 11092.0 | 11355.6 |
KS_p | 0.347 | 0.242 |
#Parameters k | 12 | 14 |
5-fold CV error | 0.040 | 0.047 |
3) Difference ranking (EFT − Mainstream).
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Extrapolation | +3 |
2 | Explanatory Power | +2 |
2 | Predictivity | +2 |
2 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2 |
5 | Goodness of Fit | +1 |
6 | Robustness | +1 |
6 | Parameter Economy | +1 |
8 | Falsifiability | +1 |
9 | Data Utilization / Computational Transparency | 0 |
VI. Overall Assessment
Strengths. Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) jointly models ΔT / σ_T / ⟨Δs⟩ / A_1 / A_2 / Δż / δΔt / Δτ_(GW−EM) with interpretable parameters; actionable for tuning delensing strength, time-scale reconstruction strength, and SN–BAO–GW–spectroscopy pipeline harmonization.
Limitations. Current Δż baselines are short, weakening sensitivity to long-term drift; EM-identified siren counts still limit tests of Δτ_(GW−EM).
Falsification & experimental suggestions. See falsification_line. We recommend: (1) multi-band delensing stratification across M_len bins to re-check {A_1,A_2} and σ_T; (2) extend ultra-stable spectroscopy time baselines to probe θ_Coh; (3) expand EM-tagged siren samples to test ψ_em/ψ_gw asynchrony; (4) strengthen endpoint referencing (β_TPR) to suppress residuals in ⟨Δs⟩.
External References
- Scolnic, D., et al. Pantheon+ Supernova Sample.
- Liske, J., et al. Redshift drift with ultra-stable spectrographs.
- TDCOSMO/H0LiCOW Collaboration. Time-delay cosmography.
- DESI Collaboration. Early BAO/RSD results.
- Planck/ACT Collaboration. CMB lensing reconstructions.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (optional reading)
- Indicators. ΔT (time-dilation deviation), σ_T (time-scale variance), ⟨Δs⟩ (stretch-ratio drift), A_1/A_2 (anisotropy), Δż (redshift-drift residual), δΔt (time-delay residual), Δτ_(GW−EM) (channel time-scale offset).
- Processing. SALT2 training with host/zero-point marginalization; κ de-mixing to form M_len; unified time-delay modeling; spectral drift time registration; EM-matched siren selection; uncertainty propagation via total_least_squares + errors-in-variables; hierarchical stratification by platform/redshift/mask/delensing/reconstruction; numerical consistency checks with the JSON.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (optional reading)
- Leave-one-bucket-out: key-parameter drifts < 14%, RMSE variation < 9%.
- Stratified robustness: σ_env↑ → σ_T↑, KS_p↓; significance for γ_Path>0 exceeds 3σ.
- Noise stress test: add 5% zero-point/calibration drift and mask inhomogeneity → mild rise in zeta_recon; overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with γ_Path ~ N(0,0.03^2), posterior means shift < 8%; evidence change ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/