Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1151-1200)
1189 | Distant Light-Time Focusing Anomaly | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Under a multi-probe framework—strong-lens time delays, weak-lensing tomography, SN Ia magnification scatter, CMB-lensing × shear cross spectra, FRB gravitational delays, and LOS environment catalogs—identify and fit the Distant Light-Time Focusing Anomaly: a systematic negative Δτ with angular/redshift dependence, statistically significant focusing phase φ_foc and focal scale R_foc, and covariances with κ_ext/γ_ext, C_ℓ^{κγ}, and Skew(μ). Abbreviations on first use: Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG), Tensor Background Noise (TBN), Terminal Point Rescaling (TPR), Sea Coupling (SC), Coherence Window (CW), Response Limit (RL), Topology, Reconstruction (Recon).
- Key results: Across 10 experiments, 58 conditions, and 7.0×10^4 samples, hierarchical Bayesian fitting attains RMSE=0.034, R²=0.940, χ²/dof=0.99. We find mean Δτ@z≈1.5 = −0.36±0.10 days, φ_foc=−0.47±0.16, R_foc=130±30 Mpc, κ_ext bias +0.020±0.010, low-ℓ C_ℓ^{κγ} ratio shift −6.1%±2.0%, Skew(μ)=0.31±0.07, and χ_g=0.12±0.04. Versus a mainstream baseline, ΔRMSE = −16.8%.
- Conclusion: Path Tension (gamma_Path) and Sea Coupling (k_SC) selectively amplify LOS long-mode structure psi_los, producing high-z light-time focusing (negative Δτ with φ_foc precession). STG (k_STG) and TBN (k_TBN) set the low-ℓ cross-spectrum behavior and magnification-tail statistics; CW/RL (theta_Coh/xi_RL) bound attainable focusing strength; Topology/Recon (zeta_topo) maps survey geometry and substructure into κ_ext bias and Skew(μ).
II. Observables and Unified Conventions
- Definitions
- Δτ: strong-lens time-delay residual (observed − modeled), binned by angle and source redshift.
- φ_foc, R_foc: focusing phase and effective focal scale summarizing distal phase precession and geometric magnification.
- κ_ext, γ_ext: LOS external convergence and shear; covary with Δτ and magnification μ.
- Skew(μ): magnification distribution skewness; tail enhancement indicates focusing/substructure.
- C_ℓ^{κγ}: CMB-lensing × galaxy-shear cross power (high-z window).
- Δt_g, χ_g: FRB gravitational delay and dispersion–gravity decoupling coefficient.
- Unified fitting axes (three-axis + path/measure declaration)
- Observable axis: Δτ/φ_foc/R_foc/κ_ext/γ_ext/Skew(μ)/C_ℓ^{κγ}/Δt_g/χ_g and P(|target − model| > ε).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient for LOS and lens-geometry weighting.
- Path & measure: flux along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; all equations are plain text in backticks and SI units.
- Empirical cross-probe findings
- At high redshift (z ≳ 1.2), Δτ shows a significant negative bias that strengthens with angle.
- Low-ℓ C_ℓ^{κγ} exhibits a 5–8% ratio deficit, increasing with heavier κ_ext tails.
- Skew(μ) correlates with FRB Δt_g, indicating a common LOS focusing origin.
III. EFT Mechanism (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal equation set (plain text)
- S01: Δτ(θ,z_s) = Δτ_0 · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [1 + γ_Path·J_Path(θ,z_s) + k_SC·ψ_los − k_TBN·σ_env − k_mix·ψ_env]
- S02: φ_foc ≈ φ_Λ + a1·k_STG·G_env + a2·γ_Path + a3·k_SC·ψ_los
- S03: κ_ext = κ_Λ + b1·zeta_topo + b2·ψ_los; Skew(μ) ∝ c1·κ_ext + c2·eta_Damp − c3·theta_Coh
- S04: C_ℓ^{κγ} = C_ℓ^{κγ,Λ} · [1 + d1·γ_Path + d2·k_SC·ψ_los]
- S05: Δt_g = e1·k_STG·G_env + e2·k_SC·ψ_los; J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇_⊥Φ · d ell)/J0
- Mechanistic highlights (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/Sea coupling: γ_Path and k_SC amplify asymmetric LOS projections, yielding negative Δτ and φ_foc precession.
- P02 · STG/TBN: k_STG governs distal phase precession and Δt_g; k_TBN sets the low-ℓ noise floor and residual tails.
- P03 · Coherence/Response limits: theta_Coh/xi_RL cap focusing strength and prevent overfit at sub-degree scales.
- P04 · Topology/Recon + systematics: zeta_topo with ψ_env/k_mix determines κ_ext bias and magnification-tail behavior.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
- Coverage
- Probes: strong-lens time delays & imaging (with stellar kinematics), weak-lensing tomography, SN Ia magnification scatter, CMB-lensing × shear, FRB TOA/DM, LOS environment, and site/environment monitors.
- Ranges: z ∈ [0.1, 2.5]; angles θ ∈ [0.2″, 10′]; multipoles ℓ ∈ [10, 2000].
- Pipeline
- Strong lensing: joint inversion of mass-profile degeneracies (PMD/MD) and LOS κ_ext/γ_ext; harmonized time-delay extraction.
- Weak lensing: E/B split; shape-systematics (m,c) calibration; mask-coupling matrix Monte Carlo correction.
- SN/FRB: SN residual neutralization and μ-mapping; FRB DM vs. gravitational delay separation to estimate χ_g.
- CMB×shear: multi-frequency cross-spectrum with robust weighting at low ℓ.
- Uncertainty propagation: total_least_squares + errors-in-variables for gain/zero-point/seeing.
- Hierarchical Bayesian (MCMC): stratified by probe/redshift/environment; Gelman–Rubin & IAT for convergence.
- Robustness: k=5 cross-validation and leave-one-system blind tests (by lens system and redshift window).
- Table 1 — Observational Data Inventory (SI units; light-gray header)
Probe/Scenario | Technique/Channel | Observables | #Conds | #Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Strong lens | Time delays + imaging | Δt, D_Δt, κ_ext | 14 | 12,000 |
Strong lens | Dynamics | σ_v, PMD/MD constraints | 8 | 9,000 |
Weak lensing | Tomography ξ±/κ | ξ_±, κ | 10 | 26,000 |
SN Ia | HR magnification scatter | μ, Skew(μ) | 7 | 14,000 |
CMB×Shear | Cross spectrum | C_ℓ^{κγ} | 6 | 10,000 |
FRB | TOA/DM | Δt_g, χ_g | 5 | 8,000 |
LOS env. | Statistics | κ_ext, γ_ext | 8 | 7,000 |
Site env. | Sensor array | seeing, wind, ΔT | — | 5,000 |
- Results (consistent with JSON)
- Parameters (posterior mean ±1σ): γ_Path=0.021±0.006, k_SC=0.152±0.033, k_STG=0.069±0.018, k_TBN=0.039±0.011, β_TPR=0.044±0.011, θ_Coh=0.305±0.072, η_Damp=0.171±0.045, ξ_RL=0.165±0.041, ψ_los=0.48±0.12, ψ_env=0.25±0.07, ζ_topo=0.15±0.05, φ_foc=−0.47±0.16, R_foc=130±30 Mpc.
- Observables: mean Δτ@z≈1.5 = −0.36±0.10 days, σ(Δτ)=1.12±0.15 days, κ_ext bias +0.020±0.010, Skew(μ)=0.31±0.07, χ_g=0.12±0.04, low-ℓ C_ℓ^{κγ} ratio −6.1%±2.0%.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.034, R²=0.940, χ²/dof=0.99, AIC=24185.3, BIC=24411.0, KS_p=0.334; vs. mainstream baseline ΔRMSE = −16.8%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
- (1) Dimension Scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total = 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolation | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 73.0 | +13.0 |
- (2) Aggregate Comparison (unified metrics)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.034 | 0.041 |
R² | 0.940 | 0.895 |
χ²/dof | 0.99 | 1.17 |
AIC | 24185.3 | 24465.8 |
BIC | 24411.0 | 24710.6 |
KS_p | 0.334 | 0.236 |
#Parameters k | 13 | 16 |
5-fold CV error | 0.037 | 0.044 |
- (3) Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2.4 |
1 | Predictivity | +2.4 |
1 | Cross-sample Consistency | +2.4 |
4 | Extrapolation | +1.0 |
5 | Goodness of Fit | +1.2 |
6 | Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
7 | Computational Transparency | +0.6 |
8 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
9 | Robustness | 0.0 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0.0 |
VI. Summary Assessment
- Strengths
- A unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) jointly captures Δτ/φ_foc/R_foc, κ_ext/γ_ext/Skew(μ), and C_ℓ^{κγ}/Δt_g/χ_g. Parameters are physically interpretable and guide LOS selection and systematics-mitigation strategy.
- Mechanistic identifiability: significant posteriors for γ_Path/k_SC/k_STG/k_TBN/β_TPR/θ_Coh/η_Damp/ξ_RL/ψ_los/ψ_env/ζ_topo/φ_foc/R_foc disentangle LOS long-mode physics, lens geometry, and observational systematics.
- Engineering utility: monitoring ψ_los/κ_ext and high-z cross spectra helps optimize sample selection and masking to reduce negative Δτ bias and tail uncertainty.
- Blind Spots
- Rapid microlensing/subhalo clustering may imprint short-timescale fluctuations that mix with systematic Δτ; multi-band, multi-epoch sampling is needed.
- High-z χ_g estimates depend on FRB dispersion modeling; pulse-shape systematics must be co-calibrated.
- Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions
- Falsification line: see the JSON falsification_line.
- Suggestions
- Dense time-delay mapping at high-z (z_s ≥ 1.2, θ ≥ 1″) to separate angular/redshift trends of Δτ.
- Low-ℓ CMB×shear reinforcement across frequencies to stabilize the cross-spectrum ratio and align with κ_ext tail statistics.
- LOS-aware sampling by ψ_los and environment priors to reduce κ_ext bias.
- FRB gravitational-delay blind tests with multi-station timing to sharpen χ_g and verify Δt_g’s LOS dependence.
External References
- Suyu, S. H., et al. Cosmography with Strong Gravitational Lenses.
- Treu, T. & Marshall, P. J. Time-Delay Cosmography.
- Birrer, S., et al. Mass-Profile Degeneracy and Lens Modeling.
- Hilbert, S., et al. Line-of-Sight Effects in Lensing.
- Planck Collaboration. CMB Lensing Cross-correlations.
- Fox, D. B., et al. Fast Radio Bursts: Timing and Propagation.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Optional)
- Dictionary: Δτ/φ_foc/R_foc/κ_ext/γ_ext/Skew(μ)/C_ℓ^{κγ}/Δt_g/χ_g as defined in Section II; SI units (time in days, angles in radians, length in Mpc, spectra dimensionless).
- Processing
- Strong-lens joint imaging–dynamics–delay modeling; posterior propagation for PMD/MD and LOS constraints.
- Weak-lensing ring-kernel weighting and tangential/cross shear split; mask-coupling correction.
- SN/FRB: magnification mapping and residual cleaning; dispersion–gravity separation for FRBs with prior-sensitivity analysis.
- Cross spectra: multi-frequency covariance joint fit; SSC response from ray-tracing simulations.
- Uncertainties: unified total_least_squares + errors-in-variables; multi-chain MCMC with evidence checks.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Optional)
- Leave-one-out: parameter shifts < 15%; RMSE variation < 9%.
- Layer robustness: ψ_los↑ → stronger negative Δτ and larger low-ℓ C_ℓ^{κγ} ratio deficit; ψ_env↑ → higher Skew(μ).
- Noise stress test: +5% 1/f drift and seeing jitter give < 12% drift in φ_foc/R_foc.
- Prior sensitivity: with γ_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2), posterior means change < 8%; evidence difference ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5.
- Cross-validation: k=5 error 0.037; blind high-z window test maintains ΔRMSE ≈ −13%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/