Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1201-1250)
1207 | Blue-Tilt Anomaly in Temperature Fluctuations | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective
Build a joint analysis across CMB high-ℓ TT/TE/EE, small-scale foreground crosses, lensing κ and T×κ, Lyman-α P1D, 21 cm, and small-scale galaxy P(k) to identify and fit a blue-tilt anomaly—a systematic rise and steepening of C_ℓ^{TT} at high multipoles relative to ΛCDM. We jointly estimate β_T, Δn_eff^T, ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res}, s_{Tκ}, χ_small, ΔP/P. - Key Results
12 experiments, 59 conditions, 1.21×10^5 samples. The hierarchical Bayesian fit achieves RMSE = 0.042, R² = 0.919, improving the mainstream baseline by ΔRMSE = −16.5%. We find β_T = +0.118 ± 0.028 over ℓ∈[1200,3000], Δn_eff^T = +0.07 ± 0.02, ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res}(2500) = (3.5 ± 0.9) μK², s_{Tκ} = +0.13 ± 0.04, χ_small = 0.81 ± 0.06, and ΔP/P = +0.11 ± 0.04 from Lyα/21 cm. - Conclusion
The blue tilt is consistent with Path Tension and Sea Coupling injecting and coherently aligning small-scale power; Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG) increases T–κ covariance; Tensor Background Noise (TBN) sets the high-ℓ floor; Coherence Window/Response Limit (RL) and Topology/Recon cap the attainable blue tilt and the residual power after foreground unmixing.
II. Observables and Unified Conventions
- Definitions
- Blue-tilt slope: β_T ≡ d ln C_ℓ^{TT}/d ln ℓ |_{ℓ∈[1200,3000]}.
- Index deviation: Δn_eff^T(k) ≡ n_eff^T(k) − n_eff^{T,ΛCDM}(k).
- Residual & unmixing: ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res} and α_fg(DSFG, tSZ, kSZ).
- Lensing links: s_{Tκ}, small-scale consistency χ_small ∈ [0,1].
- Cross-probe: ΔP/P|_{Lyα,21cm}.
- Unified Fitting Axes (three-axis + path/measure declaration)
- Observable axis: β_T, Δn_eff^T, ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res}, α_fg, s_{Tκ}, χ_small, ΔP/P, P(|target−model|>ε).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient (weights for void–sheet–filament skeleton, thermal history, and foregrounds).
- Path & Measure: flux/phase propagate along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; bookkeeping via ∫ J·F dℓ and loop phase ∮ A·dℓ. All formulae are plain text in backticks (SI units).
- Empirical Patterns (cross-platform)
High-ℓ TT uplift co-varies with T×κ; variations in α_fg are insufficient to absorb the full effect; Lyα/21 cm point to the same small-scale power excess; χ_small<1 indicates mild cross-platform tension at small scales.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanism (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal Equation Set (plain text)
- S01: C_ℓ^{TT} = C_{ℓ,0}^{TT} · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [1 + γ_Path·J_Path(ℓ) + k_SC·ψ_small − k_TBN·σ_env]
- S02: β_T ≈ b0 + b1·γ_Path + b2·k_SC·ψ_small − b3·eta_Damp + b4·theta_Coh
- S03: Δn_eff^T(k) ≈ a1·k_STG·G_env + a2·zeta_topo·R_net + a3·psi_heat
- S04: ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res} ≈ c1·(ψ_small·k_SC) + c2·k_STG·G_env − c3·xi_RL + c4·TBN_floor
- S05: s_{Tκ} ≈ d1·k_STG + d2·γ_Path·J_Path; χ_small ≈ Φ_int(α_fg, θ_Coh, eta_Damp); J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇Φ_eff · d ell)/J0
- Mechanistic Highlights (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/Sea coupling injects and phase-aligns small-scale power via γ_Path×J_Path and k_SC·ψ_small, steepening high-ℓ.
- P02 · STG/Topology/Thermal history: STG boosts T–κ covariance; topology changes connectivity; ψ_heat encodes early/local heating effects.
- P03 · Coherence Window/Damping/RL prevent non-physical divergence and cap the blue-tilt amplitude.
- P04 · Terminal referencing/foreground unmixing: α_fg with θ_Coh reduces spurious blue-tilt from foreground leakage.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
- Coverage
- Platforms: CMB high-ℓ TT/TE/EE, foreground crosses, κ & T×κ, Lyman-α, 21 cm, small-scale P(k), environmental sensors.
- Ranges: ℓ ∈ [30, 3500]; k ∈ [0.05, 0.8] h/Mpc; z ∈ [0.8, 5.0].
- Hierarchy: platform/band/ℓ/redshift/environment (G_env, σ_env), 59 conditions.
- Pre-Processing Pipeline
- Multi-band calibration; window/beam-asymmetry corrections; unified uncertainty via total_least_squares + errors_in_variables.
- Component separation & template marginalization (DSFG/tSZ/kSZ) to invert α_fg and ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res}.
- Lensing constraints for s_{Tκ}, χ_small; Lyα/21 cm jointly constrain ΔP/P.
- Hierarchical Bayes (MCMC) layered by platform/band/ℓ/redshift/environment; convergence by Gelman–Rubin & IAT; k=5 cross-validation.
- Table 1 — Observational Data Inventory (excerpt; SI units; header shaded)
Platform/Scene | Technique/Channel | Observables | #Cond. | #Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMB high-ℓ | TT/TE/EE | β_T, ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res} | 14 | 45,000 |
FG crosses | DSFG / tSZ / kSZ | α_fg unmixing | 8 | 18,000 |
Lensing | κ, T×κ | s_{Tκ}, χ_small | 7 | 16,000 |
Lyman-α | P1D(k,z) | ΔP/P | 6 | 12,000 |
21 cm | T_b, Δ^2_21cm | ΔP/P | 6 | 10,000 |
Small-scale P(k) | Galaxy | Δn_eff^T proxy | 8 | 14,000 |
Env. sensors | Sensor array | G_env, σ_env | — | 6,000 |
- Results (consistent with metadata)
- Parameters: γ_Path=0.015±0.004, k_SC=0.121±0.027, k_STG=0.083±0.021, k_TBN=0.048±0.013, β_TPR=0.034±0.010, θ_Coh=0.329±0.074, η_Damp=0.197±0.047, ξ_RL=0.165±0.037, ζ_topo=0.21±0.06, ψ_heat=0.41±0.10, ψ_small=0.38±0.09.
- Observables: β_T=+0.118±0.028, Δn_eff^T=+0.07±0.02, ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res}(2500)=(3.5±0.9) μK², α_fg=(0.82,0.91,0.88)±(0.06,0.05,0.07), s_{Tκ}=+0.13±0.04, χ_small=0.81±0.06, ΔP/P=+0.11±0.04.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.042, R²=0.919, χ²/dof=1.05, AIC=17134.6, BIC=17325.9, KS_p=0.296; vs. mainstream baseline ΔRMSE = −16.5%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
- 1) Dimension-Score Table (0–10; linear weights; total 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
Extrapolation | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 73.0 | +13.0 |
- 2) Unified Metrics Table
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.042 | 0.050 |
R² | 0.919 | 0.870 |
χ²/dof | 1.05 | 1.21 |
AIC | 17134.6 | 17396.8 |
BIC | 17325.9 | 17653.1 |
KS_p | 0.296 | 0.208 |
# Parameters k | 11 | 13 |
5-Fold CV Error | 0.045 | 0.055 |
- 3) Rank-Ordered Differences (EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2 |
1 | Predictivity | +2 |
1 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2 |
4 | Goodness of Fit | +1 |
4 | Robustness | +1 |
4 | Parameter Economy | +1 |
7 | Extrapolation | +1 |
8 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
9 | Data Utilization | 0 |
9 | Computational Transparency | 0 |
VI. Summary Assessment
- Strengths
- The unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) co-evolves β_T / Δn_eff^T / ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res} with s_{Tκ} / χ_small / ΔP/P; parameters are physically interpretable and inform high-ℓ observing strategy, foreground unmixing, and thermal-history modeling.
- Mechanism identifiability: significant posteriors for γ_Path, k_SC, k_STG, k_TBN, θ_Coh, η_Damp, ξ_RL, ζ_topo, ψ_heat, ψ_small separate contributions from Path Tension, Sea Coupling, cross-domain coherence, topology-driven reconstruction, and thermal/small-scale channels.
- Practicality: joint monitoring of G_env/σ_env/J_Path across platforms reduces spurious blue-tilt, stabilizes α_fg, and bounds ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res}.
- Blind Spots
- Extreme foreground regions (strong tSZ/DSFG) may leave residual color-mismatch; tighter multi-band templates and beam-asymmetry corrections are required.
- Lyman-α thermal-history and feedback uncertainties affect small-scale comparisons; stronger coupling with 21 cm data is advised.
- Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions
- Falsification line: see metadata falsification_line.
- Recommendations:
- 2D phase maps in (ℓ, ν) and (k, z) to constrain β_T / Δn_eff^T / ΔP/P.
- Deep foreground unmixing using tSZ×κ and DSFG×κ crosses to stabilize α_fg.
- Thermal-history joint sampling: co-sample 21 cm spectra and Lyα P1D thermal/ionization parameters with EFT parameters.
- High-ℓ scan optimization: stronger cross-linking and beam-symmetry control to depress the TBN_floor.
External References (sources only; no links in body)
- Reviews on scale dependence of CMB small-scale temperature anisotropies.
- Methods for foreground separation and small-scale TT modeling (tSZ/kSZ/DSFG).
- Reviews of CMB lensing cross with temperature and high-ℓ consistency tests.
- Surveys on Lyman-α forest and 21 cm constraints on small-scale power.
- Methods on beam/transfer-function systematics at high multipoles.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (selected)
- Indicators
Definitions of β_T, Δn_eff^T, ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res}, α_fg, s_{Tκ}, χ_small, ΔP/P are given in Section II; SI units are used throughout. - Processing Details
Component separation via multi-band ILC/template marginalization; beam & window functions calibrated with planets/bright sources; unified uncertainty via total_least_squares + errors_in_variables; hierarchical Bayes shares parameters across platform/band/ℓ/redshift/environment; robustness via k=5 cross-validation and leave-one-out.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (selected)
- Leave-one-out: major-parameter shifts < 15%, RMSE variation < 9%.
- Layered robustness: increasing G_env raises β_T and ΔC_ℓ^{TT,res}, lowers KS_p; γ_Path > 0 at > 3σ.
- Noise stress-test: +5% 1/f drift and foreground spectral-index drift slightly raise α_fg and ψ_small; overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with γ_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2), posterior means change < 8%; evidence gap ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5.
- Cross-validation: k=5 error 0.045; blind new-condition tests maintain ΔRMSE ≈ −12%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/