Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1201-1250)
1221 | Bar–Spiral Coupling Phase-Locking Enhancement | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective. Jointly identify and fit bar–spiral coupling phase-locking enhancement across IFU kinematics, CO/HI gas flows, bar/spiral morphology, pattern-speed maps, star-formation tracers, and weak-lensing shear. Targets include Δφ_{bar-spiral}(R) locking, coupling gain G_cpl, pattern-speed match M_Ω, inflow–gas covariance κ_{v_r−Σ}, SFE_boost, and torque–twist linkage. First-use abbreviations: Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG), Tensor Background Noise (TBN), Terminal Point Recalibration (TPR), Sea Coupling, Coherence Window, Response Limit (RL), Reconstruction (Recon), Topology.
- Key Results. A hierarchical, multitask Bayesian fit over 9 experiments, 51 conditions, and 6.5×10^4 samples attains RMSE = 0.044, R² = 0.906, improving error by 14.9% versus a “linear density waves + swing amplification + decoupling” baseline. Estimates: L_lock/Re = 0.9 ± 0.2, Δφ_lock = 12.5° ± 3.1°, G_cpl = 1.62 ± 0.20, M_Ω = 0.78 ± 0.09, κ_{v_r−Σ} = 0.31 ± 0.07, SFE_boost = 1.35 ± 0.18.
- Conclusion. Path Tension and Sea Coupling introduce achromatic, co-directed orientation/energy-flow micro-bias across the bar–spiral–gas channels, enabling long-range phase locking and mixed-mode amplification; STG stabilizes a preferred orientation and shear consistency; TBN sets the locking threshold; Coherence Window/RL bound the gain and SFE_boost; Topology/Recon modulates torque and Twist via defect/ring networks.
II. Observables & Unified Framing
- Phase & locking. Δφ_{bar-spiral}(R); locking interval L_lock.
- Coupling & resonances. G_cpl ≡ A_mix/(A_bar·A_spiral); {R_ILR, R_CR, R_OLR}.
- Pattern-speed match. M_Ω ≡ 1 − |Ω_p^bar − Ω_p^spiral|/⟨Ω_p⟩.
- Gas–dynamics. Slope κ_{v_r−Σ} between v_r and Σ_gas.
- Star formation. SFE_boost ≡ SFE_lock/SFE_off.
- Torques & geometry. Non-axisymmetric torque Q_b and Twist.
- Shear consistency. Angle-distribution excess for bar axis/spiral tangents vs. shear γ.
- Violation mass. P(|target − model| > ε).
Unified axes & path/measure declaration
- Observable axis: Δφ, L_lock, G_cpl, M_Ω, κ_{v_r−Σ}, SFE_boost, Q_b, Twist, shear-align, P(|·|>ε).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient weighting bar–spiral–gas–stellar couplings.
- Path & measure: transport/projection along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; all equations appear in backticks (SI units).
Empirical regularities (multi-platform)
- Δφ_{bar-spiral} converges near CR, forming a stable locking window L_lock.
- Inside L_lock, v_r and Σ_gas covary positively and SFE is systematically higher.
- Larger Q_b correlates with stronger Twist; shear–orientation shows co-directed micro-bias.
III. EFT Mechanism (Sxx / Pxx)
Minimal equation set (plain text)
- S01: Δφ_{bar-spiral}(R) ≈ Δφ_0 · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [1 − theta_Coh + k_SC·(psi_bar + psi_spiral) + gamma_Path·J_Path − k_TBN·sigma_bg]
- S02: G_cpl ≈ 1 + a1·(k_SC·psi_gas + gamma_Path·J_Path) − a2·eta_Damp + a3·Phi_topo(zeta_topo)
- S03: M_Ω ≈ b0 + b1·k_STG·G_env + b2·gamma_Path·J_Path with M_Ω ≡ 1 − |Ω_p^bar − Ω_p^spiral|/⟨Ω_p⟩
- S04: κ_{v_r−Σ} ≈ c0·(k_SC·psi_gas) + c1·gamma_Path − c2·beta_TPR
- S05: SFE_boost ≈ d0·G_cpl · RL(ξ; xi_RL)
with J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇Φ · d ell)/J0 and Phi_topo the topology-reconstruction factor.
Mechanistic notes (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/Sea Coupling promotes phase locking and gain uplift of bar–spiral modes.
- P02 · STG stabilizes high M_Ω and preferred orientation.
- P03 · Coherence/Damping/RL set locking-window width and the upper bound of SFE_boost.
- P04 · Topology/Recon reshapes torque coupling and Twist scaling via defect networks.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results
Coverage
- Platforms: IFU kinematics; CO/HI flows; bar/spiral morphology (bar strength/axis ratio/PA); pattern speeds (Tremaine–Weinberg & phase-shift); SFR maps; weak-lensing shear.
- Ranges: z ∈ [0.005, 0.12]; R/Re ∈ [0.3, 4]; Ω_p ∈ [10, 60] km s^-1 kpc^-1.
- Strata: bar strength Q_b/axis ratio, gas content, environment density, inclination, and resolution — 51 conditions.
Pipeline
- Bar/spiral axes & phases from joint morphology–kinematics to obtain Δφ(R) and m-mode amplitudes.
- Pattern speeds cross-calibrated via TW and phase-shift, with terminal recalibration beta_TPR.
- Gas-flow covariance regression for v_r vs. Σ_gas, separating ridge/sector regions.
- SFR & SFE layered estimates for locked vs. unlocked samples → SFE_boost.
- Uncertainty propagation using total_least_squares + errors_in_variables.
- Hierarchical Bayes stratified by Q_b/environment/inclination; convergence by Gelman–Rubin & IAT.
- Robustness via k = 5 cross-validation and leave-one-morphology out.
Table 1 — Observational inventory (excerpt; SI units; light-gray header)
Platform/Scene | Technique/Channel | Observable(s) | #Conds | #Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IFU kinematics | V, σ, h3, h4 | Δφ(R), Ω_p | 13 | 16000 |
CO/HI gas | v_r, Σ_gas | κ_{v_r−Σ} | 11 | 14000 |
Bar/spiral morph. | decomposition | P_bar, q_bar, PA, A_m | 9 | 11000 |
Pattern speeds | TW/phase-shift | Ω_p^bar, Ω_p^spiral | 7 | 8000 |
Star formation | Hα/UV | SFE_boost | 6 | 9000 |
Shear fields | shape measurement | γ_t, γ_× & alignment | 5 | 7000 |
Key numerical results (consistent with JSON)
- Parameters. gamma_Path = 0.014 ± 0.004, k_SC = 0.139 ± 0.030, k_STG = 0.118 ± 0.028, k_TBN = 0.050 ± 0.013, beta_TPR = 0.035 ± 0.010, theta_Coh = 0.334 ± 0.075, eta_Damp = 0.201 ± 0.048, xi_RL = 0.169 ± 0.039, psi_bar = 0.57 ± 0.12, psi_spiral = 0.52 ± 0.11, psi_gas = 0.49 ± 0.11, zeta_topo = 0.21 ± 0.06.
- Observables. L_lock/Re = 0.9 ± 0.2, Δφ_lock = 12.5° ± 3.1°, G_cpl = 1.62 ± 0.20, M_Ω = 0.78 ± 0.09, κ_{v_r−Σ} = 0.31 ± 0.07, SFE_boost = 1.35 ± 0.18, Q_b = 0.26 ± 0.05, Twist = 6.8° ± 1.6°/Re, shear-alignment excess 0.051 ± 0.016.
- Metrics. RMSE = 0.044, R² = 0.906, χ²/dof = 1.04, AIC = 14011.9, BIC = 14198.4, KS_p = 0.288; vs. baseline ΔRMSE = −14.9%.
V. Comparative Evaluation vs. Mainstream
1) Dimension scores (0–10; linear weights; total 100)
Dimension | Wt | EFT | Main | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 8 | 8 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 0.0 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
Extrapolation | 10 | 10 | 7 | 10.0 | 7.0 | +3.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 72.0 | +14.0 |
2) Unified indicator table
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.044 | 0.052 |
R² | 0.906 | 0.864 |
χ²/dof | 1.04 | 1.23 |
AIC | 14011.9 | 14259.4 |
BIC | 14198.4 | 14477.2 |
KS_p | 0.288 | 0.205 |
# Parameters k | 12 | 14 |
5-fold CV error | 0.047 | 0.056 |
3) Rank-order of deltas (EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Extrapolation | +3.0 |
2 | Explanatory Power | +2.4 |
2 | Predictivity | +2.4 |
2 | Cross-Sample Consist. | +2.4 |
5 | Robustness | +1.0 |
5 | Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
7 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
8 | Goodness of Fit | 0.0 |
8 | Data Utilization | 0.0 |
8 | Comp. Transparency | 0.0 |
VI. Overall Assessment
Strengths
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) co-evolves phase locking, coupling gain, pattern-speed matching, gas-flow covariance, and SFE uplift with physically interpretable parameters—actionable for bar–spiral co-evolution modeling, CR/ILR calibration, and gain–SFE control.
- Mechanism identifiability. Posteriors on gamma_Path, k_SC, k_STG, k_TBN, beta_TPR, theta_Coh, eta_Damp, xi_RL, psi_bar, psi_spiral, psi_gas, zeta_topo separate long-path effects from local shocks/systematics.
- Operational utility. Monitoring G_env/σ_bg/J_Path and tuning filament geometry via Recon/Topology can widen the locking window, stabilize pattern speeds, and optimize SFR.
Limitations
- Inclination/extinction systematics can bias phase and Ω_p estimation.
- Multiphase gas & feedback induce short-term pulsations, adding non-linear scatter in κ_{v_r−Σ}.
Falsification line & experimental suggestions
- Falsification. If EFT parameters → 0 and covariance among L_lock/Δφ/G_cpl/M_Ω/κ_{v_r−Σ}/SFE_boost disappears while the mainstream linear-wave + swing-amplification baseline attains ΔAIC < 2, Δχ²/dof < 0.02, ΔRMSE ≤ 1% globally, the EFT mechanism is falsified.
- Experiments.
- 2D phase maps: R/Re × Ω_p maps of Δφ/G_cpl/SFE to delineate locking boundaries.
- Multi-band synergy: simultaneous CO+HI+Hα/UV to disentangle flow–SFE time lags.
- Resonance calibration: high-precision Ω_p and Twist near CR/ILR to verify monotonic M_Ω–G_cpl.
External References
- Sellwood, J. A., Dynamics of Disks and Bars.
- Athanassoula, E., Bar–Spiral Coupling and Secular Evolution.
- Tremaine, S., & Weinberg, M., A Method for Measuring Pattern Speeds.
- Binney, J., & Tremaine, S., Galactic Dynamics.
- Dobbs, C., & Baba, J., Spiral Structures in Disk Galaxies.
- Querejeta, M., et al., Star Formation and Gas Flows in Barred Galaxies.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (selected)
- Indicators. Δφ_{bar-spiral} (bar–spiral phase difference), L_lock (locking interval), G_cpl (coupling gain), M_Ω (pattern-speed match), κ_{v_r−Σ} (inflow–gas slope), SFE_boost (locked vs. unlocked SFE ratio), Q_b (non-axisymmetric torque), Twist (sectoral twist rate).
- Processing. Phases via joint morphology–kinematics inversion; Ω_p cross-calibrated with TW and phase-shift; κ_{v_r−Σ} robustly regressed in ridge/sector partitions; uncertainties via total_least_squares + errors_in_variables; hierarchical Bayes across Q_b/environment/inclination with k-fold CV and convergence diagnostics.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (selected)
- Leave-one (morphology/region) out: parameter shifts < 15%, RMSE fluctuation < 10%.
- Systematics stress test: adding +3% inclination error and +5% extinction zero-point raises beta_TPR and mildly psi_gas; overall drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with gamma_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2), posterior means shift < 8%; evidence ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
- Cross-validation: k = 5 CV error 0.047; new-sample blind tests maintain ΔRMSE ≈ −12%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/