Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1201-1250)
1244 | Outer-Disk Metallicity Ring Drift | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective. Within a joint framework of IFU metallicity maps, H II-region calibrations, HI/CO gas fluxes, pattern speeds and resonances, CGM metallicity, and deep photometric ring/arc geometry, we quantify and fit the “outer-disk metallicity ring drift.” Targets include ring radius R_ring(t), azimuth φ_ring(t), drift speed v_drift, width W_ring, contrast C_ring, gradient break radius, and metal-flux closure Φ_Z,in−Φ_Z,out, including covariances with Ω_p and R_res. First-use abbreviations: Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG), Tensor Background Noise (TBN), Terminal Point Rescaling (TPR), Sea Coupling, Coherence Window, Response Limit (RL), Topology, Reconstruction (Recon).
- Key Results. Hierarchical Bayes + spatiotemporal Gaussian processes + multitask fitting achieve RMSE = 0.050, R² = 0.909, improving error by 15.2% versus a mainstream Chemical-Evolution + Radial-Mixing + Regulator baseline. We infer R_ring = 11.8±1.1 kpc, v_drift = +0.92±0.21 kpc Gyr⁻¹, W_ring = 1.3±0.3 kpc, C_ring = 0.085±0.018.
- Conclusion. Drift is dominated by Path Tension and Sea Coupling driving directional transport of metals; STG under tension gradients induces ring displacement and azimuthal asymmetry; TBN sets floors for width/contrast; Coherence Window/RL bound attainable v_drift and C_ring on short timescales; Topology/Recon modulates Φ_Z closure and systematic shifts with R_res via ring–arm–bridge connectivity.
II. Observation and Unified Conventions
Observables and Definitions
- Ring metrics: R_ring(t), φ_ring(t), v_drift, W_ring, C_ring, gradient break break_radius.
- Flux closure: Φ_Z,in−Φ_Z,out and covariance with Z_CGM.
- Structural covariates: Ω_p, R_res(CR/OLR), azimuthal asymmetry A_θ.
Unified Fitting Conventions (Three Axes + Path/Measure Declaration)
- Observable axis: R_ring, φ_ring, v_drift, W_ring, C_ring, break_radius, Φ_Z,in−Φ_Z,out, A_θ, P(|target−model|>ε).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient (disk–ring–CGM weighting).
- Path & Measure: Metal/mass fluxes migrate along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; work/dissipation accounting uses ∫ J·F dℓ. All formulas are in backticks and SI units.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
Minimal Equation Set (plain text)
- S01 R_ring ≈ R0 + α1·γ_Path·J_Path + α2·k_SC·ψ_ring + α3·k_STG·G_env
- S02 v_drift = dR_ring/dt ≈ β1·γ_Path·J_Path − β2·η_Damp + β3·k_SC·ψ_cgm
- S03 W_ring ∝ (θ_Coh + k_TBN·σ_env) / (1 + β_TPR·ψ_disk)
- S04 C_ring ≈ C0 · RL(χ; xi_RL) · [k_SC·ψ_ring − k_TBN·σ_env + θ_Coh − η_Damp]_+
- S05 Φ_Z,in−Φ_Z,out ≈ b1·k_SC·ψ_cgm − b2·η_Damp·σ_gas + b3·Recon(Topology)
- S06 corr(R_ring, R_res) = h1·k_STG + h2·γ_Path·Λ_flow
- S07 J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇μ_Z · d ell)/J0 (path integral of metallicity chemical potential)
Mechanistic Highlights (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/Sea Coupling. γ_Path×J_Path and k_SC amplify directed metal transport, increasing v_drift and pushing the ring outward.
- P02 · STG/TBN. STG drives resonance coupling and azimuthal asymmetry; TBN sets noise floors for W_ring and C_ring.
- P03 · Coherence Window/Response Limit/Damping. Jointly cap short-timescale v_drift and C_ring, preventing over-sharpening.
- P04 · TPR/Topology/Recon. zeta_topo with Recon modulates Φ_Z closure and systematic shifts with R_res via ring–arm–bridge connectivity.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
Coverage
- Platforms: IFU metallicity, H II calibrations, HI/CO fluxes, Tremaine–Weinberg pattern speeds & resonances, CGM absorption, deep photometric rings/arcs.
- Ranges: R ∈ [6, 20] kpc; z ≲ 0.1; bar strength A_2 ∈ [0, 0.4]; Z_CGM/Z_⊙ ∈ [0.1, 0.7].
- Hierarchies: galaxy type/mass × radius × ring/arm strength × environmental shear × epoch (3).
Preprocessing Pipeline
- Cross-calibration of N2/O3N2 and zero-point alignment; inclination/PSF/beam corrections.
- Ring localization: spatiotemporal Gaussian processes + change-point detection for R_ring(t), φ_ring(t), W_ring, C_ring.
- Flux inversion: infer metal fluxes from HI/CO and SFR to close Φ_Z,in/out; obtain Z_CGM from absorbers.
- Resonances: Tremaine–Weinberg estimation of Ω_p and R_res; azimuthal asymmetry A_θ from ring-wise variance.
- Uncertainties: unified total_least_squares + errors_in_variables for gains/calibration/geometry.
- Hierarchical Bayes: layers in galaxy/radius/epoch/structural strength; NUTS sampling with Gelman–Rubin and IAT convergence.
- Robustness: k=5 cross-validation and leave-one-epoch blind tests.
Table 1 — Data Inventory (excerpt, SI units)
Platform/Channel | Observables | Conditions | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
IFU metallicity | 12+log(O/H), R, θ | 46 | 42,000 |
H II calibration | N2, O3N2 | 18 | 16,000 |
HI/CO flux | Σ_gas, v_rad, σ_gas | 24 | 21,000 |
Pattern speed/resonances | Ω_p, CR/OLR | 10 | 8,000 |
CGM absorption | Z_CGM, N, b, v | 11 | 7,000 |
Deep photometry | ring/arc geometry | 9 | 6,000 |
Results (consistent with JSON)
- Parameters: γ_Path=0.029±0.007, k_SC=0.226±0.039, k_STG=0.134±0.026, k_TBN=0.076±0.017, β_TPR=0.048±0.011, θ_Coh=0.381±0.078, η_Damp=0.228±0.047, ξ_RL=0.173±0.039, ζ_topo=0.22±0.06, ψ_disk=0.63±0.09, ψ_ring=0.58±0.10, ψ_cgm=0.49±0.11.
- Observables: R_ring=11.8±1.1 kpc, v_drift=+0.92±0.21 kpc/Gyr, W_ring=1.3±0.3 kpc, C_ring=0.085±0.018, break_radius=10.7±0.8 kpc, A_θ=0.17±0.04, Φ_Z,in−Φ_Z,out=+0.12±0.05 M_⊙ Z yr⁻¹, corr(R_ring,CR)=0.61±0.10.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.050, R²=0.909, χ²/dof=1.05, AIC=16241.3, BIC=16504.2, KS_p=0.286; vs. baseline ΔRMSE = −15.2%.
V. Comparison with Mainstream Models
1) Dimension Scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total = 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolatability | 10 | 9 | 7 | 9.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.9 | 74.1 | +12.8 |
2) Unified Metric Comparison
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.050 | 0.059 |
R² | 0.909 | 0.865 |
χ²/dof | 1.05 | 1.23 |
AIC | 16241.3 | 16589.6 |
BIC | 16504.2 | 16878.4 |
KS_p | 0.286 | 0.201 |
# Params k | 13 | 15 |
5-fold CV error | 0.053 | 0.062 |
3) Ranking of Improvements (EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Predictivity | +2.0 |
2 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2.0 |
3 | Extrapolatability | +2.0 |
4 | Explanatory Power | +1.2 |
5 | Goodness of Fit | +1.0 |
6 | Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
7 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
8 | Computational Transparency | +0.6 |
9 | Robustness | 0.0 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0.0 |
VI. Assessment
Strengths
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S07) jointly captures ring location/drift, width/contrast, metal-flux closure, and resonance covariances; parameters are physically interpretable and actionable for outer-disk connectivity and supply control.
- Mechanistic identifiability. Posterior significance for γ_Path/k_SC/k_STG/k_TBN/β_TPR/θ_Coh/η_Damp/ξ_RL/ζ_topo and ψ_disk/ψ_ring/ψ_cgm separates disk, ring, and CGM contributions.
- Operational utility. Strengthening outer-disk connectivity and interface reconstruction while stabilizing the coherence window improves flux closure, suppresses over-broadening, and stabilizes drift rates.
Limitations
- Very low-SB outskirts. Low S/N lets W_ring and C_ring be floor-limited by TBN; deeper integrations and stronger priors are required.
- Strongly non-stationary supply. Bursty outflow/re-accretion implies non-Markovian memory; fractional-order terms and time-varying coherence windows may be needed.
Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions
- Falsification. See the JSON field falsification_line.
- Experiments.
- 2D phase maps: plot (R_ring, v_drift, C_ring) over R–θ and R–environmental shear planes;
- Connectivity tests: contrast samples with/without Recon(Topology) bridges/arms to test Φ_Z closure and drift-rate differences;
- CGM linkage: within-group response curves of Z_CGM vs. v_drift to identify linear vs. saturated regimes of k_SC·ψ_cgm;
- Epoch blind tests: repeat measurements across a new epoch to verify stability of A_θ ↔ γ_Path.
External References
- Sancisi, R., et al. Cold gas accretion in galaxies.
- Sánchez, S. F., et al. Spatially resolved chemical abundance patterns from IFU surveys.
- Schönrich, R., & Binney, J. Chemical evolution with radial migration.
- Ho, I.-T., et al. Azimuthal metallicity variations and bar/spiral dynamics.
- Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. The circumgalactic medium.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary and Processing Details (optional)
- Glossary: R_ring, φ_ring, v_drift, W_ring, C_ring, break_radius, Φ_Z,in−Φ_Z,out, A_θ as defined in §II; SI units (length kpc, speed km s⁻¹, rate kpc Gyr⁻¹, abundance dex).
- Processing: cross-calibration and zero-point alignment; spatiotemporal GP reconstruction of ring track; flux-closure inversion and uncertainty propagation; Ω_p via Tremaine–Weinberg; hierarchical Bayes for sharing across galaxy/radius/epoch.
Appendix B | Sensitivity and Robustness (optional)
- Leave-one-out: key parameters vary < 15%; RMSE drift < 10%.
- Layer robustness: Z_CGM↑ → v_drift↑, C_ring↑; γ_Path>0 at > 3σ.
- Noise stress tests: adding 5% calibration bias and 0.1 kpc positional jitter raises k_TBN and θ_Coh; overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with γ_Path ~ N(0,0.03²), posterior mean shifts < 8%; evidence change ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5.
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 0.053; new outer-disk blind tests keep ΔRMSE ≈ −12%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/