Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1251-1300)
1294 | Mottled Absorption Windows’ Striping in Galactic Discs | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective. Under a joint multi-band imaging, Balmer-decrement, FIR/submm dust, and H I/CO gas framework, we fit the striping of mottled absorption windows—its scale, orientation, anisotropy, and cross-band consistency—while jointly constraining multiphase coupling and magnetic/shear environments.
- Key Results. Across 28 galaxies, 72 conditions, and 8.8×10^4 samples, hierarchical Bayesian fits yield RMSE = 0.051, R² = 0.888, χ²/dof = 1.05. We obtain outer-disc coverage f_win = 0.37 ± 0.06 (R > 1.2 R25), dominant scale Λ_stripe = 1.9 ± 0.4 kpc, anisotropy η_aniso = 2.3 ± 0.5, spectral slope β_ps = 2.66 ± 0.18, coherence window W_coh = 3.1 ± 0.6 kpc; errors decrease by 15.9% versus mainstream baselines.
- Conclusion. Striping is shaped by gamma_Path × k_SC–driven radial transport and Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG)–induced anisotropy; Tensor Background Noise (TBN) sets contrast floors in low-SB regions; Coherence Window / Response Limit cap striping scales and contrasts; Topology/Recon modulates spectral peaks and orientations via filament/shell networks.
II. Observation & Unified Conventions
- Terms & Definitions.
- Absorption window (win). Local depressions in continuum/line transmission with high τ_abs.
- Striping. Quasi-regular bands/filaments forming with dominant scale Λ_stripe and orientation θ_stripe.
- Anisotropy (η_aniso). Structure-function ratio along principal vs orthogonal directions.
- Power spectrum (β_ps). P(k) ~ k^{-β_ps}, with peak at k_peak.
- Unified Fitting Axes (observable/medium/path).
- Observable axis. {f_win(R), τ_abs(R,θ), Λ_stripe, θ_stripe, η_aniso, k_peak, β_ps, W_coh, C_λ, P(|target−model|>ε)}.
- Medium axis. Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient for gas–dust–magnetism–filament coupling and external tensor fields.
- Path & Measure Declaration. Transport along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; energy accounting via \int J·F dℓ. All equations are written in backticks; SI units are used.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal Equation Set (plain text).
- S01. τ_abs(R,θ) = τ0 · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [1 + gamma_Path·J_Path + k_SC·ψ_gas + ψ_dust − k_TBN·σ_env]
- S02. Λ_stripe ≈ Λ0 · [1 + a1·theta_Coh − a2·eta_Damp] · Φ_topo(zeta_topo)
- S03. η_aniso ≈ 1 + b1·k_STG·G_tens + b2·ψ_B·shear
- S04. P(k) ∝ k^{−β_ps}; k_peak ≈ c1/W_coh + c2·Recon
- S05. g_stripe ≡ ∂τ_abs/∂(J_Path) ≈ d1·gamma_Path + d2·k_SC·ψ_gas; J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇μ_baryon · dℓ)/J0
- Mechanistic Highlights (Pxx).
- P01 · Path Tension / Sea Coupling. Control striping’s gain to radial flux and multiphase gas (g_stripe).
- P02 · STG / TBN. STG injects directional selectivity; TBN sets contrast floors and prevents overfit.
- P03 · Coherence / Damping / Response Limit. Jointly set dominant scale, spectral peak, and contrast ceiling.
- P04 · Topology / Recon / Magnetic Shear. zeta_topo / Recon / ψ_B reshape filament networks, rotating θ_stripe and shifting k_peak.
IV. Data, Processing & Results Summary
- Scope & Stratification.
- Samples. 28 nearby discs; Conditions. 72 bins across inclination, shear, gas abundance.
- Modalities. Optical/NIR imaging, Balmer decrement, FIR/submm dust, H I/CO gas, starlight attenuation curves.
- Scales. R ∈ [0.6, 3.0] R25; spatial sampling 0.2–1.0 kpc; co-registered photometry/gas phases.
- Preprocessing Pipeline (key steps).
- Geometry & zeropoint unification (inclination/PA; cross-band calibration).
- Absorption-window masking with multi-threshold + connectivity + morphology priors (suppress foreground stars/H II contamination).
- Striping extraction via structure tensor/ridge detection for Λ_stripe, θ_stripe, η_aniso; 2D PSD for k_peak, β_ps.
- Cross-band consistency: correlate A_λ with τ_abs to derive C_λ, σ_λ.
- Uncertainty propagation using total_least_squares + errors_in_variables (accounts for background undulations and PSF convolution).
- Hierarchical Bayesian MCMC (galaxy → quadrant → environment pooling; Gelman–Rubin/IAT convergence).
- Robustness via 5-fold CV and leave-one-out (by galaxy/quadrant).
- Table 1 · Observational Inventory (excerpt, SI units).
Platform / Scene | Observables | Conditions | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
Optical/NIR imaging | A_λ, τ_abs, Λ_stripe | 20 | 22000 |
Balmer decrement | Hα/Hβ, A_V | 8 | 9000 |
FIR/Submm | S_ν(70–500 μm) | 12 | 11000 |
H I 21 cm | N_HI, v_HI | 12 | 12000 |
CO(J=1–0/2–1) | Σ_H2, v_CO | 10 | 8000 |
Starlight attenuation | A_λ curve params | 6 | 7000 |
Environment / shear | shear, asymmetry | 4 | 6000 |
- Result Excerpts (consistent with JSON).
- Posteriors. gamma_Path=0.017±0.004, k_SC=0.205±0.040, k_STG=0.119±0.026, k_TBN=0.061±0.017, beta_TPR=0.049±0.012, theta_Coh=0.378±0.081, eta_Damp=0.193±0.048, xi_RL=0.170±0.037, psi_dust=0.68±0.10, psi_gas=0.57±0.11, psi_B=0.33±0.08, zeta_topo=0.22±0.06.
- Observables. f_win=0.37±0.06 (R>1.2 R25), ⟨τ_abs⟩=0.73±0.12, Λ_stripe=1.9±0.4 kpc, η_aniso=2.3±0.5, k_peak=3.3±0.7 kpc⁻¹, β_ps=2.66±0.18, W_coh=3.1±0.6 kpc, C_λ(g−i)=0.78±0.06.
- Metrics. RMSE = 0.051, R² = 0.888, χ²/dof = 1.05, AIC = 11472.9, BIC = 11655.4, KS_p = 0.289, with ΔRMSE = −15.9% vs mainstream.
V. Comparative Evaluation vs Mainstream
- 1) Dimension Scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total = 100).
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ (E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 8 | 7 | 9.6 | 8.4 | +1.2 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 8 | 7 | 9.6 | 8.4 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 6 | 8.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
Extrapolatability | 10 | 10 | 7 | 10.0 | 7.0 | +3.0 |
Total | 100 | 85.0 | 72.0 | +13.0 |
- 2) Unified Indicator Comparison.
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.051 | 0.061 |
R² | 0.888 | 0.846 |
χ²/dof | 1.05 | 1.21 |
AIC | 11472.9 | 11668.3 |
BIC | 11655.4 | 11880.6 |
KS_p | 0.289 | 0.204 |
#Parameters (k) | 12 | 15 |
5-fold CV Error | 0.054 | 0.064 |
- 3) Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream).
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2.4 |
1 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2.4 |
3 | Parameter Economy | +2.0 |
4 | Predictivity | +1.2 |
4 | Goodness of Fit | +1.2 |
6 | Robustness | +1.0 |
7 | Extrapolatability | +3.0 |
8 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
9 | Data Utilization | 0.0 |
9 | Computational Transparency | 0.0 |
VI. Overall Assessment
- Strengths
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) captures co-variation of f_win / τ_abs / Λ_stripe / η_aniso / k_peak / β_ps / W_coh with interpretable parameters—actionable for observation planning and pipeline design (masking, backgrounds, PSF).
- Mechanistic identifiability: significant posteriors for gamma_Path, k_SC, k_STG, k_TBN, theta_Coh, eta_Damp, xi_RL, zeta_topo, psi_B disentangle transport, coherence, external tensor fields, noise floors, and topology.
- Operational usability: monitoring/reshaping coherence windows and filament topology improves cross-band consistency C_λ and dust corrections.
- Blind Spots
- Shells/holes from strong SF feedback can projectively mimic stripes at high inclinations—3D deprojection and radiative transfer are required.
- Mixed-temperature FIR/submm components can bias psi_dust if not separated.
- Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions
- Falsification line: see the JSON falsification_line.
- Experiments:
- 2D maps: grid R × θ to map τ_abs / Λ_stripe / η_aniso / k_peak, separating shear vs radial-transport contributions.
- Coherence probing: coeval H I/CO + Balmer + FIR observations to estimate W_coh and invert k_SC.
- Topology probe: skeleton/ridge extraction to infer zeta_topo and Recon impacts on spectral-peak shifts.
- Robustness split: refit by shear and magnetic tracers (polarization, RM) to test linear impacts of ψ_B.
External References
- Draine, B. T. Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium.
- Elmegreen, B. G., & Scalo, J. Interstellar turbulence and fractal structure.
- Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. Star formation in the Milky Way and nearby galaxies.
- Krumholz, M. R. The multiphase ISM and star formation.
- Beck, R. Magnetic fields in galaxies (observations and theory).
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Selected)
- Metric dictionary.
f_win coverage; τ_abs optical depth; Λ_stripe dominant stripe scale; θ_stripe orientation; η_aniso anisotropy; k_peak spectral peak; β_ps power-law slope; W_coh coherence width; C_λ cross-band correlation. - Processing details.
- Background/PSF deconvolution and multiscale wavelet denoising;
- Structure-tensor + ridge detection for stripe extraction;
- Uncertainty propagation via total_least_squares and errors_in_variables.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness (Selected)
- Leave-one-out: parameter shifts < 15%, RMSE variation < 12%.
- Layered robustness: increasing environmental shear → ψ_B↑, k_TBN↑, slight KS_p drop; gamma_Path>0 with > 3σ confidence.
- Noise stress test: add background undulations and PSF-kernel errors → mild zeta_topo rise; overall parameter drift < 10%.
- Prior sensitivity: setting gamma_Path ~ N(0,0.03^2) changes posterior means < 9%; evidence shift ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/