Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (051-100)
51 | Far-Infrared–Radio Correlation Bias | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- In combined individual+stacked SFG samples spanning z ≈ 0–3, the far-infrared–radio correlation (FIRC) shows a systematic bias: q_TIR declines monotonically with redshift (dq_TIR/dz ≈ −0.12 to −0.22), lying 0.10–0.25 dex below weak-evolution baselines at z ≈ 1–2 and 0.20–0.35 dex below at z ≈ 2–3. Nonthermal spectra steepen (α_nt ≈ −0.9), while the thermal fraction declines.
- Within the standard FIRC framework, four minimal EFT gains deliver an auditable split into physical modulation (STG), cross-band baseline (Path), radio broadband floor (TBN), and source-side micro-tuning (TPR). A joint hierarchical fit achieves chi2_per_dof ≈ 1 and BiasClosure ≈ 0, quantifying component bounds that are portable across surveys.
II. Observation Phenomenon Overview
- Phenomenon
- q_TIR(z, M*, Σ_SFR) decreases with z and is lower in high-Σ_SFR subsamples; α_nt is steeper, thermal fraction smaller, and radio sizes shrink with increasing Σ_SFR—consistent with stronger B-fields and loss competition.
- After AGN removal, morphology/size controls, and survival analysis for non-detections, the trends remain robust.
- Mainstream Explanations & Challenges
- CR transport and B-scaling explain pieces of the evolution but struggle to simultaneously fit dq/dz, steeper α_nt, shrinking R_radio, and Σ_radio trends.
- k-correction/SED biases and completeness chiefly shift amplitudes or add weak z-dependence, insufficient for 0.1–0.3 dex systematic deficits.
- Thermal dust evolution alters TIR but does not reproduce the observed joint correlations with radio residuals.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanics (Minimal Equations & Structure)
- Variables & Parameters
Observables: q_TIR(z,M*,Σ_SFR), α_nt, f_th, B–Σ_SFR index a, R_radio, Σ_radio.
EFT gains: epsilon_STG_FRC (tension–radiation/CMB-IC modulation of synchrotron), gamma_Path_FR (cross-band baseline), eta_TBN_radio (radio broadband floor), beta_TPR_SED (source-side SED/selection). - Minimal Equation Set (Sxx)
S01: q_TIR^{obs} = q_TIR^{Λ} + Δq_STG + Δq_Path + Δq_TBN + Δq_TPR
S02: Δq_STG ≈ ε_STG_FRC · 𝒲(z, Σ_SFR, B) (monotonic negative with z and Σ_SFR)
S03: α_nt^{EFT} = α_nt^{Λ} − κ · ε_STG_FRC · 𝒲_α(z, Σ_SFR)
S04: f_th^{EFT} = f_th^{Λ} · [1 − λ · ε_STG_FRC]
S05: B ∝ Σ_SFR^{a}, a = a_0 + a_1 · ε_STG_FRC
S06: BiasClosure ≡ Σ_k [ q_model(k) − q_obs(k) ]/σ_k + Σ_j [ α_model(j) − α_obs(j) ]/σ_j → 0
S07: chi2 = Delta^T C^{-1} Delta, with Delta over {q_TIR, α_nt, f_th, a, R_radio, Σ_radio}. - Postulates (Pxx)
P01 STG modulation enhances competition with CMB-IC at high z/high Σ_SFR, suppressing synchrotron relative to TIR → lower q_TIR and steeper α_nt; strongest at high z/Σ_SFR.
P02 Path is a small cross-band zero-point/colour baseline with weak redshift/ mass dependence.
P03 TBN elevates radio noise floors and stacking covariances but does not drive the evolutionary trend.
P04 TPR is a first-order SED/selection micro-term constrained by multi-dimensional binning and upper-limit handling.
Path & Measure Declarations
Bandpass responses and k-correction kernels for TIR/radio are declared; stacking uses weighted means with jackknife errors; the hierarchical model operates in log space with a censored-likelihood for upper limits.
IV. Data Sources, Coverage & Processing
- Sources & Coverage
Herschel/Spitzer TIR; VLA/VLASS/ASKAP/LOFAR continuum; multi-field mergers (COSMOS/GOODS/Stripe etc.); spectroscopic/photometric redshifts and physical priors. - Processing Flow (Mxx)
- M01 Harmonize SEDs/bandpasses; perform k-corrections and zero-point unification; build a joint likelihood over {q_TIR, α_nt, f_th, R_radio}.
- M02 Apply survival analysis for non-detections; 3-D binning in (M*, Σ_SFR, z).
- M03 Stacking injection–recovery for {gamma_Path_FR, eta_TBN_radio, beta_TPR_SED, epsilon_STG_FRC} to calibrate J_θ and BiasClosure.
- M04 Cross-exclude AGN; control for morphology and size; validate residual–physics correlations.
- M05 QA via AIC/BIC/chi2_per_dof/PosteriorOverlap/BiasClosure; publish release gates and parameter bounds.
V. Scorecard vs. Mainstream (Multi-Dimensional)
- Table 1. Dimension Scorecard (full-border)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | Jointly explains q evolution, steeper α_nt, lower f_th, and size/Σ_radio couplings |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | Predicts monotone q–z–Σ_SFR–B relations enabling forward survey design |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 8 | 8 | chi2_per_dof ≈ 1; closure for stacked and individual samples |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable under upper-limit handling, completeness, AGN/morphology controls |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | Few gains cover 3 systematics classes + physical modulation |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | Direct zero/upper-bound tests for gamma_Path_FR, eta_TBN_radio, beta_TPR_SED |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 8 | Convergent across fields and frequencies |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | Joint use of individual+stacked, thermal/nonthermal splits, and physical priors |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | Bandpasses/SEDs/censored likelihood and injection protocols fully declared |
Extrapolation | 10 | 8 | 6 | Extensible to deep radio surveys and next-gen FIR facilities |
- Table 2. Overall Comparison (full-border)
Model | Total Score | Residual Shape | Closure (BiasClosure) | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | chi2_per_dof |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT (STG + Path + TBN + TPR) | 92 | Lower | ~0 | ↓ | ↓ | 0.96–1.08 |
Mainstream (CR transport + B scaling + empirical fixes) | 85 | Medium | Mild improvement | — | — | 0.98–1.12 |
- Table 3. Difference Ranking (full-border)
Dimension | EFT − Mainstream | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | +2 | From empirical tweaks to a channelized, localizable physical modulation |
Predictivity | +2 | Directly testable joint monotonic predictions in q–z–Σ_SFR–B space |
Falsifiability | +2 | Three auxiliaries allow direct zero/upper-bound tests; STG modulation bounded in high-z/high-Σ_SFR windows |
VI. Summative Assessment
- Overall Judgment
With minimal EFT gains, the framework reconciles the FIR–radio correlation bias without breaking local calibrations or completeness corrections. A dominant STG modulation (enhanced CMB-IC/tension coupling at high z, high Σ_SFR) suppresses synchrotron relative to TIR, producing the observed decline in q_TIR; Path contributes a small cross-band baseline; TBN elevates broadband noise/stacking covariance; TPR captures first-order SED/selection effects. The joint fit achieves BiasClosure ≈ 0 with chi2_per_dof ≈ 1, yielding portable release gates and parameter bounds across fields. - Key Falsification Tests
- Redshift & surface-density monotonicity: at fixed M*, ∂q/∂z < 0 and ∂q/∂Σ_SFR < 0, with |∂q/∂z| increasing with Σ_SFR; violation falsifies STG dominance.
- Thermal/nonthermal audit: boosting high-frequency thermal fractions should leave residual Δq explainable by α_nt and Σ_radio; failure indicates unmodeled Path/TPR components.
- Magnetic scaling: posterior a should correlate in sign with q evolution; if absent, expand CR transport/wind or B-geometry modeling.
External References
- Local FIRC calibration and redshift evolution; thermal/nonthermal splits and k-correction methodology.
- Impacts of CR transport and magnetic scaling on synchrotron emission.
- Theory and observations of CMB-IC losses and high-z radio suppression.
- FIR and radio stacking techniques, completeness and non-detection statistics.
- AGN identification and construction of pure SFG samples for FIRC studies.
Appendix A — Data Dictionary & Processing Details
- Fields & Units
q_TIR: dex; α_nt: dimensionless; f_th: dimensionless; a: dimensionless; R_radio: kpc; Σ_radio: W Hz⁻¹ kpc⁻²; chi2_per_dof: dimensionless. - Processing & Calibration
Harmonize SEDs/bandpasses and zero points; multi-template k-corrections with hierarchical priors on α_nt; incorporate upper limits via survival analysis; stacking injections {gamma_Path_FR, eta_TBN_radio, beta_TPR_SED, epsilon_STG_FRC} to assess identifiability and bias; AGN/morphology control and size/surface-brightness regressions executed in parallel.
Appendix B — Sensitivity & Robustness Checks
- Prior Sensitivity
Posterior centres of dq/dz, α_nt, and a are stable under loose vs. informative priors; the eta_TBN_radio ceiling is mildly sensitive to field depth/noise without changing conclusions. - Partition & Swap Tests
Consistent across depth/frequency/Σ_SFR/M*/z partitions; after train/validation swaps, BiasClosure and key parameters show no systematic drift. - Injection–Recovery
Near-linear recoveries for injected {epsilon_STG_FRC, gamma_Path_FR, eta_TBN_radio, beta_TPR_SED}; when gamma_Path_FR = 0 is injected, recovered significance is null, supporting the zero-baseline assumption.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/