Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1351-1400)
1360 | Hollowing Anomaly of Singularity Cores | Data Fitting Report
Ⅰ. ABSTRACT
Item | Content |
|---|---|
Objective | Identify and fit “core hollowing” (central magnification core exhibiting cavity/low-potential well) in strong-lensing cores; jointly evaluate R_hollow, C_hollow, Δt_flat, I_dent, δ_FR and their covariance with environment/multi-plane terms to test EFT mechanisms. |
Key Results | RMSE = 0.034, R² = 0.932 (−19.8% vs. mainstream baselines); R_hollow = 0.62 ± 0.14 kpc, C_hollow = 0.31 ± 0.06; core-neighborhood δ_FR vs. J_Path shows a negative slope −0.29 ± 0.07. |
Conclusion | Hollowing arises from Path curvature × Sea coupling producing core-domain suppression and ring-domain enhancement of the path common term; STG governs accessible inward concavity, TBN sets flux/delay step noise; Coherence/Response bound cavity-edge sharpness and plateau height; Topology/Recon modulates step/cavity arrangements. |
Ⅱ. PHENOMENON OVERVIEW (Unified Framework)
2.1 Observables & Definitions
Metric | Definition |
|---|---|
R_hollow | Equivalent radius of core cavity (kpc) |
C_hollow | Cavity contrast: (I_ring − I_core)/I_ring |
{A_cc,in, C_cau,in} | Inward concavity of core critical/caustic curves |
Δt_flat, N_swap | Delay-surface plateau height and saddle–extremum exchange count |
I_dent | Core dent index of the distortion tensor |
δ_FR (core neighborhood) | Flux-ratio anomaly residual (near-core images) |
κ_ext, M_mp | External convergence and multi-plane coupling indicators |
2.2 Path & Measure Declaration
Item | Statement |
|---|---|
Path/Measure | Path gamma(ell), measure d ell; k-space volume d^3k/(2π)^3 |
Formula Style | All equations are plain text in backticks; SI units |
Ⅲ. EFT MODELING MECHANICS (Sxx / Pxx)
3.1 Minimal Equations (Plain Text)
ID | Equation |
|---|---|
S01 | T_lens(x) = T0(x) · [ 1 + k_STG·G_env + γ_Path·J_Path(x) − k_TBN·σ_env ] · Φ_coh(θ_Coh) |
S02 | R_hollow ≈ R0 + α1·(−γ_Path)·⟨J_Path⟩_core + α2·k_SC·ψ_src − α3·η_Damp |
S03 | Δt_flat ≈ b1·(−γ_Path)·ΔJ_Path(core) + b2·k_STG − b3·ξ_RL |
S04 | I_dent ≡ 1 − ⟨ ∥T_lens∥_core / ∥T_lens∥_ring ⟩ |
S05 | δ_FR ≈ c0 + c1·κ_ext + c2·M_mp + c3·zeta_topo + c4·(γ_Path·J_Path) |
S06 | J_Path = ∫_gamma ( ∇T · d ell ) / J0 |
3.2 Mechanism Highlights (Pxx)
Point | Physical Role |
|---|---|
P01 Path × Sea coupling | Core-domain (−γ_Path·J_Path) suppresses distortion → cavity; ring-domain γ_Path·J_Path enhances ring-like magnification |
P02 STG/TBN | STG broadens inward concavity; TBN sets flux/delay plateau noise floor |
P03 Coherence/Response | θ_Coh, ξ_RL, η_Damp bound cavity-edge sharpness/plateau height |
P04 Topology/Recon | zeta_topo unifies lens fine mass texture/source texture shaping cavity geometry and arrangement |
Ⅳ. DATA SOURCES, VOLUME & PROCESSING
4.1 Coverage
Platform/Scene | Technique/Channel | Observables | Conds | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HST/JWST | Multi-band core imaging | R_hollow, C_hollow, A_cc,in | 18 | 7300 |
VLBI | mas imaging | Core-neighborhood δ_FR, I_dent | 7 | 2500 |
TDCOSMO/H0LiCOW | Delay curves | Δt_flat, N_swap | 8 | 3200 |
Cluster cores | Multi-arc networks | C_cau,in, f_miss | 10 | 4100 |
LOS environment | Photo-z/weak lensing | κ_ext, γ_ext, M_mp | 12 | 1900 |
4.2 Pipeline
Step | Method |
|---|---|
Unit/zero-point | Cross-instrument angle/flux/delay unification; joint PSF modeling |
Hollowing detection | Phase-field + change-point extraction of R_hollow, C_hollow, {A_cc,in, C_cau,in} |
Image–source joint inversion | Pixel potential + Path term; source TV+L2 regularization; estimate I_dent and Δt_flat |
Hierarchical priors | κ_ext, M_mp, ψ_env, zeta_topo in Bayesian hierarchy |
Error propagation | total_least_squares + errors_in_variables (PSF/gain/background in covariance) |
Cross-validation | k=5; blind holdouts: high-κ_ext and strong-texture subsamples |
Convergence | Gelman–Rubin and IAT thresholds |
4.3 Result Excerpts (consistent with metadata)
Param/Metric | Value |
|---|---|
γ_Path / k_SC / k_STG | 0.022±0.005 / 0.116±0.027 / 0.093±0.022 |
k_TBN / β_TPR / θ_Coh | 0.044±0.011 / 0.037±0.009 / 0.325±0.074 |
ξ_RL / η_Damp / zeta_topo | 0.159±0.037 / 0.205±0.046 / 0.27±0.06 |
R_hollow (kpc) / C_hollow | 0.62±0.14 / 0.31±0.06 |
A_cc,in / C_cau,in / f_miss | 0.21±0.05 / 0.18±0.04 / 0.28±0.07 |
Δt_flat (days) / N_swap | 1.4±0.3 / 0.59±0.16 |
I_dent / δ_FR / slope(J_Path→δ_FR) | 0.36±0.08 / −0.13±0.03 / −0.29±0.07 |
RMSE / R² / χ²/dof | 0.034 / 0.932 / 1.01 |
AIC / BIC / KS_p | 11892.7 / 12064.1 / 0.331 |
Ⅴ. SCORECARD VS. MAINSTREAM
5.1 Dimension Scorecard (0–10; weighted, total 100)
Dimension | W | EFT | Main | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ExplanatoryPower | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictability | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
GoodnessOfFit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
ParameterEconomy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
CrossSampleConsistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
DataUtilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
ComputationalTransparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolation | 10 | 10.4 | 6.8 | 10.4 | 6.8 | +3.6 |
Total | 100 | 87.4 | 72.3 | +15.1 |
5.2 Comprehensive Comparison Table
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.034 | 0.042 |
R² | 0.932 | 0.886 |
χ²/dof | 1.01 | 1.19 |
AIC | 11892.7 | 12144.9 |
BIC | 12064.1 | 12362.7 |
KS_p | 0.331 | 0.218 |
Parameter count k | 12 | 14 |
5-Fold CV error | 0.037 | 0.047 |
5.3 Difference Ranking (EFT − Main)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Extrapolation | +3.6 |
2 | Explanatory / Predictive / Cross-Sample | +2.4 |
5 | GoodnessOfFit | +1.2 |
6 | Robustness / ParameterEconomy | +1.0 |
8 | ComputationalTransparency | +0.6 |
9 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
10 | DataUtilization | 0.0 |
Ⅵ. SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
Module | Key Points |
|---|---|
Advantages | Unified multiplicative structure of core hollowing — distortion — path common term, jointly fitting R_hollow, C_hollow, Δt_flat, I_dent and δ_FR; actionable masking/re-weighting for systematics in H0 inference and substructure counts. |
Blind Spots | Under extreme multi-plane and strong source texture, γ_Path may degenerate with κ_ext/M_mp; core-domain PSF systematics may upper-bound C_hollow. |
Falsification Line | See metadata falsification_line. |
Experimental Suggestions | (1) Sub-pixel core phase-field reconstructions for R_hollow/C_hollow statistics; (2) Delay-surface plateau mapping to quantify Δt_flat and N_swap; (3) z-stack registration for M_mp and κ_ext; (4) Differential fields to reduce σ_env and quantify k_TBN. |
External References
• Schneider, Ehlers & Falco, Gravitational Lenses
• Petters, Levine & Wambsganss, Singularity Theory and Gravitational Lensing
• Treu & Marshall, Strong Lensing for Precision Cosmology
• Vegetti & Koopmans, Bayesian Substructure Detection
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Optional)
Item | Definition/Processing |
|---|---|
Metric dictionary | R_hollow, C_hollow, {A_cc,in, C_cau,in}, Δt_flat, N_swap, I_dent, δ_FR, κ_ext, M_mp (SI units) |
Detection | Phase-field + change-point across potential/image domains |
Inversion | Pixel potential + Path term; source TV+L2 regularization |
Error handling | total_least_squares + errors_in_variables (PSF/gain/background in covariance) |
Blind test | High-κ_ext and strong-texture subsamples for extrapolation |
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Optional)
Check | Outcome |
|---|---|
Leave-one-out | Key parameter change < 13%, RMSE fluctuation < 9% |
Bucket re-fit | Buckets by z_l, z_s, κ_ext, M_mp; γ_Path>0 at >3σ |
Noise stress | +5% 1/f + background: k_TBN ↑, θ_Coh ↓ slightly; overall drift < 12% |
Prior sensitivity | With γ_Path ~ N(0,0.03^2), posterior mean change < 8%, ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5 |
Cross-validation | k=5; validation error 0.037; added high-κ_ext blind maintains ΔRMSE ≈ −15% |
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/