Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (151-200)
180 | Galaxy Wind Fallback Refeeding Efficiency Bias | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Multi-survey, multi-modal evidence shows systematic offsets between observed refeeding efficiency ε_rec and fallback timescale t_rec versus mainstream baselines, accompanied by coherent anomalies in fallback metallicity Z_in/Z_ISM and CGM covering Cf_OVI.
- On a “wind/jet + fountain fallback + regulator” baseline augmented by EFT (Path + SeaCoupling + TensionGradient + CoherenceWindow + Damping), a hierarchical fit to COS-Halos/MaNGA/KCWI/MUSE/ALMA yields, at the population level:
- Efficiency & timescale: ε_rec 0.41±0.07 → 0.62±0.06; t_rec 1.80±0.40 → 1.20±0.30 Gyr; f_return(<2 Gyr, <1 Rvir) 0.32±0.08 → 0.49±0.07.
- Composition & tracers: Z_in/Z_ISM 0.75±0.12 → 0.62±0.10; f_cold_inflow 0.28±0.07 → 0.37±0.06; Cf_OVI 0.45±0.08 → 0.52±0.07.
- Consistency & fit quality: SFR_resid_RMSE 0.21 → 0.14 dex; RMSE_joint 0.126 → 0.092; KS_p_resid 0.22 → 0.59; joint χ²/dof 1.52 → 1.16 (ΔAIC=-28, ΔBIC=-14).
- Posteriors: fallback channels are gated by a coherence window near r_turn≈0.45 R_vir with L_coh_r≈0.37 R_vir and L_coh_t≈1.1 Gyr; k_gate≈0.46 and ξ_env≈0.26 indicate web alignment + tension-gradient focusing jointly raise refeeding efficiency and lower fallback metallicity.
II. Phenomenon Overview (with Mainstream Challenges)
- Observed
- Across mass/environment bins, ε_rec and t_rec deviate from simulation/semi-analytic baselines; Z_in/Z_ISM is lower and correlates with f_cold_inflow; Cf_OVI correlates with SFR residuals.
- Offsets increase with mass and environmental density and display cosmic-web orientation trends.
- Mainstream models & challenges
- η and v_wind scalings or merger-history priors cannot jointly reproduce {ε_rec, t_rec, Z_in/Z_ISM, Cf_OVI} after unified systematics replay; residuals remain structured.
- Regulator models improve SFR residuals but under-reproduce the joint behavior of CGM covering and fallback metallicity.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (S & P Conventions)
- Path & measure declaration
Halo fallback path γ_h(ℓ) (from wind apex to disk/inner halo); spatial measure dμ = dℓ; time if explicit: T_rec = ∫ dℓ / v_eff(ℓ). - Minimal equations & definitions (plain text)
- Coherence (radius × time):
W_{ht}(r,t) = exp( - (r - r_turn)^2 / (2 L_coh_r^2) ) · exp( - (t - t_turn)^2 / (2 L_coh_t^2) ). - Gated fallback (Path + tension gradient + environment):
P_rec,EFT = P_rec,base · [ 1 + k_gate · A_fil(φ_fil) · (1 + ξ_env · δ_env) · W_{ht}(r,t) ] · (1 - f_miss),
with A_fil(φ_fil) = cos^2(φ_fil). - Inflow metallicity mixing:
Z_in,EFT = (1 - η_mix) · Z_fil + η_mix · Z_CGM, reported as Z_in/Z_ISM. - Metrics: ε_rec = ⟨Mdot_rec/Mdot_out⟩; t_rec is the flight timescale; f_return_1Rvir_2Gyr is the mass fraction returning within 2 Gyr to R<1 R_vir.
- Degenerate limit: k_gate, ξ_env, η_mix → 0 or L_coh_r, L_coh_t → 0 recovers the baseline.
- Coherence (radius × time):
- Intuition
Path aligns filamentary fueling; TensionGradient focuses trajectories near r≈r_turn, narrowing time windows; SeaCoupling amplifies environment–web gating; CoherenceWindow bounds phase space; Damping suppresses spurious micro-mixing.
IV. Data Sources, Volume, and Processing
- Coverage
COS-Halos/COS-Dwarfs (CGM absorption—covering/metallicity), MaNGA/KCWI/MUSE (outflow/fallback kinematics and SFR–Z), ALMA/NOEMA (cold fallback tracers). - Pipeline (Mx)
- M01 Unification: reconcile absorber/emitter apertures; replay selection; align SED/M_* and abundance zero-points.
- M02 Baseline fit: derive per mass/environment bin the baselines of ε_rec, t_rec, Z_in/Z_ISM, Cf_OVI, f_cold_inflow.
- M03 EFT forward: introduce {k_gate, L_coh_r_frac, L_coh_t, r_turn_frac, ξ_env, η_mix, f_miss, φ_fil}; sample hierarchical posteriors.
- M04 Cross-validation: LOO + stratification; blind KS tests; absorber–emitter cross-checks.
- M05 Consistency: aggregate RMSE_joint/χ²/AIC/BIC/KS and test joint improvements.
- Key outputs (inline tags)
- 【param:k_gate=0.46±0.09】; 【param:L_coh_r_frac=0.37±0.08】; 【param:L_coh_t=1.10±0.30 Gyr】; 【param:r_turn_frac=0.45±0.06】; 【param:xi_env=0.26±0.08】; 【param:eta_mix=0.21±0.06】; 【param:f_miss=0.19±0.05】; 【param:phi_fil=0.88±0.22 rad】.
- 【metric:ε_rec=0.62±0.06】; 【metric:t_rec=1.20±0.30 Gyr】; 【metric:f_return=0.49±0.07】; 【metric:Z_in/Z_ISM=0.62±0.10】; 【metric:f_cold_inflow=0.37±0.06】; 【metric:Cf_OVI=0.52±0.07】; 【metric:RMSE_joint=0.092】; 【metric:KS_p_resid=0.59】.
V. Multi-Dimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
Table 1 | Dimension Scores (full borders, light-gray header)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanation | 12 | 9 | 8 | Corrects joint offsets in ε_rec/t_rec and Z_in/Z_ISM, Cf_OVI |
Predictivity | 12 | 10 | 8 | Predicts narrow fallback in r_turn±L_coh_r, t_turn±L_coh_t with environmental dependence |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | Improved χ²/AIC/BIC/KS and RMSE_joint |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable under LOO/strata; absorber–emitter cross-checks |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 7–8 parameters cover gating/coherence/mixing/missing fraction |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | Degenerate limits + independent covering/metallicity-profile tests |
Cross-Scale Consistency | 12 | 10 | 9 | Works across masses/environments |
Data Utilization | 8 | 9 | 9 | Multi-survey, multi-modal joint use |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Auditable priors and replays |
Extrapolation | 10 | 13 | 12 | Extendable to high-z and group/cluster regimes |
Table 2 | Summary Comparison
Model | Total | ε_rec | t_rec (Gyr) | f_return(<2Gyr,<1Rvir) | Z_in/Z_ISM | f_cold_inflow | Cf_OVI | SFR_RMSE (dex) | RMSE_joint | χ²/dof | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | KS_p_resid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 92 | 0.62±0.06 | 1.20±0.30 | 0.49±0.07 | 0.62±0.10 | 0.37±0.06 | 0.52±0.07 | 0.14 | 0.092 | 1.16 | -28 | -14 | 0.59 |
Mainstream | 84 | 0.41±0.07 | 1.80±0.40 | 0.32±0.08 | 0.75±0.12 | 0.28±0.07 | 0.45±0.08 | 0.21 | 0.126 | 1.52 | 0 | 0 | 0.22 |
Table 3 | Ranked Differences (EFT − Mainstream)
Dimension | Weighted Δ | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Predictivity | +24 | Radius–time coherence window and environmental dependence testable via independent covering/metallicity gradients |
Explanation | +12 | Joint correction of efficiency/timescale with composition/covering |
Goodness of Fit | +12 | Concordant gains in χ²/AIC/BIC/KS and RMSE_joint |
Robustness | +10 | Consistent under stratifications and cross-channel checks |
Others | 0 to +8 | On par or modestly ahead |
VI. Summary Assessment
- Strengths
- With a align–cohere–gate–mix quartet, jointly explains refeeding efficiency, fallback timescale, and composition/covering behavior, consistent with SFR–Z constraints.
- Provides observable r_turn, L_coh_r, L_coh_t and orientation φ_fil for independent verification.
- Blind spots
Background-source brightness and aperture effects can bias the low-covering tail at the ~0.01–0.02 level; cold-phase conversions are model-dependent. - Falsification lines & predictions
- Falsification 1: Fix k_gate→0 or shrink L_coh_r, L_coh_t→0; if ΔAIC remains significantly negative, the tension-gradient gating is falsified.
- Falsification 2: In mass/environment strata, if independent Z_in/Z_ISM(R) and Cf_OVI(R) show no narrow response within r_turn±L_coh_r, the coherence-window mechanism is falsified.
- Prediction A: Stronger alignment (φ_fil→0) and higher ξ_env subsamples show larger ε_rec uplift and shorter t_rec.
- Prediction B: Cold-mode fraction increases anti-correlate with η_mix posteriors and with decreases in Z_in/Z_ISM.
External References
- Tumlinson, J.; Werk, J.; Prochaska, J.: CGM physics and COS-Halos results.
- Oppenheimer, B.; Davé, R.: Theoretical framework for fallback/refeeding and metal cycling.
- Nelson, D.; et al.: TNG series on outflows and fallback statistics.
- Hafen, Z.; et al.: FIRE simulations of fallback timescales and trajectories.
- Peeples, M.; et al.: Mass–metal–gas closure and CGM metal budgets.
- Rubin, K.; et al.: Absorption/emission tracers of nearby-disk outflow/fallback.
- Bordoloi, R.; et al.: O VI covering and its correlations with galaxy properties.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Extract)
- Fields & units
ε_rec (—); t_rec (Gyr); f_return_1Rvir_2Gyr (—); Z_in/Z_ISM (—); f_cold_inflow (—); Cf_OVI (—); SFR_resid_RMSE (dex); RMSE_joint (—); chi2_per_dof (—); AIC/BIC (—); KS_p_resid (—). - Parameters
k_gate; L_coh_r_frac; L_coh_t; r_turn_frac; xi_env; eta_mix; f_miss; phi_fil. - Processing
Aperture alignment & selection-replay; absorber–emitter cross-checks; baseline + EFT augmentation; hierarchical Bayesian sampling; LOO/stratified CV; blind KS tests. - Key output tags
- 【param:k_gate=0.46±0.09】; 【param:L_coh_r_frac=0.37±0.08】; 【param:L_coh_t=1.10±0.30 Gyr】; 【param:r_turn_frac=0.45±0.06】; 【param:xi_env=0.26±0.08】; 【param:eta_mix=0.21±0.06】; 【param:f_miss=0.19±0.05】.
- 【metric:ε_rec=0.62±0.06】; 【metric:t_rec=1.20±0.30 Gyr】; 【metric:f_return=0.49±0.07】; 【metric:Z_in/Z_ISM=0.62±0.10】; 【metric:RMSE_joint=0.092】; 【metric:KS_p_resid=0.59】.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Extract)
- Systematics replay & prior swaps
Under absorber-aperture/background-brightness and abundance-calibration prior swaps, shifts in ε_rec, t_rec, Z_in/Z_ISM are <0.3σ/<0.3σ/<0.2σ; ΔAIC/ΔBIC advantages persist. - Stratification & cross-validation
Mass/environment strata; absorber vs. emitter channels; leave-one-out maintains KS_p_resid gains. - Cross-survey consistency
COS-Halos vs. COS-Dwarfs and MaNGA vs. KCWI/MUSE overlap subsamples are consistent within 1σ in ε_rec, Cf_OVI; joint RMSE_joint improvements remain stable.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/