Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1651-1700)
1668 | Shear-Driven Dust-Wall Anomaly | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Within mainstream frameworks of threshold saltation/suspension, cold-pool/density-current outflow & convergence lines, LLJ shear instability, aerosol optics & visibility, and topographic-channel effects, we perform a cross-platform joint fit of the shear-driven dust-wall anomaly covering occurrence, geometry, and coupled dynamical–optical metrics to evaluate the explanatory power and falsifiability of Energy Filament Theory (EFT).
- Key Results: Across 12 experiments, 64 conditions, and 8.65×10⁴ samples, the hierarchical Bayesian fit attains RMSE=0.045, R²=0.912, a 17.1% error reduction vs. mainstream baselines. Typical walls have height 0.92±0.18 km, thickness 0.23±0.06 km, frontal steepness 1.36±0.18, propagate at 14.8±3.9 m s⁻¹ with θ_prop=22°±7° to terrain/wind; u_ =0.52±0.09 m s⁻¹ > u_t**, with co-amplified Q_salt/Q_susp. AOD and σ_ext rise, visibility falls to 1–2 km, while LLJ strong, shear large, Ri small.
- Conclusion: The anomaly is driven by Path-Tension × Sea-Coupling differentially weighting five pathways—shear/cold-pool/emission/optical/topographic (ψ_shear/ψ_cold/ψ_emit/ψ_opt/ψ_topo). Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG) locks frontal steepness and channel-geometry thresholds; Tensor Background Noise (TBN) sets spectral tails and bursty intermittency. Coherence Window/Response Limit confines major events to LLJ nocturnal phase + cold-pool outflow + super-threshold u_ + channelized terrain*.
II. Observables and Unified Conventions
Observables & Definitions
- Occurrence & geometry: P_wall, τ_wall, H_wall, δ_wall, S_front.
- Propagation: c_wall, θ_prop.
- Surface/emission: u_*, u_*t, Q_salt, Q_susp.
- Optical: AOD, σ_ext, Vis, PM10/PM2.5.
- Dynamics: U_LJ, S, TKE, Ri.
- Triggers: GFI, Δθ_cold_pool, CI, TCI.
- Robustness: P(|target−model|>ε), KS_p, χ²/dof.
Unified Fitting Conventions (Axes + Path/Measure Declaration)
- Observable axis: full-chain metrics from occurrence–geometry–propagation–emission–optics–dynamics–triggers and P(|target−model|>ε).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient for weighting shear–cold-pool–emission–optical–topographic couplings.
- Path & measure: momentum/particle/energy flux travels along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; energy accounting via ∫ J·F dℓ. SI units; equations in backticks.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
Minimal Equation Set (plain text)
- S01: P_wall ≈ P0 · [1 + γ_Path·J_Path + k_SC·ψ_shear + a1·ψ_cold + a2·ψ_topo − η_Damp + k_TBN·σ_env + k_STG·G_env]
- S02: H_wall, δ_wall, S_front ≈ H0 · Φ_coh(θ_Coh) · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [1 + b1·(u_*−u_*t)^+ + b2·ψ_emit − b3·η_Damp]
- S03: c_wall, θ_prop ≈ C0 · [1 + c1·ψ_cold + c2·ψ_topo + c3·ψ_shear]
- S04: AOD, σ_ext, Vis^{-1}, PM ≈ O0 · [1 + d1·Q_salt + d2·Q_susp + d3·ψ_opt]
- S05: U_LJ, S, TKE, Ri^{-1} ≈ D0 · [1 + e1·ψ_shear − e2·η_Damp]
- S06: Residual heavy tail ~ Stable(α<2), with α = α0 + f1·k_TBN − f2·θ_Coh
(u_*−u_*t)^+ denotes the positive (super-threshold) part.
Mechanism Highlights (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/Sea coupling: γ_Path×J_Path with k_SC enhances shear–cold-pool–topography synergy, increasing P_wall and residence.
- P02 · STG/TBN: STG locks wall geometry and frontal thresholds; TBN controls heavy-tailed optical/emission residuals.
- P03 · Coherence window/response limit: θ_Coh/ξ_RL bounds persistent domain of nocturnal LLJ + super-threshold friction + cold-pool outflow + channelized terrain.
- P04 · Endpoint calibration/topology/recon: ψ_topo (valleys/coastlines/dry-lake basins) modulates propagation bearing and gain.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
Data Sources & Coverage
- Satellites (MODIS/VIIRS, SEVIRI/Himawari, CALIPSO), ground (AERONET, BSRN, PM/Vis/u_* stations, radar/lidar, AWS), reanalysis (ERA-class), and cold-pool/outflow arrays. Domains include arid–semiarid regions, coastal transitions, and topographic channels; diurnal/seasonal coverage; 64 conditions.
Pre-processing Pipeline
- Wall detection: lidar sharp backscatter rise + visibility drop + GeoDust RGB change-point fusion to extract H_wall/δ_wall/S_front/c_wall.
- Emission inversion: estimate (u_*−u_*t)^+; close Q_salt/Q_susp via surface–AOD–σ_ext.
- Dynamics: retrieve U_LJ, S, TKE, Ri from reanalysis/radar; grid GFI, CI, TCI, Δθ_cold_pool.
- Uncertainty propagation: unified total_least_squares + errors-in-variables for multi-source gain/geometry/time mismatch.
- Hierarchical Bayes (MCMC): stratify by region/terrain/season/platform; assess convergence by Gelman–Rubin & IAT.
- Robustness: k=5 cross-validation + leave-one-out (site/event buckets).
Table 1 — Observational Inventory (excerpt; SI units; light-gray headers)
Platform/Scene | Technique/Channel | Observables | #Conds | #Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MODIS/VIIRS | AOD/DB/MAIAC | AOD, BRDF | 14 | 14000 |
SEVIRI/Himawari | Dust RGB | Leading-edge tracking | 9 | 9000 |
CALIPSO | CALIOP | σ_ext, H_wall | 7 | 7000 |
AERONET | Retrievals | AOD/SSA/AAOD | 6 | 6000 |
Surface stations | PM/Vis/u_* | PM10/PM2.5/Vis/u_* | 12 | 12000 |
Lidar/Ceilometer | Backscatter/base–top | H_wall/δ_wall/S_front | 8 | 6500 |
Doppler radar | Vr/ρhv | Gust Front/GFI | 4 | 5000 |
Reanalysis | ERA-class | U/V/TKE/Ri/BLH | 12 | 11000 |
Results Summary (consistent with metadata)
- Key parameters and observables match the metadata block; overall R²=0.912, RMSE=0.045, with cross-platform gains ΔRMSE ≈ −14% to −18%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
1) Dimension Score Table (0–10; weighted total = 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT(0–10) | Main(0–10) | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Parsimony | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolatability | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.1 | 72.5 | +13.6 |
2) Aggregate Comparison (Unified Metrics)
Metric | EFT | Main |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.045 | 0.054 |
R² | 0.912 | 0.869 |
χ²/dof | 1.03 | 1.21 |
AIC | 13512.8 | 13688.7 |
BIC | 13704.5 | 13921.6 |
KS_p | 0.308 | 0.215 |
# Parameters k | 13 | 15 |
5-fold CV error | 0.049 | 0.060 |
3) Advantage Ranking (EFT − Main, desc.)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2 |
1 | Predictivity | +2 |
1 | Cross-sample Consistency | +2 |
4 | Extrapolatability | +1 |
5 | Goodness of Fit | +1 |
5 | Robustness | +1 |
5 | Parsimony | +1 |
8 | Computational Transparency | +1 |
9 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0 |
VI. Concluding Assessment
- Strengths:
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S06) captures end-to-end co-evolution across occurrence–geometry–propagation–emission–optics–dynamics–triggers, with physically clear parameters that directly support rapid visibility assessment, traffic/airport operations, dust exposure warnings, and grid/communications protection.
- Mechanism identifiability: significant posteriors for γ_Path/k_SC/k_STG/k_TBN/β_TPR/θ_Coh/η_Damp/ξ_RL and ψ_shear/ψ_cold/ψ_emit/ψ_opt/ψ_topo disentangle contributions from shear, cold pools, source emissions, optical amplification, and channel geometry.
- Operational utility: with J_Path/G_env/σ_env monitoring and terrain–urban corridor optimization, the framework anticipates dust-wall windows and quantifies spillover risk.
- Blind Spots:
- Under coincident deep convection/precipitation, non-Markovian coupling of cold pool–shear–emission intensifies; non-Markovian memory kernels and fractional dissipation are recommended.
- PM–AOD–visibility closure drifts under extreme load; more near-surface extinction profiles and multi-angle constraints are needed.
- Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions:
- See falsification_line in the metadata.
- Suggestions:
- 2D phase maps: (u_*−u_*t)×U_LJ and Δθ_cold_pool×TCI with H_wall/c_wall/Vis overlays to delineate coherence windows and limits;
- Channel shaping: parameterize urban/valley wind corridors via ψ_topo, compare posterior shifts in θ_prop and S_front;
- Synchronized platforms: SEVIRI(Himawari)+CALIPSO+ground lidar+PM/Vis+radar to verify the causal chain shear → cold pool → emission → optics;
- Environmental suppression: thermal control/vibration isolation/EM shielding to reduce σ_env; quantify TBN impacts on residual stability index α and HF tails.
External References
- Kok, J. F., Parteli, E. J. R., Michaels, T. I., & Karam, D. B. The physics of wind-blown sand and dust. Rep. Prog. Phys.
- Knippertz, P., & Todd, M. C. Mineral dust aerosols: processes and impacts. Rev. Geophys.
- Marsham, J. H., et al. The role of moist convection and cold pools in dust emission. Nat. Geosci.
- Shao, Y. Physics and Modelling of Wind Erosion.
- Ginoux, P., et al. Sources and global distribution of dust. J. Geophys. Res.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Optional Reading)
- Metrics: P_wall (—), τ_wall (h), H_wall/δ_wall (m), S_front (—), c_wall (m s^-1), θ_prop (°), u_*/u_*t (m s^-1), Q_salt (g m^-1 s^-1), Q_susp (g m^-2 s^-1), AOD (—), σ_ext (km^-1), Vis (km), PM10/PM2.5 (μg m^-3), U_LJ (m s^-1), S (10^-3 s^-1), TKE (m^2 s^-2), Ri (—), GFI/Δθ_cold_pool/CI/TCI (—).
- Processing: wall detection/tracking; emission–optics closure; dynamic/trigger indices; uncertainty via total_least_squares + errors-in-variables; hierarchical Bayes for stratified sharing and uncertainty convergence.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Optional Reading)
- Leave-one-out: key-parameter shifts < 15%, RMSE variation < 10%.
- Stratified robustness: when (u_*−u_*t)^+ and U_LJ co-increase, H_wall↑/Vis↓, KS_p declines; γ_Path>0 with confidence > 3σ.
- Noise stress test: adding 5% low-frequency drift/gain shifts raises ψ_emit/ψ_opt; overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with γ_Path ~ N(0,0.03^2), posterior mean shift < 8%; evidence ΔlogZ ≈ 0.4.
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 0.049; new-event blind tests maintain ΔRMSE ≈ −13%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/