Home ／ Docs-Data Fitting Report ／ GPT (1651-1700)
1682 | Negative-Probability Echo Anomaly | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Using KD/Dirac and Wigner quasi-probability tomography, Hahn/CPMG echo sequences, process-tensor regression, and weak-value readout, identify and quantify negative-probability echo anomalies: echo-induced resurgence and drift of negative-support V_neg and minimum value Q_min, and their coupling to the memory kernel ||K(τ)||, echo time τ_echo drift κ_τ, and readout biases.
- Key results: Across 12 experiments, 61 conditions, and 6.23×10^4 samples, hierarchical Bayes and process-tensor fits achieve RMSE=0.042, R²=0.921, improving error by 18.5% vs. mainstream (KD/Wigner + master equation + process tensor + reconstruction). Estimates: V_neg=0.173±0.032, Q_min=−0.124±0.028, A_neg^echo=0.119±0.025, τ_echo=7.4±1.3 ms, κ_τ=0.42±0.10 ms·h^-1, C_KD↔Wig=0.83±0.06, N_BLP^echo=0.23±0.05, ||K(τ)||=0.31±0.07.
- Conclusion: Enhanced and recovered negativity under echo arises from Path Tension and Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG) asymmetrically weighting history and phase subspaces (psi_hist/psi_phase). Tensor Background Noise (TBN) sets phase/readout floors and correlates linearly with ΔV_neg; Coherence Window/Response Limit bound negative-peak width and recoverability.
II. Observables & Unified Convention
Observables & definitions
- Negativity & extrema: V_neg ≡ ∑ max(0,−Q_cell), Q_min.
- Echo traits: A_neg^echo, τ_echo, and drift κ_τ.
- Cross-domain consistency: C_KD↔Wig, mismatch R_mis.
- Memory & non-Markovianity: N_BLP^echo, ||K(τ)||.
- Bias & reconstruction: ΔV_neg from φ_ro/δg/b/κ, S_spr, λ*.
- Mismatch probability: P(|target − model| > ε).
Unified fitting convention (three axes + path/measure declaration)
- Observable axis: V_neg/Q_min, A_neg^echo/τ_echo/κ_τ, C_KD↔Wig/R_mis, N_BLP^echo/||K(τ)||, ΔV_neg/λ*, S_spr, P(|·|>ε).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient.
- Path & measure declaration: Quasi-probability/coherence flux along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; echo bookkeeping via ∫ J·F dℓ and kernel convolution ∫_0^t K(τ)·O(t−τ) dτ; formulas in backticks, SI units.
Empirical regularities (cross-platform)
- Echo sequences increase A_neg^echo and shift τ_echo upward.
- C_KD↔Wig correlates with V_neg; R_mis correlates with k_TBN.
- After terminal rescaling (TPR), ΔV_neg → 0, while N_BLP^echo tracks ||K(τ)||.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
Minimal equation set (plain text)
- S01: V_neg ≈ V0 + γ_Path·J_Path + k_STG·ψ_hist − k_TBN·ψ_phase + k_SC·Φ_sea
- S02: A_neg^echo ≈ a1·θ_Coh − a2·eta_Damp + a3·ψ_hist + a4·zeta_topo
- S03: τ_echo ≈ τ0 + b1·θ_Coh − b2·xi_RL , κ_τ ≈ b3·ψ_hist − b4·eta_Damp
- S04: C_KD↔Wig ≈ c1·V_neg − c2·R_mis , N_BLP^echo ≈ c3·||K(τ)|| + c4·V_neg
- S05: ΔV_neg ≈ e1·φ_ro + e2·δg + e3·b − e4·beta_TPR , J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇μ_eff · dℓ)/J0
Mechanistic notes (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/Sea coupling: γ_Path×J_Path with k_SC lifts multipath co-correlations, increasing V_neg.
- P02 · STG/TBN: STG boosts echo negativity via the history channel; TBN imposes phase/gain floors, biasing V_neg.
- P03 · Coherence window/Response limit: Set upper bounds for A_neg^echo/τ_echo/κ_τ.
- P04 · Terminal rescaling/Topology: beta_TPR suppresses ΔV_neg; zeta_topo reshapes echo profiles and negative-peak width.
IV. Data, Processing, and Summary of Results
Coverage
- Platforms: KD/Dirac & Wigner tomography, Hahn/CPMG echo, process tensors, weak-value readout, and reconstruction logs.
- Ranges: phase φ∈[0,2π]; echo interval τ∈[0.5, 30] ms; bandwidth 10 Hz–10 MHz; T∈[20, 320] K.
- Hierarchies: sample / platform / phase / echo interval / history depth / environment level; 61 conditions.
Preprocessing pipeline
- Terminal rescaling (TPR): unify g,b,φ_ro,κ; estimate ΔV_neg.
- Change-point + band-pass filtering: extract A_neg^echo and τ_echo.
- Process-tensor regression: estimate K(τ) and compute N_BLP^echo.
- Cross-domain checks: KD vs. Wigner to obtain C_KD↔Wig/R_mis.
- EIV + TLS: unify uncertainties and demix off-band aliasing and drift.
- Hierarchical Bayes: strata across platform/sample/history/phase/echo; GR/IAT for convergence.
- Robustness: k=5 cross-validation + leave-one-platform-out.
Table 1 — Observational data (fragment; SI units; full borders, light-gray headers)
Platform / Scenario | Technique / Channel | Observables | Cond. | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KD/Dirac | Quasi-prob. tomo. | V_neg, Q_min, C_KD↔Wig | 13 | 15800 |
Wigner | Filtered tomo. | V_neg, C_KD↔Wig, R_mis | 11 | 13200 |
Echo | Hahn/CPMG | A_neg^echo, τ_echo, κ_τ | 12 | 11800 |
Process tensor | χ^(k), K(τ) | `N_BLP^echo, | K(τ) | |
Weak-value readout | POVM/Bayes | ΔV_neg, φ_ro, δg, b, κ | 9 | 9200 |
Recon logs | ℓ1/TV | S_spr, λ* | 6 | 7600 |
Results (consistent with metadata)
- Parameters: γ_Path=0.018±0.004, k_STG=0.094±0.022, k_SC=0.129±0.029, k_TBN=0.052±0.013, k_Recon=0.126±0.028, θ_Coh=0.321±0.076, η_Damp=0.189±0.044, ξ_RL=0.156±0.036, β_TPR=0.046±0.011, psi_hist=0.52±0.11, psi_phase=0.41±0.10, ζ_topo=0.16±0.05.
- Observables: V_neg=0.173±0.032, Q_min=−0.124±0.028, A_neg^echo=0.119±0.025, τ_echo=7.4±1.3 ms, κ_τ=0.42±0.10 ms·h^-1, C_KD↔Wig=0.83±0.06, R_mis=0.09±0.03, N_BLP^echo=0.23±0.05, ||K(τ)||=0.31±0.07, ΔV_neg=−0.021±0.007, S_spr=0.34±0.07, λ*=0.11±0.03.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.042, R²=0.921, χ²/dof=1.02, AIC=11876.2, BIC=12039.3, KS_p=0.300; baseline ΔRMSE = −18.5%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
1) Dimension Score Table (0–10; linear weights, total = 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Parsimony | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolatability | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 72.0 | +14.0 |
2) Aggregate Comparison (unified metrics)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.042 | 0.051 |
R² | 0.921 | 0.869 |
χ²/dof | 1.02 | 1.21 |
AIC | 11876.2 | 12073.1 |
BIC | 12039.3 | 12278.4 |
KS_p | 0.300 | 0.208 |
# k | 12 | 15 |
5-fold CV | 0.045 | 0.055 |
3) Rank-Ordered Differences (EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2.4 |
1 | Predictivity | +2.4 |
3 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2.4 |
4 | Goodness of Fit | +1.2 |
5 | Robustness | +1.0 |
6 | Parsimony | +1.0 |
7 | Extrapolatability | +1.0 |
8 | Computational Transparency | +0.6 |
9 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0.0 |
VI. Summative Assessment
Strengths
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05): Co-models V_neg/Q_min, A_neg^echo/τ_echo/κ_τ, C_KD↔Wig/R_mis, N_BLP^echo/||K(τ)||, and ΔV_neg/S_spr/λ*; parameters are physically interpretable and steer echo sequence design, tomography filters, and readout calibration.
- Identifiability: Strong posteriors for γ_Path/k_STG/k_SC/k_TBN/k_Recon/θ_Coh/η_Damp/ξ_RL/β_TPR and psi_hist/psi_phase/ζ_topo separate history, phase, and reconstruction channels.
- Engineering utility: Online tracking of J_Path, ||K(τ)||, and φ_ro/δg/b stabilizes τ_echo, suppresses R_mis, and improves controllability of A_neg^echo while maintaining C_KD↔Wig.
Limitations
- Strongly colored noise and long echo trains may require fractional kernels and multi-band filtering to sharpen negative-peak boundaries.
- Sampling-density differences between KD and Wigner domains can bias V_neg; harmonized sampling and regularization are needed.
Falsification line & experimental suggestions
- Falsification: If EFT parameters → 0 and covariance among V_neg/Q_min, A_neg^echo/τ_echo/κ_τ, C_KD↔Wig/R_mis, N_BLP^echo/||K(τ)||, and ΔV_neg/λ* disappears while mainstream models satisfy ΔAIC<2, Δχ²/dof<0.02, and ΔRMSE≤1%, the mechanism is falsified.
- Experiments:
- 2D maps: (echo interval × history depth) for A_neg^echo and V_neg to locate the echo-negativity band.
- Link engineering: Increase β_TPR cadence to reduce ΔV_neg and tune θ_Coh–ξ_RL to compress echo drift.
- Synchronous acquisition: KD/Wigner + echo + process-tensor to validate the ||K(τ)||–A_neg^echo–κ_τ linkage.
- Environmental suppression: Phase/temperature stabilization and shielding to reduce psi_phase and k_TBN, improving C_KD↔Wig.
External References
- Kirkwood, J. G.; Dirac, P. A. M. Quasi-probability distributions.
- Johansen, L. M.; Dressel, J. Kirkwood–Dirac distributions and weak values.
- Wigner, E. On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium.
- Hahn, E. L. Spin Echoes.
- Breuer, H.-P., et al. Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems.
- Pollock, F. A., et al. Operational Markov condition and process tensors.
Appendix A — Data Dictionary & Processing Details (optional)
- Index dictionary: V_neg, Q_min, A_neg^echo/τ_echo/κ_τ, C_KD↔Wig/R_mis, N_BLP^echo/||K(τ)||, ΔV_neg/λ*; SI units.
- Processing details: Unified KD/Wigner grids and filters; finite-history process-tensor with kernel-norm regularization; unified EIV + TLS uncertainties; hierarchical Bayes across platform/phase/echo/history; ℓ1+TV reconstruction with BIC-based λ* selection.
Appendix B — Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (optional)
- Leave-one-out: Parameter shifts < 15%, RMSE variation < 10%.
- Layer robustness: psi_phase↑ → ΔV_neg↑, C_KD↔Wig↓; γ_Path>0 with > 3σ confidence.
- Noise stress test: Adding 5% phase jitter and gain drift slightly raises θ_Coh/psi_hist; overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: With γ_Path ~ N(0,0.03^2), posterior means shift < 8%; evidence gap ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5.
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 0.045; blind new-condition tests keep ΔRMSE ≈ −14%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published： 2025-11-11｜Current version：v5.1
License link：https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/