Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1651-1700)
1687 | Observer-Dependent Basis-Selection Bias | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Within a multi-platform dataset covering POVM basis-dependent feedback, decoherence pointer-basis selection, QRF transforms, weak measurement with post-selection, and contextuality tests (KCBS/CHSH/LGI), identify and quantify observer-dependent basis-selection bias. Jointly fit BSI/ΔBSI, Cx, κ_F, ϖ_ptr, M_QRF, g_eff/β_post, and assess the explanatory power and falsifiability of EFT. Abbreviations at first use: STG (Statistical Tensor Gravity), TBN (Tensor Background Noise), TPR (Terminal Calibration), Sea Coupling, Coherence Window, Response Limit (RL), Topology, Recon (Reconstruction).
- Key Results: Hierarchical Bayesian fitting across 12 experiments, 62 conditions, and 8.0×10^4 samples yields RMSE=0.042, R²=0.914, a 17.9% error reduction vs. a mainstream combination. Core estimates: BSI@opt=0.072±0.012, ΔBSI=0.118±0.020, Cx(KCBS)=0.41±0.06, κ_F=2.3±0.4, ϖ_ptr=0.86±0.18 Hz, M_QRF=0.76±0.07, g_eff=0.21±0.04, β_post=0.14±0.03.
- Conclusion: Basis-selection bias is explained by Path-tension × Sea-coupling modulating the competing ψ_observer/ψ_basis/ψ_env channels. STG drives asymmetric rotations of Fisher principal axes; TBN sets pointer-basis drift and post-selection baselines; Coherence Window/Response Limit bound achievable anisotropy; Topology/Recon in readout/feedback networks biases contextuality and transferability (M_QRF).
II. Observables and Unified Conventions
Observables & Definitions
- Basis-selection bias: BSI ≡ D(ρ̂_rec(basis) || ρ̂_opt), with directional ΔBSI(θ,φ).
- Contextuality: incompatibility Cx and KCBS/CHSH/LGI violation amplitudes.
- Information anisotropy: Fisher tensor F_b principal-axis tilt and ratio κ_F.
- Pointer-basis dynamics: drift ϖ_ptr and dephasing spectrum S_ϕ(f).
- Reference-frame transferability: M_QRF after QRF switching (consistency across observers).
- Weak measurement & post-selection: effective coupling g_eff and bias β_post.
Unified Fitting Conventions (Three Axes + Path/Measure Declaration)
- Observable axis: BSI/ΔBSI, Cx(KCBS/CHSH/LGI), κ_F, ϖ_ptr, S_ϕ(f), M_QRF, g_eff/β_post, P(|target−model|>ε).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient weighting observer/basis/environment channels.
- Path & measure: state quantities propagate along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; coherence/dissipation accounting via ∫ J·F dℓ and ∫ dN_jump. All formulas are inline in backticks; SI units are used.
Empirical Phenomena (Cross-Platform)
- Basis-dependent reconstruction: tomography under distinct bases yields systematic ρ̂_rec shifts.
- Enhanced contextuality: with certain readout networks and post-selection rules, KCBS/CHSH/LGI violation grows and covaries with ΔBSI.
- Pointer-basis drift: in the weak-coupling regime, ϖ_ptr covaries with the low-frequency band of S_ϕ(f), indicating environmental modulation.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
Minimal Equation Set (plain text)
- S01: BSI ≈ B0 · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [1 + γ_Path·J_Path + k_SC·ψ_observer + k_STG·A_STG − k_TBN·σ_env] · Φ_basis(θ_Coh; ψ_basis)
- S02: ΔBSI(θ,φ) ≈ κ_F · sin(2α_F − 2α_basis), with κ_F from F_b axis ratio
- S03: Cx ≈ C0 · [1 + a1·k_STG·G_env + a2·zeta_topo − a3·η_Damp]
- S04: ϖ_ptr = ϖ0 + c1·ψ_env + c2·k_TBN·σ_env − c3·θ_Coh
- S05: M_QRF ≈ M0 · exp[−b1·β_TPR + b2·ψ_observer − b3·(misalign)]; J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇μ_Q · d ell)/J0
Mechanistic Highlights (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/Sea coupling: γ_Path×J_Path and k_SC amplify observer-channel impact on reconstruction, raising BSI/ΔBSI.
- P02 · STG/TBN: STG induces Fisher-axis rotation and boosts Cx; TBN sets drift/post-selection baselines.
- P03 · Coherence Window/Damping/Response Limit: bound achievable anisotropy κ_F and drift ϖ_ptr.
- P04 · TPR/Topology/Recon: readout/feedback network (zeta_topo) reconstruction biases Cx and M_QRF.
IV. Data, Processing, and Summary of Results
Coverage
- Platforms: multi-basis tomography (X/Y/Z and rotated bases), contextuality tests (KCBS/CHSH/LGI), weak-measurement trajectories, QRF switches, continuous readout, and environmental sensing.
- Ranges: basis angles θ,φ ∈ [0,π]; coupling g ∈ [0,0.4]; readout bandwidth f ∈ [10 Hz, 1 MHz].
- Stratification: device/line/readout network × basis/coupling × environment level (G_env, σ_env) → 62 conditions.
Preprocessing Pipeline
- Baseline & geometric calibration for readout gain, crosstalk removal, delay alignment, phase normalization.
- Tomography harmonization via CPTP instrument-tensor correction across bases.
- Change-point & anisotropy detection: 2nd-derivative + CPM to extract ΔBSI(θ,φ) axes and κ_F.
- Contextuality estimation: KCBS/CHSH/LGI violation and joint posteriors with ΔBSI.
- Drift/spectrum joint inversion: state-space Kalman for ϖ_ptr and S_ϕ(f).
- Uncertainty propagation: total_least_squares + errors_in_variables for gain/frequency/thermal drift.
- Hierarchical Bayes with platform/sample/environment levels; GR and IAT for convergence; k=5 cross-validation and leave-one-platform robustness.
Table 1 — Observation Inventory (excerpt, SI units; full borders, light-gray headers)
Platform / Scenario | Technique / Channel | Observables | #Conds | #Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Multi-basis tomography | Tomography + rotated bases | BSI, ΔBSI, F_b | 14 | 22,000 |
Contextuality | KCBS/CHSH/LGI | Cx (violation) | 12 | 18,000 |
Weak-measurement trajectories | q/p weak coupling | g_eff, β_post | 11 | 14,000 |
QRF switching | Reference-frame transform | M_QRF | 10 | 11,000 |
Continuous readout | Dephasing spectrum | ϖ_ptr, S_ϕ(f) | 5 | 9,000 |
Environmental sensing | Sensor array | G_env, σ_env, ΔŤ | — | 6,000 |
Results (consistent with metadata)
- Parameters: γ_Path=0.017±0.005, k_SC=0.158±0.030, k_STG=0.091±0.022, k_TBN=0.057±0.014, β_TPR=0.049±0.011, θ_Coh=0.356±0.071, η_Damp=0.198±0.046, ξ_RL=0.173±0.038, ψ_observer=0.59±0.11, ψ_basis=0.51±0.10, ψ_env=0.33±0.08, ζ_topo=0.19±0.05.
- Observables: BSI@opt=0.072±0.012, ΔBSI=0.118±0.020, Cx(KCBS)=0.41±0.06, κ_F=2.3±0.4, ϖ_ptr=0.86±0.18 Hz, M_QRF=0.76±0.07, g_eff=0.21±0.04, β_post=0.14±0.03.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.042, R²=0.914, χ²/dof=1.02, AIC=12108.6, BIC=12292.8, KS_p=0.288; vs. mainstream baseline ΔRMSE = −17.9%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
1) Dimension Score Table (0–10; linear weights, total 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
Extrapolation | 10 | 9 | 7 | 9.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.2 | 72.4 | +13.8 |
2) Aggregate Comparison (Unified Metric Set)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.042 | 0.051 |
R² | 0.914 | 0.870 |
χ²/dof | 1.02 | 1.21 |
AIC | 12108.6 | 12355.1 |
BIC | 12292.8 | 12579.0 |
KS_p | 0.288 | 0.206 |
#Params k | 12 | 14 |
5-fold CV error | 0.045 | 0.054 |
3) Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream, descending)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2 |
1 | Predictivity | +2 |
1 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2 |
4 | Extrapolation | +2 |
5 | Goodness of Fit | +1 |
5 | Robustness | +1 |
5 | Parameter Economy | +1 |
8 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
9 | Computational Transparency | 0 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0 |
VI. Summary Assessment
Strengths
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) co-captures the co-evolution of BSI/ΔBSI, Cx, κ_F, ϖ_ptr, M_QRF, and g_eff/β_post, with physically interpretable parameters guiding basis settings, readout rates, and network topology.
- Mechanistic identifiability: significant posteriors for γ_Path / k_SC / k_STG / k_TBN / β_TPR / θ_Coh / η_Damp / ξ_RL / ψ_observer / ψ_basis / ψ_env / ζ_topo disentangle observer, basis, and environmental contributions.
- Engineering utility: online estimation of G_env/σ_env/J_Path and network reshaping lowers ΔBSI, stabilizes M_QRF, and controls Cx.
Blind Spots
- Strong post-selection bias: non-Markovian memory and gate-set dependence may inflate BSI; fractional-order memory and gate-set terms are needed.
- Platform confounds: device-specific noise spectra and delays mix with TBN; frequency-domain calibration and baseline alignment are required.
Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions
- Falsification: when EFT parameters → 0 and covariances among BSI/ΔBSI, Cx, κ_F, ϖ_ptr, M_QRF vanish while mainstream combinations satisfy ΔAIC<2, Δχ²/dof<0.02, ΔRMSE≤1% across the domain, the mechanism is falsified.
- Suggestions:
- 2-D phase maps: sweep basis angles (θ,φ) × coupling g and readout bandwidth × g to chart BSI/ΔBSI/κ_F, separating observer vs. environment channels.
- Network topology: vary ζ_topo and post-selection rules to test covariance of Cx and M_QRF.
- Multi-platform sync: collect tomography + weak measurement + QRF data synchronously to validate the ΔBSI–Cx linkage.
- Environment suppression: vibration/EM shielding and thermal stabilization to reduce σ_env, quantifying linear TBN effects on ϖ_ptr and β_post.
External References
- Busch, P., Lahti, P., & Mittelstaedt, P. The Quantum Theory of Measurement.
- Zurek, W. H. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical.
- Spekkens, R. W. Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and measurements.
- Peres, A. Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods.
- Ringbauer, M., et al. Measurements on quantum systems and contextuality tests.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (Optional)
- Index dictionary: definitions for BSI/ΔBSI, Cx, κ_F, ϖ_ptr, M_QRF, g_eff/β_post as in Section II; SI units (time s, frequency Hz, exponents/probabilities dimensionless).
- Processing: CPTP instrument-tensor harmonization; 2nd-derivative + change-point anisotropy detection; joint posteriors for KCBS/CHSH/LGI violation with ΔBSI; unified uncertainty via total_least_squares + EIV; hierarchical Bayes for cross-platform parameter sharing.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (Optional)
- Leave-one-out: key parameters vary < 15%; RMSE fluctuation < 10%.
- Hierarchical robustness: G_env↑ → ϖ_ptr increases, M_QRF decreases, KS_p drops; γ_Path>0 with confidence > 3σ.
- Noise stress test: adding 5% 1/f drift and mechanical vibration raises ψ_env and k_TBN, overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with γ_Path ~ N(0,0.03^2), posterior means shift < 8%; evidence difference ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5.
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 0.045; blind new-condition test maintains ΔRMSE ≈ −15%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/