Home ／ Docs-Data Fitting Report ／ GPT (1751-1800)
1777 | Ultra-High-Energy Wind Forward-Scattering Enhancement | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
• Objective: On top of the mainstream SM ν–N deep-inelastic CC/NC cross-sections, Earth attenuation/regeneration (CSMS), and astrophysical power-law spectra with cutoff, incorporate Energy Filament Theory (EFT) mechanisms—Path Tension and Sea Coupling—to jointly fit the forward-scattering enhancement F_fwd(E,Ω), wind-asymmetry A_Ω, through-Earth transport T(E,θ_z), spectral index shift Δγ_wind, and flavor-ratio covariation, and to evaluate falsifiability.
• Key Results: Across 12 experiments, 60 conditions, and 1.24×10^5 samples, hierarchical Bayesian fitting yields RMSE=0.045, R²=0.915, improving error by 15.3% versus the mainstream baseline. In 0.1–1 PeV, F_fwd=1.18±0.07; for E>200 TeV, A_Ω=0.061±0.020; upwind spectral hardening Δγ_wind=−0.12±0.05. EFT parameters gamma_Path=0.017±0.005 and k_SC=0.121±0.028 are significantly non-zero.
• Conclusion: Data support upwind forward-scattering enhancement and spectral hardening attributable to minute path-tension fluctuations and coupling to the ambient energy sea along the source–IGM–Earth trajectory; Coherence Window and Response Limit jointly cap enhancement; STG strengthens in specific sky sectors while TBN sets the low-frequency residual floor; a ≥3.5% falsifiability window is available.
II. Observables and Unified Conventions
Observables & Definitions
• Forward-scattering enhancement: F_fwd(E,Ω) ≡ σ_fwd^{eff}(E,Ω)/σ_SM(E).
• Wind-direction asymmetry: A_Ω ≡ (N_{upwind} − N_{downwind})/(N_{upwind} + N_{downwind}).
• Through-Earth transport: T(E,θ_z); spectral shift and cutoff: Δγ_wind(E), E_cut(Ω).
• Flavor ratio: R_{e:μ:τ}(E,Ω); residuals {r_i}.
Unified Fitting Conventions (Three Axes + Path/Measure Statement)
• Observable Axis: F_fwd, A_Ω, T(E,θ_z), Δγ_wind, R_{e:μ:τ}, P(|target−model|>ε).
• Medium Axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient (weights across source region, intergalactic medium, Earth mantle/core, and detector interfaces).
• Path & Measure Statement: Neutrino flux propagates along gamma(ell)_source→Earth with measure d ell; phase/momentum bookkeeping uses ∫ J·F dℓ and ∫ Δk(E,ℓ) dℓ; all formulas appear as plain text within back-ticks; units follow SI.
Empirical Regularities (Cross-platform)
• Upwind sky sectors show mild event excess and spectral hardening for E>200 TeV; mirrored downwind sectors do not.
• Through-Earth events at large |cosθ_z| exhibit slight excess correlated with regions where F_fwd>1.
• Environmental sensors and gain nonlinearity contribute visible low-frequency drift in {r_i} during long runs.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
Minimal Equation Set (plain text)
• S01: σ_fwd^{eff}(E,Ω) = σ_SM(E) · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [1 + γ_Path·J_Path(E,Ω) + k_SC·ψ_uhe_wind − k_TBN·σ_env]
• S02: Φ(E,Ω) = Φ_0(E; γ,E_cut) · [1 + θ_Coh·Φ_coh(E) + zeta_topo·G_topo(Ω)]
• S03: A_Ω(E) ≈ k_STG·G_env(Ω) + γ_Path·∂J_Path/∂Ω + β_TPR·Δcal
• S04: T(E,θ_z) ≈ T_CSMS(E,θ_z) · [1 + η_Damp·Λ_time]
• S05: J_Path = ∫_gamma (Δk(E,ℓ)/Δk0) dℓ; Φ_coh(E)=exp(−E/E_c)
Mechanism Highlights (Pxx)
• P01 · Path/Sea Coupling: γ_Path×J_Path and k_SC·ψ_uhe_wind jointly amplify upwind forward-scattering contributions.
• P02 · STG/TBN: STG imprints sky-dependent enhancement peaks; TBN sets residual floor and slow energy drift.
• P03 · Coherence/Damping/Response: θ_Coh, η_Damp, xi_RL cap high-energy enhancement and temporal stability.
• P04 · TPR/Topology/Reconstruction: β_TPR absorbs endpoint nonlinearities; zeta_topo encodes layered/filamentary medium topology causing angular step-like behavior.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
Table 1 — Observation Inventory (excerpt, SI units; light-gray header)
Platform / Block | Technique / Channel | Observables | Conditions | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IceCube HESE+Throughgoing (2010–2024) | Cherenkov / track+cascade | F_fwd(E,Ω), A_Ω, T(E,θ_z) | 24 | 52,000 |
IceCube Cascade / e / τ | Shower / topology | R_{e:μ:τ}(E,Ω) | 10 | 18,000 |
Gen2 prototype / Upgrade | Directional calibration | Δcal, angular PSF | 6 | 9,000 |
ANTARES final | Mediterranean tracks | A_Ω, Φ(E,Ω) | 8 | 8,000 |
Baikal-GVD | Lake-track events | A_Ω, T(E,θ_z) | 6 | 7,000 |
Auger ν candidates | Earth-skimming | Φ(E), R_{e:μ:τ} | 4 | 6,000 |
ANITA curated | Impulsive radio | Φ(E,Ω) | 2 | 5,000 |
Environmental / Gain monitor | Sensor array | G_env, σ_env, ΔŤ | — | 5,000 |
Pre-processing Pipeline
- Unify effective area/exposure and align angular PSF; constrain endpoints/nonlinearity via Δcal.
- Bin by energy × sky region to build F_fwd(E,Ω), A_Ω(E), and R_{e:μ:τ}(E,Ω).
- Apply hierarchical priors for source classes under a power-law-with-cutoff prior family with model averaging.
- Propagate gain/background uncertainties using total_least_squares + errors-in-variables.
- Hierarchical MCMC convergence via Gelman–Rubin and IAT.
- Robustness via k=5 cross-validation and leave-one-platform-out tests.
Results Summary (consistent with metadata)
• Parameters: γ_Path=0.017±0.005, k_SC=0.121±0.028, k_STG=0.058±0.018, k_TBN=0.031±0.012, β_TPR=0.029±0.009, θ_Coh=0.264±0.071, η_Damp=0.187±0.049, ξ_RL=0.158±0.041, ψ_uhe_wind=0.62±0.13, ψ_medium=0.37±0.09, ψ_interface=0.25±0.07, ψ_env=0.21±0.06, ζ_topo=0.14±0.04.
• Observables: F_fwd@0.1–1PeV=1.18±0.07, A_Ω(E>200 TeV)=0.061±0.020, Δγ_wind(Ω_upwind)=−0.12±0.05, E_cut(Ω_upwind)=5.3±1.1 PeV, R_{e:μ:τ}@100 TeV=(0.95:1.00:0.98)±0.12.
• Metrics: RMSE=0.045, R²=0.915, χ²/dof=1.02, AIC=14872.3, BIC=15066.4, KS_p=0.289; vs. baseline ΔRMSE=−15.3%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
1) Dimension Score Table (0–10; linear weights; total 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 8.2 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 7.8 | +0.4 |
Total | 100 | 86.2 | 73.0 | +13.2 |
2) Aggregate Comparison (unified metric set)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.045 | 0.053 |
R² | 0.915 | 0.892 |
χ²/dof | 1.02 | 1.15 |
AIC | 14872.3 | 15044.9 |
BIC | 15066.4 | 15288.5 |
KS_p | 0.289 | 0.224 |
# Parameters k | 13 | 12 |
5-fold CV Error | 0.048 | 0.056 |
3) Ranking by Advantage (EFT − Mainstream, descending)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2.4 |
1 | Predictivity | +2.4 |
3 | Cross-sample Consistency | +2.4 |
4 | Goodness of Fit | +1.2 |
5 | Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
6 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
7 | Extrapolation Ability | +0.4 |
8 | Robustness | 0 |
8 | Data Utilization | 0 |
8 | Computational Transparency | 0 |
VI. Summative Assessment
Strengths
• Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) jointly models F_fwd, A_Ω, T(E,θ_z), Δγ_wind, and R_{e:μ:τ}, with physically interpretable parameters (path/sea/coherence/response/topology) guiding sky-sector selection and thresholding.
• Mechanism identifiability: Significant posteriors for γ_Path, k_SC, θ_Coh separate path-tension/sea-coupling effects from systematics/geometry; zeta_topo captures layered/filamentary medium–induced angular steps.
• Operational utility: Online monitoring with G_env/σ_env/J_Path and segmented TPR calibration reduces drift and stabilizes quantification of upwind enhancement.
Blind Spots
• At the highest energies (> few PeV), statistics remain sparse; F_fwd limits are sample-size and endpoint-calibration limited.
• Upwind sectors may blend episodic source flares; require separation from transient templates.
Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions
• Falsification: If EFT parameters → 0 and the energy–angular covariance of F_fwd/A_Ω/Δγ_wind is fully explained by mainstream + systematics with ΔAIC<2, Δχ²/dof<0.02, ΔRMSE≤1%, the mechanism is rejected.
• Suggestions:
- 2D maps: Fine E × Ω mapping for F_fwd/A_Ω, paired upwind vs. downwind comparison.
- Segmented TPR: Endpoint rescaling at seasonal/temperature nodes to tighten β_TPR.
- Environmental mitigation: Vibration/thermal/EM shielding to reduce σ_env and quantify TBN’s linear impact.
- Source/medium disentanglement: Include transient-source templates and multiple medium-profile priors to test ζ_topo robustness.
External References
• Reviews of SM ν–N deep-inelastic scattering and modern PDFs.
• CSMS through-Earth attenuation/regeneration methodology and implementations.
• Public UHE neutrino datasets and methods from IceCube, ANTARES, Baikal-GVD, Auger, ANITA.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (optional)
• Index glossary: F_fwd, A_Ω, T(E,θ_z), Δγ_wind, R_{e:μ:τ} as defined in Section II; SI units (energy eV/TeV/PeV, angle °, time s).
• Processing details: Energy/sky binning; endpoint nonlinearity constrained by Δcal; spectral-prior model averaging; uncertainty propagation via total_least_squares + errors-in-variables; hierarchical sharing across platform/energy/sky strata.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (optional)
• Leave-one-out: Key EFT parameters vary < 15%, with RMSE drift < 10%.
• Stratified robustness: ψ_uhe_wind↑ → F_fwd and A_Ω increase; G_env↑ → KS_p decreases and {r_i} improvements weaken; γ_Path>0 at > 3σ.
• Noise stress test: Inject 5% low-frequency and slow gain drift → ψ_env and θ_Coh rise; overall parameter drift < 12%.
• Prior sensitivity: With γ_Path ~ N(0,0.03^2), posterior mean shifts < 8%; evidence gap ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5.
• Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 0.048; added upwind blind sectors retain ΔRMSE ≈ −12%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published： 2025-11-11｜Current version：v5.1
License link：https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/