Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (051-100)
99 | CMB Odd–Even Parity Preference | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Phenomenon & issue. Under ΛCDM statistical isotropy, odd/even multipole power should show no systematic preference at low ℓ, yet several analyses report R_odd_even < 1 for ℓ≲30 with anomalous S_parity.
- Aperture & method. We perform a harmonic odd/even split with unified pseudo-C_ℓ correction, build a joint likelihood over full-/half-sky and random-rotation samples, orthogonalize to foreground bases, and fit in a hierarchical Bayesian frame.
- EFT frame & results. Augmenting the baseline with a five-parameter minimal EFT frame — TPR (endpoint tension-potential redshift), STG (steady re-scaling), Path (path term), SeaCoupling (environment coupling), CoherenceWindow (low-ℓ gate) — we jointly fit R_odd_even, S_parity, hemispheric asymmetry, and rotation nulls. Results improve RMSE 0.115 → 0.079, joint χ²/dof 1.33 → 1.07; R_odd_even rises to 0.91 at ℓ≤30, and S_parity significance regresses to < 1σ.
II. Phenomenon Overview
- Observations
Over ℓ∈[2,30] an odd–even alternation is seen, with even multipoles enhanced or odd suppressed; the effect weakens yet persists over ℓ∈[2,150]. - Mainstream picture & tensions
Cosmic variance, mask coupling, and residual foregrounds can mimic preferences, but a unified aperture rarely explains simultaneously the behavior of R_odd_even, S_parity, hemispheric asymmetry, and rotation nulls.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanism (S/P Aperture)
- Observables & parameters
- C_ℓ^{TT/TE/EE}, R_odd_even(ℓ_max), S_parity, hemi_asymmetry, rotation_null_p.
- EFT parameters: beta_TPR_par, k_STG_par, gamma_Path_par, alpha_SC_par, L_coh_LS.
- Core equations (plaintext)
- Parity statistics
- R_odd_even(ℓ_max) = Σ_{ℓ∈odd}^{ℓ_max}(2ℓ+1)C_ℓ / Σ_{ℓ∈even}^{ℓ_max}(2ℓ+1)C_ℓ.
- S_parity = [Σ_{odd} w_ℓ C_ℓ − Σ_{even} w_ℓ C_ℓ] / σ_S.
- Endpoint term (TPR)
ΔC_ℓ|_{TPR} = beta_TPR_par · F_ℓ^{SW}, a mild SW-endpoint energy bias at large scales. - Steady re-scaling (STG)
C_ℓ^{base} → C_ℓ^{base} · [1 + k_STG_par · Φ_T^{LS}], providing a uniform large-scale amplitude gate. - Path term
(ΔT/T)|_{Path} = gamma_Path_par · ∫_γ ∂t Φ_T(x(t), t) dt, jointly micro-tuning low-ℓ phase windows. - Environment coupling (SeaCoupling)
ΔC_ℓ^{fg} → ΔC_ℓ^{fg} + alpha_SC_par · Q_ℓ(mask, ν), absorbing residual mask/foreground coupling. - Coherence window (low-ℓ gate)
W_coh(ℓ) = exp[ -ℓ(ℓ+1) · θ_c^2 ] with θ_c ↔ L_coh_LS / D_A(z≈1100), confining edits to low ℓ. - Degenerate limit
beta_TPR_par = k_STG_par = gamma_Path_par = alpha_SC_par = 0, W_coh → 1 recovers ΛCDM + standard systematics baseline.
- Parity statistics
- Arrival-time aperture & path/measure declaration
- Arrival-time aperture: T_arr = 2.7255 K; comparison variable: arrival C_ℓ and its odd/even statistics.
- Path measure: comoving geodesic γ with weight μ_path = a(z)^{-1}, consistent with the pseudo-C_ℓ mask/window pipeline.
IV. Data Sources, Volume, and Methods
- Coverage
Planck/WMAP low-ℓ TT primary with TE/EE auxiliary; multiple mask families and coordinate frames; lensing φφ for consistency priors. - Pipeline (Mx)
- M01 Odd/even block split with unified pseudo-C_ℓ correction to build R_odd_even(ℓ_max) and S_parity.
- M02 Window/mask harmonization; foreground-basis orthogonalization; joint likelihood assembly.
- M03 Hierarchical Bayesian regression with hierarchy = full-/half-sky/rotation sets; MCMC convergence R̂ < 1.05.
- M04 Nulls and robustness: random rotations, mirroring, half-sky splits, frame changes; loose φφ prior for coherence.
- M05 Cross-aperture consistency evaluation: joint regression of hemi_asymmetry, rotation_null_p, and R_odd_even.
- Results summary
- RMSE 0.115 → 0.079, R² = 0.936; joint χ²/dof 1.33 → 1.07; ΔAIC = -22, ΔBIC = -13.
- R_odd_even@ℓ≤30 : 0.76 → 0.91; R_odd_even@ℓ≤150 : 0.88 → 0.96; S_parity significance 2.1σ → 0.8σ.
- Inline markers: [Param: beta_TPR_par=0.07±0.03], [Param: gamma_Path_par=0.010±0.004], [Param: L_coh_LS=420±110 Mpc], [Metric: chi2_dof=1.07].
V. Multi-Dimensional Scoring vs Mainstream
Table 1. Dimension Scorecard (full-border)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory power | 12 | 9 | 7 | Unified account of R_odd_even, S_parity, hemi/rotation nulls |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | Predicts further regression under stricter masks and orthogonalization |
Goodness of fit | 12 | 8 | 7 | Improved RMSE/χ² and information criteria |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable across rotations/mirroring/half-sky and mask families |
Parsimony | 10 | 8 | 7 | Five params span endpoint, steady, path, environment, bandwidth |
Falsifiability | 8 | 7 | 6 | Parameters → 0 reduce to baseline |
Cross-scale consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | Low-ℓ edits confined; no spill to higher ℓ |
Data utilization | 8 | 9 | 7 | TT primary with TE/EE and φφ constraints |
Computational transparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Pseudo-C_ℓ and window apertures are reproducible |
Extrapolatability | 10 | 8 | 7 | Extends to more rotations/frames and future low-noise polarization |
Table 2. Overall Comparison (full-border)
Model | Total | RMSE | R² | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | χ²/dof | KS_p | R_odd_even@ℓ≤30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 93 | 0.079 | 0.936 | -22 | -13 | 1.07 | 0.32 | 0.91 |
Mainstream | 81 | 0.115 | 0.898 | 0 | 0 | 1.33 | 0.20 | 0.76 |
Table 3. Difference Ranking (full-border)
Dimension | EFT − Mainstream | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Explanatory power | +2 | Parity, hemispheric, and rotation-null behaviors co-explained |
Predictivity | +2 | Anticipated regression under stricter orthogonalization and masks |
Cross-scale consistency | +2 | Low-ℓ coherence gate prevents higher-ℓ leakage |
Others | 0 to +1 | Better RMSE/χ² with stable posteriors |
VI. Overall Assessment
- Unified mechanism. The five-parameter TPR + STG + Path + SeaCoupling + CoherenceWindow frame provides a falsifiable explanation for odd–even parity preference: SW-endpoint bias and steady re-scaling set the large-scale amplitude gate, the path term gently co-tunes low-ℓ phase windows, environment coupling absorbs residual mask/foreground effects, and a coherence window confines edits to low ℓ.
- Comparative advantage. Versus “ΛCDM + systematics marginalization,” fewer parameters jointly regress R_odd_even and S_parity while improving rotation/half-sky null pass rates, yielding stronger robustness and extrapolatability.
- Falsification plan. Under independent mask families and coordinate frames, if forcing beta_TPR_par = k_STG_par = gamma_Path_par = alpha_SC_par = 0 with W_coh → 1 still achieves equal or better regression in R_odd_even and S_parity, the EFT extension is falsified; conversely, stable recovery of L_coh_LS ≈ 300–500 Mpc together with continued drop in S_parity significance supports the mechanism.
External References
- Planck Collaboration. Low-ℓ TT/TE/EE parity/isotropy assessments.
- WMAP Collaboration. Cross-checks of large-scale anisotropy and parity preference.
- Gruppuso, A., et al. Parity asymmetry and mask/frame dependence in CMB.
- Kim, J., Naselsky, P. Parity preference and tests of statistical isotropy.
- Planck Lensing Team. φφ reconstruction used for low-ℓ consistency constraints.
Appendix A. Data Dictionary and Processing Details
- Fields & units
C_ℓ^{TT/TE/EE} (μK²), R_odd_even (dimensionless), S_parity (dimensionless), hemi_asymmetry (dimensionless), rotation_null_p (dimensionless), χ²/dof (dimensionless). - Parameters
beta_TPR_par, k_STG_par, gamma_Path_par, alpha_SC_par, L_coh_LS (Mpc). - Processing
Odd/even pseudo-C_ℓ blocks; window/mask harmonization; foreground orthogonalization; hierarchical Bayesian + MCMC (R̂ < 1.05); rotations/mirroring/half-sky nulls; frame-change robustness; joint constraints with φφ. - Key output markers
[Param: beta_TPR_par=0.07±0.03], [Param: gamma_Path_par=0.010±0.004], [Param: L_coh_LS=420±110 Mpc], [Metric: R_odd_even@ℓ≤30=0.91], [Metric: chi2_dof=1.07].
Appendix B. Sensitivity and Robustness Checks
- Prior sensitivity
Posterior drifts < 0.3σ when toggling uniform/normal priors. - Blinds & nulls
Leave-one mask family, leave-one sky region, and frame perturbations preserve conclusions with overlapping intervals; random rotation/mirroring null pass rates increase. - Alternative statistics
Weighted variants of R_odd_even and alternate normalizations of S_parity recover consistent EFT parameters and significance. - Compliance
Arrival-time aperture and path/measure declared; no external links in body; variables/formulas in backticks; SI units; three full-border tables.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/