Home / Docs-Technical WhitePaper / 22-EFT.WP.Metrology.Instrument v1.0
I. Purpose and Applicable Scenarios
- Unify instrumentation metrology, calibration, and uncertainty publication across benchtop, embedded, and in-service contexts, enabling an end-to-end loop for R&D, production testing, and operational monitoring.
- Standardize measurement functions, uncertainty budgets, and certificate issuance; coordinate with the TimeBase, Sync, Cleaning, and Imaging volumes to deliver a complete, auditable chain from front-end acquisition to certified release.
- Target engineering deliveries that must be traceable, reproducible, and auditable: type evaluation, production release, in-service comparisons, cross-site harmonization, and templated compliance.
II. Audience and Reading Paths
- Intended readers: metrology/test engineers, lab managers, data & algorithm engineers, and quality & compliance leads.
- Suggested reading paths:
- Chapter 2 (Modeling Baseline) → Chapter 4 (Range & Dynamic Range) → Chapter 6 (Noise & Sensitivity) → Chapter 10 (Traceability & Certificates)
- In-service monitoring & operations: Chapter 8 (Timebase Alignment) → Chapter 14 (SLO & Dashboards)
- Cross-instrument harmonization: Chapter 12 (Cross-Comparison) → Appendix E (Uncertainty Propagation)
- Cross-volume references: see Metrology.TimeBase v1.0, Metrology.Sync v1.0, Methods.Cleaning v1.0, Methods.Imaging v1.0.
III. Scope, Objects, and Dependencies
- Objects: signal chains of electrical/optical/acoustic/RF/microwave and multi-modal composite instruments (AFE/ADC/DAC/photoelectric conversion/RF chain).
- Inputs: device/channel configuration, references & standards, environment & operating conditions, calibration & raw measurement records.
- Outputs: calibration parameters, measurement results, u_c and U = k * u_c, certificates and manifest.instrument.*, compliance and contract assessment reports.
- Dependencies & interfaces: timebase/synchronization (tau_mono, ts, offset/skew/J), the two arrival-time formulations, data-cleaning contracts, and imaging chain mappings for PSF/OTF/MTF.
IV. Methodology Baseline and Unified Conventions
- Dimensions & units: every field entering equations must declare unit(x) and dim(x); run check_dim(expr) prior to publication.
- Uncertainty: adopt the GUM approach; report combined standard uncertainty u_c and coverage uncertainty U = k * u_c. Handle correlations via Jacobian propagation u_c^2 = J * Sigma * J^T.
- Quantization & resolution: LSB = FS / 2^N, quantization noise u_q = LSB / sqrt(12); ENOB, SNR, SFDR per unified definitions.
- Noise & bandwidth: define S_n(f), window functions, and equivalent noise bandwidth (ENBW); energy relation ( ∫ |H(f)|^2 S_n(f) df ) = Vn_rms^2.
- Two arrival-time formulations (cross-volume canonical forms):
- Constant factored out: T_arr = ( 1 / c_ref ) * ( ∫ n_eff d ell )
- General form: T_arr = ( ∫ ( n_eff / c_ref ) d ell )
- The manifest must log the difference delta_form between the two and assert delta_form ≤ tol_Tarr.
- Numbering system: Postulates P70x-*, Minimal Equations S70x-*, Metrology Procedures M70-*, Implementation Bindings I70-*, Contracts C70-*.
V. Key Concepts and Unified Symbols (Selected)
- Signal chain & resolution: FS, LSB, N, ENOB, SNR, SFDR, INL, DNL.
- Noise & response: S_n(f), ENBW, H(f), BW_3dB, RBW, VBW, Vn_rms.
- Uncertainty & propagation: u(x), u_c, U = k * u_c, J, Sigma.
- Timebase & arrival time: tau_mono, ts, offset/skew/J, T_arr, gamma(ell), delta_form.
- Environment & corrections: RefCond, corr_env(x; RefCond), aging_rate.
- Traceability & certificates: TraceID, certificate.id, signature, TUR.
VI. Deliverables, Compliance Templates, and Audit
- Deliverables:
- Calibration & measurement reports: calibration curves/tables, u_c/U, conformity decisions, and guard-banding strategy.
- Certificates & manifests: emit_certificate(...) and manifest.instrument.*, including device.*, results.*, unc.*, contracts.*, signature.
- Operational dashboards: SLO/SLI indicators (availability, latency_ms_p99, drift, etc.) and alerting policy.
- Compliance & audit:
- Contract assertions assert_instrument_contract: uniqueness, dimensional consistency, arrival-time form difference, linearity/noise/bandwidth thresholds, certificate coverage factor.
- Audit trail: TraceID spans prototypes/standards/data/certificates; file-level hash_sha256(blob) and signature.
VII. Versioning, Changes, and Compatibility
- Versioning policy: semantic versioning; breaking changes must be registered in Appendix F with migration guidance.
- Compatibility constraints: interfaces I70-* prioritize backward compatibility; when dimensions or metrology conventions change, publish compat_map and a recommended re-calibration window.
- Traceability closure: any change affecting U or conformity decisions must trigger re-signing and re-publication.
VIII. Document Structure and Cross-Volume References
- Structure: Chapters 1–7 cover core signal-chain models; Chapters 8–12 address timebase, environment, comparison, and harmonization; Chapters 13–15 focus on interfaces, SLOs, and use cases; appendices detail interfaces, contracts, manifests, metrics, and uncertainty propagation.
- Fixed cross-volume reference style (examples):
- Timebase mapping: see Metrology.TimeBase v1.0, Chapter 5, S/T/I.
- Sync servo: see Metrology.Sync v1.0, Chapter 6.
- Cleaning contracts & publication: see Methods.Cleaning v1.0, Chapter 10.
- Imaging mappings (PSF/OTF/MTF): see Methods.Imaging v1.0, Chapter 5.
IX. Ready-to-Release Criteria
- All mandatory assertions hold:
- check_dim(all) = true
- U = k * u_c computed with k stated explicitly
- Linearity, noise, bandwidth, and time-jitter meet C70-* thresholds
- Arrival-time form difference satisfies delta_form ≤ tol_Tarr
- Certificate and manifest.instrument.* are signed; TraceID ensures end-to-end traceability
- Release action: freeze_release_certificate(certificate, tag) -> manifest.instrument, and register the audit log plus dashboard baselines.
Summary
This volume centers on a unified metrology model, standardized uncertainty publication, and cross-volume interfaces, providing an executable path from acquisition, calibration, and verification to certificates and dashboards. Adhering to these conventions materially reduces cross-instrument/cross-site inconsistencies while strengthening compliance and reproducibility.Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/