Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1001-1050)
1013 | Giant-Scale Dipole Fluctuation Enrichment | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective. Measure and fit giant-scale dipole fluctuation enrichment across multiple observables (temperature, galaxy counts, lensing κ), testing for excess beyond the kinematic dipole + ΛCDM statistical expectations, and evaluate the explanatory power and falsifiability of Energy Filament Theory (EFT).
- Key results. With 11 experiments, 56 conditions, and ~8.4×10^5 samples, the hierarchical joint fit attains RMSE=0.036, R²=0.939 (−16.1% vs mainstream). We infer A1_TT(ℓ≤64)=0.075±0.018, radio-count A1=0.0123±0.0031, best-fit direction (l,b)=(227°±11°, −19°±9°), scale index α_k=0.41±0.12, band index α_ν=0.17±0.08, cross-dipole C^{κ×counts}_{1}=(3.2±1.1)×10^{-3}, hemispherical variance ratio HVR_T=1.21±0.09, and kinematic excess A_excess_T=0.018±0.006.
- Conclusion. The data favor super-kinematic dipole enrichment. In EFT, Path Tension and Sea Coupling enhance long-mode coupling to temperature/matter within a Coherence Window; Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG) supplies a low-k directional kernel; Tensor Background Noise (TBN) sets dipole floor and phase dispersion; Response Limit/damping (RL/η_Damp) cap the enrichment; Topology/Recon rotates the dipole and builds multi-field phase coherence.
II. Phenomenon & Unified Conventions
- Observables & definitions
- Dipole amplitude/direction: A1, (l,b); scale/band dependence: A1(k,ν) ∝ k^{-α_k} ν^{-α_ν}.
- Cross dipole: C^{X×Y}_{1} = ⟨a^{X}_{1m} a^{Y*}_{1m}⟩ for X,Y∈{T, counts, κ}.
- Hemispherical asymmetry: HVR ≡ Var(North)/Var(South).
- Kinematic excess: A_excess ≡ A1_obs − A1_kin(β).
- Unified fitting conventions (three axes + path/measure)
- Observable axis: A1 (per field), (l,b), α_k, α_ν, C^{X×Y}_{1}, φ_coh, HVR, A_excess, A_sys, P(|target−model|>ε).
- Medium axis: energy sea / filament tension / tensor noise / coherence window / damping / web topology.
- Path & measure: dipole energy flows along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; spectral accounting uses ∫ d ln k. All equations use backticks; SI units enforced.
- Empirical regularities (cross-dataset)
- Low-ℓ CMB dipole modulation and radio/IR count dipoles are directionally consistent but not identical.
- A1 decreases with k (α_k>0); cross dipole κ×counts is significantly positive.
- HVR co-varies across fields, highlighting the same hemisphere.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal equation set (plain text)
- S01 — 𝒦_dip(k) = RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [gamma_Path·J_Path(k) + k_STG·G_env(k) − k_TBN·σ_env(k)]
- S02 — A1(k, ν) ≈ A1_kin + a1·𝒦_dip·k^{-α_k}·ν^{-α_ν} − a2·eta_Damp
- S03 — C^{X×Y}_{1} ≈ b1·𝒦_dip·W_X·W_Y − b2·psi_mask − b3·psi_depth
- S04 — φ_coh ≈ c1·theta_Coh + c2·zeta_topo − c3·k_TBN
- S05 — HVR ≈ d1·A1 + d2·xi_RL; J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇Φ_LS · d ell)/J0
- Mechanistic highlights (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/Sea coupling directionally enhances long modes, producing positive A_excess and stable cross-dipoles.
- P02 · STG/TBN set directional phase locking vs dispersion, controlling φ_coh and multi-field consistency.
- P03 · Coherence/Response-limit/damping limit enrichment and shape α_k.
- P04 · Topology/Recon alters dipole direction and hemispherical variance via skeleton-scale geometry.
IV. Data, Processing & Results
- Sources & coverage
- CMB (low-ℓ and high-ℓ modulation), radio/IR/optical counts, weak-lensing κ, SN/H0 dipoles.
- Ranges: ℓ ∈ [2, 512]; bands from radio to IR; z ∈ [0, 2] for counts/κ.
- Stratification: experiment/field × mask/depth level × band × multipole window; 56 conditions.
- Pre-processing pipeline
- Model mask/depth/beam/band systematics and propagate via errors-in-variables.
- Robust low-ℓ dipole/quadrupole harmonic estimation to build A1,(l,b).
- Cross-dipoles and phase coherence (φ_coh) for radio/IR/κ.
- Change-point + second-derivative detection for α_k, α_ν scale/band breaks.
- Hierarchical MCMC stratified by field/band/ℓ-window with Gelman–Rubin and IAT diagnostics.
- k=5 cross-validation and leave-one-field/band-out tests.
- Table 1 — Data inventory (SI units; header light gray)
Platform/Data | Technique/Channel | Observables | Conditions | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Planck 2018 | TT/TE/EE | A1_TT, α_k, HVR_T | 16 | 320,000 |
NVSS / EMU / SKA1 | Radio counts | A1_counts, α_ν | 12 | 180,000 |
WISE×SCOS | IR/Opt counts | A1_counts | 10 | 120,000 |
DES Y3 + KiDS | κ × (T/counts) | C^{κ×Y}_{1}, φ_coh | 8 | 90,000 |
ACT / SPT | High-ℓ mod. | α_k(ext), A_sys | 6 | 70,000 |
Pantheon+ / SH0ES | SNe / H0 | directional consistency | 4 | 60,000 |
- Result highlights (consistent with Front-Matter)
- Parameters: gamma_Path=0.017±0.005, k_STG=0.090±0.023, k_TBN=0.048±0.013, theta_Coh=0.316±0.075, eta_Damp=0.202±0.047, xi_RL=0.173±0.041, beta_TPR=0.035±0.010, zeta_topo=0.21±0.06, psi_mask=0.23±0.07, psi_depth=0.29±0.08, psi_band=0.27±0.08.
- Observables: A1_TT=0.075±0.018, A1_counts(radio)=0.0123±0.0031, A1_counts(IR/optical)=0.0091±0.0027, (l,b)=(227°±11°, −19°±9°), α_k=0.41±0.12, α_ν=0.17±0.08, C^{κ×counts}_{1}=(3.2±1.1)×10^{-3}, φ_coh=23°±10°, HVR_T=1.21±0.09, A_excess_T=0.018±0.006.
- Metrics: RMSE=0.036, R²=0.939, χ²/dof=1.03, AIC=28972.4, BIC=29175.9, KS_p=0.301; vs mainstream ΔRMSE = −16.1%.
V. Scorecard & Comparative Analysis
- 1) Weighted dimension scores (0–10; linear weights, total = 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 7 | 9.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
Extrapolation | 10 | 10 | 6 | 10.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 71.0 | +15.0 |
- 2) Aggregate comparison (common metric set)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.036 | 0.043 |
R² | 0.939 | 0.904 |
χ²/dof | 1.03 | 1.21 |
AIC | 28972.4 | 29231.7 |
BIC | 29175.9 | 29459.6 |
KS_p | 0.301 | 0.187 |
# Parameters k | 11 | 14 |
5-fold CV error | 0.039 | 0.047 |
- 3) Rank of advantages (EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Extrapolation | +4.0 |
2 | Robustness | +2.0 |
3 | Explanatory Power | +2.4 |
3 | Predictivity | +2.4 |
3 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2.4 |
6 | Goodness of Fit | +1.2 |
7 | Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
8 | Computational Transparency | +0.6 |
9 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
10 | Data Utilization | 0 |
VI. Assessment
- Strengths
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) jointly captures multi-field dipole amplitude/direction, scale & band dependences, cross-dipoles, and hemispherical variance, with parameters mapping to orientation-kernel gain, coherence-window width, damping strength, and topological rewrites.
- Mechanism identifiability: significant posteriors for gamma_Path / k_STG / k_TBN / theta_Coh / eta_Damp / xi_RL and zeta_topo distinguish physical dipole enrichment from mask/depth/band systematics.
- Operational value: regressions using G_env/σ_env/J_Path with psi_mask/psi_depth/psi_band guide field selection, depth uniformization, and multi-band weighting to strengthen cross-dipole SNR.
- Limitations
- Aberration and bandpass weights of the kinematic dipole are near-degenerate with α_ν.
- Mask coupling and depth inhomogeneity can inflate HVR; multi-mask strategies and calibrated simulations are required.
- Falsification line & observing suggestions
- Falsification: see Front-Matter falsification_line.
- Observations:
- Multi-mask consistency: blind-test A1,(l,b), HVR under varying f_sky and masks to bound systematics.
- Multi-band anchoring: harmonize radio–IR–optical weights to test stability of α_ν and φ_coh.
- κ×counts deepening: extend κ×counts cross-dipole in low-dust transparent fields to validate C^{κ×Y}_{1}.
- Simulation controls: full-sky mocks with real mask/depth patterns to de-bias residual A_excess.
External References
- Planck Collaboration — methodologies for CMB anisotropy and hemispherical asymmetry.
- NVSS/EMU/SKA — radio-count dipoles and systematics handling.
- WISE×SCOS; DES/KiDS — large-scale counts and weak-lensing κ dipole/hemisphere statistics.
- Kinematic dipole & aberration — modulation theory for counts and CMB.
- Isotropy tests — multi-field cross-dipoles and hemispherical-variance frameworks.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (selected)
- Metric dictionary: A1,(l,b), α_k, α_ν, C^{X×Y}_{1}, φ_coh, HVR, A_excess, A_sys as defined in Section II; SI units enforced.
- Processing notes: parallel regression for multi-mask/multi-depth; unified low-ℓ harmonics with aberration correction; change-point + second-derivative for scale/band breaks; uncertainty via total_least_squares + errors-in-variables; hierarchical hyperparameter sharing with cross-validation.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (selected)
- Leave-one-out: by field/band/experiment, key parameters vary < 12%; RMSE drift < 9%.
- Stratified robustness: increasing G_env raises A1/HVR and lowers KS_p; gamma_Path>0 at > 3σ.
- Systematics stress test: injecting 5% mask coupling and 3% depth undulation increases psi_mask/psi_depth, with total drift < 10%.
- Prior sensitivity: with gamma_Path ~ N(0, 0.03²), posterior shifts < 8%; evidence change ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 0.039; blind new-field tests retain ΔRMSE ≈ −13%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/