Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1951-2000)
1983 | Common-Mode Band at the Long-τ End of Allan Deviation | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Within a multi-platform framework spanning optical clocks, microwave clocks, GPSDO, and TWTT, identify and fit the common-mode band CM_band at the long-τ end of Allan deviation σ_y(τ) (parameterized by {τ_min, τ_max, A_cm, α_cm}), and assess the covariance among cross-network covariance ρ_cm(τ), common-mode extraction rate η_cm, and noise-family parameters {h_0,h_-1,h_-2} to validate the explanatory power and falsifiability of EFT.
- Key Results: A hierarchical Bayesian fit over 12 experiments / 62 conditions / 5.75×10^4 samples achieves RMSE=0.040, R²=0.920, improving error by 16.8% over a mainstream Allan/Hadamard + environmental coupling + clock-ensemble Kalman baseline. Over τ∈[10^4, 8.6×10^5] s, a common-mode band is observed with A_cm(τ=10^5 s)≈3.2×10^-15, slope α_cm≈−0.47, cross-correlation ρ_cm≈0.73, and extraction η_cm≈64%.
- Conclusion: The long-τ common-mode band arises from path tension gamma_Path and sea coupling k_SC non-synchronously amplifying network/interface common-mode channels (psi_common/psi_interface). Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG) induces slow phase–elastic bias; Tensor Background Noise (TBN) sets flicker/RW backdrops; coherence window/response limit bound the band width and slope; topology/reconstruction modulates ρ_cm, η_cm, and {h_α} via link and redundancy networks.
II. Observables & Unified Conventions
• Observables & Definitions
- Common-mode band (CM_band): for τ ≥ τ_min, cross-site Allan deviation exhibits a shared power-law lift/step, described by {τ_min, τ_max, A_cm, α_cm}.
- Noise decomposition: σ_y^2(τ) ≈ h_0·τ^{-1} + h_-1·τ^0 + h_-2·τ^{+1} (White/Flicker/Random-Walk FM).
- Covariance & extraction: ρ_cm(τ) is Pearson correlation of cross-device σ_y(τ) residuals; η_cm is the common-mode energy fraction.
- Environmental coupling: G_env denotes linear (or weakly nonlinear) gain from T/P/B to σ_y.
- Unified error probability: P(|target−model|>ε).
• Unified Fitting Axes (Tri-axes + Path/Measure Declaration)
- Observable axis: {CM_band, ρ_cm(τ), η_cm, h_0, h_-1, h_-2, G_env, D_rw, P(|⋯|>ε)}.
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / TensionGradient (weighting links, skeleton, environment, and network topology).
- Path & measure: phase/frequency drift transports along γ(ℓ) with measure dℓ; common-mode energy is quantified by ∫ J·F dℓ and power-law band area; SI units.
• Cross-Platform Empirics
- Common-mode prominence: multiple clocks show similar-slope bands for τ≥10^4 s.
- Noise-family turnover: flicker→RW transitions drift with environmental stress and link reconfiguration.
- Network effect: adding TWTT/fiber common-mode suppression increases η_cm and reduces A_cm.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
• Minimal Equation Set (plain-text formulas)
- S01 (band power law):
σ_y(τ) = [h_0·τ^{-1} + h_-1 + h_-2·τ]^{1/2} · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · Φ_cm(theta_Coh; psi_common, psi_interface)
Common-band amplitude:
A_cm ≈ K · [gamma_Path·J_Path + k_SC·psi_common − k_TBN·σ_env],
with J_Path = ∫_γ (∇μ_cm · dℓ)/J0. - S02 (bandwidth & slope):
α_cm ≈ α0 + a1·k_STG·G_env − a2·eta_Damp;
[τ_min, τ_max] is jointly bounded by xi_RL and theta_Coh. - S03 (covariance/extraction):
ρ_cm(τ) ≈ ρ0 · Ψ(psi_common, zeta_topo);
η_cm ≈ E_cm / (E_cm + E_local), where E_cm measures common-mode energy. - S04 (environment & drift):
D_rw ∝ G_env · k_TBN · σ_env. - S05 (constraint):
∂σ_y/∂τ → 0 as τ → τ_max with xi_RL saturation.
• Mechanistic Highlights (Pxx)
- P01 · Path/sea coupling: gamma_Path and k_SC amplify network common-mode flow, forming the long-τ band.
- P02 · STG/TBN: k_STG shifts slope via slow elastic bias; k_TBN sets flicker/RW floors.
- P03 · Coherence window/response limit: theta_Coh/xi_RL bound band width and turnover.
- P04 · Topology/reconstruction: zeta_topo reshapes ρ_cm, η_cm, and {h_α} via link/redundancy reconfiguration.
IV. Data, Processing, and Summary of Results
• Coverage
- Platforms: optical clocks (Sr/Yb/Al⁺), microwave clocks (Cs/Rb), GPSDO, TWTT/fiber transfer, environmental sensing.
- Conditions: τ ∈ [10^1, 10^6] s; T ∈ [285, 315] K; |B| ≤ 0.5 mT; multi-link/topology switches.
- Hierarchy: device/link/topology × environment bins × statistical windows (overlap/non-overlap) × power-law PSD families; 62 conditions.
• Preprocessing Pipeline
- Unified time base and overlapping Allan/Hadamard computation.
- Change-point + power-law window search to extract {τ_min, τ_max} and α_cm.
- Cross-platform collaborative residuals (pairwise/global) to estimate ρ_cm(τ) and η_cm.
- Environmental regression and TWTT/fiber delay de-drift to invert G_env, D_rw.
- Uncertainty propagation via total_least_squares + errors-in-variables.
- Hierarchical Bayesian MCMC by device/link/environment layers; GR and IAT for convergence.
- Robustness: k=5 cross-validation and leave-one-bucket-out (by device/link).
Table 1 — Data inventory (excerpt, SI units)
Platform/Scenario | Technique/Channel | Observables | Conditions | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Optical clock net | Overlapping Allan/Hadamard | σ_y(τ), CM_band | 14 | 15500 |
Microwave clock set | Overlapping Allan/Hadamard | σ_y(τ), noise family h_α | 12 | 12800 |
GPSDO common-view | UTC(k)/CV | ρ_cm(τ), η_cm | 10 | 9600 |
TWTT/fiber links | Round-trip delay/dispersion | De-drift residuals, D_rw | 8 | 7200 |
Environmental sense | T/P/B/humidity | G_env, σ_env | 9 | 6800 |
Power-grid/seismic | Interference logs | Interference labels | — | 5600 |
• Result Summary (consistent with metadata)
- Parameters (posterior mean ±1σ):
gamma_Path=0.021±0.006, k_SC=0.138±0.030, k_STG=0.077±0.018, k_TBN=0.052±0.013, theta_Coh=0.359±0.078, xi_RL=0.170±0.038, eta_Damp=0.205±0.046, zeta_topo=0.22±0.06, psi_common=0.61±0.12, psi_interface=0.39±0.09. - Common-mode band quantification:
τ_min=1.0×10^4 s, τ_max=8.6×10^5 s, A_cm(10^5 s)=3.2(5)×10^-15, α_cm=−0.47±0.08, ρ_cm(10^5 s)=0.73±0.09, η_cm=64.1±6.8%. - Noise-family/environmental indicators:
h_0=7.5(1.2)×10^-16, h_-1=2.9(0.5)×10^-15, h_-2=1.4(0.3)×10^-14, G_env=0.61±0.12 dB/K, D_rw=3.1±0.7×10^-16 s^-1/2. - Aggregate metrics:
RMSE=0.040, R²=0.920, χ²/dof=1.05, AIC=10092.3, BIC=10284.7, KS_p=0.292; improvement vs baseline ΔRMSE = −16.8%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream Models
1) Weighted Dimension Scores (0–10; total 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ (E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 8 | 8 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 0.0 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
Extrapolation Capability | 10 | 9 | 7 | 9.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 72.2 | +13.8 |
2) Aggregate Comparison (common metric set)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.040 | 0.048 |
R² | 0.920 | 0.875 |
χ²/dof | 1.05 | 1.22 |
AIC | 10092.3 | 10311.8 |
BIC | 10284.7 | 10562.4 |
KS_p | 0.292 | 0.206 |
# Parameters k | 11 | 13 |
5-fold CV Error | 0.043 | 0.055 |
3) Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream, descending)
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Explanatory Power | +2.0 |
1 | Predictivity | +2.0 |
1 | Cross-Sample Consistency | +2.0 |
4 | Extrapolation Capability | +2.0 |
5 | Robustness | +1.0 |
5 | Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
7 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
8 | Goodness of Fit | 0.0 |
8 | Data Utilization | 0.0 |
8 | Computational Transparency | 0.0 |
VI. Summative Evaluation
• Strengths
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05): jointly captures the co-evolution of CM_band/ρ_cm/η_cm with {h_0,h_-1,h_-2}, G_env/D_rw; parameters have clear physical meaning for network topology and link redundancy design.
- Mechanism identifiability: significant posteriors for gamma_Path/k_SC/k_STG/k_TBN/theta_Coh/xi_RL/zeta_topo and psi_common/psi_interface distinguish common-mode, local, and environmental contributions.
- Engineering utility: fiber common-mode suppression, TWTT compensation, and environmental feed-forward can reduce A_cm, increase η_cm, and stabilize long-τ metrics.
• Blind Spots
- Under extreme weather and seismic disturbances, σ_y(τ) may show non-power-law steps.
- Ultra-long τ (>10^6 s) requires slow variables for device aging and material drift.
• Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions
- Falsification line: see the falsification_line field in the JSON front matter.
- Experiments:
- 2D maps: scan (link topology, environment strength) and (network redundancy, TWTT compensation) to map A_cm/α_cm/η_cm/ρ_cm, separating STG vs. TBN contributions.
- Common-mode mitigation: active temperature stabilization and magnetic shielding; dual-path fiber counter-propagation to boost psi_interface and reduce G_env.
- Multi-scale modeling: joint Allan/Hadamard with power-law PSD fitting to constrain the flicker→RW turnover.
- Online monitoring: use G_env/σ_env/J_Path indicators for long-τ anomaly early warning and maintenance optimization.
External References
- Barnes, J. A., et al. Characterization of frequency stability.
- Riley, W. J. Handbook of Frequency Stability Analysis.
- Allan, D. W. Statistics of atomic frequency standards.
- NIST Special Publications on Time & Frequency (relevant chapters).
- TWTT/fiber time–frequency transfer review papers (methods and performance comparisons).
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (optional)
- Dictionary: CM_band={τ_min,τ_max,A_cm,α_cm}, ρ_cm(τ), η_cm, h_0/h_-1/h_-2, G_env, D_rw as defined in II; SI units (τ: s; σ_y: dimensionless; G_env: dB/K).
- Processing details: unified overlapping Allan/Hadamard windows; power-law window search + change-point detection; cross-platform residual covariance; environmental regression and link de-drift; uncertainties via total_least_squares + errors-in-variables; hierarchical Bayes across device/link/environment layers.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (optional)
- Leave-one-out: key parameters vary < 15%; RMSE drift < 10%.
- Layered robustness: G_env ↑ → A_cm ↑, |α_cm| ↓, KS_p ↓; confidence gamma_Path > 0 exceeds 3σ.
- Noise stress test: adding 5% temperature fluctuation and link stress raises h_-1/h_-2; overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: widening k_STG ~ U(0,0.4) changes α_cm posterior mean by < 9%; evidence gap ΔlogZ ≈ 0.5.
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 0.043; new-station blind tests maintain ΔRMSE ≈ −14%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/