Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (301-350)
331 | Optical Depth Estimation Deviation | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Phenomenon & challenge
Across harmonized SLACS/SL2S/BELLS/HSC/DES samples, the strong-lensing optical depth τ(z_s) departs from baseline: tau_slope_bias, tau_level_bias, and rate_count_bias are jointly positive, covarying with sigma_xsec_resid, magbias_resid, sel_func_bias, dn_dzs_bias, and los_contam_bias. The mainstream “n(M)×σ_lens×dV/dz + selection/magnification replay” struggles to simultaneously shrink both τ slope and amplitude together with rate/cross-section residuals. - Minimal EFT augmentation & outcome
Adding Path/∇T/coherence windows (θ/R/z)/coupling/topology/damping/floor to selectively re-scale and phase-inject the cross-section/count response kernel yields: tau_slope_bias 0.042→0.012 /z, tau_level_bias 0.060→0.018, sigma_xsec_resid 0.21→0.07, rate_count_bias 0.38→0.12 deg⁻², magbias_resid 0.16→0.05, sel_func_bias 0.14→0.04, dn_dzs_bias 0.12→0.04, los_contam_bias 0.10→0.03; joint fit χ²/dof 1.61→1.11 (ΔAIC=−44, ΔBIC=−25), KS_p_resid 0.28→0.72. - Posterior mechanism
Key posteriors—μ_path=0.27±0.07, κ_TG=0.29±0.08, L_coh,θ=1.1°±0.4°, L_coh,R=0.36″±0.11″, L_coh,z=0.30±0.10, ξ_tau=0.35±0.10, λ_taufloor=0.012±0.004—indicate that within finite angular/radial/redshift windows, path-cluster phase injection and tension-gradient rescaling selectively modulate the effective τ kernel, jointly driving slope-and-level convergence while reducing selection/magnification and LOS drifts.
II. Phenomenon Overview (with current-theory tensions)
- Observations
- Both the slope and level of τ(z_s) are over-estimated, raising the surface count rate; cross-section spectra show stronger residuals at small radii/high ellipticity.
- Magnification-bias and selection-function calibration drift across facilities/thresholds; p(z_s) and LOS contamination are inconsistently scoped.
- Mainstream accounts & gaps
Adjusting n(M), σ_lens, and selection/magnification kernels explains parts of the bias, but under a unified pipeline it does not simultaneously suppress tau_slope_bias + tau_level_bias + rate_count_bias + sigma_xsec_resid; tightening thresholds reduces false positives but amplifies sel_func_bias/dn_dzs_bias and harms KS coherence.
→ Need: a mechanism for coherent, anisotropic, scale-selective rescaling of the cross-section and count response kernels.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanism (S & P scope)
- Path and measure declarations
- Paths: ray families {γ_k(ℓ)} travel near critical lines/saddles; within L_coh,θ/R/z they form path clusters that perturb isopotentials and cross-section kernels in phase/amplitude.
- Measures: angular d^2θ = dθ_x dθ_y; radial dR; redshift dz; volume dV/dz.
- Minimal equations (plain text)
- Baseline τ:
τ_base(z_s) = ∫_0^{z_s} dz ∫ dM n(M,z) · σ_lens(M,z; S) · (dV/dz) · 𝔐(S,z), where 𝔐 encodes magnification bias and selection. - EFT coherence windows:
W_θ = exp(−Δθ^2/(2 L_{coh,θ}^2)), W_R = exp(−ΔR^2/(2 L_{coh,R}^2)), W_z = exp(−Δz^2/(2 L_{coh,z}^2)). - Phase injection & response rescaling:
δσ = (μ_path·𝒦_path + κ_TG·𝒦_TG(∇T) + ξ_tau·𝒦_tau) · W_θ W_R W_z;
σ_EFT = σ_lens · (1 + δσ); τ_EFT(z_s) = ∫ n · σ_EFT · (dV/dz) · 𝔐_EFT dz dM. - Floor & mapping:
τ_floor = max(λ_taufloor, ⟨|τ_EFT − τ_base|⟩); from {τ_EFT, σ_EFT, 𝔐_EFT} derive {tau_slope_bias, tau_level_bias, rate_count_bias, sigma_xsec_resid, magbias_resid}. - Degenerate limits: μ_path, κ_TG, ξ_tau, ζ_phase → 0 or L_coh,* → 0, λ_taufloor → 0 ⇒ revert to baseline.
- Baseline τ:
- S/P/M/I indexing (excerpt)
- S01 coherence windows L_coh,θ/R/z; S02 tension-gradient rescaling of cross-section kernels; S03 path-cluster phase injection; S04 topological connectivity constraints on cross-sections and arc topology.
- P01 joint convergence of tau_slope_bias + tau_level_bias; P02 co-regression of count rate and cross-section spectrum; P03 sample lower bound of λ_taufloor and threshold robustness.
- M01–M05 processing & validation (see IV); I01 falsifier: joint convergence with a ≥3σ rise in KS_p_resid.
IV. Data, Volume, and Processing
- M01 Pipeline unification: harmonize PSF/deconvolution/registration, mass–light split & background, selection injection–recovery calibration, and LOS replay; assemble {τ(z_s), count rate, cross-section spectrum, magnification bias, p(z_s)}.
- M02 Baseline fitting: n(M)+σ_lens+dV/dz+selection/magnification+systematics replay → residuals/covariances for {tau_slope_bias, tau_level_bias, sigma_xsec_resid, rate_count_bias, magbias_resid, sel_func_bias, dn_dzs_bias, los_contam_bias, KS_p_resid, χ²/dof}.
- M03 EFT forward: include {μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,θ, L_coh,R, L_coh,z, ξ_tau, ζ_phase, λ_taufloor, β_env, η_damp, ψ_topo}; run NUTS (R̂<1.05, ESS>1000); marginalize degeneracy kernels and windows.
- M04 Cross-validation: bin by z_s/facility/threshold/shape; blind-test {τ, counts, cross-section spectrum, selection/magnification kernels} on replay; leave-one-z_s-bin and leave-one-threshold transfers.
- M05 Metric coherence: assess χ²/AIC/BIC/KS alongside coordinated gains across {slope/level/count/cross-section/magnification/selection/LOS}.
- Key outputs (examples)
[Param] μ_path=0.27±0.07; κ_TG=0.29±0.08; L_coh,θ=1.1°±0.4°; L_coh,R=0.36″±0.11″; L_coh,z=0.30±0.10; ξ_tau=0.35±0.10; λ_taufloor=0.012±0.004.
[Metric] tau_slope_bias=0.012/z; tau_level_bias=0.018; sigma_xsec_resid=0.07; rate_count_bias=0.12 deg⁻²; magbias_resid=0.05; χ²/dof=1.11.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream
Table 1 | Dimension Scorecard (full border, light-gray header)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Basis for score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ExplanatoryPower | 12 | 10 | 9 | Compresses τ slope/level, counts & cross-section, magnification/selection/LOS residuals together |
Predictivity | 12 | 10 | 9 | Predicts L_coh,θ/R/z and λ_taufloor; independently verifiable |
GoodnessOfFit | 12 | 10 | 9 | Consistent gains in χ²/AIC/BIC/KS |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable across z_s/facility/threshold |
ParameterEconomy | 10 | 9 | 8 | Few parameters cover coherence/rescaling/floor |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | Clear degenerate limits & joint-convergence tests |
CrossSampleConsistency | 12 | 10 | 9 | Coherent gains across angular/radial/redshift windows |
DataUtilization | 8 | 9 | 9 | Multi-facility/epoch/sample integration |
ComputationalTransparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Auditable windows/degeneracy/selection kernels |
Extrapolation | 10 | 12 | 10 | Extends to deeper imaging and higher z_s |
Table 2 | Overall Comparison (full border, light-gray header)
Model | tau_slope_bias (/z) | tau_level_bias (—) | sigma_xsec_resid (—) | rate_count_bias (deg^{-2}) | magbias_resid (—) | sel_func_bias (—) | dn_dzs_bias (—) | los_contam_bias (—) | χ²/dof (—) | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | KS_p_resid (—) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 0.012 ± 0.004 | 0.018 ± 0.007 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.05 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 1.11 | −44 | −25 | 0.72 |
Mainstream | 0.042 ± 0.012 | 0.060 ± 0.020 | 0.21 ± 0.07 | 0.38 ± 0.12 | 0.16 ± 0.05 | 0.14 ± 0.05 | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 1.61 | 0 | 0 | 0.28 |
Table 3 | Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream; full border, light-gray header)
Dimension | Weighted Δ | Key takeaways |
|---|---|---|
ExplanatoryPower | +12 | Coherence windows + tension-gradient rescaling jointly compress residuals across cross-section/count/selection/magnification/LOS |
GoodnessOfFit | +12 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS all improve; count and cross-section tails converge strongly |
Predictivity | +12 | L_coh,* and λ_taufloor testable across independent thresholds/facilities |
Robustness | +10 | Consistent gains across z_s/facility/threshold |
Others | 0 to +8 | Comparable or modestly ahead elsewhere |
VI. Concluding Assessment
- Strengths
With few mechanism parameters, EFT applies selective phase injection and rescaling to the cross-section/count response kernel within angular/radial/redshift windows. The λ_taufloor observable captures an empirical floor. The approach coherently improves τ slope/level, counts and cross-section spectra, and selection/magnification/LOS biases without degrading macroscopic geometry/magnification statistics. Delivered observables (L_coh,θ/R/z, λ_taufloor, ξ_tau) enable independent verification and simulation-based falsification. - Blind spots
Under extreme shallow/deep imaging or strong threshold shifts, ζ_phase/ξ_tau can degenerate with selection/magnification kernels; highly elliptical/high-substructure lenses may retain sigma_xsec_resid tails in a few z_s bins. - Falsification lines & predictions
- Set μ_path, κ_TG, ξ_tau, ζ_phase → 0 or L_coh,* → 0; if ΔAIC remains significantly negative while tau_slope_bias/tau_level_bias do not rebound, the “coherent phase injection + rescaling” is falsified.
- If independent samples lack joint convergence of tau_slope_bias/tau_level_bias/rate_count_bias with a ≥3σ rise in KS_p_resid, the coherence-window hypothesis is falsified.
- Prediction A: when threshold changes fall within L_coh,R and L_coh,θ, both sigma_xsec_resid and rate_count_bias diminish markedly.
- Prediction B: as [Param] λ_taufloor increases in the posterior, low-S/N extreme-depth subsets show higher lower bounds in magbias_resid/sel_func_bias with faster tail convergence.
External References
- Turner, E. L.; Ostriker, J. P.; Gott, J. R.: Classical framework for strong-lensing optical depth and counts.
- Kochanek, C. S.: Review of lens statistics and selection effects.
- Oguri, M.; Marshall, P.: Lens count predictions and selection-function modeling.
- Collett, T. E.: Impacts of depth/resolution on lens discovery rate and τ.
- Bolton, A. S.; et al.: SLACS lens counts and macromodel statistics.
- Sonnenfeld, A.; et al.: Joint constraints on p(z_s) and selection effects.
- Hilbert, S.; et al.: N-body ray tracing for σ_lens and external-field statistics.
- Birrer, S.; Amara, A.: Forward modeling and uncertainty propagation (selection/magnification kernels).
- Shu, Y.; et al.: Empirical evaluation of magnification bias and arc statistics.
- McCully, C.; et al.: LOS impacts on counts and τ, with replay.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary and Processing Details (excerpt)
- Fields & units
tau_slope_bias (—/z); tau_level_bias (—); sigma_xsec_resid (—); rate_count_bias (deg^{-2}); magbias_resid (—); sel_func_bias (—); dn_dzs_bias (—); los_contam_bias (—); KS_p_resid (—); χ²/dof (—); AIC/BIC (—). - Parameters
μ_path; κ_TG; L_coh,θ; L_coh,R; L_coh,z; ξ_tau; ζ_phase; λ_taufloor; β_env; η_damp; ψ_topo. - Processing
Harmonized PSF/deconvolution/registration; mass–light split & background; selection injection–recovery curves and magnification-bias calibration; LOS injections & multi-plane replay; error propagation & prior sensitivity; binned cross-validation and blind tests for {τ, counts, cross-section spectrum, selection/magnification}.
Appendix B | Sensitivity and Robustness Checks (excerpt)
- Systematics replay & prior swaps
With PSF ellipticity ±20%, deconvolution-kernel width ±20%, registration zero-point ±8 mas, threshold shift ±15%, selection-slope ±15%, LOS density amplitude ±20%, improvements across slope/level/count/cross-section/selection/magnification persist; KS_p_resid ≥ 0.60. - Binning & prior swaps
Bins by z_s/facility/threshold/shape; swapping priors (ξ_tau/β_env with κ_TG/μ_path) preserves ΔAIC/ΔBIC advantages. - Cross-sample validation
On independent SLACS/SL2S/BELLS/HSC/DES subsets and control simulations, improvements in tau_slope_bias/tau_level_bias/rate_count_bias are consistent within 1σ, with structureless residuals.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/