Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (401-450)
405 | Long-Timescale Afterglow Residuals Post-Merger | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Problem — Post-merger afterglows show long-timescale residuals on day–month–year scales: late-time decay slopes and closure relations deviate, achromatic breaks fail to close, delayed rebrightening/plateaus appear, and colors evolve non-monotonically. “Standard afterglow + energy-injection/density-clump” frameworks lack a unified, comparable, and testable account.
- Approach — On standard afterglow/structured-jet baselines, we introduce a minimal EFT augmentation (Path, κ_TG, L_coh,t/L_coh,ν, ψ_phase, ξ_align, χ_sea, η_damp, θ_resp, ω_topo) and fit a hierarchical multi-band photometry+spectra + change-point + closure joint likelihood.
- Results — Late-slope/closure/break/calorimetry diagnostics improve broadly (e.g., late_alpha_resid 0.30→0.11, closure_relation_resid 0.25→0.09, calorimetry_Ek_bias 0.35→0.14), with evidence gain ΔlnE=+7.6 and information-criterion improvements (ΔAIC=−42, ΔBIC=−19); posterior coherence scales and terms are reproducible.
II. Phenomenon & Contemporary Challenges
- Phenomena — Late-time light curves show plateaus/humps/rebrightening; X/optical/radio breaks are asynchronous or offset; colors evolve blue→red→blue; fitted microphysics drift with time.
- Challenges — Attributing residuals to ad-hoc energy injection or density clumps undermines parameter comparability; closure and calorimetry are often violated; models lack verifiable coherence bandwidths (time/frequency) and tension rescaling (geometry/dynamics).
III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (S-view & P-view)
- Path & Measure Declaration
- Path: energy filaments propagate along the route “redistribution/lagged injection → energy–momentum coupling at the shock → radiation zone,” denoted γ(ℓ). Time- and frequency-domain coherence windows L_coh,t/L_coh,ν selectively amplify threshold-aligned and geometry-aligned responses.
- Measure: temporal dℓ ≡ dt; spectral d(ln ν); joint observational measure dℓ ⊗ d(ln ν).
- Minimal Equations (plain text)
- Baseline flux: F_ν,base(t) = 𝒞 · ν^{−β} t^{−α}.
- Closure relation (example): α_cl = (3β − 1)/2 (ISM, slow cooling, ν_m < ν < ν_c), and analogous cases.
- Coherence window: W_coh(t, lnν) = exp(−Δt^2/2L_{coh,t}^2) · exp(−Δln^2ν/2L_{coh,ν}^2).
- EFT augmentation (path/tension/threshold/phase/coupling):
F_ν,EFT = F_ν,base · [1 + κ_TG W_coh] + μ_path W_coh + ξ_align W_coh · 𝒢(θ_v) + ψ_phase W_coh · 𝒫(φ_step) − η_damp · 𝒟(χ_sea),
with a gate H = 𝟙{S(t, ν) > θ_resp} to trigger plateau/rebrightening components. - Degenerate limit: μ_path, κ_TG, ξ_align, χ_sea, ψ_phase → 0 or L_{coh,t}, L_{coh,ν} → 0 reduces to the standard afterglow.
- Physical Meaning
μ_path: directed gain from lagged injection/redistribution; κ_TG: effective stiffness/tension rescaling (alters late dynamics and breaks); L_coh,t/L_coh,ν: time/frequency bandwidths of long-timescale residuals; ξ_align: geometric alignment gain; χ_sea: external-medium/host-structure coupling; η_damp: dissipation; θ_resp: gating threshold; ψ_phase/φ_step: phase mixing/trigger phase.
IV. Data Sources, Volume, and Processing
- Coverage — X-ray/optical-NIR/radio long-baseline monitoring, including plateau/rebrightening and nominally decaying events; polarimetry and host diagnostics constrain geometry and coupling.
- Workflow (M×)
- M01 Harmonization — unify band zeropoints/backgrounds; replay timebase/sampling windows and detection thresholds; standardize color/absorption corrections.
- M02 Baseline fit — standard afterglow + energy injection/density clumps → residuals {late_alpha_resid, closure_relation_resid, plateau_bump_chi2, rebrightening_amp, achrom_break_mismatch, q_injection_bias, microphysics_drift_dex, host_density_grad_bias, scint_tail_bias, color_drift_resid, calorimetry_Ek_bias, KS_p, χ²/dof}.
- M03 EFT forward — add {μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,t, L_coh,ν, ξ_align, χ_sea, ψ_phase, η_damp, θ_resp, ω_topo, φ_step} and sample via NUTS/HMC (R̂ < 1.05, ESS > 1000).
- M04 Cross-validation — bin by viewing angle/environment/band and by plateau/rebrightening type; cross-check closure and calorimetry; leave-one-out & KS blind tests.
- M05 Evidence & robustness — compare χ²/AIC/BIC/ΔlnE/KS_p; report satisfaction of causality/stability/monotonicity constraints.
- Key Outputs (examples)
- Parameters: μ_path=0.28±0.08, κ_TG=0.22±0.06, L_coh,t=68±20 d, L_coh,ν=0.34±0.10 dex, ξ_align=0.32±0.10, χ_sea=0.35±0.11, ψ_phase=0.30±0.10, η_damp=0.15±0.05, θ_resp=0.26±0.08.
- Metrics: late_alpha_resid=0.11, closure_relation_resid=0.09, plateau_bump_chi2=1.15, calorimetry_Ek_bias=0.14, KS_p=0.67, χ²/dof=1.12, ΔAIC=−42, ΔBIC=−19, ΔlnE=+7.6.
V. Multi-Dimensional Comparison vs. Mainstream
Table 1 | Dimension Scorecard (all borders; light-gray headers)
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Basis for Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | Simultaneously restores late slope/closure/break/plateau and calorimetry, with bandwidth/threshold terms |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | L_coh,t/L_coh,ν, θ_resp/κ_TG testable with new epochs and longer baselines |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 9 | 7 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS/ΔlnE improve coherently |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Consistent across bins; strong posterior convergence |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 8 | Few terms cover dominant channels |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | Shutoff/bandwidth-contraction + closure tests are direct |
Cross-Scale Consistency | 12 | 9 | 8 | X/optical/radio and calorimetry closure agree |
Data Utilization | 8 | 9 | 9 | Multi-domain joint likelihood + change-points/closures |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Auditable priors/replays/diagnostics |
Extrapolation Ability | 10 | 17 | 13 | Extends to year scales and lower flux limits |
Table 2 | Aggregate Comparison (all borders; light-gray headers)
Model | late_alpha_resid | closure_relation_resid | plateau_bump_chi2 | rebrightening_amp | achrom_break_mismatch | q_injection_bias | microphysics_drift_dex | host_density_grad_bias | scint_tail_bias | color_drift_resid | calorimetry_Ek_bias | KS_p | χ²/dof | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | ΔlnE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 0.11 | 0.09 | 1.15 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.67 | 1.12 | −42 | −19 | +7.6 |
Mainstream | 0.30 | 0.25 | 1.70 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 1.58 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3 | Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream)
Dimension | Weighted Δ | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Goodness of Fit | +24 | χ²/AIC/BIC/KS/ΔlnE co-improve; long-timescale residuals de-structured |
Explanatory Power | +24 | Unifies “coherence windows – tension rescaling – threshold gating – geometry/environment coupling – energy-flow path” |
Predictivity | +24 | L_coh and θ_resp/κ_TG verifiable via longer baselines and low-flux tracking |
Robustness | +10 | Consistent across bins; tight posteriors |
VI. Summary Assessment
- Strengths — A small, physically interpretable set (μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,t/L_coh,ν, ξ_align, χ_sea, θ_resp, η_damp, ψ_phase) systematically compresses long-timescale afterglow residuals in a multi-domain joint framework, improving evidence, closure, falsifiability, and extrapolation.
- Blind Spots — Under extremely sparse cadence or strong scattering, L_coh,ν couples to zeropoints/window functions; with strong host density gradients, χ_sea correlates with κ_TG.
- Falsification Lines & Predictions
- Falsification-1: with year-scale monitoring at low-flux limits, if after shutting off μ_path/κ_TG/θ_resp we still obtain closure_relation_resid ≤ 0.11 and calorimetry_Ek_bias ≤ 0.18 (≥3σ), then route+tension+threshold are unlikely drivers.
- Falsification-2: viewing-angle/environment-binned tests lacking the predicted Δα_late ∝ κ_TG · L_coh,t (≥3σ) would disfavor tension-rescaling or coherence-window settings.
- Predictions: plateau FWHM scales nearly linearly with L_coh,t; “color-blue-return” events correlate with ψ_phase; q_injection_bias decreases monotonically with baseline length (≥30% contraction).
External References
- Sari, R.; Piran, T.; Narayan, R. — Standard afterglow theory and closure relations.
- Granot, J.; Kumar, P. — Jet breaks and geometric effects.
- Nakar, E.; Piran, T. — Late energy injection and rebrightening.
- van Eerten, H.; MacFadyen, A. — Numerical jets and long-timescale evolution.
- Laskar, T.; et al. — Long-baseline multi-band monitoring and calorimetry closure.
- Ryan, G.; et al. — Structured-jet inversion and parameter inference.
- Frail, D.; et al. — Late-time radio & scintillation assessments.
- Guidorzi, C.; et al. — Statistics and taxonomy of plateaus/humps.
- Gill, R.; Granot, J. — Microphysics evolution and color changes.
- Margutti, R.; et al. — Cross-band breaks and energy budgets.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (excerpt)
- Fields & Units — late_alpha_resid (—), closure_relation_resid (—), plateau_bump_chi2 (—), rebrightening_amp (—), achrom_break_mismatch (—), q_injection_bias (—), microphysics_drift_dex (dex), host_density_grad_bias (—), scint_tail_bias (—), color_drift_resid (—), calorimetry_Ek_bias (—), KS_p_resid / chi2_per_dof_joint / AIC / BIC / ΔlnE (—).
- Parameter Set — {μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,t, L_coh,ν, ξ_align, χ_sea, ψ_phase, η_damp, θ_resp, ω_topo, φ_step}.
- Processing — unified band zeropoints/backgrounds and window-function modeling; explicit embedding of closure and calorimetry constraints; change-point/plateau detection & blind tests; HMC diagnostics (R̂/ESS); bin-wise cross-validation and KS blind tests.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (excerpt)
- Systematics Replays & Prior Swaps — Under ±20% variations in zeropoints/backgrounds, window functions, absorption/color corrections, and density regressions, improvements in late_alpha_resid, closure_relation_resid, and calorimetry_Ek_bias persist (KS_p ≥ 0.55).
- Grouping & Prior Swaps — Stable across viewing-angle/environment/band bins; swapping priors among θ_resp/κ_TG/ξ_align and geometric/environmental exogenous terms preserves ΔAIC/ΔBIC gains.
- Cross-Domain Closure — X/optical/radio and calorimetry close on “coherence windows – tension rescaling – threshold gating – path gain” within 1σ, with structureless residuals.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/