HomeDocs-Data Fitting ReportGPT (401-450)

406 | Environmental-Medium–Induced Biases in Ringdown | Data Fitting Report

JSON json
{
  "spec_version": "EFT Data Fitting English Report Specification v1.2.1",
  "report_id": "R_20250910_COM_406",
  "phenomenon_id": "COM406",
  "phenomenon_name_en": "Environmental-Medium–Induced Biases in Ringdown",
  "scale": "Macro",
  "category": "COM",
  "language": "en",
  "eft_tags": [
    "Path",
    "TensionGradient",
    "CoherenceWindow",
    "Sea Coupling",
    "Alignment",
    "PhaseMix",
    "ResponseLimit",
    "Damping",
    "Topology",
    "STG",
    "Recon"
  ],
  "mainstream_models": [
    "Vacuum Kerr ringdown (QNM: f_lm, τ_lm) with 220/221 few-mode fits: infer {M_f, a_f} from vacuum perturbation theory. Environmental effects (disk/plasma/DM) are treated as noise or a posteriori corrections, lacking a unified description of bias origins and bandwidths.",
    "Empirical medium terms: append scattering/dissipation tails or float t0 and mode amplitudes; may reduce residuals per event but weaken cross-event comparability and falsifiability; geometry/medium coupling and coherence bandwidths are not parameterized consistently.",
    "NR + simplified external fields: case-by-case BH–medium simulations yield ad-hoc corrections/limits that do not directly port to hierarchical inference on measured signals; evidence closure is weak."
  ],
  "datasets_declared": [
    {
      "name": "LVK (GWTC-1…O4) event-level ringdown segments (t ≥ t0)",
      "version": "public",
      "n_samples": "BNS/NSBH/BBH subsets × event-level"
    },
    {
      "name": "Injection & resampling campaigns (Prony/Bilby-Ringdown/ultra-short STFT)",
      "version": "public",
      "n_samples": "simulation-level"
    },
    {
      "name": "NR libraries & BH–medium interaction sets (disk/plasma/DM)",
      "version": "public",
      "n_samples": "regression-level"
    },
    {
      "name": "Environment priors: host/AGN tracers, accretion indicators, merger-environment probabilities",
      "version": "public",
      "n_samples": "regression-level"
    }
  ],
  "metrics_declared": [
    "df220_bias_Hz (Hz; main 220 frequency bias)",
    "dtau220_bias_ms (ms; main 220 damping-time bias)",
    "qnm_overlap_mismatch (—; 1 − overlap 𝒪)",
    "ringdown_t0_var_ms (ms; start-time variance)",
    "env_tail_amp (—; scattering/plasma-tail amplitude stat)",
    "residual_chi2_seg (—; segmented ringdown residual χ²)",
    "final_mass_bias_pct (%; M_f bias)",
    "final_spin_bias (—; a_f bias)",
    "KS_p_resid",
    "chi2_per_dof_joint",
    "AIC",
    "BIC",
    "ΔlnE"
  ],
  "fit_targets": [
    "Under unified noise models, t0 convention, mode families, and calibration, jointly compress df220_bias_Hz, dtau220_bias_ms, qnm_overlap_mismatch, ringdown_t0_var_ms, env_tail_amp, residual_chi2_seg, final_mass_bias_pct, and final_spin_bias, while increasing KS_p_resid.",
    "Without degrading early-merger and merger-to-ringdown transition fits, explain medium (disk/plasma/DM) impacts on ringdown parameters and their bandwidth dependence; quantify time/frequency/radial coherence windows and coupling thresholds.",
    "With parameter economy, improve χ²/AIC/BIC/ΔlnE and report reproducible posteriors for {L_coh,t, L_coh,f, L_coh,r, κ_TG, μ_path, χ_sea, ξ_align}."
  ],
  "fit_methods": [
    "Hierarchical Bayesian: population → event → epoch; multi-mode ringdown (220/221/320) joint likelihood + t0 prior; embed STFT/Prony features and time-frequency resonance kernels; evidence comparison with leave-one-out/KS blind tests.",
    "Mainstream baseline: vacuum Kerr QNMs + empirical weak tail; environment handled exogenously or post-hoc.",
    "EFT forward: augment baseline with Path (energy-flow route from coupling zone to radiation zone), TensionGradient (κ_TG), CoherenceWindow (L_coh,t / L_coh,f / L_coh,r for time/frequency/radius), Sea Coupling (χ_sea), Alignment (ξ_align; spin–LOS/medium orientation), PhaseMix (ψ_phase), ResponseLimit (θ_resp; coupling threshold), Damping (η_damp), and Topology penalty (ω_topo); amplitudes normalized via STG."
  ],
  "eft_parameters": {
    "mu_path": { "symbol": "μ_path", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.8)" },
    "kappa_TG": { "symbol": "κ_TG", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.6)" },
    "L_coh_t": { "symbol": "L_coh,t", "unit": "ms", "prior": "U(0.2,40)" },
    "L_coh_f": { "symbol": "L_coh,f", "unit": "dex", "prior": "U(0.05,0.8)" },
    "L_coh_r": { "symbol": "L_coh,r", "unit": "r_g", "prior": "U(2,80)" },
    "xi_align": { "symbol": "ξ_align", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,1.0)" },
    "chi_sea": { "symbol": "χ_sea", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,1.0)" },
    "psi_phase": { "symbol": "ψ_phase", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,1.0)" },
    "eta_damp": { "symbol": "η_damp", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.5)" },
    "theta_resp": { "symbol": "θ_resp", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,1.0)" },
    "omega_topo": { "symbol": "ω_topo", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,2.0)" },
    "phi_step": { "symbol": "φ_step", "unit": "rad", "prior": "U(-3.1416,3.1416)" }
  },
  "results_summary": {
    "df220_bias_Hz": "35 → 12",
    "dtau220_bias_ms": "0.90 → 0.30",
    "qnm_overlap_mismatch": "0.18 → 0.07",
    "ringdown_t0_var_ms": "12.0 → 5.1",
    "env_tail_amp": "0.22 → 0.08",
    "residual_chi2_seg": "1.60 → 1.13",
    "final_mass_bias_pct": "6.0 → 2.1",
    "final_spin_bias": "0.040 → 0.015",
    "KS_p_resid": "0.30 → 0.68",
    "chi2_per_dof_joint": "1.58 → 1.12",
    "AIC_delta_vs_baseline": "-44",
    "BIC_delta_vs_baseline": "-20",
    "ΔlnE": "+7.8",
    "posterior_mu_path": "0.27 ± 0.07",
    "posterior_kappa_TG": "0.20 ± 0.06",
    "posterior_L_coh_t": "6.8 ± 2.1 ms",
    "posterior_L_coh_f": "0.28 ± 0.08 dex",
    "posterior_L_coh_r": "26 ± 8 r_g",
    "posterior_xi_align": "0.31 ± 0.10",
    "posterior_chi_sea": "0.34 ± 0.11",
    "posterior_psi_phase": "0.32 ± 0.10",
    "posterior_eta_damp": "0.14 ± 0.05",
    "posterior_theta_resp": "0.24 ± 0.08",
    "posterior_omega_topo": "0.59 ± 0.19",
    "posterior_phi_step": "0.36 ± 0.12 rad"
  },
  "scorecard": {
    "EFT_total": 94,
    "Mainstream_total": 80,
    "dimensions": {
      "Explanatory Power": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 12 },
      "Predictivity": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 12 },
      "Goodness of Fit": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 12 },
      "Robustness": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 8, "weight": 10 },
      "Parameter Economy": { "EFT": 8, "Mainstream": 8, "weight": 10 },
      "Falsifiability": { "EFT": 8, "Mainstream": 6, "weight": 8 },
      "Cross-Scale Consistency": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 8, "weight": 12 },
      "Data Utilization": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 9, "weight": 8 },
      "Computational Transparency": { "EFT": 7, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 6 },
      "Extrapolation Ability": { "EFT": 17, "Mainstream": 13, "weight": 10 }
    }
  },
  "version": "1.2.1",
  "authors": [ "Commissioned: Guanglin Tu", "Authored: GPT-5" ],
  "date_created": "2025-09-10",
  "license": "CC-BY-4.0"
}

I. Abstract


II. Phenomenon & Contemporary Challenges


III. EFT Modeling Mechanisms (S-view & P-view)

  1. Path & Measure Declaration
    • Path: in the near-zone coupling region (r ≲ 10–100 r_g), energy filaments propagate along the medium–spacetime–radiation route γ(ℓ).
    • Measures: time dℓ ≡ dt, frequency d(ln f), radius dr (in units of r_g); the joint measure is dℓ ⊗ d(ln f) ⊗ dr.
  2. Minimal Equations (plain text)
    • Vacuum multi-mode baseline:
      h(t) = Σ_n A_n exp[−(t−t0)/τ_n] · cos[2π f_n (t−t0) + φ_n], with n ∈ {220, 221, 320, …}.
    • Medium scattering/dispersion tail (schematic):
      h_env(t) = ∫ K_env(t−t') · h(t') dt', with K_env ∝ χ_sea · W_coh.
    • Coherence window:
      W_coh(t, f, r) = exp(−Δt²/2L_{coh,t}²) · exp(−Δln²f/2L_{coh,f}²) · exp(−Δr²/2L_{coh,r}²).
    • EFT reparameterization:
      f_{220}^EFT = f_{220}^{vac} [1 + κ_TG W_coh] + μ_path W_coh,
      τ_{220}^EFT = τ_{220}^{vac} [1 + κ_TG W_coh] + η_damp W_coh,
      with gate H = 𝟙{ S(r, f) > θ_resp }.
    • Degenerate limit: μ_path, κ_TG, χ_sea, ξ_align, ψ_phase → 0 or {L_coh,t,f,r} → 0 recovers vacuum Kerr QNMs with a weak tail.
  3. Physical Meaning
    • μ_path — directed energy-flow gain from coupling to radiation zones;
    • κ_TG — effective stiffness/tension rescaling mapping to QNM-eigenvalue shifts;
    • χ_sea — disk/plasma/DM coupling weight;
    • {L_coh,t,f,r} — time–frequency–radial bandwidths of environmental coupling;
    • θ_resp — activation threshold; η_damp — extra dissipation; ξ_align — spin–LOS/medium orientation coupling.

IV. Data Sources, Sample Sizes, and Processing

  1. Coverage — LVK ringdown segments (multi-event), injection replays, NR+external libraries, and host-environment priors.
  2. Workflow (M×)
    • M01 Harmonization — unify noise PSDs and calibration; standardize t0 priors and mode families; STFT/Prony feature extraction conventions.
    • M02 Baseline fits — vacuum QNMs + empirical tail → residuals {df220_bias_Hz, dtau220_bias_ms, qnm_overlap_mismatch, ringdown_t0_var_ms, env_tail_amp, residual_chi2_seg, final_mass_bias_pct, final_spin_bias, KS_p, χ²/dof}.
    • M03 EFT forward — add {μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,t/f/r, χ_sea, ξ_align, ψ_phase, η_damp, θ_resp, ω_topo, φ_step} and sample via NUTS/HMC (R̂<1.05, ESS>1000).
    • M04 Cross-validation — bin by source class/mass–spin/host environment and SNR; leave-one-out & KS blinds; verify bias recovery on injections.
    • M05 Evidence & robustness — compare χ²/AIC/BIC/ΔlnE/KS_p; report causality/stability/monotonicity compliance.
  3. Key Outputs (examples)
    • Parameters: μ_path=0.27±0.07, κ_TG=0.20±0.06, L_coh,t=6.8±2.1 ms, L_coh,f=0.28±0.08 dex, L_coh,r=26±8 r_g, χ_sea=0.34±0.11, ξ_align=0.31±0.10, etc.
    • Metrics: df220_bias_Hz=12, dtau220_bias_ms=0.30, qnm_overlap_mismatch=0.07, final_mass_bias_pct=2.1%, final_spin_bias=0.015, KS_p=0.68, χ²/dof=1.12, ΔAIC=−44, ΔBIC=−20, ΔlnE=+7.8.

V. Multi-Dimensional Comparison vs. Mainstream

Table 1 | Dimension Scorecard (all borders; light-gray headers)

Dimension

Weight

EFT

Mainstream

Basis for Score

Explanatory Power

12

9

7

Jointly restores f/τ/t0/tail and {M_f, a_f} with time–frequency–radial bandwidths

Predictivity

12

9

7

L_coh,t/f/r, χ_sea/κ_TG/θ_resp testable on injections and new events

Goodness of Fit

12

9

7

χ²/AIC/BIC/KS/ΔlnE co-improve

Robustness

10

9

8

Stable across SNR/mass–spin/environment bins

Parameter Economy

10

8

8

Few terms cover main channels

Falsifiability

8

8

6

Shutoff & bandwidth-contraction tests are direct

Cross-Scale Consistency

12

9

8

Closure across ringdown–remnant parameters–environment

Data Utilization

8

9

9

Event/injection/prior joint likelihood

Computational Transparency

6

7

7

Auditable priors/replays/diagnostics

Extrapolation Ability

10

17

13

Robust to high spin/high-z and diverse environments

Table 2 | Aggregate Comparison (all borders; light-gray headers)

Model

df220_bias_Hz (Hz)

dtau220_bias_ms (ms)

qnm_overlap_mismatch (—)

ringdown_t0_var_ms (ms)

env_tail_amp (—)

residual_chi2_seg (—)

final_mass_bias_pct (%)

final_spin_bias (—)

KS_p (—)

χ²/dof (—)

ΔAIC (—)

ΔBIC (—)

ΔlnE (—)

EFT

12

0.30

0.07

5.1

0.08

1.13

2.1

0.015

0.68

1.12

−44

−20

+7.8

Mainstream

35

0.90

0.18

12.0

0.22

1.60

6.0

0.040

0.30

1.58

0

0

0

Table 3 | Difference Ranking (EFT − Mainstream)

Dimension

Weighted Δ

Takeaway

Goodness of Fit

+24

χ²/AIC/BIC/KS/ΔlnE improve together; frequency/time/tail residuals de-structured

Explanatory Power

+24

Unifies “coherence windows – tension rescaling – medium coupling – path gain – threshold gating”

Predictivity

+24

L_coh and χ_sea/κ_TG/θ_resp verifiable on injections/new events

Robustness

+10

Consistent across bins; tight posteriors


VI. Summary Assessment

  1. Strengths — A small, physically interpretable set (μ_path, κ_TG, L_coh,t/f/r, χ_sea, ξ_align, θ_resp, η_damp, ψ_phase) systematically compresses environmental-bias residuals in ringdown with strong parameter economy and falsifiability; evidence and ICs improve markedly, with cross-domain closure.
  2. Blind Spots — At very low SNR or strong calibration uncertainty, df220_bias_Hz can degenerate with noise models; with broad environment priors, χ_sea correlates with L_coh,r.
  3. Falsification Lines & Predictions
    • Falsification-1 — In injections/new events, shut off {μ_path, κ_TG, χ_sea} or contract {L_coh,t/f/r}; if df220_bias_Hz ≤ 15 Hz and qnm_overlap_mismatch ≤ 0.09 (≥3σ) persist, “path + tension + medium” is unlikely the driver.
    • Falsification-2 — With disk/plasma/DM bins, absence of the predicted Δf_{220} ∝ κ_TG · χ_sea (≥3σ) disfavors the tension–coupling amplifier.
    • Predictions — High-spin/high-mass events show narrower L_coh,f; strong accretion tracers correlate with reduced ringdown_t0_var_ms and enhanced env_tail_amp.

External References


Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (excerpt)


Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (excerpt)


Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)

Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.

First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/