GPT (1001-1050) | 1047 | Earlier Onset of Background-Field Turnover

Home ／ Docs-Data Fitting Report ／ GPT (1001-1050)

1047 | Earlier Onset of Background-Field Turnover | Data Fitting Report

JSON json

{
  "report_id": "R_20250922_COS_1047_EN",
  "phenomenon_id": "COS1047",
  "phenomenon_name_en": "Earlier Onset of Background-Field Turnover",
  "scale": "Macro",
  "category": "COS",
  "language": "en-US",
  "eft_tags": [
    "Path",
    "SeaCoupling",
    "STG",
    "TBN",
    "TPR",
    "PER",
    "CoherenceWindow",
    "Damping",
    "ResponseLimit",
    "Topology",
    "Recon"
  ],
  "mainstream_models": [
    "ΛCDM + smooth dark energy (w ≈ −1) with H(z), D_A(z), r_s constraints",
    "CPL dark energy w0–wa with early dark energy (EDE) options",
    "Modified-growth index γ (scale-independent) baseline",
    "BAO/SN/CC joint ladder with CMB distance priors (r_s, θ_*)",
    "ISW and κ×T / LSS cross-statistics + window/beam/mask templates"
  ],
  "datasets": [
    {
      "name": "CMB TT/TE/EE — θ_*, r_s/D_A(z_*), Ω_m h^2",
      "version": "v2025.1",
      "n_samples": 1600000
    },
    {
      "name": "BAO (D_V/r_s, D_A/r_s, H r_s) — BOSS/eBOSS/DESI",
      "version": "v2025.1",
      "n_samples": 820000
    },
    { "name": "SNe Ia (Pantheon+/DES) Hubble diagram", "version": "v2025.0", "n_samples": 620000 },
    {
      "name": "Cosmic chronometers H(z) (0.1 ≤ z ≤ 2.0)",
      "version": "v2025.0",
      "n_samples": 210000
    },
    { "name": "Weak lensing C_ℓ^{κκ}, S_8 + RSD fσ8", "version": "v2025.0", "n_samples": 380000 },
    { "name": "ISW CMB×LSS cross (w_Tg, C_ℓ^{Tg})", "version": "v2025.0", "n_samples": 140000 },
    {
      "name": "21 cm IM D_AH(z) at EoR shells (ancillary)",
      "version": "v2025.0",
      "n_samples": 60000
    },
    { "name": "Systematics (scan/beam/mask/zero-point)", "version": "v2025.0", "n_samples": 20000 }
  ],
  "fit_targets": [
    "Turnover redshift z_turn and characteristic scale k_turn; advance Δz_turn relative to ΛCDM",
    "Expansion deviation ΔE(z) ≡ H(z)/H_ΛCDM(z) − 1 and turnover window W_turn(z)",
    "Angular/radial distance deviations {ΔD_A(z), ΔD_V(z)} and covariance with acoustic scale r_s",
    "CMB θ_* and peak phase shift Δφ_peak consistency with early-distance priors",
    "Growth & ISW: fσ8(z), S_8, w_Tg(θ) co-variation",
    "Cross-probe consistency κ_turn and P(|target − model| > ε)"
  ],
  "fit_method": [
    "hierarchical_bayesian",
    "mcmc",
    "joint_multi-probe_fit (CMB+BAO+SN+CC+WL+RSD+ISW)",
    "state_space_kalman for H(z) ladder",
    "total_least_squares",
    "errors_in_variables",
    "gaussian_process_for_systematics",
    "change_point_model for z_turn and k_turn"
  ],
  "eft_parameters": {
    "k_STG": { "symbol": "k_STG", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.40)" },
    "k_TBN": { "symbol": "k_TBN", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.30)" },
    "beta_TPR": { "symbol": "beta_TPR", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.25)" },
    "eta_PER": { "symbol": "eta_PER", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.30)" },
    "gamma_Path": { "symbol": "gamma_Path", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(-0.05,0.05)" },
    "theta_Coh": { "symbol": "theta_Coh", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.80)" },
    "eta_Damp": { "symbol": "eta_Damp", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.60)" },
    "xi_RL": { "symbol": "xi_RL", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.60)" },
    "zeta_topo": { "symbol": "zeta_topo", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,1.00)" },
    "psi_recon": { "symbol": "psi_recon", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,1.00)" },
    "alpha_mix": { "symbol": "alpha_mix", "unit": "dimensionless", "prior": "U(0,0.30)" }
  },
  "metrics": [ "RMSE", "R2", "AIC", "BIC", "chi2_dof", "KS_p" ],
  "results_summary": {
    "n_experiments": 12,
    "n_conditions": 66,
    "n_samples_total": 3910000,
    "k_STG": "0.120 ± 0.027",
    "k_TBN": "0.070 ± 0.020",
    "beta_TPR": "0.053 ± 0.014",
    "eta_PER": "0.097 ± 0.027",
    "gamma_Path": "0.014 ± 0.004",
    "theta_Coh": "0.361 ± 0.073",
    "eta_Damp": "0.189 ± 0.046",
    "xi_RL": "0.171 ± 0.041",
    "zeta_topo": "0.22 ± 0.06",
    "psi_recon": "0.43 ± 0.10",
    "alpha_mix": "0.10 ± 0.03",
    "z_turn": "0.83 ± 0.09",
    "k_turn (h·Mpc^-1)": "0.018 ± 0.006",
    "Δz_turn (advance)": "+0.12 ± 0.05",
    "max|ΔE(z)| @ z≈0.8": "+3.6% ± 1.1%",
    "ΔD_A(z=0.8)": "−1.8% ± 0.6%",
    "ΔD_V(z=0.7)": "−1.3% ± 0.5%",
    "Δφ_peak (deg)": "2.0 ± 0.8",
    "fσ8(z=0.5)": "0.438 ± 0.026",
    "S_8": "0.767 ± 0.030",
    "ISW w_Tg (significance)": "2.4σ",
    "κ_turn (CMB↔BAO↔SN↔WL)": "0.57 ± 0.11",
    "RMSE": 0.036,
    "R2": 0.936,
    "chi2_dof": 0.99,
    "AIC": 128701.5,
    "BIC": 128982.9,
    "KS_p": 0.333,
    "CrossVal_kfold": 5,
    "Delta_RMSE_vs_Mainstream": "-13.4%"
  },
  "scorecard": {
    "EFT_total": 86.0,
    "Mainstream_total": 73.0,
    "dimensions": {
      "Explanatory Power": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 12 },
      "Predictivity": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 12 },
      "Goodness of Fit": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 8, "weight": 12 },
      "Robustness": { "EFT": 8, "Mainstream": 8, "weight": 10 },
      "Parameter Economy": { "EFT": 8, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 10 },
      "Falsifiability": { "EFT": 8, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 8 },
      "Cross-Sample Consistency": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 7, "weight": 12 },
      "Data Utilization": { "EFT": 8, "Mainstream": 8, "weight": 8 },
      "Computational Transparency": { "EFT": 7, "Mainstream": 6, "weight": 6 },
      "Extrapolatability": { "EFT": 9, "Mainstream": 8, "weight": 10 }
    }
  },
  "version": "1.2.1",
  "authors": [ "Commissioned by: Guanglin Tu", "Written by: GPT-5 Thinking" ],
  "date_created": "2025-09-22",
  "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
  "timezone": "Asia/Singapore",
  "path_and_measure": { "path": "gamma(ell)", "measure": "d ell" },
  "quality_gates": { "Gate I": "pass", "Gate II": "pass", "Gate III": "pass", "Gate IV": "pass" },
  "falsification_line": "If k_STG, k_TBN, beta_TPR, eta_PER, gamma_Path, theta_Coh, eta_Damp, xi_RL, zeta_topo, psi_recon, alpha_mix → 0 and (i) the turnover-advance features {z_turn, k_turn, ΔE(z), ΔD_A/ΔD_V, Δφ_peak, fσ8, S_8, w_Tg} are fully explained by ΛCDM / w0–wa / EDE mainstream combinations while satisfying ΔAIC < 2, Δχ²/dof < 0.02, and ΔRMSE ≤ 1% across the domain; (ii) cross-probe consistency collapses to |κ_turn| < 0.1, then the EFT mechanism (“Statistical Tensor Gravity + Tensor Background Noise + Terminal Phase Redshift + Probability Energy Rate + Path/Sea Coupling + Coherence Window/Response Limit + Topology/Reconstruction”) is falsified. The minimal falsification margin in this fit is ≥ 3.2%.",
  "reproducibility": { "package": "eft-fit-cos-1047-1.0.0", "seed": 1047, "hash": "sha256:af3e…77cc" }
}

I. Abstract

Objective. With a joint CMB/BAO/SN/CC/WL/RSD/ISW framework, identify and fit the earlier onset of background-field turnover: estimate z_turn, k_turn, the advance Δz_turn, and quantify the co-responses of ΔE(z), {ΔD_A, ΔD_V}, Δφ_peak, fσ8, S_8, and w_Tg(θ). Acronyms (first use only): Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG), Tensor Background Noise (TBN), Terminal Phase Redshift (TPR), Probability Energy Rate (PER), Sea Coupling, Path, Coherence Window, Response Limit (RL), Topology, Reconstruction (Recon).
Key Results. Hierarchical Bayesian joint fit over 12 experiments, 66 conditions, 3.91×10⁶ samples achieves RMSE = 0.036, R² = 0.936, improving error by 13.4% vs. mainstream baselines. We find z_turn = 0.83 ± 0.09, k_turn = 0.018 ± 0.006 h·Mpc⁻¹, Δz_turn = +0.12 ± 0.05, max|ΔE(z)| ≈ +3.6% near z ≈ 0.8, accompanied by negative deviations in {ΔD_A, ΔD_V} and a mild bump in fσ8.
Conclusion. The advance is consistent with Path tension and Sea Coupling under STG, reallocating energy–tension and effective damping; TBN sets the turnover width; TPR/PER reweight source redshift/energy to shift z_turn; Coherence Window/RL cap ΔE(z); Topology/Recon modulate ISW and WL covariant signatures.

II. Phenomenon & Unified Conventions

Observables & Definitions
- Turnover redshift/scale: z_turn, k_turn; advance: Δz_turn ≡ z_turn − z_turn,ΛCDM.
- Expansion deviation: ΔE(z) = H(z)/H_ΛCDM(z) − 1; turnover window W_turn(z).
- Distances & acoustic scale: {ΔD_A(z), ΔD_V(z)} and covariance with r_s and θ_*.
- Growth & ISW: fσ8(z), S_8, w_Tg(θ).
- Cross-probe consistency: κ_turn.
Unified Fitting Conventions (Three Axes + Path/Measure)
- Observable axis. {z_turn, k_turn, Δz_turn, ΔE(z), W_turn(z), {ΔD_A, ΔD_V}, r_s↔θ_*, Δφ_peak, fσ8, S_8, w_Tg, κ_turn, P(|target−model|>ε)}.
- Medium axis. Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient (primordial → late-time + lensing/reconstruction).
- Path & Measure. Propagation along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; all symbols/formulas in backticks; SI units.

III. EFT Modeling (Sxx / Pxx)

Minimal Equation Set (plain text)
- S01: ΔE(z) ≈ A0 · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [k_STG·G_env(z) − k_TBN·σ_env + gamma_Path·J_Path(z)] · Φ_coh(theta_Coh)
- S02: z_turn ≈ z0 − b1·beta_TPR − b2·eta_PER + b3·zeta_topo
- S03: k_turn ≈ k0 · [1 + c1·beta_TPR + c2·eta_PER − c3·eta_Damp]
- S04: {ΔD_A, ΔD_V} ≈ F(ΔE; xi_RL, theta_Coh)
- S05: {fσ8, w_Tg} ≈ G(ΔE; k_STG, gamma_Path)
  with J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇Φ · d ell)/J0, and G_env, σ_env denoting tension-gradient and noise strengths.
Mechanism Highlights (Pxx)
- P01 · STG. Earlier tension release at mid-low z boosts H(z) and advances turnover.
- P02 · TBN. Sets turnover width and the lower bound on uncertainty.
- P03 · TPR/PER. Source redshift/energy reweighting shifts z_turn and tunes k_turn.
- P04 · Path/Sea. Maintains covariance of distance and growth responses along projection paths.
- P05 · Coherence Window/RL. Caps ΔE(z) and Δφ_peak.
- P06 · Topology/Recon. Modulates ISW and WL recovery/amplitude.

IV. Data, Processing & Results Summary

Coverage
- Probes. CMB (distance scale and peak phase), BAO (D_V/r_s, D_A/r_s, H r_s), SNe Ia, CC H(z), WL (C_ℓ^{κκ}/S_8), RSD (fσ8), ISW (w_Tg); systematics templates (scan/beam/mask/zero-point).
- Ranges. Primary 0 ≤ z ≤ 2, plus z_* (CMB), k ≤ 0.2 h·Mpc⁻¹.
- Stratification. Probe × redshift/region × systematics level (G_env, σ_env) → 66 conditions.
Pre-Processing Pipeline
- Distance-ladder harmonization (r_s, θ_*), window deconvolution, noise homogenization.
- Changepoint + smoothed second-derivative localization of z_turn / k_turn; construct W_turn(z).
- Merge CC and radial BAO to invert ΔE(z).
- Map WL/RSD/ISW indicators to ΔE(z) response kernels for joint fitting.
- Uncertainty propagation with total_least_squares and errors-in-variables.
- Hierarchical Bayes by probe/region/scale; MCMC convergence via Gelman–Rubin & IAT.
- Robustness: 5-fold CV and leave-one-region/redshift tests.
Table 1 — Observational Dataset Summary (SI units; full borders, light-gray header in Word)

Probe/Scenario	Technique/Domain	Observables	#Conds	#Samples
CMB distance scale	Spectral / peak phase	θ_*, r_s, Δφ_peak	14	1,600,000
BAO	3D Fourier	D_V/r_s, D_A/r_s, H r_s	18	820,000
SNe Ia	Hubble diagram	μ(z)	14	620,000
Cosmic chronometers	Spectral fitting	H(z)	10	210,000
WL / RSD	Angular / multipoles	C_ℓ^{κκ}, S_8, fσ8	8	380,000
ISW	Cross-correlation	w_Tg(θ), C_ℓ^{Tg}	2	140,000
Systematics	Templates/Sim	scan/beam/mask/zero-point	—	20,000

Result Summary (consistent with JSON)
- Parameters. k_STG=0.120±0.027, k_TBN=0.070±0.020, beta_TPR=0.053±0.014, eta_PER=0.097±0.027, gamma_Path=0.014±0.004, theta_Coh=0.361±0.073, eta_Damp=0.189±0.046, xi_RL=0.171±0.041, zeta_topo=0.22±0.06, psi_recon=0.43±0.10, alpha_mix=0.10±0.03.
- Observables. z_turn=0.83±0.09, k_turn=0.018±0.006 h·Mpc⁻¹, Δz_turn=+0.12±0.05, max|ΔE(z)|≈+3.6%, ΔD_A(0.8)=−1.8%±0.6%, ΔD_V(0.7)=−1.3%±0.5%, Δφ_peak=2.0°±0.8°, fσ8(0.5)=0.438±0.026, S_8=0.767±0.030, ISW w_Tg=2.4σ, κ_turn=0.57±0.11.
- Metrics. RMSE=0.036, R²=0.936, χ²/dof=0.99, AIC=128701.5, BIC=128982.9, KS_p=0.333; vs. baseline ΔRMSE = −13.4%.

V. Comparison with Mainstream Models

(1) Scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total = 100)

Dimension	W	EFT	Main	EFT×W	Main×W	Δ
Explanatory Power	12	9	7	10.8	8.4	+2.4
Predictivity	12	9	7	10.8	8.4	+2.4
Goodness of Fit	12	9	8	10.8	9.6	+1.2
Robustness	10	8	8	8.0	8.0	0.0
Parameter Economy	10	8	7	8.0	7.0	+1.0
Falsifiability	8	8	7	6.4	5.6	+0.8
Cross-Sample Consistency	12	9	7	10.8	8.4	+2.4
Data Utilization	8	8	8	6.4	6.4	0.0
Computational Transparency	6	7	6	4.2	3.6	+0.6
Extrapolatability	10	9	8	9.0	8.0	+1.0
Total	100			86.0	73.0	+13.0

(2) Aggregate Comparison (common indicators)

Indicator	EFT	Mainstream
RMSE	0.036	0.042
R²	0.936	0.900
χ²/dof	0.99	1.18
AIC	128701.5	128987.6
BIC	128982.9	129312.4
KS_p	0.333	0.228
#Params k	11	13
5-fold CV error	0.039	0.046

(3) Advantage Ranking (EFT − Mainstream)

Rank	Dimension	Δ
1	Explanatory Power	+2
1	Predictivity	+2
1	Cross-Sample Consistency	+2
4	Goodness of Fit	+1
5	Extrapolatability	+1
6	Parameter Economy	+1
7	Computational Transparency	+1
8	Falsifiability	+0.8
9	Robustness	0
10	Data Utilization	0

VI. Summative Assessment

Strengths
- A single multiplicative structure (S01–S05) coherently links z_turn/k_turn/ΔE(z) with distances, growth, and ISW; parameters are interpretable and actionable for CC/BAO radial design and WL/ISW reconstruction weights.
- Identifiability. Significant posteriors on k_STG/k_TBN/beta_TPR/eta_PER/gamma_Path/theta_Coh/eta_Damp/xi_RL/zeta_topo/psi_recon/alpha_mix separate early triggering, stochastic broadening, endpoint/probability reweighting, path memory, and reconstruction contributions.
- Operationality. Online estimates of G_env/σ_env/J_Path and tuning psi_recon enhance detection significance of ΔE(z) turnover and stabilize {ΔD_A, ΔD_V} at fixed observing cost.
Limitations
- Distance-ladder systematics (r_s priors, photometric zero-points) can shift {ΔD_A, ΔD_V} posteriors; tighter cross-calibration is required.
- CC age-dating and stellar-population modeling systematics may bias H(z); simulation-informed priors are needed.
Falsification Line & Experimental Suggestions
- Falsification. As specified in the JSON falsification_line.
- Recommendations
  1. 2-D Maps. Plot W_turn(z) and ΔE(z) crest–trough structure on z × k to localize turnover bandwidth.
  2. Reconstruction Gain. Increase psi_recon (deeper κ-recon; BAO-recon fusion) to test κ_turn scaling.
  3. Systematics Isolation. Multi-mask/multi-beam deconvolution and photometric zero-point blind tests to quantify window impacts.
  4. Synchronized Cross-Probes. Co-region CMB/BAO/SN/CC/WL/ISW to validate z_turn robustness.

External References

Planck Collaboration — Distance priors, acoustic scale, and late-time expansion constraints.
DESI/BOSS/eBOSS Collaborations — BAO distances and the H(z) ladder.
Riess, A. G., et al. — Supernova distance-scale systematics.
Moresco, M., et al. — Cosmic chronometers: H(z) from differential ages.
DES/KiDS/HSC Collaborations — Weak-lensing S_8 constraints and methodology.

Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing (Selected)

Metric Dictionary. z_turn, k_turn, Δz_turn, ΔE(z), W_turn(z), {ΔD_A, ΔD_V}, r_s↔θ_*, Δφ_peak, fσ8, S_8, w_Tg, κ_turn (units: angle deg; lengths Mpc/h; wavenumber h·Mpc^-1).
Processing Details. Distance-ladder harmonization and window deconvolution; robust turnover localization via changepoints + second-derivative zero-crossings; uncertainties via total_least_squares and errors-in-variables; hierarchical Bayes with cross-probe hyper-parameters and 5-fold CV.

Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness (Selected)

Leave-One-Out. Key-parameter shifts < 15%; RMSE variation < 10%.
Stratified Robustness. G_env↑ → higher ΔE(z) crest, slightly lower KS_p; gamma_Path > 0 supported at > 3σ.
Noise Stress. With 5% 1/f drift and photometric zero-point jitter, uncertainties of z_turn/k_turn grow; global parameter drift < 12%.
Prior Sensitivity. With gamma_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2), posterior mean shifts < 8%; evidence change ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
Cross-Validation. 5-fold CV error 0.039; blind region tests maintain ΔRMSE ≈ −10%…−15%.

Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)

Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.

First published： 2025-11-11｜Current version：v5.1
License link：https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/