Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (101-150)
105 | Large-Scale Structure Ring-Like Void Super-Scale | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Multiple surveys report large-radius, rim-overdense ring-like voids and stacked signals whose super-scale incidence above a unified R_thr exceeds baseline simulations. Even after mask/integral-constraint unification, ΛCDM + SvdW plus standard compensated profiles struggle to jointly explain the super-scale rate, annularity stability, and κ/ISW co-signals.
- With a minimal EFT frame—STG (common term), Path (shared path term), CoherenceWindow (coherence bandwidth), SeaCoupling (environment coupling), TBN (tension background noise), and Topology (ring-rim constraint)—we perform a hierarchical joint fit of geometry, topology, and κ/ISW stacks. We obtain RMSE: 0.094 → 0.068, χ²/dof: 1.30 → 1.08, observed super-scale rate 6.1% → 3.2%, posterior true rate 2.4% ± 0.9%, and improved κ stack SNR: 2.1 → 3.0.
II. Phenomenon
- Definition and observables
Ring-like voids are underdense cores surrounded by a compensating overdense rim. We score annularity via annularity_index using energy in an annulus vs the core. Key parameters: R_ring (rim radius), w_ring (rim thickness), delta_core (core contrast), delta_rim (rim contrast). - Super-scale criterion
Under a unified threshold R_thr, objects with R_ring > R_thr are flagged as super-scale. Across z ≈ 0.2–1.1, super-scale incidence is elevated and aligns in sign with stacked κ and ISW residuals. - Mainstream challenges
- Watershed false-positives and mask geometry inflate annularity, yet a residual super-scale excess persists after unification.
- SvdW size-function and compensated profiles extrapolate poorly at the large-R end, failing to jointly fit R_ring, w_ring, and annularity_index.
- Volume/resolution limits in simulations widen threshold and false-positive calibration bounds.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanism (S/P Framing)
- Core equations (text format)
- Radial contrast with EFT structure:
Δ_EFT(r) = Δ_base(r) + f_STG(alpha_STG) + A_top · exp(-(r - R_ring)^2 / (2 · w_ring^2)) - |delta_core| · exp(-r^2 / (2 · σ_core^2)) - Annularity score (normalized rim-vs-core energy):
annularity_index = (E_annulus - E_core) / (E_annulus + E_core + ε), with E_* = ∫_{band} Δ_EFT(r) dr. - Incidence (logit layer):
logit(super_ring_rate) = β0 + βR · (R_ring - R_thr) + βA · annularity_index + βC · rim_core_contrast. - Frequency-domain coherence and path factors:
P_EFT(k) = P_base(k) · W^2(k; L_coh_void) · S_path(k) + N_TBN(k), with S_path(k) = 1 + gamma_Path_LS · J(k).
- Radial contrast with EFT structure:
- Intuition
Topology + SeaCoupling + TBN provide a weak, localized boost to rim formation; STG ensures large-scale consistency; CoherenceWindow confines modifications near the large-R band; Path harmonizes low-k alignment across fields.
IV. Data, Coverage, and Methods (Mx)
- Coverage
Radii R ∈ [60, 320] h^-1 Mpc, redshifts z ∈ [0.1, 1.2]; unified R_thr from simulation-aided cross-validation. - Pipeline
- M01 Unified watershed and morphological skeletonization; mask-coupling deconvolution; random density ≥ 50× targets; marginalize integral-constraint term in the likelihood.
- M02 Competitive annularity decision and threshold calibration using simulation stacks to control false discovery.
- M03 Hierarchical Bayesian joint likelihood over R_ring, w_ring, delta_core, delta_rim and super_ring_rate, jointly constrained with κ/ISW stacks.
- M04 Leave-one-out and prior-sensitivity scans; posteriors for R_ring, w_ring, alpha_STG, L_coh_void, gamma_Path_LS, rho_TBN and incidence coefficients.
- Key output flags
[param: R_ring = 210 ± 30 h^-1 Mpc], [param: w_ring = 35 ± 10 h^-1 Mpc], [metric: super_ring_rate = 2.4% ± 0.9%], [metric: chi2_per_dof = 1.08].
V. Path and Measure Declaration (Arrival Time)
Declaration- Arrival-time aperture: T_arr = ∫ (n_eff / c_ref) · dℓ. The measure dℓ is induced by the unified window operator. The shared path factor S_path(k) enters non-dispersively.
- Units: 1 Mpc = 3.0856776e22 m; report R_ring, w_ring, L_coh_void in h^-1 Mpc.
VI. Results and Comparison with Mainstream Models
Table 1. Dimension Scorecard
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanation | 12 | 9 | 7 | Jointly explains super-scale rate, annularity, and κ/ISW co-signals |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | Predicts further rollback under stricter thresholds and larger volumes |
GoodnessOfFit | 12 | 8 | 8 | Significant improvements in RMSE and information criteria |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable under leave-one-out and prior scans |
Parsimony | 10 | 8 | 7 | Few parameters cover common, coherence, path, and topological terms |
Falsifiability | 8 | 7 | 6 | Parameters → 0 reduce to ΛCDM + SvdW baseline |
CrossScaleConsistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | Changes confined to large-R band; small scales and BAO preserved |
DataUtilization | 8 | 9 | 7 | Joint use of geometry/morphology + κ/ISW information |
ComputationalTransparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Reproducible masking, IC handling, and threshold calibration |
Extrapolation | 10 | 8 | 8 | Extendable to deeper redshifts and higher-resolution volumes |
Table 2. Overall Comparison
Model | Total | RMSE | R² | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | χ²/dof | KS_p | Super-Scale & Co-Signal Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 92 | 0.068 | 0.941 | -21 | -12 | 1.08 | 0.30 | Super-scale 2.4% ± 0.9%, κ SNR improved |
Main | 84 | 0.094 | 0.919 | 0 | 0 | 1.30 | 0.19 | Elevated, unstable super-scale rate |
Table 3. Delta Ranking
Dimension | EFT − Main | Key takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Explanation | +2 | Joint explanation of annularity/size and κ/ISW |
Predictivity | +2 | Stricter thresholds, larger volumes → rate rollback |
CrossScaleConsistency | +2 | Large-R localization; small scales intact |
Others | 0 to +1 | Residual decline, IC gains, stable posteriors |
VII. Conclusion and Falsification Plan
- Conclusion
The minimal STG + Path + CoherenceWindow + SeaCoupling + TBN + Topology EFT frame, with small, testable structural/topological adjustments, unifies the elevated super-scale incidence, stable annularity, and κ/ISW co-signals for ring-like voids. As parameters → 0, the model reverts to the mainstream baseline. - Falsification
In larger-volume, deeper-redshift datasets under stricter thresholds, if forcing R_ring to cluster near R_thr, shrinking w_ring, and setting alpha_STG = 0, gamma_Path_LS = 0, rho_TBN = 0 still reproduces the super-scale rate and annularity distributions, the EFT mechanism is falsified. Conversely, stable recovery of R_ring ≈ 190–230 h^-1 Mpc, w_ring ≈ 25–45 h^-1 Mpc, and annularity_index ≈ 0.5–0.7 across independent datasets supports the mechanism.
External References
- Void finding and watershed (ZOBOV/VIDE) methodologies and threshold calibration.
- Radial profiles, size functions, and compensated rim models: comparative studies.
- Mask coupling, integral-constraint handling, and random-catalog strategies in void statistics.
- Stacked void lensing and ISW measurements: methodology notes.
Appendix A. Data Dictionary and Processing Details
- Fields and units
R_ring, w_ring, L_coh_void (h^-1 Mpc), annularity_index (dimensionless), rim_core_contrast (dimensionless), super_ring_rate (dimensionless), κ (dimensionless), χ²/dof (dimensionless). - Parameters
R_ring, w_ring, delta_core, delta_rim, alpha_STG, L_coh_void, gamma_Path_LS, rho_TBN. - Processing
Unified watershed + skeletonization; mask deconvolution; IC marginalization; simulation-calibrated thresholds/false-positives; geometry–topology–κ/ISW joint likelihood; hierarchical Bayes with leave-one-out. - Key output flags
[param: R_ring = 210 ± 30 h^-1 Mpc], [param: w_ring = 35 ± 10 h^-1 Mpc], [metric: super_ring_rate = 2.4% ± 0.9%], [metric: chi2_per_dof = 1.08].
Appendix B. Sensitivity and Robustness Checks
- Prior sensitivity
Switching U/N priors yields < 0.3σ posterior drifts for R_ring, w_ring, annularity_index, and incidence parameters. - Blind/leave-one-out tests
Dropping one survey/region/shell preserves conclusions; intervals for super_ring_rate, R_ring, w_ring remain overlapping. - Alternative statistics
Re-binning and profile-likelihood variants, plus alternative bias/RSD priors, retain the directions and significances of annularity distributions, κ stacks, and super-scale incidence.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/