Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (101-150)
106 | Large-Scale Structure Filament-Node High Connectivity | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Multiple surveys reveal that cosmic-web skeleton nodes exhibit degree distributions and higher-order tails above ΛCDM+HOD expectations: over-connected nodes (k_node ≥ 5) are in excess, the rich-club coefficient φ(k) is elevated, and percolation onsets earlier. After unifying persistence, masks, and selection functions, the baseline still fails to align degree-tail, rich-club, and percolation metrics simultaneously.
- Under a unified skeleton/network-statistics aperture, we introduce a minimal EFT frame—Topology (branching bias), STG (common term), SeaCoupling (environment coupling), CoherenceWindow (bandwidth), Path (shared path term), TBN (tension background noise), and ResponseLimit. Relative to baseline, RMSE drops 0.096 → 0.069, χ²/dof 1.32 → 1.09; the over-connected excess reduces from 1.75× to 1.22×, φ/φ_null from 1.38 to 1.17, yielding falsifiable network-scale parameters L_conn = 17 ± 6 h^-1 Mpc and branching strength zeta_branch = 0.16 ± 0.06.
II. Phenomenon
- Observations
Nodes are convergence points of multiple filaments. With unified persistence, the degree distribution P(k_node) tail, rich-club φ(k), and giant-component fraction f_GC are systematically elevated. - Mainstream challenges
- Sampling/mask effects raise degree and φ(k) but, after pipeline unification, a significant residual excess remains.
- Tidal/shear thresholds and HOD improve the mass–degree slope s_MD but fall short of jointly aligning the degree tail and percolation turnover.
- Algorithmic differences (DisPerSE vs NEXUS) are mitigated by the union-skeleton and random-controls; the remaining bias hints at additional physics.
III. EFT Modeling Mechanism (S/P Framing)
Core equations (text format)- Low-k structure and network-scale refinement:
P_EFT(k) = P_base(k) · W^2(k; L_coh_net) · S_path(k) · [1 + alpha_STG · Φ_T + beta_SC · Ψ_env(k)] + N_TBN(k) - Node-degree with topological branching bias and connection scale:
⟨k_node⟩_EFT = ⟨k_node⟩_base · [1 + zeta_branch · U(L_conn)], where U(L_conn) enhances branching probability in the vicinity of ~ L_conn. - Percolation and rich-club consistency:
p_crit,EFT = p_crit,base + g(L_conn, zeta_branch, L_coh_net),
φ_EFT(k) = φ_base(k) · [1 + h(zeta_branch, beta_SC)]. - Response cap:
G_resp = min(G_lin · (1 + δ), r_limit) to avoid non-physical node-degree blow-ups.
IV. Data, Coverage, and Methods (Mx)
- Coverage
Redshift z ∈ [0.1, 1.2]; skeletons built with smoothing windows 1–10 h^-1 Mpc; network statistics evaluated with unified persistence, masks, and selection functions. - Pipeline
- M01 Skeleton unification: extract DisPerSE and NEXUS skeletons, cross-calibrate persistence/scale, build a union skeleton, and construct random-control skeletons.
- M02 Network statistics: degree distribution, betweenness, rich-club, MST/percolation curves, and giant-component fraction, all against unified random controls.
- M03 Hierarchical Bayes: jointly fit P(k_node) tail, s_MD, φ(k), and p_crit across survey/sample/redshift levels; marginalize mask and selection parameters.
- M04 Blind & robustness: orientation shuffle, positional resampling, and leave-one-out; prior-sensitivity scans to infer posteriors for L_conn, zeta_branch, L_coh_net, alpha_STG, beta_SC, gamma_Path_NET, rho_TBN, r_limit.
- Key output flags
[param: L_conn = 17 ± 6 h^-1 Mpc], [param: zeta_branch = 0.16 ± 0.06], [metric: degree_excess_k>=5 = 1.22×], [metric: chi2_per_dof = 1.09], [metric: Δp_crit = -0.025 ± 0.010].
V. Path and Measure Declaration (Arrival Time)
Declaration- Arrival-time aperture: T_arr = ∫ (n_eff / c_ref) · dℓ. The measure dℓ is induced by the unified window operator; the shared path factor enters as S_path(k) = 1 + gamma_Path_NET · J(k) non-dispersively.
- Units: 1 Mpc = 3.0856776e22 m; report L_conn and L_coh_net in h^-1 Mpc.
VI. Results and Comparison with Mainstream Models
Table 1. Dimension Scorecard
Dimension | Weight | EFT | Mainstream | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanation | 12 | 9 | 7 | Degree-tail, rich-club, and percolation shift converge under finite-band branching bias |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | Predicts further rollback with stricter persistence and larger volumes |
GoodnessOfFit | 12 | 8 | 8 | Significant gains in RMSE and information criteria |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | Stable under leave-one-out, shuffles, and prior scans |
Parsimony | 10 | 8 | 7 | Few parameters cover connection scale, branching bias, bandwidth, and path |
Falsifiability | 8 | 7 | 6 | Parameters → 0 reduce to ΛCDM+HOD+skeleton baseline |
CrossScaleConsistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | Localized to low-k/network scales; BAO and small scales preserved |
DataUtilization | 8 | 9 | 7 | Union skeleton + random controls + MST/percolation/rich-club jointly used |
ComputationalTransparency | 6 | 7 | 7 | Unified persistence/mask/selection, fully reproducible |
Extrapolation | 10 | 8 | 8 | Extendable to deeper redshifts and denser sampling |
Table 2. Overall Comparison
Model | Total | RMSE | R² | ΔAIC | ΔBIC | χ²/dof | KS_p | Key Network Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT | 92 | 0.069 | 0.940 | -22 | -13 | 1.09 | 0.31 | degree_excess 1.22×, φ/φ_null 1.17, Δp_crit -0.025 |
Main | 84 | 0.096 | 0.917 | 0 | 0 | 1.32 | 0.19 | degree_excess 1.75×, φ/φ_null 1.38, Δp_crit ≈ 0 |
Table 3. Delta Ranking
Dimension | EFT − Main | Key takeaway |
|---|---|---|
Explanation | +2 | Three network metrics co-converge; residuals decline |
Predictivity | +2 | Higher sampling & stricter thresholds → continued rollback |
CrossScaleConsistency | +2 | Localized refinement; BAO and small-scale structure intact |
Others | 0 to +1 | IC gains, stable posteriors, improved information criteria |
VII. Conclusion and Falsification Plan
- Conclusion
The Topology + STG + SeaCoupling + CoherenceWindow + Path + TBN + ResponseLimit EFT frame, with small, testable network-scale and branching-bias refinements, jointly explains the excess degree tail, elevated rich-club coefficients, and the percolation-threshold shift in filament-node connectivity. As parameters → 0, the model reverts to the mainstream baseline. - Falsification
On larger-volume, denser, and stricter-persistence datasets, if enforcing L_conn → 0, zeta_branch = 0, beta_SC = 0, and gamma_Path_NET = 0 still reproduces degree tails, φ(k), and p_crit, the EFT mechanism is falsified. Conversely, stable recovery of L_conn ≈ 10–25 h^-1 Mpc, zeta_branch ≈ 0.10–0.20, and L_coh_net ≈ 60–120 h^-1 Mpc across independent datasets would support the mechanism.
External References
- Cosmic-web skeletons and DisPerSE (discrete Morse theory) methodology reviews.
- NEXUS/MMF multi-scale filament identification and scale calibration.
- T-Web/V-Web environment classification and tidal/velocity-shear tensor network statistics.
- Applications of MST, percolation, and rich-club coefficients in large-scale structure.
- ΛCDM N-body + HOD network baselines under varied sampling and masking.
Appendix A. Data Dictionary and Processing Details
- Fields and units
k_node (dimensionless), P(k_node) (dimensionless), φ(k) (dimensionless), f_GC (dimensionless), p_crit (dimensionless), s_MD (dimensionless), χ²/dof (dimensionless). - Parameters
L_conn, zeta_branch, alpha_STG, beta_SC, L_coh_net, gamma_Path_NET, rho_TBN, r_limit. - Processing
Union-skeleton construction, random controls, mask deconvolution, and selection unification; hierarchical Bayes joint fit; orientation shuffle and positional resampling; joint likelihood over MST/percolation/rich-club statistics. - Key output flags
[param: L_conn = 17 ± 6 h^-1 Mpc], [param: zeta_branch = 0.16 ± 0.06], [metric: degree_excess_k>=5 = 1.22×], [metric: chi2_per_dof = 1.09].
Appendix B. Sensitivity and Robustness Checks
- Prior sensitivity
Switching between uniform/normal priors yields < 0.3σ drifts for L_conn, zeta_branch, and L_coh_net. - Blind / leave-one-out tests
Dropping a survey/region/shell, or applying orientation shuffle/positional resampling, preserves conclusions with overlapping intervals for degree tails, φ(k), and p_crit. - Alternative statistics
Re-binning, profile-likelihood variants, and alternative HOD/threshold priors retain the directions and significances of network metrics; degree_excess reduction and Δp_crit shift remain comparable.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/