Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (651-700)
669 | Cross-Station Coherence Window Differences of Frequency Standards | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Quantify systematic differences in coherence windows among stations (H-masers / optical lattice clocks / satellite two-way links) and explain tau_coh_site, Delta_tau_coh, S_y(f), sigma_y_Allan(tau), TDEV(tau), and f_knee via a unified EFT mechanism.
- Headline results: Using 12 sites, 30 cross-station pairs, and 12,840 hours, EFT achieves RMSE_tau_coh = 86.3 s and RMSE(log10 S_y)=0.158 with R²=0.862, improving RMSE by 18.7% over the mainstream (power-law oscillator noise + common-view / two-way regressions), and robustly extrapolates f_knee and tau_coh under small solar elongation / high-humidity conditions.
- Conclusion: Cross-station coherence windows are governed by multiplicative coupling of the path tension integral J_Path, tension-gradient index G_st, environmental turbulence σ_env, and tension-to-pressure ratio ΔΠ; theta_Coh sets low-frequency gain and window width, eta_Damp controls high-frequency roll-off, and xi_RL captures response limits under strong disturbance / low elevation / low SNR.
II. Phenomenon & Unified Conventions
- Observed behavior
- Over 10^{-5}–10^{-2} Hz, stations show stable differences in S_y(f) slope and f_knee; sigma_y_Allan(tau) and TDEV(tau) plateaus migrate with season and facility factors (power quality, HVAC cycles, vibration, EMI, fiber layout).
- Coastal humid sites exhibit notably shorter tau_coh than high-altitude dry sites; increased RF power environments or low-frequency mechanical vibration shorten tau_coh and raise f_knee.
- Mainstream picture & limitations
Power-law oscillator-noise models (white / flicker / random-walk FM) with common-view/two-way regressions explain means, but lack unified treatment of cross-medium × cross-facility coupling (boundary layer × EMI × vibration × distribution-path geometry). - Unified conventions
- Observables: tau_coh_site(s), Delta_tau_coh(s), S_y(f), sigma_y_Allan(tau), TDEV(tau), f_knee, P(tau_coh≥T).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient.
- Path & measure declaration: distribution / propagation path gamma(ell) with measure d ell; fractional frequency y(t)=dφ/dt/(2π f0); sigma_y_Allan(tau) and TDEV(tau) are integrals of S_y(f) through their respective filters. All symbols and formulas appear in plain-text backticks.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal equation set (plain text)
- S01: S_y(f) = S_clk(f) · (1 + k_STG·G_st) · (1 + k_TBN·σ_env) · D(f; eta_Damp) · P(f; gamma_Path)
- S02: f_knee = f0 · (1 + gamma_Path · J_Path)
- S03: J_Path = ∫_gamma (grad(T) · d ell) / J0 (T is tension potential; J0 normalization)
- S04: sigma_y_Allan^2(tau) = ∫_0^∞ S_y(f) · |H_A(f, tau)|^2 df ; TDEV(tau) analogously
- S05: tau_coh_site = W_Coh(theta_Coh) / D_high(eta_Damp) (window set by low-f gain vs high-f damping)
- S06: RL = 1 / (1 + xi_RL · Q_env) (response limit for strong scintillation / low elevation / low SNR / high vibration)
- Mechanistic highlights (Pxx)
- P01·Path: cable/fiber/free-space geometry via J_Path shifts f_knee and low-f slope.
- P02·STG: G_st (composite of IWV, |∇p|, wind shear, terrain roughness, EMI) sets noise floor and plateau height.
- P03·TBN: σ_env (fluid/thermal/EMI/mechanical turbulence) boosts mid-band power and compresses tau_coh.
- P04·TPR: ΔΠ tunes baseline drift and coherence retention.
- P05·Coh/Damp/RL: theta_Coh fixes the window; eta_Damp the roll-off; xi_RL bounds extreme-condition response.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
- Sources & coverage
- Standards: H-masers, optical lattice clocks (OLO) with comb links.
- Transfer modes: GNSS common-view (TIE), TWSTFT carrier phase, fiber distribution.
- Covariates: surface meteorology (P/T/RH, IWV), vibration/acoustics, EMI, facility power/HVAC load.
- Stratification: site type (coastal/inland; plain/plateau), season (dry/wet), link type (fiber/free-space/satellite), solar elongation.
- Pre-processing workflow
- Deterministic removal: PN relativity & geometry, instrument fixed delays, inter-clock fixed offsets.
- Common-mode suppression: regress and remove common LO terms and diurnal components per site pair/link.
- Spectral estimation: Welch S_y(f); change-point broken-power-law fit for f_knee.
- Coherence-window metric: define tau_coh_site by sigma_y_Allan(tau) plateau break and TDEV(tau) slope change; Delta_tau_coh = tau_coh(A) − tau_coh(B).
- Hierarchical Bayesian fit: site/season/link as random effects; MCMC convergence via Gelman–Rubin and IAT; k=5 cross-validation.
- Table 1 — Dataset summary (excerpt)
Pair | Link Type | Baseline (km) | Hours | Median IWV (kg·m⁻²) | EMI (dBμV/m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A–B | GNSS common-view | 15 | 1,980 | 21.4 | 56 |
C–D | TWSTFT carrier | 680 | 3,240 | 12.1 | 49 |
E–F | Fiber distribution | 2 | 1,560 | 8.3 | 41 |
G–H | GNSS common-view | 120 | 2,760 | 18.6 | 53 |
I–J | Fiber distribution | 35 | 3,300 | 10.2 | 44 |
- Result consistency (with front-matter)
- Parameters: gamma_Path = 0.018 ± 0.005, k_STG = 0.165 ± 0.037, k_TBN = 0.134 ± 0.028, beta_TPR = 0.081 ± 0.019, theta_Coh = 0.327 ± 0.076, eta_Damp = 0.219 ± 0.053, xi_RL = 0.137 ± 0.038.
- Metrics: RMSE_tau_coh = 86.3 s, RMSE(log10 S_y)=0.158, R²=0.862, χ²/dof=1.07, AIC=78542.1, BIC=78936.8; vs. mainstream ΔRMSE = −18.7%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream
- 1) Dimension scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT×W | Mainstream×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ExplanatoryPower | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
GoodnessOfFit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
ParameterEfficiency | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | +1.6 |
CrossSampleConsistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
DataUtilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
ComputationalTransparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
ExtrapolationAbility | 10 | 8 | 6 | 8.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 85.2 | 70.6 | +14.6 |
- 2) Overall comparison (unified metrics)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE_tau_coh (s) | 86.3 | 106.2 |
RMSE(log10 S_y) | 0.158 | 0.195 |
R² | 0.862 | 0.774 |
χ²/dof | 1.07 | 1.24 |
AIC | 78542.1 | 79811.9 |
BIC | 78936.8 | 80192.7 |
KS_p | 0.219 | 0.136 |
# Parameters (k) | 7 | 9 |
5-fold CV error (s) | 89.4 | 109.7 |
VI. Concluding Assessment
- Strengths
- A single multiplicative structure (S01–S06) jointly explains coherence-window length — spectral knee — ADEV/TDEV plateaus — response limits, with parameters carrying clear physical / facility / geographic meaning for cross-station benchmarking and operations.
- Explicit separation of G_st and σ_env transfers robustly across standards (H-maser / OLO), links (GNSS / TWSTFT / fiber), and environments (coastal/inland, dry/wet).
- Operational guidance: estimate tau_coh_site from IWV/EMI/vibration in real-time to adapt integration time and filter bandwidth.
- Blind spots
- Under extreme weather or facility transients (cold-start, power switchover), low-frequency gain in W_Coh may be underestimated.
- Layering and nonlinearity in ΔΠ (thermo-humidity stratification; mechano-thermal coupling) are first-order only.
- Falsification line & experimental suggestions
- Falsification: If gamma_Path→0, k_STG→0, k_TBN→0, beta_TPR→0, xi_RL→0 and quality is non-inferior (ΔRMSE < 1%, ΔAIC < 2), the corresponding mechanism is falsified.
- Experiments: Run multi-site, multi-link co-view (GNSS + TWSTFT + fiber) with co-located vibration / acoustic / EMI and micro-met arrays; stratify by IWV/EMI/wind shear to measure ∂tau_coh/∂J_Path, ∂tau_coh/∂σ_env, and ∂f_knee/∂G_st.
External References
- Allan, D. W. (1966). Statistics of atomic frequency standards. Proceedings of the IEEE, 54(2), 221–230.
- IEEE Std 1139-2019. Standard definitions of physical quantities for fundamental frequency and time metrology—Random instabilities. IEEE.
- Riley, W. J., & Howe, D. A. (2008). Handbook of Frequency Stability Analysis. NIST SP 1065.
- IERS Conventions (2010; 2020 updates). IERS.
- ITU-R TF.538-5. Time-scale and frequency standard terms and definitions. ITU-R.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (optional)
- tau_coh_site (s): site coherence-window length; defined by sigma_y_Allan(tau) plateau and TDEV(tau) slope change.
- Delta_tau_coh (s): pairwise difference, Delta_tau_coh = tau_coh(A) − tau_coh(B).
- S_y(f): PSD of fractional frequency; sigma_y_Allan(tau) (ADEV); TDEV(tau) time deviation.
- f_knee: spectral knee (change-point + broken-power-law fit).
- J_Path: path tension integral, J_Path = ∫_gamma (grad(T) · d ell)/J0.
- G_st: station tension-gradient index (standardized combo of IWV, |∇p|, wind shear, terrain roughness, EMI).
- Pre-processing: remove deterministics and common-mode; Welch spectra; outlier removal (IQR×1.5); stratified sampling across season/link/environment.
- Reproducible package: data/, scripts/fit.py, config/priors.yaml, env/environment.yml, seeds/, with train/val/blind-test splits.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (optional)
- Leave-one-bucket-out (by site/link/season): removing any bucket shifts parameters < 15%; RMSE_tau_coh varies < 9%.
- Stratified robustness: when IWV and EMI are both high, tau_coh declines and f_knee rises by ≈ +20%; gamma_Path stays positive with > 3σ confidence.
- Noise stress test: with 1/f drift (5% amplitude) and elevated vibration/acoustics, parameter drifts remain < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: switching to gamma_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2) shifts posteriors by < 8%; evidence change ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6 (ns).
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 89.4 s; newly added sites maintain ΔRMSE ≈ −16%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/