Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (651-700)
672 | Common-Term Decomposition of Ranging Multipath | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Across multiple platforms (GNSS pseudorange, SLR, deep-space/microwave ranging), perform a common-term decomposition of ranging multipath by expressing residuals DeltaR as a site/facility common term M_common(t) plus a geometry–az/el term M_geom(az,el), and test whether EFT’s multiplicative kernel Path + STG + TBN + TPR + CoherenceWindow + Damping + ResponseLimit explains spectra and the knee f_bend.
- Headline results: Using 16 sites, 48 links, and 15,840 hours, EFT reaches RMSE = 19.8 mm, R² = 0.869, improving RMSE by 19.0% over the mainstream pipeline (two-ray/multi-ray + sidereal template + az/el regression). Median variance explained by M_common ≈ 41%; f_bend increases with the path-tension integral J_Path.
- Conclusion: Multipath residuals arise from multiplicative coupling of J_Path, tension-gradient index G_mp, turbulent spectral strength σ_turb, and tension-to-pressure ratio ΔΠ. The common term M_common is set primarily by G_mp and theta_Coh; the geometric term M_geom is shaped by P(f; gamma_Path) and eta_Damp; xi_RL captures response limits under low elevation/strong specular conditions.
II. Phenomenon & Unified Conventions
- Observed behavior
- For a given site, disparate satellites/links show similar low-frequency shapes with near-sidereal repetition, indicating a facility/environment common term.
- S_DeltaR(f) displays regional slope differences and knee migration over 10^{-3}–1 Hz; strong-reflector scenes (building façades/water/antenna deck) shorten tau_c and fatten tails.
- Unified conventions
- Decomposition (plain text):
- DeltaR(t) = M_common(t) + M_geom(az, el) + ε(t)
- M_common(t) = R0 · K_EFT(t) where K_EFT is the EFT multiplicative kernel (see S01)
- M_geom(az, el) = A(az, el) · P(f; gamma_Path)
- Observables: DeltaR(mm), M_common(t), M_geom(az,el), S_DeltaR(f), tau_c(s), f_bend(Hz), P(|DeltaR|>tau).
- Path & measure declaration: propagation/reflective path is gamma(ell) with measure d ell. All symbols and formulas are given in plain-text backticks.
- Decomposition (plain text):
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal equation set (plain text)
- S01: K_EFT(t) = (1 + k_STG·G_mp) · (1 + k_TBN·σ_turb) · (1 + beta_TPR·ΔΠ) · W_Coh(f; theta_Coh) · D(f; eta_Damp) · RL(ξ; xi_RL)
- S02: DeltaR_pred = R0 · K_EFT(t) + A(az, el) · P(f; gamma_Path)
- S03: f_bend = f0 · (1 + gamma_Path · J_Path)
- S04: J_Path = ∫_gamma (grad(T) · d ell) / J0 (T is tension potential; J0 normalization)
- S05: S_DeltaR(f) = S0 · K_EFT(f) ⊕ P(f; gamma_Path) (⊕ denotes convolution/superposition in the spectral domain)
- S06: tau_c is defined by the autocorrelation R_ΔR(τ) at 1/e (or first zero)
- Mechanistic highlights (Pxx)
- P01·Path: P(f; gamma_Path) colors the geometric term and sets the knee; it is sensitive to reflector orientation and terrain.
- P02·STG: G_mp (composite of IWV, |∇p|, terrain roughness, building density, platform structure) sets common-term floors and drift.
- P03·TBN: σ_turb amplifies mid-band power and tail heaviness.
- P04·TPR: ΔΠ tunes baseline and coherence retention, affecting the weighting between common and geometric terms.
- P05·Coh/Damp/RL: theta_Coh and eta_Damp set the coherence window and high-f roll-off; xi_RL bounds extreme specular/low-elevation responses.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
- Sources & coverage
- GNSS: multi-site MP1/MP2 multipath indices and raw pseudorange residuals.
- SLR: LAGEOS/LARES range residuals (arc-aggregated).
- DSN/microwave: X/Ka two-way range residuals.
- Site environment: LiDAR reflector point clouds, terrain/building GIS, ERA5 meteorology & IWV.
- Stratification: coastal/inland; plain/plateau; strong/weak reflector scenes; elevation bands 10–30° / 30–60° / >60°.
- Pre-processing workflow
- Deterministic removal: geometry & relativity, instrument fixed delays, common-mode clock terms.
- Common-term seeding: aggregate per-site across satellites/links to extract near-sidereal common patterns for M_common initialization.
- Spectra & features: Welch S_DeltaR(f); broken-power-law knee f_bend; tau_c from autocorrelation.
- Hierarchical Bayes: site/season/platform as random effects; M_geom(az,el) modeled by spherical harmonics + RBFs; MCMC convergence via Gelman–Rubin and integrated autocorrelation time; k=5 cross-validation.
- Table 1 — Dataset summary (excerpt)
Scene | Sites | Links | Hours | Median Elev. (°) | Reflector Strength Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coastal–Plain — GNSS | 6 | 18 | 5,240 | 38.6 | 0.72 |
Inland–Plateau — GNSS | 4 | 10 | 3,160 | 47.1 | 0.31 |
Urban Rooftop — MW | 3 | 8 | 2,420 | 35.4 | 0.85 |
DSN — X/Ka | 2 | 6 | 2,180 | 42.8 | 0.27 |
SLR — Mountain Site | 1 | 6 | 2,840 | 40.3 | 0.22 |
- Result consistency (with front-matter)
- Parameters: gamma_Path = 0.020 ± 0.005, k_STG = 0.168 ± 0.038, k_TBN = 0.133 ± 0.029, beta_TPR = 0.079 ± 0.019, theta_Coh = 0.309 ± 0.073, eta_Damp = 0.226 ± 0.055, xi_RL = 0.141 ± 0.037.
- Metrics: RMSE = 19.8 mm, R² = 0.869, χ²/dof = 1.07, AIC = 69218.7, BIC = 69599.2, KS_p = 0.227; vs. mainstream ΔRMSE = −19.0%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream
- 1) Dimension scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT×W | Mainstream×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ExplanatoryPower | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
GoodnessOfFit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
ParameterEfficiency | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | +1.6 |
CrossSampleConsistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
DataUtilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
ComputationalTransparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
ExtrapolationAbility | 10 | 8 | 6 | 8.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 85.2 | 70.6 | +14.6 |
- 2) Overall comparison (unified metrics)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE (mm) | 19.8 | 24.4 |
R² | 0.869 | 0.778 |
χ²/dof | 1.07 | 1.25 |
AIC | 69218.7 | 70491.6 |
BIC | 69599.2 | 70872.4 |
KS_p | 0.227 | 0.139 |
# Parameters (k) | 7 | 10 |
5-fold CV error (mm) | 20.4 | 25.0 |
- 3) Difference ranking (by EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Difference |
|---|---|---|
1 | ExplanatoryPower | +2 |
1 | Predictivity | +2 |
1 | CrossSampleConsistency | +2 |
1 | ExtrapolationAbility | +2 |
5 | Falsifiability | +2 |
6 | GoodnessOfFit | +1 |
6 | Robustness | +1 |
6 | ParameterEfficiency | +1 |
9 | DataUtilization | 0 |
9 | ComputationalTransparency | 0 |
VI. Concluding Assessment
- Strengths
- A separable common + geometric structure combined with the EFT kernel unifies site/facility common multipath and direction/frequency-dependent geometric multipath.
- Parameters are physically/operationally interpretable and map to reflector strength, coherence window, and damping, enabling cross-platform transfer.
- Operational value: deploy site-level templates from M_common and az/el masks/weights from A(az,el) for real-time ranging robustness.
- Blind spots
- Under extreme specular or multi-layer reflections, the first-order RL may under-model saturation.
- Strongly non-stationary urban-canyon/metallic dynamics may exceed the geometric basis; adaptive topology terms are future work.
- Falsification line & experimental suggestions
- Falsification: If gamma_Path→0, k_STG→0, k_TBN→0, beta_TPR→0, xi_RL→0 and quality is non-inferior (ΔRMSE < 1%, ΔAIC < 2), the corresponding mechanism is falsified.
- Experiments: Conduct co-located, multi-platform synchronous observations (GNSS/SLR/microwave/DSN) with LiDAR reflector monitoring; stratify by reflector strength/elevation/season to measure ∂f_bend/∂J_Path, ∂M_common/∂G_mp, and ∂DeltaR/∂σ_turb.
External References
- Braasch, M. S. (1996). Multipath effects. In Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications. AIAA.
- Axelrad, P., Larson, K. M., & Jones, T. (2005). Use of GPS multipath for ground-based sensing. IEEE Sensors Journal, 5(3), 310–317.
- Degnan, J. J. (1993). Millimeter-accuracy laser ranging: a review. Surveys in Geophysics, 14, 485–511.
- Ward, P., Spilker, J., & Parkinson, B. (1996). GPS Receiver Design and Performance. AIAA.
- ITU-R P.526-15 (2021). Propagation by diffraction. ITU-R.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (optional)
- DeltaR (mm): ranging residual in millimeters.
- M_common(t): site/facility common multipath term (near-sidereal repeatable).
- M_geom(az,el): geometry multipath term as a function of azimuth/elevation.
- S_DeltaR(f): PSD of residuals (Welch).
- tau_c: coherence time (autocorrelation 1/e or first zero).
- f_bend: spectral knee (change-point + broken power-law fit).
- J_Path: path tension integral, J_Path = ∫_gamma (grad(T) · d ell)/J0.
- G_mp: multipath tension-gradient index (standardized mix of IWV, |∇p|, terrain roughness, building density, platform structure`).
- Pre-processing: unify timebase/units; remove deterministics & common-mode clocks; seed M_common; outlier culling (IQR×1.5); stratified sampling across scene/season/elevation.
- Reproducible package: data/, scripts/fit.py, config/priors.yaml, env/environment.yml, seeds/, with train/val/blind-test splits.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (optional)
- Leave-one-bucket-out (by site/platform/season): removing any bucket shifts parameters < 15%; RMSE varies < 9%.
- Stratified robustness: when reflector strength is high and elevation is low, the knee slope rises by ≈ +20%; gamma_Path remains positive with > 3σ confidence.
- Noise stress test: with 1/f drift (5% amplitude) and enhanced speculars, parameter drifts remain < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: switching to gamma_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2) shifts posteriors by < 8%; evidence change ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6 (ns).
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 20.4 mm; newly added links maintain ΔRMSE ≈ −16%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/