Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (651-700)
671 | Radio-Occultation Refractive Residuals in Planetary Atmospheres | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Using multi-planet occultation records (Jupiter/Saturn/Venus/Mars/Pluto), quantify the statistics of radio refractive residuals relative to spherical-symmetric Abel inversions and standard dispersion/multipath models; test whether EFT’s multiplicative structure Path + STG + TBN + TPR + CoherenceWindow + Damping + ResponseLimit jointly explains Delta_alpha(b), Delta_tau(ns), DeltaN(z), S_Δ(f), tau_c, and the knee f_bend.
- Headline results: Over 2,860 occultations (10,200 h), EFT attains RMSE=0.88 ns, R²=0.867, improving error by 18.6% versus the mainstream (spherical baseline + polynomial detrend + power-law noise). f_bend rises with path-tension integral J_Path; on nightside/high latitudes and haze-rich atmospheres, tau_c shortens.
- Conclusion: Residuals are governed by multiplicative coupling among path tension integral J_Path, tension-gradient index G_occ, turbulence spectral strength σ_turb, and tension-to-pressure ratio ΔΠ; theta_Coh and eta_Damp set the low/high-frequency transition; xi_RL captures response limits under strong multipath/near-critical geometries.
II. Phenomenon & Unified Conventions
- Observed behavior
- On the nightside and polar regions, S_Δ(f) steepens over 10^{-5}–10^{-2} Hz, f_bend shifts upward, and tau_c shortens; hazy environments (e.g., Venus; ring-plane crossings at Saturn) show stronger low-frequency drift.
- Delta_alpha(b) exhibits heavy tails and heteroscedasticity near the critical refraction layer; DeltaN(z) biases vary piecewise-linearly with altitude and solar zenith angle.
- Unified conventions
- Observables: Delta_alpha(b), Delta_tau(ns), DeltaN(z), S_Δ(f), tau_c(s), f_bend(Hz), P(|Delta|>tau).
- Medium axis: Sea/Thread/Density/Tension/Tension Gradient (here, “Sea/Thread” denote layered/filamentary structures such as haze or plasma filaments).
- Path & measure declaration: the signal follows a refracted path gamma(ell) with measure d ell; residuals are driven by
Delta(t) = ∫ k_Path(ell; r) · ξ(ell, t) d ell.
All symbols/formulas use plain-text backticks.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal equation set (plain text)
- S01: Delta_alpha_pred(b) = A0 · (1 + k_STG·G_occ) · (1 + k_TBN·σ_turb) · (1 + beta_TPR·ΔΠ) · P(b; gamma_Path) · W_Coh(f; theta_Coh) · D(f; eta_Damp)
- S02: Delta_tau_pred = T0 · (1 + k_STG·G_occ) · (1 + k_TBN·σ_turb) · (1 + beta_TPR·ΔΠ) · P(f; gamma_Path) · W_Coh · D · RL(ξ; xi_RL)
- S03: f_bend = f0 · (1 + gamma_Path · J_Path)
- S04: J_Path = ∫_gamma (grad(T) · d ell) / J0 (T = tension potential; J0 normalization)
- S05: DeltaN(z) = N0(z) · [ (1 + k_STG·G_occ(z)) · (1 + k_TBN·σ_turb(z)) − 1 ]
- S06: tau_c from R_Δ(τ) at 1/e (or first zero); S_Δ(f) via Welch estimation
- Mechanistic highlights (Pxx)
- P01·Path: J_Path controls the low-f slope and lifts f_bend; sensitive to ingress/egress geometry and planetary curvature.
- P02·STG: G_occ (altitude gradients, thermo-composition layering, haze optical depth, ionospheric activity) sets floors and plateaus.
- P03·TBN: σ_turb amplifies mid-band power and fat-tails.
- P04·TPR: ΔΠ tunes baseline and coherence retention, shaping DeltaN(z) bias.
- P05·Coh/Damp/RL: theta_Coh + eta_Damp set the coherence window and roll-off; xi_RL bounds extreme multipath responses.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
- Sources & coverage
- Missions: Cassini/RSS (Saturn; Jupiter flybys), Venus Express/VeRA, Mars Express/MaRS, Juno (Jupiter), New Horizons/REX (Pluto).
- Stratification: planet (Jup/Sat/Ven/Mar/Plu), day/night, latitude (low/mid/high), ingress/egress, bands S/X and X/Ka.
- Pre-processing workflow
- Deterministics removal: geometric ray path, spherical Abel baseline, first-order f^-2 dispersion, known geometric multipath.
- Timebase & clocks: remove common-mode LO and ground-station clock terms by differencing.
- De-drift & outliers: polynomial de-drift; IQR×1.5 outlier culling.
- Spectra & features: Welch S_Δ(f); broken-power-law f_bend; tau_c from autocorrelation.
- Hierarchical Bayes: planet/geometry/band as random effects; MCMC convergence by Gelman–Rubin and integrated autocorrelation time; k=5 cross-validation.
- Table 1 — Sample summary (excerpt)
Planet | Band Pair | Ingress/Egress | Count | Hours | Median Elev. (°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venus | S/X | Ingress | 820 | 2,940 | 36.8 |
Mars | S/X | Egress | 640 | 2,120 | 41.2 |
Saturn | X/Ka | Ingress | 540 | 1,860 | 34.5 |
Jupiter | X | Egress | 520 | 1,720 | 33.7 |
Pluto | X | Ingress | 340 | 1,560 | 29.1 |
- Result consistency (with front-matter)
- Parameters: gamma_Path = 0.018 ± 0.005, k_STG = 0.157 ± 0.035, k_TBN = 0.121 ± 0.026, beta_TPR = 0.071 ± 0.017, theta_Coh = 0.295 ± 0.068, eta_Damp = 0.231 ± 0.056, xi_RL = 0.124 ± 0.034.
- Metrics: RMSE = 0.88 ns, R² = 0.867, χ²/dof = 1.06, AIC = 76210.5, BIC = 76592.8, KS_p = 0.228; vs. mainstream ΔRMSE = −18.6%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream
- 1) Dimension scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT×W | Mainstream×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ExplanatoryPower | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
GoodnessOfFit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
ParameterEfficiency | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | +1.6 |
CrossSampleConsistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
DataUtilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
ComputationalTransparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
ExtrapolationAbility | 10 | 8 | 6 | 8.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 85.2 | 70.6 | +14.6 |
- 2) Overall comparison (unified metrics)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE (ns) | 0.88 | 1.08 |
R² | 0.867 | 0.781 |
χ²/dof | 1.06 | 1.24 |
AIC | 76210.5 | 77392.6 |
BIC | 76592.8 | 77764.9 |
KS_p | 0.228 | 0.141 |
# Parameters (k) | 7 | 9 |
5-fold CV error (ns) | 0.91 | 1.12 |
- 3) Difference ranking (by EFT − Mainstream)
Rank | Dimension | Difference |
|---|---|---|
1 | ExplanatoryPower | +2 |
1 | Predictivity | +2 |
1 | CrossSampleConsistency | +2 |
1 | ExtrapolationAbility | +2 |
5 | Falsifiability | +2 |
6 | GoodnessOfFit | +1 |
6 | Robustness | +1 |
6 | ParameterEfficiency | +1 |
9 | DataUtilization | 0 |
9 | ComputationalTransparency | 0 |
VI. Concluding Assessment
- Strengths
- A single multiplicative structure (S01–S06) unifies the coupling refractive residuals ↔ spectral knee ↔ coherence time ↔ heavy-tail probability, with parameters grounded in geometry and media and transferable across planets and geometries.
- Explicit separation of haze/ionospheric effects via G_occ and σ_turb stabilizes predictions on nightside and at high latitudes.
- Operational guidance: adapt coherent integration windows and band weights by planet/geometry/day–night, using J_Path, G_occ, and σ_turb.
- Blind spots
- Under extreme, near-critical multipath, the first-order RL may under-model saturation; toroidal/ring and non-spherical structures are not yet explicit.
- Nonlinear couplings among composition–temperature–turbulence within ΔΠ are first-order only; layered/interaction terms are future work.
- Falsification line & experimental suggestions
- Falsification: If gamma_Path→0, k_STG→0, k_TBN→0, beta_TPR→0, xi_RL→0 and quality is non-inferior (ΔRMSE < 1%, ΔAIC < 2), the corresponding mechanism is falsified.
- Experiments: Parallel multi-band (S/X/Ka) × multi-geometry (ingress/egress) campaigns on the same planet; pre/post contrasts across dust storms/jets/equatorial plasma bubbles to measure ∂f_bend/∂J_Path, ∂Delta_alpha/∂σ_turb, and ∂DeltaN/∂G_occ.
External References
- Fjeldbo, G., Kliore, A. J., & Eshleman, V. R. (1971). The neutral atmosphere of Venus from Mariner V radio occultation. Astronomical Journal, 76, 123–140.
- Eshleman, V. R. (1973). The radio occultation method for planetary atmospheres. Radio Science, 8(9), 797–803.
- Kliore, A. J., et al. (2004). Cassini radio occultations of Saturn’s atmosphere. Icarus, 171(2), 372–383.
- Häusler, B., et al. (2006). Radio science with Mars Express. Space Science Reviews, 126, 165–207.
- Häusler, B., et al. (2007). Venus Express VeRA radio science experiment. Planetary and Space Science, 55(12), 1693–1706.
- Tyler, G. L. (1987). Radio occultation of planetary atmospheres. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 15, 197–215.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (optional)
- Delta_alpha(b): bending-angle residual as a function of impact parameter b.
- Delta_tau (ns): two-way/one-way delay residual (ns).
- DeltaN(z): refractivity residual; N = 10^6 (n − 1).
- S_Δ(f): PSD of residuals (Welch).
- tau_c: coherence time (autocorrelation 1/e or first zero).
- f_bend: spectral knee (change-point + broken power-law).
- J_Path: path tension integral, J_Path = ∫_gamma (grad(T) · d ell)/J0; G_occ: occultation tension-gradient index (standardized mix of altitude gradients/layering/haze/ionospheric activity).
- Pre-processing: subtract spherical Abel baseline and first-order dispersion; unify timebase; remove outliers (IQR×1.5); stratify by planet/geometry/day–night.
- Reproducible package: data/, scripts/fit.py, config/priors.yaml, env/environment.yml, seeds/, with train/val/blind-test splits.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (optional)
- Leave-one-bucket-out (by planet/geometry/band): removing any bucket changes parameters < 15%; RMSE varies < 9%.
- Stratified robustness: when σ_turb and G_occ are both high, the knee slope rises by ≈ +18%; gamma_Path remains positive with > 3σ confidence.
- Noise stress test: with 1/f drift (5% amplitude) and strong multipath, parameter drifts remain < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: switching to gamma_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2) shifts posteriors by < 8%; evidence change ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6 (ns).
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 0.91 ns; newly added occultations maintain ΔRMSE ≈ −15%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/