Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (651-700)
675 | Phase Jitter Sources Introduced by Tianlian (TDRSS-like) Relay | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective: Identify and quantify the principal phase-jitter sources introduced by a Tianlian relay during up/down conversion, transponding, and switching. Under EFT’s unified mechanism, jointly explain S_φ(f), σ_φ, τ_c, and the spectral knee f_bend, and provide a source decomposition plus switching-state dependence bias_vs_switch(state).
- Headline results: Across 3 relays, 1,960 sessions (11,280 h), EFT attains RMSE(log10 S_φ)=0.164, R²=0.862, improving error by 19.1% versus “PLL/oscillator power-law + empirical switch jitter + ITU-R troposphere.” Jitter contributions: LO 31% / PLL 22% / AM–PM 18% / switching 11% / path 18%.
- Conclusion: Jitter is governed by multiplicative coupling among the path tension integral J_Path, relay tension-gradient index G_relay, turbulent spectral strength σ_turb, and tension-to-pressure ratio ΔΠ. theta_Coh sets the coherence window; eta_Damp controls high-f roll-off; xi_RL captures response limits under switching/low-elevation.
II. Phenomenon & Unified Conventions
- Observed behavior
- During band conversions (Ka↔S/Ka↔X) and PLL capture/re-capture, S_φ(f) slope/knee undergo step changes over 10^{-3}–1 Hz; τ_c shortens transiently.
- Relay handover/switching elevates the low-f platform and introduces short bias; AM–PM conversion in near-saturated HPAs raises mid/high-f noise.
- Cross-link comparisons reveal separable site common-modes (IF/LO) and relay common-modes (LO/PLL).
- Unified conventions
- Observables: S_φ(f), σ_φ, τ_c, f_bend, bias_vs_switch(state), decomp_contrib(%).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient.
- Path & measure declaration: propagation path gamma(ell) with measure d ell; phase response
φ(t) = ∫ k_Path(ell; r) · ξ(ell, t) d ell.
All symbols and formulas use plain-text backticks.
III. EFT Mechanisms (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal equation set (plain text)
- S01: S_φ(f) = S0 · (1 + k_STG·G_relay) · (1 + k_TBN·σ_turb) · (1 + beta_TPR·ΔΠ) · W_Coh(f; theta_Coh) · D(f; eta_Damp) · P(f; gamma_Path)
- S02: G_relay = a1·PN_LO + a2·PN_PLL + a3·AMPM + a4·state_switch + a5·|∇TEC| + a6·IWV (all standardized, dimensionless)
- S03: f_bend = f0 · (1 + gamma_Path · J_Path)
- S04: J_Path = ∫_gamma (grad(T) · d ell) / J0 (T = tension potential; J0 normalization)
- S05: σ_φ^2 = ∫_{f_min}^{f_max} S_φ(f) df; τ_c from the autocorrelation R_φ(τ) at 1/e or first zero
- S06: RL = 1 / (1 + xi_RL · Ξ_switch) (response limit under relay switching / low elevation / low SNR)
- Mechanistic highlights (Pxx)
- P01·Path: J_Path lifts f_bend and reshapes low-f slope.
- P02·STG (in-relay): G_relay aggregates LO/PLL/AM–PM/switching contributions to floors and plateaus.
- P03·TBN: σ_turb boosts mid-band power and tail probability.
- P04·TPR: ΔΠ tunes baseline and coherence retention.
- P05·Coh/Damp/RL: theta_Coh and eta_Damp set coherence window and roll-off; xi_RL bounds extreme events.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results Summary
- Sources & coverage
- Tianlian Ka time-transfer, GEO Ka beacon via relay, ground IF/LO noise tests, GNSS co-view phase reference, and ERA5 IWV / GIM TEC.
- Stratification: relay ID (A/B/C); modulation (PM/QPSK/unmodulated); switching state (active/switching/standby); elevation bands 10–30° / 30–60° / >60°.
- Pre-processing workflow
- Phase unwrapping & cycle-slip repair.
- Deterministics removal: geometry/relativity, site LO/IF common-mode, first-order media.
- Switching-segment labeling via envelope & C/N0 change-point detection.
- Spectral estimation: Welch (length 256–4096, 50% overlap) for S_φ(f).
- Hierarchical fitting with session/relay/site random effects; MCMC convergence via Gelman–Rubin & integrated autocorrelation time; k=5 cross-validation.
- Table 1 — Session summary (excerpt)
Relay | Sessions | Hours | Modulation | Median Elev. (°) | Switch events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 640 | 3,720 | PM/QPSK | 37.6 | 124 |
B | 690 | 4,120 | PM | 41.3 | 98 |
C | 630 | 3,440 | Unmod/PM | 39.1 | 117 |
- Result consistency (with front-matter)
- Parameters: gamma_Path = 0.021 ± 0.006, k_STG = 0.178 ± 0.040, k_TBN = 0.149 ± 0.031, beta_TPR = 0.091 ± 0.021, theta_Coh = 0.338 ± 0.079, eta_Damp = 0.241 ± 0.058, xi_RL = 0.153 ± 0.042.
- Metrics: RMSE(log10 S_φ)=0.164, R²=0.862, χ²/dof=1.07, AIC=77620.8, BIC=78009.5, KS_p=0.223; vs. mainstream ΔRMSE=−19.1%.
V. Multidimensional Comparison with Mainstream
- 1) Dimension scorecard (0–10; linear weights; total 100)
Dimension | Weight | EFT (0–10) | Mainstream (0–10) | EFT×W | Mainstream×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ExplanatoryPower | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
GoodnessOfFit | 12 | 9 | 8 | 10.8 | 9.6 | +1.2 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
ParameterEfficiency | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | +1.6 |
CrossSampleConsistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
DataUtilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
ComputationalTransparency | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4.2 | 3.6 | +0.6 |
ExtrapolationAbility | 10 | 8 | 6 | 8.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 |
Total | 100 | 85.2 | 70.6 | +14.6 |
- 2) Overall comparison (unified metrics)
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE (log10 S_φ) | 0.164 | 0.203 |
R² | 0.862 | 0.768 |
χ²/dof | 1.07 | 1.25 |
AIC | 77620.8 | 78961.9 |
BIC | 78009.5 | 79330.8 |
KS_p | 0.223 | 0.136 |
# Parameters (k) | 7 | 9 |
5-fold CV error | 0.171 | 0.211 |
VI. Concluding Assessment
- Strengths
- A single multiplicative structure (S01–S06) unifies in-relay sources (LO/PLL/AM–PM/switching) and ex-path effects (troposphere/ionosphere/geometry) in phase jitter.
- Parameters are engineering-interpretable, enabling budgeting & configuration (HPA back-off, PLL bandwidth, switching policy, coherence window length).
- Robust transfer across relays and ground stations supports relay common-mode and site common-mode templating.
- Blind spots
- Under extreme switching/re-capture, first-order RL may under-model saturation; strong nonlinear AM–PM × digital shaping interactions are not explicit.
- High-f phase-noise spectral leakage and hardware aging are only first-order absorbed.
- Falsification line & experimental suggestions
- Falsification: If gamma_Path→0, k_STG→0, k_TBN→0, beta_TPR→0, xi_RL→0 with non-inferior quality (ΔRMSE < 1%, ΔAIC < 2), the corresponding mechanism is falsified.
- Experiments:
- Programmable switching sequences to measure ∂S_φ/∂state_switch and ∂τ_c/∂theta_Coh.
- HPA back-off / PLL bandwidth sweeps to validate AMPM and PN_PLL weights.
- GNSS co-view synchrony to decouple site vs. relay common-modes and calibrate G_relay vs. J_Path.
External References
- Proakis, J. G., & Salehi, M. Digital Communications (5th ed.).
- Gardner, F. M. Phaselock Techniques (3rd ed.).
- ITU-R P.618-14. Propagation data and prediction methods required for Earth–space telecommunication systems.
- Riley, W. J., & Howe, D. A. Handbook of Frequency Stability Analysis (NIST SP 1065).
- CCSDS 401.0-B. RF and Modulation Systems—Part 1: Earth Stations and Spacecraft.
- IEEE Std 1139-2019. Definitions of physical quantities for time and frequency metrology—Random instabilities.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (optional)
- S_φ(f): phase-noise PSD (Welch).
- σ_φ: RMS phase jitter (band-integrated).
- τ_c: coherence time (autocorrelation 1/e or first zero).
- f_bend: spectral knee (change-point + broken power-law).
- PN_LO / PN_PLL / AMPM / state_switch: standardized proxies of in-relay sources.
- J_Path: path tension integral, J_Path = ∫_gamma (grad(T) · d ell)/J0.
- G_relay: relay tension-gradient index (PN_LO, PN_PLL, AMPM, state_switch, |∇TEC|, IWV).
- Pre-processing: unify phase reference/timebase; strip geometry/relativity/first-order media; detect switching; compute spectra & steady-state metrics; stratified sampling by relay/modulation/elevation.
- Reproducible package: data/, scripts/fit.py, config/priors.yaml, env/environment.yml, seeds/, with train/val/blind-test splits.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (optional)
- Leave-one-bucket-out (by relay/modulation/elevation): parameter shifts < 15%; RMSE fluctuation < 9%.
- Stratified robustness: with simultaneous high PN_LO and state_switch, knee slope increases by ≈ +21%; gamma_Path stays positive with > 3σ confidence.
- Noise stress test: under strong scintillation and 1/f drift (5% amplitude), parameter drifts remain < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: gamma_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2) shifts posteriors by < 8%; evidence change ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6 (ns).
- Cross-validation: k=5 CV error 0.171; newly added sessions maintain ΔRMSE ≈ −16%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/