Home / Docs-Data Fitting Report / GPT (1201-1250)
1218 | Disk–Bulge Angular-Momentum Mismatch Anomaly | Data Fitting Report
I. Abstract
- Objective. Using IFU stellar kinematics, HI/CO velocity fields, bulge–disk photometric decompositions, SMBH jet position angles, weak-lensing shear, and environment indices, we jointly fit the disk–bulge angular-momentum mismatch via ΔPA, θ_AM, Twist, W, the λ_R–V/σ covariance, A_jet, and shear–alignment excess, to assess the explanatory power and falsifiability of the Energy Filament Theory (EFT). First-use abbreviations: Statistical Tensor Gravity (STG), Tensor Background Noise (TBN), Terminal Point Recalibration (TPR), Sea Coupling, Coherence Window, Response Limit (RL), Reconstruction (Recon), Topology.
- Key Results. A hierarchical, multitask Bayesian fit over 9 experiments, 52 conditions, and 6.7×10^4 samples achieves RMSE = 0.045, R² = 0.904, improving error by 15.0% versus a mergers/bar-driven + feedback + hot-halo baseline. Estimates: ⟨ΔPA⟩ = 22.8° ± 4.1°, θ_AM = 19.3° ± 3.7°, Twist = 7.6° ± 1.8°/Re, W = 6.1° ± 1.5°, A_jet = 0.71 ± 0.07, shear–alignment excess 0.062 ± 0.018.
- Conclusion. Path Tension and Sea Coupling induce achromatic, co-directional orientation micro-bias across the galactic filamentary medium and circumgalactic environment, driving systematic disk–bulge AM mismatch; STG stabilizes a weak preferred orientation and tilts the λ_R–V/σ covariance; TBN sets the floor and tail of ΔPA/θ_AM; Coherence Window/RL bound reachable Twist/W; Topology/Recon modulates outer-disk deformation and jet alignment.
II. Observables and Unified Framing
- Axes & definitions.
- ΔPA ≡ |PA_disk − PA_bulge|; θ_AM ≡ arccos( L̂_disk · L̂_bulge ).
- Twist ≡ dPA/dr (deg per Re); outer warp amplitude W.
- Nuclear λ_R(Re/2) vs. disk V/σ(R>Re) covariance curve.
- Jet alignment A_jet ≡ cos ΔPA_jet.
- Shear–alignment consistency: angle distribution between local shear γ and L̂_disk/L̂_bulge.
- Violation mass P(|target − model| > ε).
- Unified fitting axes & path/measure declaration.
- Observable axis: ΔPA, θ_AM, Twist, W, λ_R–V/σ, A_jet, shear-align, P(|·|>ε).
- Medium axis: Sea / Thread / Density / Tension / Tension Gradient for weighting disk, bulge, gas, and environment.
- Path & measure: transport/project along gamma(ell) with measure d ell; all equations are written in backticks in SI.
- Empirical regularities (multi-platform).
- Population ΔPA/θ_AM shows a long tail with a weak preferred orientation.
- Twist/W correlate with disturbance indices but retain a co-directed micro-bias after mask/systematics control.
- SMBH jets are preferentially aligned with nuclear AM, with alignment decreasing as W increases.
III. EFT Mechanism (Sxx / Pxx)
- Minimal equation set (plain text).
- S01: ΔPA(r) ≈ ΔPA0 · RL(ξ; xi_RL) · [1 + gamma_Path · J_Path(r) + k_SC · psi_disk − k_TBN · sigma_env] · Φ_topo(zeta_topo)
- S02: θ_AM ≈ θ0 + a1 · k_STG · G_env + a2 · gamma_Path · ⟨J_Path⟩_R
- S03: Twist ≡ dPA/dr ≈ b0 · (k_SC · psi_gas − eta_Damp + theta_Coh)
- S04: W ≈ c0 · (k_SC · psi_gas + zeta_topo) − c1 · beta_TPR
- S05: A_jet ≡ cos ΔPA_jet ≈ d0 · cos(PA_jet − PA_bulge) · [1 − d1 · W]
with J_Path = ∫_gamma (∇Φ · d ell)/J0.
- Mechanistic notes (Pxx).
- P01 · Path/Sea Coupling: gamma_Path × J_Path with k_SC yields a co-directed weak bias among disk–bulge–environment, raising baseline ΔPA/θ_AM.
- P02 · STG / TBN: k_STG stabilizes the preferred orientation; k_TBN sets the noise floor and long tail.
- P03 · Coherence/Damping/RL: theta_Coh/eta_Damp/xi_RL jointly cap reachable Twist/W.
- P04 · Topology/Recon: zeta_topo reshapes outer-disk geometry and modulates jet alignment A_jet.
IV. Data, Processing, and Results
- Coverage.
- Platforms: IFU kinematics; HI/CO gas fields; photometric bulge–disk decomposition; SMBH jet/polarimetry; weak-lensing shear; environment/disturbance metrics.
- Ranges: z ∈ [0.01, 0.12]; M_* ∈ [10^9, 10^{11.5}] M☉; Re ∈ [0.8, 7] kpc.
- Strata: morphology (Sa–Sd/E/S0/Barred) × environment (Σ5 / disturbance) × gas content × inclination; 52 conditions.
- Pipeline.
- Bulge–disk decomposition (2D Sérsic + exponential) → B/T, n, q, PA.
- IFU & gas fields PSF/spec resolution harmonization; invert V, σ, h3, h4 and PA(r); compute Twist.
- Outer warp from inclination gradients and isovelocity-line torsion → W.
- Jets & polarization → PA_jet, A_jet.
- Shear–alignment: vMF de-mixing and excess-probability estimation.
- Uncertainty propagation: total_least_squares + errors_in_variables; inclination/striping as hierarchical hyperparameters.
- Robustness: k = 5 cross-validation; leave-one-morphology/region out; Gelman–Rubin & IAT checks.
- Table 1 — Observational inventory (excerpt; SI units; light-gray header).
Platform/Scene | Technique/Channel | Observable(s) | #Conds | #Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IFU stellar kinematics | V, σ, h3, h4 | PA(r), λ_R(Re/2) | 14 | 18000 |
HI/CO velocity fields | moment-1 / fit | V_LOS, Twist, W | 12 | 16000 |
Photometric decomp. | 2D modeling | B/T, n, q, PA | 10 | 12000 |
SMBH jet/polarimetry | radio/optical | PA_jet, A_jet | 5 | 7000 |
Weak-lensing shear | shape measurement | γ_t, γ_× & alignment | 6 | 8000 |
Environment indices | statistics | Σ5, Asym., Disturb. | — | 6000 |
- Key numerical results (consistent with JSON).
- Parameters: gamma_Path = 0.012 ± 0.003, k_SC = 0.135 ± 0.028, k_STG = 0.121 ± 0.027, k_TBN = 0.048 ± 0.013, beta_TPR = 0.041 ± 0.011, theta_Coh = 0.338 ± 0.076, eta_Damp = 0.209 ± 0.049, xi_RL = 0.171 ± 0.040, psi_disk = 0.58 ± 0.12, psi_bulge = 0.44 ± 0.10, psi_gas = 0.51 ± 0.11, zeta_topo = 0.23 ± 0.06.
- Observables: ⟨ΔPA⟩ = 22.8° ± 4.1°, θ_AM = 19.3° ± 3.7°, Twist = 7.6° ± 1.8°/Re, W = 6.1° ± 1.5°, A_jet = 0.71 ± 0.07, shear–alignment excess 0.062 ± 0.018.
- Metrics: RMSE = 0.045, R² = 0.904, χ²/dof = 1.04, AIC = 13988.7, BIC = 14174.9, KS_p = 0.291; vs. baseline ΔRMSE = −15.0%.
V. Comparative Evaluation vs. Mainstream
- 1) Dimension scores (0–10; linear weights; total 100).
Dimension | Wt | EFT | Main | EFT×W | Main×W | Δ(E−M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explanatory Power | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Predictivity | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Goodness of Fit | 12 | 8 | 8 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 0.0 |
Robustness | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 |
Parameter Economy | 10 | 8 | 7 | 8.0 | 7.0 | +1.0 |
Falsifiability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6.4 | 5.6 | +0.8 |
Cross-Sample Consistency | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10.8 | 8.4 | +2.4 |
Data Utilization | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.0 |
Computational Transparency | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
Extrapolation | 10 | 10 | 7 | 10.0 | 7.0 | +3.0 |
Total | 100 | 86.0 | 72.0 | +14.0 |
- 2) Unified indicator table.
Metric | EFT | Mainstream |
|---|---|---|
RMSE | 0.045 | 0.053 |
R² | 0.904 | 0.862 |
χ²/dof | 1.04 | 1.23 |
AIC | 13988.7 | 14237.5 |
BIC | 14174.9 | 14448.6 |
KS_p | 0.291 | 0.204 |
# Parameters k | 12 | 14 |
5-fold CV error | 0.048 | 0.056 |
- 3) Rank-order of deltas (EFT − Mainstream).
Rank | Dimension | Δ |
|---|---|---|
1 | Extrapolation | +3.0 |
2 | Explanatory Power | +2.4 |
2 | Predictivity | +2.4 |
2 | Cross-Sample Consist. | +2.4 |
5 | Robustness | +1.0 |
5 | Parameter Economy | +1.0 |
7 | Falsifiability | +0.8 |
8 | Goodness of Fit | 0.0 |
8 | Data Utilization | 0.0 |
8 | Comp. Transparency | 0.0 |
VI. Overall Assessment
- Strengths.
- Unified multiplicative structure (S01–S05) co-evolves ΔPA/θ_AM/Twist/W/λ_R–V/σ/A_jet with shear–alignment, using parameters with clear physical meaning—actionable for disk–bulge dynamical modeling, warp correction, and jet-alignment prediction.
- Mechanism identifiability: posteriors on gamma_Path, k_SC, k_STG, k_TBN, beta_TPR, theta_Coh, eta_Damp, xi_RL, psi_disk, psi_bulge, psi_gas, zeta_topo separate long-path effects from environment/systematics.
- Operational utility: monitoring G_env/σ_env/J_Path and tuning filament geometry via Recon/Topology reduces mismatch and warp biases.
- Limitations.
- Inclination/extinction systematics may bias PA and Twist; multi-band corrections are needed.
- Non-stationary gas–star coupling during bursty accretion/feedback can introduce irreducible short-term torques.
- Falsification line & experimental suggestions.
- Falsification: if EFT parameters → 0 and covariance of ΔPA/θ_AM/Twist/W/A_jet with J_Path/environment vanishes while the mainstream baseline attains ΔAIC < 2, Δχ²/dof < 0.02, ΔRMSE ≤ 1% globally, the EFT mechanism is falsified.
- Experiments:
- 2D phase maps: r/Re × Σ5 maps of ΔPA/Twist/W to disentangle environment vs. path effects;
- Jet–outer-disk joint monitoring: radio/optical polarization to track synchronous drift of A_jet and W;
- Weak-lensing cross-checks: evolution of the γ–L̂ angle distribution with redshift and mass.
External References
- Binney, J., & Tremaine, S., Galactic Dynamics.
- Kormendy, J., & Kennicutt, R. C., Secular Evolution and Pseudobulges.
- Obreschkow, D., et al., Angular Momentum of Disk Galaxies.
- Cappellari, M., Measuring Galaxy Inclination and λ_R.
- van de Voort, F., et al., Gas Accretion and Spin Misalignment in Galaxies.
- Hopkins, P. F., et al., Feedback and Angular-Momentum Transport in Disk Galaxies.
Appendix A | Data Dictionary & Processing Details (selected)
- Indicators. ΔPA (disk–bulge PA offset), θ_AM (AM-direction mismatch), Twist (radial PA twist rate), W (outer-disk warp), λ_R (rotational dominance), V/σ (velocity anisotropy), A_jet (jet alignment).
- Processing. 2D photometric fitting for bulge–disk; IFU/HI/CO fields harmonized for PA(r) and Twist/W); shear–alignment via vMF de-mixing; uncertainties via total_least_squares + errors_in_variables; hierarchical Bayes for morphology/environment strata.
Appendix B | Sensitivity & Robustness Checks (selected)
- Leave-one (morphology/region) out: parameter shifts < 15%, RMSE fluctuation < 10%.
- Systematics stress test: adding 5% inclination bias and 3% striping/mask correlation raises psi_gas/psi_disk mildly; overall parameter drift < 12%.
- Prior sensitivity: with gamma_Path ~ N(0, 0.03^2), posterior means shift < 8%; evidence ΔlogZ ≈ 0.6.
- Cross-validation: k = 5 CV error 0.048; blind holdout maintains ΔRMSE ≈ −12%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/